STATISTICS CANADA - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 15
About This Presentation
Title:

STATISTICS CANADA

Description:

Census in Canada. Legal requirement every 5 years, De Jure basis ... Mail-out via Canada Post for 73% of households (Address register critical) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:41
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 16
Provided by: Aror6
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: STATISTICS CANADA


1
STATISTICS CANADA 2006 CENSUSInternet Response
Option Presentation at UN Statistical
Commission
  • February 28, 2007

2
Census in Canada
  • Legal requirement every 5 years, De Jure basis
  • Last Census May 16th, 2006 13 million dwellings
  • 80-short form (8 questions) 20-long form (53
    questions 8 dwelling questions )
  • Confidentiality is paramount
  • Combined collection for Census of Population and
    Census of Agriculture
  • Development and integration of Internet
    application and processing systems was outsourced
    to private sector
  • Targeted 20 of initial response from the internet

3
Census 2006 Drivers for change
  • Privacy concerns local enumerator issue
  • Government On-Line (GOL) initiative
  • Data Entry Capability/Manual Coding
  • Recruitment and retention of staff

4
Radical Change
  • Most radical changes since 1970s
  • Mail-out via Canada Post for 73 of households
    (Address register critical)
  • List leave for remainder
  • Unique dwelling identifier and internet access
    code for each questionnaire

5
Radical Change
  • Mail-back or Internet option (canvasser
    method for a few areas)
  • One Data Processing Centre (CATI or Field
    Follow-up initiated from it)
  • Intelligent Character Recognition (ICR)
  • Master Control List
  • Automated coding

6
Internet mode of collection
  • Nothing left on respondents computer (Zero
    footprint)
  • Log-on using internet access code printed on
    questionnaire
  • Innovative Security Solution using GOC Secure
    Channel (PKI light, secure islands)
  • One-time recyclable certificates
  • Multiple sessions for long form (user can assign
    own password)

7
How did we do - Results
  • Metrics
  • 22 of initial response was by Internet
  • Overall internet represented 18 of all responses
  • Graceful Deferral Contingency Procedure seldom
    used, except on Census night
  • Data Quality better for internet response

8
How did we do - Results
  • Internet available and used (on a gradually
    declining basis) until end of follow-up period
    (end of August)
  • Push Strategy experiment (no questionnaire
    sent, only a letter asking to respond via
    internet) yielded very good results
  • Successful use of a reminder letter to
    non-respondents asking to reply by internet (no
    questionnaire sent)

9
Implementation Issues
  • Operational/development plan
  • Sizing, technical, integration issues
  • Testing strategies
  • Support (technical and respondent)
  • Security and public perception (independent
    validations)

10
Lessons Learned
  • Integrating with Secure Channel was harder and
    took longer than expected
  • Difficult to exercise volume tests that
    accurately reflected production
  • Being able to monitor and control the number of
    respondents accessing the system was critical
  • Not mailing paper questionnaires increases the
    internet take up rate
  • Testing every aspect and linkage is crucial
  • True partnership with contractors was critical
    success factor

11
Going forward - 2011
  • Basic methodology will be retained
  • Aggressive assumption regarding Internet take-up
    Rate. Significant Potential Savings
  • Return postage
  • Paper handling and data capture
  • Follow-up for edit-failures
  • Security approach to be determined (availability
    of Secure Channel? Should we adopt a less
    customized security method, e.g. SSL?)

12
Going forward - 2011
  • Census Day versus Census Week to spread system
    load?
  • In-house, outsourced or hybrid development
    approach a critical decision
  • Integration
  • Competency profile

13
Going forward - 2011
  • Expanding Mail-out (MO) opportunities - currently
    assessing an approach that will make better use
    of Mail-out tools as well as encourage response
    by Internet as opposed to paper questionnaire
  • Wave 1 - Initial MO - 90 of all dwellings
  • 80 of MO dwellings will receive an invitation to
    use Internet only - no paper questionnaire will
    be provided
  • 20 of MO dwellings will receive paper
    questionnaire package (areas of low
    connectivity)
  • Approximately two weeks before Census Day.

14
Going forward - 2011
  • Wave 2 - All dwellings will receive a mailed
    "pre-addressed reminder" to complete
    questionnaire via Internet or paper questionnaire
    received during Wave 1
  • Mailed around Census Day.
  • Wave 3 - one week after Census Day determine
    mail-out universe that did not reply - A paper
    questionnaire package will be prepared and
    mail-out to each dwelling which did not reply
  • Approximately two weeks allowed for package
    preparation and postal delivery. An additional
    week will be allowed for households to respond.
  • Wave 4 - Start Non- Response Follow-up (NRFU)
    approximately 4 weeks after census Day.

15
Going forward - 2011
  • 2006 Collection Process Methodology

Census Reference Day May 10, 2011
Wait Time until 80 responses accounted
NRFU
NRFU ENDS 07/29/11
NRFU BEGINS
WAVE 1
WAVE 3
WAVE 2
WAVE 5
Deadline
Census Week May 2011
ENRFU
WAVE 4
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com