Title: Eye Witness Testimony
1Eye Witness Testimony
2Recall the crime you just witnessed
3Recall of the incident
- Interviewer Group 1
- A) There have been other reports of a gang
working the area - Was the assailant working with
an accomplice/ accomplices?
- Interviewer Group 3
- B) Describe the incident from other witnesses
point of view what do you think the two boys
saw of the assailant?
4Recall of the incident
- Eye witness Groups 2 4
- Do you think the assailant was working alone? Or
not? - Why?
- Lets look back at interviewer questions how
could these influence responses?
5Eyewitness testimony Definition
- A witness is someone who has first-hand knowledge
about a crime or dramatic event through their
senses (in this case seeing) and can certify to
its happening. - A witness who has seen the event at first-hand
is known as an eye-witness. - Witnesses are often called before a court of law
to testify in trials.
6Importance of EWT to legal Process
- EWT is considered crucial evidence in terms of
both - The identification arrest of a suspect
- The likelihood of juries convicting a defendant
- Also civil cases e.g. car accident
7How does memory work?
- Memory is not like a video-recorder.
- We do not make an exact copy of what we
experience. - We reconstruct our memory, retelling it so that
it makes sense. - Often so that it forms a plausible (not always
reliable) story
8How good is our memory for familiar things?
Image shown in lesson!
9And the real.
Were you right? Or did you expect it to be.
10Face Recognition EWT
Whats wrong with the picture (shown in lesson!)
11If you're going to rob a bank, wear a wig!
- Unless we are paying close attention to facial
features, hair plays a big part in forming an
image of individuals - The upper part of the face seems to be more
important for recognition than the lower part. - The hair seems to be the most important factor,
followed by the eyes, then the nose, and then to
a lesser extent, the mouth and chin.
12Face recognition
Who are we?
- These faces are top and bottom composites of two
famous people. - The upper part of the face is usually more
helpful in recognition than the lower part.
13Face recognition
chairman Mao
Richard Nixon
14How good is our memory for faces?
- http//faculty.washington.edu/chudler/java/facemem
2.html
15Classic errors in EWT Ronald Cotton Case Study
- What Jennifer saw
- Ronald Cotton was convicted of the rape of two
women. - 11 years later thanks to DNA evidence he was
exonerated - http//www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/dna/
cotton/summary.html.
16Prosecution evidence
- A photo identification was made by one of the
victims. - A police lineup identification was made by one of
the victims. - This witness was composed, determined, and sure.
- Circumstantial evidence A flashlight in Cotton's
home resembled the one used by the assailant.
Rubber from Cotton's tennis shoe was consistent
with rubber found at one of the crime scenes. - In court the victim testified her rapist was
Cotton. (Not real rapist Bobby Poole)
17Cottons conviction
- Largely on the grounds of the witness evidence,
Cotton was convicted. - A miscarriage of justice occurred.
- Why?
If you had been a juror in that case what do you
think you would have done?
18Face Identification
- How good are we at constructing a face?
- Take a look at the photfit.
- Now build it up
- http//www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/dna/
photos/pick/index.html
19Matching the photofit to the person
B
A
20Process of Eyewitness testimony
Acquisition what you saw
- Memory is a process that can largely be divided
into three main stages - Acquisition (encoding)
- Storage (retention)
- Retrieval (recall)
- Mistakes can occur in any of these stages
Storage how long hold it in memory
Retrieval what you recall
21Process of Eyewitness testimony
- Within these stages other Factors exert an
influence over eye witness accounts. - These are
- Event (stimulus) factors e.g. time of day/ length
of time of crime. - Witness (subject) Factors e.g. age, or race of
witness.
As we discuss them consider which stage they
apply to whether they are event or subject
factors
22Factors affecting EWT
- AGE of witness
- Children and the elderly tend to be less accurate
than other age groups. - Older adults have problem with source monitoring
23Factors affecting EWT
- Weapon focus effect
- People tend to keep their eye on weapons because
of their danger and novelty - This distracts their attention from the robbers
24Factors affecting EWT
- Cross-racial identification
- People are more accurate at recognising members
of own race - This can be mediated by experience
25Facial Distinctiveness
- Faces rated highly attractive OR highly
unattractive are better recognised than other
faces.
26Factors affecting EWT
- Perceived Seriousness of Crime
- people tend to be less accurate in identification
tests if the the crime is thought to be less
serious - BUT highly violent crimes also poor recognition
(weapon focus or stress)
27Why dont really serious crimes brand our
memory?
- Well they do good memory for emotional
experience - STRESS interferes with encoding of detail
- BUT conversely, low level of arousal also means
details arent encoded.
28Factors affecting EWT
How might this affect appeals?
- Retention period
- Our memories for conversation, events etc. tend
to fade with time. - BUT memory for faces a little more resistant,
- Nonetheless does decline over long time intervals
- Decline in correct identification with time delay
Recall what the cashier looked like last time you
went to the post office?
29Factors affecting EWT
- Viewing Opportunity
- The longer witnesses look and the more attention
they are able to pay, the more accurate their
identifications - However, witnesses are just as likely to think
they can make an identification if they have
witnessed an event under poor viewing conditions.
30Factors affecting EWT
- Post Event Information
- Our memory is not entirely objective we subject
to biases in our recall. - Information (from suggestive questioning or
media) can become incorporated into our memory
for the event
31Improving EWT
- Hypnosis
- No hard evidence that peoples memories improve
when they are hypnotized, - BUT evidence that people under hypnosis are
susceptible to suggestion, coming to believe that
they saw things that they did not.
32Improving EWT
- The Cognitive Interview Fisher Geiselman
(1988) - We have seen leading and suggestive questioning
can sometimes affect EWT - In the CI a trained interviewer tries to improve
eyewitnesses memories by focusing their
attention on the details and context of the
event. - This allows more cues for recall
More on this in CI lecture!!