11' Political parties - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 30
About This Presentation
Title:

11' Political parties

Description:

Roberto Michels: power within the German Social Democratic Party ... The party systems of the 1960s reflect the political conflicts/divisions of the 1920s ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:47
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 31
Provided by: coco8
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: 11' Political parties


1
11. Political parties party systems
2
Political party
  • Any political group identified by an official
    label that presents at elections, and is capable
    of placing through elections candidates for
    public office (Sartori)

3
Four functions
  • (1) direction to government
  • (2) political recruitment
  • (3) interest aggregation
  • (4) brand

4
Crisis of parties?
  • Vision no longer radically different
  • Links weakening (voter-party)
  • Party membership falling ageing
  • Communication TV, rather than party
  • Financing subscriptions ? subsidies

5
Box 11.1 parties in W Europe
  • General idea
  • Three levels national, sub-national,
    supra-national
  • National government/opposition, legislature,
    central organization

6
Party organization
  • Internal organization key for understanding how
    parties work
  • Genetic account (Panebianco)
  • - Elite/cadre party
  • - Mass party
  • - Catch-all party

7
(No Transcript)
8
(No Transcript)
9
(No Transcript)
10
(No Transcript)
11
(No Transcript)
12
(No Transcript)
13
Power within the party
  • Roberto Michels power within the German Social
    Democratic Party
  • Iron law of oligarchy who says organization,
    says oligarchy
  • Oligarchy rule by and for the few

14
Selection candidates leaders
  • Candidates
  • largely a function of electoral system
  • primaries a mixed blessing
  • Leaders (Box 11.4)

15
Membership finance
  • Paradox membership ? money ?
  • Membership decline in numbers, decline in
    participation (credit card members)
  • Dealignment (similar causes)
  • Consequence increased reliance on state support

16
Emergence of cartel parties
  • leading parties that exploit their dominance of
    political market to establish rules of the game
    e.g., public funding to reinforce their own
    position

17
Social base of parties
  • Parties emerge at crucial points of conflict in
    history
  • Reflected in parties
  • ideology
  • social base of support

18
Three revolutions
  • National revolution
  • Industrial revolution
  • (Post-industrial revolution)

19
National revolution
  • National revolution conflicts
  • Center vs. periphery
  • State/Church

20
Industrial revolution
  • Industrial revolution conflicts
  • Employers vs. workers
  • Urban vs. rural
  • (side note Russian revolution ? Communists vs.
    socialists)

21
Freezing hypothesis
  • The party systems of the 1960s reflect the
    political conflicts/divisions of the 1920s
  • True for the 1950s-1960s, less so today
    post-industrial revolution

22
Post-industrial revolution
  • Conflict
  • post-materialists (Green parties) vs.
    materialists (extreme right-wing parties)
  • Protest parties

23
Party system
  • A party system denotes the interaction between
    the significant parties
  • Parties respond/interact
  • Legal regulations

24
Party systems
  • (No party authoritarian)
  • (One-party totalitarian)
  • Dominant party
  • Two-party
  • Multi-party

25
Dominant party systems
  • One party is constantly in office, either
    governing alone or in a coalition
  • Examples S Africas ANC, Swedens Social
    Democrats, Japans Liberal-Democrats
  • ? Factionalism, sclerosis, corruption

26
Two-party systems
  • Two major parties compete to form single-party
    governments
  • Examples Great Britain (Conservative Labor
    parties) US (Republican Democratic parties)
  • Decline (except the US, perhaps Britain)

27
Multiparty systems
  • Several minority parties in the legislature, no
    party has majority
  • ? coalition governments
  • Examples Israel, Netherlands, Belgium
  • Assessment mixed (good in good times, not when
    radical reform needed)

28
Parties in new democracies
  • Lack of cohesiveness, of mass membership, even
    ideology
  • Post-communist parties follow the American,
    rather than Western European model
  • Is this a potential problem?

29
Parties in non-democratic regimes
authoritarianism vs. totalitarianism
  • Authoritarian regimes pre-party (traditional) or
    anti-party
  • Totalitarian regimes Communism vs. fascism

30
Democratic centralism
  • Based on two principles
  • centralism top-down decision-making
  • democracy bottom-up elections
  • Democratic centralism centralism w/o democracy
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com