BULGARIA NATIONAL STATUS REPORT 2004 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

BULGARIA NATIONAL STATUS REPORT 2004

Description:

The purpose of the work, done during the stay of L.Taseva in CNRM/GMAP , under ... Case study for two synoptic situations (09.10.2001,18.08.2001) and validation ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:29
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 3
Provided by: QQ882
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: BULGARIA NATIONAL STATUS REPORT 2004


1
BULGARIANATIONAL STATUS REPORT 2004
  • Operational changes
  • The operational suite was switched to the new
    SELAM coupling domain and new coupling files (41
    levels) on 06.07.2004
  • The Al25t1 second export version is running on
    the ALADIN-BG integration domain (90x72 points,
    41 levels) on two processor LINUX PC
  • The visualization tool is GRADS v1.9xp5 for
    LINUX
  • References
  • ALADIN Newsletter 26 January July 2004, p.10
  • More details Andrey.Bogatchev_at_meteo.bg

2
Research activities
  • VarPack
  • The purpose of the work, done during the stay of
    L.Taseva in CNRM/GMAP , under the tution of
    L.Auger, has been to study the possibility of
    implementation of the CNRM/GMAP,/3DVAR/Aladin
    scheme for diagnostic and nowcasting purposes and
    to develop an analog of the CNRM/GMAP/Diagpack/Ala
    din, based on the CANARI OI scheme. Some
    modifications of 3DVAR scheme have been done to
    improve the fit to the observations (increase of
    the SD for background error statistics,
    modifications of surface temperature). The main
    differences between VarPack and DiagPack are
  • The analysed variable is specific humidity
    instead of relative humidity
  • The diagnostic CAPE and MOCON fields can be
    derived either from the fields at the lowest
    model level or from the re-computed 2m(T,q) or
    10m(V) fields, whereas in DiagPack they are
    computed from the analysed screen-level fields.   
  • Case study for two synoptic situations
    (09.10.2001,18.08.2001) and validation tests
    have been performed. It has been shown that
  • MOCON fields obtained by DiagPack and Varpack are
    similar, but MOCON fields by Varpack are
    smoother
  • the comparison of the MOCON and CAPE fields with
    the hourly radar images has shown that both
    fields obtained by VarPack correspond better to
    the radar pictures than those obtained by
    DiagPack.
  • References
  • L.Taseva,L.Auger Varpack . Technical report
    (10th of May 19th of June 2004).
    MeteoFrance/CNRM/GMAP Available at
    http//www.cnrm/meteo.fr/aladin/publications/repor
    t.html/
  • ALADIN Newsletter 26 January July 2004, p.27
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com