Public and Private Labs Soil Test Methodology and Recommendations Comparisons and Contrasts PowerPoint PPT Presentation

presentation player overlay
1 / 19
About This Presentation
Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Public and Private Labs Soil Test Methodology and Recommendations Comparisons and Contrasts


1
Public and Private LabsSoil Test Methodology
and RecommendationsComparisons and Contrasts
2
Lab differences and similarities are best
illustrated by comparing exchange sample results.
3
Preparations for Soil Exchange
  • Bulk sample is air dried
  • Grinding
  • Mixing
  • Partitioned with attention to particle settling

4
Compare to Splitting Samples in the Field !
  • Nutrients not uniform
  • Cant properly mix sample
  • Results will likely differ even if analyzed by
    the same lab

5
Soil Test Labs Use Different Extractants
  • Mehlich 1
  • AL, FL, TN, VA, GA, SC Private
  • Mehlich 3
  • KY NC
  • Bray-1
  • Outside the Southeast

6
Reporting Exchange Results
  • Data are converted to same units (mg/dm3)
  • Data are grouped by extractants

7
Mid-Atlantic Soil Test Plant Analysis Workgroup
  • Public Labs
  • Clemson University
  • North Carolina Dept. of Agriculture
  • Penn State
  • University of Delaware
  • University of Georgia
  • University of Maryland
  • Virginia Polytechnic Institute
  • West Virginia University

8
Mid-Atlantic Soil Test Plant Analysis Workgroup
  • Private Labs
  • A L Richmond, VA
  • Agri-Analysis Leola, PA
  • Brookside New Knoxville, OH
  • Countrymark Indianapolis, IN
  • Na-Churs Marion, OH
  • Spectrum Washington C.H., OH

9
Soil pH - 1999 MASTWG
10
Soil P - 1999 MASTWG
Clemson, Georgia, Delaware, Maryland and Virginia
11
Soil K - 1999 MASTWG
12
Soil Mg - 1999 MASTWG
13
SC and GA Rating SystemsPotassium (Coastal Plain)
14
MASTWG also exchangesplant tissue andmanure
samples
15
North American Proficiency Testing program
  • Over 150 labs participate
  • Samples submitted quarterly

16
Lab Differences
  • Methodology, e.g., extractants
  • Modifications of standard methods
  • Rating systems
  • Recommendations
  • Philosophy
  • Region
  • Use of quality control

17
Lab Similarities
  • Use of standard methodology
  • Desire for credibility

18
Recommendations
  • Stick to one lab
  • Develop long-term relationship
  • Know their procedures
  • Request samples be retested if there is any
    question
  • Be aware of problems with splitting samples
    between labs

19
Final Questions
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com