After Philosophy: Introduction - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

After Philosophy: Introduction

Description:

After Philosophy: Introduction. Ron Chrisley. COGS/Informatics, University of Sussex ... Not mentioned: Philosophy continues, not transformed, but responding to the ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:49
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 12
Provided by: ronchr
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: After Philosophy: Introduction


1
After Philosophy Introduction
  • Ron Chrisley
  • COGS/Informatics, University of Sussex
  • Consciousness Studies Programme
  • University of Skövde

2
The Crisis In PhilosophyThe pre and post
collide in Kant
Plato
Descartes
Locke
Berkeley
Mill
Hume
Hegel
IMMANUEL KANT Critique of Pure Reason
Marx
Darwin
Nietzsche
Frege???
Freud
Heidegger Wittgenstein
3
Dispute 1 Reason
  • PRE
  • Necessity
  • Universality
  • A priori
  • Certainty
  • Invariance
  • Unity
  • Totality
  • Self-evident given
  • Unconditional
  • POST
  • Contingency,Convention
  • Plurality, Relativism
  • Empirical
  • Fallibility
  • Historical/cultural variability
  • Heterogeneity
  • Fragmentary
  • Interpreted signs
  • Rejection of absolute

4
Dispute 2 The Subject
  • POST

PRE
  • Sovereign
  • Rational
  • Atomistic
  • Autonomous
  • Dis-
  • Dis-
  • Self-transparent
  • Conceptual
  • Conscious
  • Mind vs. Body
  • Non-authoritative
  • Irrational
  • Holistic
  • Historical, cultural
  • Engaged
  • Embodied
  • Self-ignorant
  • Non-, pre-
  • Un-, Sub-
  • Mind/body

5
Dispute 3 Knowledge
  • POST

PRE
  • Non-
  • No sharp S/O divide
  • Pre-interpreted
  • Part of world
  • Hermeneutic circle
  • Un-articulable back/ground
  • None or partial
  • None or partial
  • Representational
  • Independent world
  • Conceptualised given
  • Independent subject
  • Ding an sich
  • Articulable
  • Full grasp
  • Full self-control

6
Dispute 4 Method
  • POST

PRE
  • Rhetoric
  • Figurative
  • Mythos
  • Narrative
  • Logic
  • Literal
  • Logos
  • Argument
  • Post- claim is that you won't understand
    philosophy or its insights until you recognise
    the rhetorical strategies, etc., involved
  • (But on the post view, can't we understand
    without understanding why we understand?)
  • On some post- views, progress on the other
    disputes (e.g., the subject) can be made by
    applying literary analysis to philosophical
    texts.

7
Post- Responses
  • The end of philosophy (Rorty, Derrida)
  • Philosophy continues, transformed into
  • A theory of meaning (Davidson, Dummett)
  • Social inquiry (Habermas)
  • Hermeneutics (Gadamer, Ricoeur)
  • Historiography (MacIntyre, Blumenberg)
  • Not mentioned Philosophy continues, not
    transformed, but responding to the crisis
    nonetheless (not considered, since only looking
    at those who have made "the linguistic turn").

1
2
2
3
3
8
Issues which divide the responses
  • Truth and conceptual schemes
  • The fate of the subject and the role of
    interpretation
  • Politics of language
  • Rhetoric and poetics of language
  • The role of theory in philosophy

9
Truth
  • Putnam agrees that reason is always culture- and
    language- dependent
  • But there is still an ideal of rationality which
    can be used to critique our own traditions
  • Truth is then understood as what is accepted
    under such ideally rational conditions

10
Conceptual schemes
  • It might be that language and meaning are
    context-bound to cultures, forms of life
    language games
  • But this need not imply incommensurabilty
    (Gadamer, MacIntyre, Habermas)
  • In fact, incommensurability may be impossible
    (Davidson) The "post" view limits itself!

11
The fate of the subject
  • One view we need to re-cast our idea of the
    subject, so that it is seen as limited, situated,
    engaged, etc. (Ricoeur, Blumenberg, Gadamer)
  • Another view There is nothing there to be
    better understood No subject, no true meaning
    (Foucault? Derrida?)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com