Title: To Do, 10.22
1To Do, 10.22
- POR Verification sheet, up front
- Turn in chapter 6 quiz, folder up front
- Chapter 5 assessment in class PPT drill
- In-class a couple final examples from chapter 5
(20ish minutes) - In-class Discuss 6, Rhetorical Analysis
- Pull out Hussein article and Hearst article from
POR (well use them to illustrate key concepts
this week) (Two questions What texts or
artifacts were studied? What rhetorical
theory/framework?) - Blackboard Discussion check folders
- Mid-term review, see checklist posted in
Blackboard and sent via email on Friday. Exam
passed out after class on Wed, returned on
Friday. - Mid-term grades submitted Tuesday. Note for
upperclassmen, a mid-term is submitted only if
you are below a C. Thus, if you see no grade for
COM 300, then you are earning a C or higher. If
you want to know how much higher, look in the
gradebook and/or see me. My mid-term calculation
does not include your Blackboard participation
grade. That will be send separately as the
checklist indicates. - Refer to our week 7 checklist in Blackboard for
additional items. - Note all PPTs posted on my website, chapters 1-5
(for mid-term)
2Chapter 5 Writing Research
Mmm. . . I wonder
Your RQ or H
Literature Review
Defined your terms
How do I organize my literature review in a way
that justifies my RQ or H?
Organizational Patterns
Justifications
1. Known to Unknown2. Deductive3.
Problem-Solution4. Chronological5. Inductive6.
Topical
1. Filling a gap2. Extending 3. Practical Needs
1. Introduction2. Literature Review3. Method
section4. Results5. Discussion6. References
How do I then, after I organize my literature and
justify my RQ or H, do I present my findings to
the public?
3Assessment
Question If you want to find out who the
subjects were in a study and how they were
sampled, in which section of the article should
you look?
Answer Method section
4Assessment
Question If you want to know which tool from the
research toolbelt was used to answer the research
question or hypothesis, where would you look?
Answer Method section
5Assessment
Question This section includes important details
that will help me to find articles the
researcher used to make her argument in support
of the RQ or H?
Answer Reference section
6Assessment
Question If you want to get a quick idea about
the authors justification, in which section
would you look?
Answer Introduction (possibly lit review)
7Assessment
Question I want to understand better the
significance of the researchers findings in
relation to the field at large. In which section
would you tell me to look?
Answer Discussion section
8Assessment
Question If you want to find out how the
dependent variables were operationalized, in
which section might you look?
Answer Method section
9Assessment
Question It is not uncommon to see these two
sections combined into a single section?
Answer 1) Introduction and Literature Review 2)
Results and Discussion
10Assessment
Question I want to know the step-by-step
procedures the researchers used to investigate
their RQ or H. Where do I look?
Answer Method section
11Assessment
Question If you want to find a formal statement
of the RQ or Hs, in which section(s) might you
look?
Answer Maybe Introduction, most likely
Literature Review (or a separate section titled
Problem Statement)
12Assessment
Question If you want an interpretation of the
authors findings, in which section might you
look?
Answer Discussion section
13Assessment
Question You need to know what specific data
analysis was conducted on data collected. Where
do you look?
Answer end of method section, and/or results
14Assessment
Question You need an idea for future research.
Where do you look?
Answer Discussion section
15Assessment
Question You want to find a summary report of
the authors observations as they relate to a
particular H or RQ. . . Where do you look?
Answer Results section
16Assessment
Question I want to replicate a study which
section will I spend most of my time on after I
figure out the H or RQ?
Answer Method section
17Assessment
Question I want to know how the key variables in
the RQ or H were conceptually defined where
would you tell me to look?
Answer Introduction and literature review
18Assessment
Question If I dont find a formal statement of
the research question by the time I reach this
section, I should go back to the beginning and
try again.
Answer Method section
19p. 175
20Deductive
The contingency theory of leadership
indicates that the context in which a leader
operates is a significant factor that influences
what is considered effective leadership (Vroom
Yetton, 1973 Fielder Brilhart Hicks, 1990
Stogdill, 1974 Bass, 1981). The educational
setting is a popular context investigated by
researchers (Smith, 1978, Jones, 1983).
Generally, however, early research into the
educational context identified specific traits
that were necessary for effective leadership
typical of traditional male (Smelnof, 1969
Holmes, 1971). It was not until the 1970s, after
the passage of equal opportunity legislation,
that women leaders were seen as their own unique
subset of the leadership literature, i.e., gender
differences began to be recognized (Moore, 1999).
Several recent doctoral dissertations suggest
that women lead differently and define leadership
differently depending on the specific position
held. One area that may highlight feminine
leadership traits is student services and life
(Meister, 1991 Davis, 1996 Sperling, 1994). . .
21Mapping Deductive Leadership
Leadership effectiveness
Higher Education
Men Leadership Effectiveness
Women Leadership Effectiveness
Women effective leadership in student affairs
Characteristics of effective student affairs
leaders who are women?
22Known to Unknown
- In short, while a substantial body of literature
has investigated possible gender differences in
computer use (Spotts, 2000 Brown, 2001), and
attitudes toward computers (Bowman, 2003, Mertz,
2003), only a few have addressed potential gender
differences related to attitudes toward
instructional technology in higher education
(Spotts, 2001 Lyman, 2002). Several studies have
explored teaching style differences between men
and women, including communication patterns
within the classroom. For instance, men use the
lecture method ("sage on the stage") more often
than women, whereas women feel more committed to
the participatory or collaborative method ("guide
on the side") (Endres Schierhorn, 1992
McDowell, 1993 Lacey, Saleh, Gorman, 1998).
In light of these and other such differences, it
has been suggested that women may be more open to
various constructivist teaching styles that
dominate online delivery approaches where
facilitation, collaboration, egalitarianism and
high interactivity are emphasized (Kearsley,
Lynch, Wizer, 1994 Stanley-Spaeth, 2000).
Pedagogical differences identified in the
traditional setting may further translate into
different uses of and attitudes toward
technology-mediated instructional enhancement
(Robin Harris, 1998 Ausburn, 2004). The
present study isolates gender differences in
faculty use and perceptions of Blackboard as a
supplement within the traditional classroom
environment.
23Mapping Known to Unknown
Gender Differences in Teaching
Gender Differences in CMC attitudes Preferences
Gender Differences in Use Perception of CMC in
Classroom
24Mapping Known to Unknown
Gender Differences in Teaching
Gender Differences in CMC Attitudes Preferences
Gender Differences in Use Perception of CMC in
Classroom
25Topical Vs. Inductive
- (topical) Some scholars who study online
community focus on several areas. Some study the
effects of community on affective learning
(Jones, 1999 Smith, 2001) whereas other focus on
cognitive learning (McKeane, 2002 Overton 2002
Baines, 2003). Still others have examined best
practices for constructing a classroom community
so that cognitive and affective learning outcomes
might be achieved (Smythe Barney, 1999,
Ebersole, 2000). - (inductive) Compare that to this Fostering
community will increase students' affective and
cognitive learning. Research demonstrates that
immediacy or pro-social behaviors positively
correlate with affective learning (McDowell,
McDowell Hyerdahl, 1980 Anderson, Norton,
Nussbaum, 1981 Plax, Kearney, McCroskey,
Richmond, 1986). Others have found that students
who report higher levels of community in the
classroom report greater levels of cognitive
learning (Richmond, Gorham, McCroskey, 1987
Gorham, 1988). . . .
26Examples
- PSC article
- PSC religious
27Mapping Topical - PSC
blockassociations
congregations
neighborhoods
community houses
universitydorms
College campuses
high schools
cities
Outcomes
workplace
PSC
What predicts PSC?
28Research Question Hypotheses
Narrow focus Identify topic
STEP 1
CONCEPTUALIZATION
Define Key Concepts
Review of Literature
STEP 2 PLANNING DESIGNING
Measurement Techniques
Operationalizaton
STEP 4 ANALYZE INTERPRET DATA
STEP 3 SELECTING A METHODOLOGY
Which Method?
STEP 5 RECONCEPTUALIZATION
Report / Write
A WORKING MODEL OF COMMUNICATION RESEARCH
29The Research Toolbelt
30The Research Toolbelt
- BIG QUESTIONS
- 1) What tools are in the toolbelt?
- 2) Which tool do you select?
31Big Ideas Chapter 6
As a result of your readings and our class
discussion this weekyou should be able to
- Define and identify texts and rhetorical
artifacts - Understand and explain rhetorical grids, or
lenses, or frameworks for analyzing texts,
and how to identify them in research articles - Distinguish working hypotheses from other kinds
of hypotheses in quantitative research - Distinguish rhetorical-textual analysis from
quantitative content analysis - Understand and explain the basic steps involved
in rhetorical-textual analysis - Identify when to pull the rhetorical-textual
research tool out of your research toolbelt (that
is, know which type of questions should be
addressed with this method?)
32Types of Qualitative Analyses
TEXTS Transcripts Outputs Spoken Written Electron
ic Visual Documents
Textual Analysis/Criticism (chpt. 6)
- rhetorical criticism (qualitative CA)
- content analysis (quantitative CA)
- unobtrusive measures (quantitative CA)
Historical-critical (type of textual analysis)
- Case studies, Oral histories, Movements
Participant Observation (Ethnography)
Focus Groups (Group Interviews)
33To Do, 10.24
- Dr. Patton, in class, 300 take out his paper
on Ent Tonight (What were his texts? His
rhetorical method?) - Before he gets here, brief mid-term overview
(passed out at end of class) - Exam due Friday, on or before 5 pm. No late exams
accepted. - Return chapter 6 quizzes any other items left
over - After he leaves finish up rhetorical critical
analysis (pull out Hussein Hearst articles) - Bb discussion grades sent out next week (mid-term
evaluation.) - RQ/H assignment due next week check syllabus
- Dr. Jindra next week (youll read his Star Trek
article hell be here on Wed. There will be a
podcast that you are required to listen to before
he arrives on Wed.)
34Dr. Paul Patton
35Questions
- 1) What is your text?
- 2) Which rhetorical method/strategy/framework/grid
did you use to do a close reading or
interpretation of the text? - 3) How was it applied and was your working
hypothesis supported? - 4) Other questions from students . . .
36Rhetorical (Textual) Criticism (How to. . .)
Does Reagans Space Shuttle Challenger Eulogy
measure up to basic criteria giving such a
speech? (Genre Criticism)
Defined using standards of excellence to
interpret evaluate messages
What social and historical factors influenced the
language used by Martin Luther King, Jr., in his
famous, I have a Dream speech? Lord of the
Rings?
description, analysis, interpretation,
evaluation of persuasive uses of human
communication reason for impact
How does social identification theory explain
the strategies used by Hitler in his speeches
against the Jews to gain German support at the
beginning of WWII?
What is the relationship between popular
television commercials and political campaign ads
used in the 2008 Presidential election?
When do we use it?
1 - Take a text... 2- Apply existing
criteria/standards... 3- Discuss how text
satisfies criteria...
to see if a message measures up to standards of
excellence
to understand the characteristics that
contributed to theeffectiveness of a particular
message (e.g., speakers method)
to understand how the message relates to the
historical context
How did Abraham Lincoln use religious imagery in
the Gettysburgh address to identify with the
audience?
to understand how certain theories apply to
persuasive discourse
to shed light on current persuasive tactics
37The Matrix
Rhetorical Analysis
1) How are religious beliefs presented in major
motion pictures? 2) What religious messages
(themes) are present in the Matrix? Does this
movie support a particular religion,
predominantly, with its message/theme?
38What is the worldview? Is this movie
pro-Christian, anti-Christian?
- The fourth movie from Kevin Smith and View Askew
Productions, the people who brought you Clerks,
Mallrats and Chasing Amy
39Robert Schullers Crystal Cathedral
1) How does this building compare to the early
(middle age) cathedrals? 2) How does it reflect
Schullers theology? 3) What message about
Christianity does it send to the masses? 4) Is
this an effective witness of the Christian
faith?
40Ronald Reagan The Great Communicator
How did Ronald Reagan use stories to effectively
communicate with his audience? What is the
relationship between Reagans use of stories and
the level of identification he built with his
audience?
41Batman
Questions of Interest?
Vs. Spiderman (?)
42POR READINGS
- Hussein
- Patricia Hearst
- Questions?
- What were the texts?
- What rhetorical theory was used?
43George W. Bush War on Iraq
- What persuasive strategies did G.W.B. use to make
his case for War with Iraq? - Was his approach effective?
- How did it compare to G.W.B. Srs earlier message
to the nation regarding the first Gulf War?
44Jesus Movement
- 1) What rhetorical/communication strategies did
those in the Jesus Movement use to communicate
the Gospel message to their generation? - 2) What communication/persuasive strategies did
Scott Ross (first ever radio show to promote
Jesus Music) use to proclaim the Gospel? - How did these strategies compare to those used by
the Civil Rights Movement?
45THE END
46(No Transcript)
47Approaches to Human Communication Research
48To Do, 10.25
- Dr. Patton is on his way, in the meantime . . .
- Note Mid-term handed out at end of class DUE
Friday, see syllabus for time and location of
submission. No late exams will be accepted. Im
leaving at 501 on Friday. - Pull out Dr. Pattons paper pull out Hussein
article and Hearst article from POR (well use
them to illustrate key concepts this week). - COM CON ON FRIDAY see syllabus for details
- Pick up chapter 6 quiz after class, plus abstract
re-dos or fixes - Extra credit option if you approached me about
the EC, you are on my list. Ill send you an
email with specific instructions (I expect this
email to go out this week). Youll have about 1
week to complete the EC. The EC involves
conducting 20 survey interviews with SAU
students. - Reminder 1 Qualitative Abstract for chapter 6, 2
Bib cards due Friday? No, Monday. Three separate
articles, total, each dealing with the method in
chapter 6 - NOTE students lose points on this next abstract
assignment because they dont 1) select 3
different articles, and 2) dont select the
methodology described in chapter 6
(rhetorical/textual analysis). If you need to go
outside your group topic area to find an article
that clearly uses this methodology, please do so.