Title: Consultant Audits Under ACECAASHTOFHWA Guidelines
1Consultant Audits Under ACEC/AASHTO/FHWA
Guidelines
2Introduction
- This program supports the implementation of
Section 307 (single audit) as well as fairness
and efficient use of scarce resources.
3Presentation Outline
- Section 307 -
- The Law and its Intent
- Task Force Guidance
- ADOTs Position
- Audit Analysis Implementation
- Recent Events
4Task Force Members
- ACEC - HNTB, Kimley-Horn, Otak, Ralph Whitehead,
and Anderson Associates - AASHTO - Alabama, Arizona, Illinois, North
Carolina, and Washington - FHWA - 2 representatives from the Office of
Program Administration including the
Pre-construction Leader
5Section 307
- (a) CONTRACTING FOR ENGINEERING AND DESIGN
SERVICES - (C) PERFORMANCE AND AUDITS - Any contract or
subcontract awarded in accordance with
subparagraph (A), whether funded in whole or in
part with Federal-aid highway funds, shall be
performed and audited in compliance with cost
principles contained in the Federal Acquisition
Regulations, including part 31 of title 48, Code
of Federal Regulations.
6Section 307
- (C) PERFORMANCE AND AUDITS
- INTENT OF THE LAW
- Single set of accounting rules FAR
- Applied consistently to all contracts
7Section 307
(C) PERFORMANCE AND AUDITS - GUIDANCE
- LAW
- 307 applies to any contract funded with
Federal-aid highway funds. - QUESTION
- Does 307 apply to State funded design contracts
when the construction contract is Federally
funded? - ANSWER
- No, 307 only applies to specific contracts funded
in whole or in part with Federal-aid highway
funds.
8Section 307
(C) PERFORMANCE AND AUDITS - GUIDANCE
- LAW
- Contracts shall be performed and audited in
accordance with the FAR. - QUESTION
- Can a firm choose national, geographic or
business segment overhead rates? - ANSWER
- Yes. It is up to a firm to propose FAR compliant
overhead rate(s) and it/they must be
consistently and fairly applied to all public
clients.
9Section 307
(C) PERFORMANCE AND AUDITS - GUIDANCE
- LAW
- Contracts shall be performed and audited in
accordance with the FAR. - QUESTION
- How can greater consistency among States in
determining FAR allowable costs be achieved? - ANSWER
- ACEC and AASHTO agree greater consistency among
States is desirable. Inconsistencies will be
referred to AASHTOs Audit Subcommittee for
action.
10Section 307
(C) PERFORMANCE AND AUDITS - GUIDANCE
- (a) CONTRACTING FOR ENGINEERING AND DESIGN
SERVICES - (D) INDIRECT COST RATES - Instead of performing
its own audits, a recipient of funds under a
contract or subcontract awarded in accordance
with subparagraph (A) shall accept indirect cost
rates established in accordance with the Federal
Acquisition Regulations for 1-year applicable
accounting periods by a cognizant Federal or
State government agency, if such rates are not
currently under dispute.
11Section 307
- ( D) INDIRECT COST RATES
- INTENT OF THE LAW
- Single, Annual Audit by a Cognizant Agency
12Section 307
(D) INDIRECT COST RATES - GUIDANCE
- LAW
- Instead of performing its own audits, a recipient
of Federal funds shall accept indirect cost rates
established by a cognizant Federal or State
agency. - QUESTION
- What is the definition of a cognizant agency?
- ANSWER
- A cognizant agency is any one of the following
- Federal Agencies
- Home State (where the firms headquarters is
located) - non-Home State (cognizance transfer required by
Home State)
13Section 307
(D) INDIRECT COST RATES - GUIDANCE
- LAW
- Instead of performing its own audits, a recipient
of Federal funds shall accept indirect cost rates
established by a cognizant Federal or State
agency. - QUESTION
- What constitutes an acceptable or cognizant
audit? - ANSWER
- A cognizant audit is one performed by a
- Cognizant Agency (unconditional)
- Non-Home State (conditional)
- CPAs hired by the Firm (conditional)
14Section 307
COGNIZANT AUDIT CONDITIONS
Reviewed Concurred With By
180 Days After Receipt
Performed By
Cognizant Audit
Cognizant Agency
No Action by Home State
Non-Home State
Home State
CPAs Hired by Firm
Non- Home State
No Action by Home State
15Section 307
(C) INDIRECT COST RATES - GUIDANCE
- LAW
- A recipient of funds shall accept indirect cost
rates from a cognizant agency, if rates are not
currently under dispute. - QUESTION
- Who can dispute and what constitutes a legitimate
dispute? - ANSWER
- AASHTO and ACEC have chosen not to address the
issue of disputes at this time. If necessary,
the Task Force will formulate additional guidance
for FHWA.
16Section 307
- (a) CONTRACTING FOR ENGINEERING AND DESIGN
SERVICES - (E) APPLICATION OF RATES - Once a firms
indirect cost rates are established under this
paragraph, the recipient of the funds shall apply
such rates for the purposes of contract
estimation, negotiation, administration,
reporting, and contract payment and shall not be
limited by administrative or de facto ceilings of
any kind.
17Section 307
- ( E) APPLICATION OF RATES
- INTENT OF THE LAW
- Single overhead rate without CAPS
18Section 307
SALARY SURVEY GUIDANCE
- FAR 31.205-6(b)(1) addresses relevant factors in
determining reasonablecompensation including the
compensation practices of other firms - of the same size
- in the same industry
- in the same geographic area
- engaged in predominately non-Government work
- The following table is guidance in determining
reasonable compensationby utilizing salary
surveys while considering these factors.
19Section 307
- (a) CONTRACTING FOR ENGINEERING AND DESIGN
SERVICES - (F) PRENOTIFICATION CONFIDENTIALITY OF DATA - A
recipient of funds requesting or using the cost
and rate data described in subparagraph (E) shall
notify any affected firm before such request or
use. Such data shall be confidential and shall
not be accessible or provided, in whole or in
part, to another firm or any government agency
which is not part of the group of agencies
sharing cost data under this paragraph, except by
written permission of the audited firm. If
prohibited by law, such cost and rate data shall
not be disclosed under any circumstances.
20Section 307
- ( F) PRENOTIFICATION CONFIDENTIALITY OF DATA
- INTENT OF THE LAW
- a Firms cost and rate data shall remain
confidential
21Section 307
(F) CONFIDENTIALITY OF DATA - GUIDANCE
- LAW
- A recipient requesting or using the cost and rate
data described in subparagraph (E)... - QUESTION
- What cost and rate data will be shared for a
given firm? - ANSWER
- AASHTO has developed an Audit Report Format which
contains sufficient disclosure of a firms cost
and rate data. ACEC agrees this is an acceptable
guide.
22Section 307
(F) CONFIDENTIALITY OF DATA - GUIDANCE
- LAW
- Such data shall be confidential and shall not be
provided to another entity which is not part of
the group sharing data. - QUESTION
- How will confidentiality be maintained?
- ANSWER
- Any member of the group sharing cost and rate
data shall use all legal means to maintain its
confidentiality. If a member is legally required
to disclose it, the firm will be notified in
advance, in writing.
23Section 307 - Quality Through Competition
SECTION 307 OPT OUT STATES
- Minnesota - West Virginia
24ADOTs Position
- All contracts should be treated in the same way,
whether federal money is involved or not. - All consultants should be treated in a fair and
equitable manner. - It is advantageous to be inclusive in providing
opportunities to Consultants of all sizes,
wherever possible.
25Audit Analysis Implementation
- All Consultants shall be treated in a fair and
impartial manner. - ACEC/AASHTO/FHWA guidelines will be followed for
all Consultants, whether operating in more than
one State or not.
26New Procedures
- The current standards for amount of work done
with ADOT will be raised as to use of Unit Prices
of Work or simplified overhead procedures. - Project managers will be kept in the loop as to
the status of AAs preaward assignments and the
compliance of Consultants with providing
information.
27Oversight by USDOT
- Ongoing three-year project by the IGs office.
- IG is staffing an audit unit of their own.
- Major concern with compensation issues.
- Failure of many CPA firms to properly audit
overhead rates, based on sampling of audit
workpapers.
28Cognizant Audits
- Many states appear to be unwilling to act as
cognizant agency. - Use of audits done by other states even though
they are not cognizant. - Changes in the Yellow Book.