Legal Implications of HR - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 20
About This Presentation
Title:

Legal Implications of HR

Description:

Civil Rights Act of 1964: Griggs v. Duke Power ... Civil Rights Act of 1991. Expands remedies. Can include punitive & compensatory damages ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:83
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 21
Provided by: bloch8
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Legal Implications of HR


1
Legal Implications of HR
  • BMA 360
  • Session 3

2
Human Resource Management
Interpret analyze how HRM policies practices
support the entire organization
Explain the importance of the person-job-organizat
ion match and how it can be established
Identify explain HR policies practices that
motivate workers
Discuss avenues to maintain strong employment
relationships
Legal, ethical bottom-line foundations of HR
policies
Contemporary environmental issues affecting HR
The financial impact of HR policies practices
The legal context within which HR operates
3
Legislation Affecting HR
  • CRA 1964 Title VII
  • Other CRAs
  • ADEA
  • Older Worker Protection Act
  • FMLA
  • EPA
  • Executive Orders
  • Rehabilitation Act of 1973
  • ADA
  • Vietnam Era Veterans Readjustment Act
  • Pregnancy Discrimination Act
  • FLSA
  • ERISA
  • COBRA
  • HIPAA
  • OSHA
  • WARN
  • IRCA
  • USERRA
  • State and local statutes

4
Civil Rights Act of 1964 What Is Discrimination?
  • Disparate treatment discrimination
  • Discrimination is using race, color, religion,
    sex or national origin as a basis for treating
    people unequally

5
Civil Rights Act of 1964 What Is Discrimination?
  • Disparate impact discrimination
  • Discrimination is any practice without business
    justification that has unequal consequences for
    people of different race, sex, religion, color or
    national origin without actually using any of
    those classifications as a basis for treating
    people unequally.

6
Civil Rights Act of 1964Griggs v. Duke Power
  • Duke Power used two neutral, color-blind
    criteria
  • Court found
  • Practices that create disparate impact are
    illegal
  • Except when justified by
  • Business necessity
  • Job relatedness

7
Civil Rights Act of 1964EEOC Uniform Guidelines
  • Definition of test
  • Job relatedness
  • Test validity
  • Does this mean we cant give applicants tests?

8
Civil Rights Act of 1964Sex Discrimination
  • BFOQ Bona fide occupational qualification
  • Diaz v. Pan American Airways
  • Court found
  • BFOQ justified only under very limited
    circumstances

9
Civil Rights Act of 1964Sexual Harassment
  • Barnes v. Costle
  • But for her womanhood
  • Meritor v. Vinson
  • Quid-pro-quo
  • Hostile environment
  • Pennsylvania State Police v. Suders
  • Grievance procedures critical

10
Civil Rights Act of 1964Sexual Harassment
  • Burlington Industries v. Ellerth
  • Faragher v. City of Boca Raton
  • Pennsylvania State Police v. Suders
  • Importance of making reasonable efforts to
    prevent harassment
  • Grievance procedures critical

11
Civil Rights Act of 1964Sexual Harassment
Prescription
  • Sexual harassment not tolerated
  • Written grievance policy
  • Thoroughly communicated

12
Civil Rights Act of 1964Sexual Harassment
Prescription
  • Investigation
  • Manager training
  • Follow-up

13
Affirmative Action
  • Three reasons employers for affirmative action
    plans
  • Government contractor
  • Court ordered
  • Voluntary

14
What is Affirmative Action?
  • Workforce analysis
  • Availability analysis
  • Reconcile by setting goals and timetables
  • Plan action steps
  • Implement
  • Monitor

15
Affirmative ActionPreferential Treatment
  • McDonald v. Santa Fe Trail Corp.
  • Obligation not to discriminate against whites
  • Weber v. Kaiser Aluminum Chemical Corp.
  • Collaboration between union employer

16
Affirmative ActionPreferential Treatment
  • Consensus of courts
  • Allowable in involuntary plans
  • Must be
  • Remedial
  • Not exclude all non-minorities
  • Temporary
  • Formalized

17
Affirmative ActionPreferential Treatment
  • Gratz v. Bollinger
  • Undergraduate admissions used mechanistic point
    system
  • Disguised quota system
  • Grutter V. Bollinger
  • Law school admissions used portfolio approach
  • Goal was to acquire a critical mass of minority
    students

18
Americans with Disabilities Act
  • Prohibits discrimination against qualified
    individuals with disabilities
  • Reasonable accommodation
  • Essential job functions
  • Undue hardship
  • Mitigating measures

19
Age Discrimination in Employment Act
  • Protects all workers 40 or over
  • Outlaws discrimination or mandatory retirement
  • Waivers for early retirement

20
Civil Rights Act of 1991
  • Expands remedies
  • Can include punitive compensatory damages
  • Can request jury trial
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com