From Individuals to Organizations: Brokering at CHSRF - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 21
About This Presentation
Title:

From Individuals to Organizations: Brokering at CHSRF

Description:

Work with researchers and users of research to create researchable questions ... learning events. Support for knowledge networks. Targeted research summaries ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:43
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 22
Provided by: jolst
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: From Individuals to Organizations: Brokering at CHSRF


1
From Individuals to Organizations Brokering at
CHSRF
  • David Clements, MPA
  • Vice-President, Knowledge Exchange

2
Objectives
  • To share the experience knowledge brokering at
    the Canadian Health Services Research Foundation
  • To share knowledge from scanning and survey work
    on knowledge brokering in Canada
  • To reflect on the recent experience of CHSRFs
    knowledge brokering demonstration sites.

3
What is Knowledge Brokering?
  • Knowledge brokering offers a perspective on
    innovation and innovators that recognizes the
    value not of invention but of inventive
    combination.
  • - Andrew Hargadon

4
Why Knowledge Brokering?
  • Interpersonal links, spread through the life of
    a given study, are the key to research use. They
    allow non-researchers to find their niche and
    their voice while a study is still young There
    are reciprocal effects, such that we are no
    longer in a conventional research-to-practice
    paradigm, but in more of a conversation among
    professionals, each bringing different expertise
    to bear on the same topic
  • Huberman, M Research Utilization The State of
    the Art. Knowledge and Policy 1994722

5
Why Knowledge Brokering?
  • Systematic review of 24 studies that asked over
    2000 policymakers what facilitated or prevented
    their use of research evidence
  • 1 facilitator of research use personal contact
    between researchers between researchers and
    policy-makers (13/24)
  • 1 barrier to research use absence of personal
    contact between researchers and policy-makers
    (11/24)
  • Innvaer et al. J Hlth Serv Res Pol 20027241

6
Our Journey
  • 1997 CHSRF created, with research and KE
    mandate
  • 1998 Policy syntheses
  • 1999 Plain-language workshops
  • 2000 Self-assessment tool
  • 2001 Research summaries (Mythbusters)
  • 2002 Cross-country KB focus groups review of
    KB literature
  • 2003 The Theory and Practice of Knowledge
    Brokering
  • 2004 Knowledge Brokering Demonstration sites
    Evaluation
  • 2006 - Shift to tools and strategies for
    research use

7
Knowledge Brokering Survey and Scanning
  • Regional consultations across Canada in which we
    met with close to 200 knowledge brokers working
    in Canadas health system
  • National meeting to confirm findings, create
    consensus and check assumptions
  • Extensive literature review on brokering in a
    variety of disciplines
  • Canadian Health Services Research Foundation.
  • The Theory and Practice of Knowledge Brokering in
    Canadas Health System. Ottawa CHSRF, 2003.

8
What do knowledge brokers do?
  • Find and link people
  • Work with both parties to scan the literature,
    summarize what exists, identify gaps
  • Work with researchers and users of research to
    create researchable questions from
    policy/management issues
  • Ensure that both researchers and users of
    research are engaged throughout the research
    process

9
What do brokers do?
  • Collaboratively set agendas
  • Facilitate interactions
  • Communicate different realities
  • Create a common language and frame of reference
  • Help to establish realistic expectations, roles
    and responsibilities

10
Brokering Competencies
  • Understanding of both the research and decision
    making environments
  • Ability to find and assess relevant research
  • Entrepreneurial skills (networking,
    problem-solving skills, innovative solutions,
    etc)
  • Mediation and negotiation
  • Understanding of the principles of adult learning
  • Communication skills
  • Credibility

11
Gladwell
  • Connectors are the people who "link us up with
    the world ... people with a special gift for
    bringing the world together.
  • Mavens are "information specialists", or "people
    we rely upon to connect us with new
    information."They accumulate knowledge,
    especially about the marketplace, and know how to
    share it with others.
  • Salesmen are "persuaders", charismatic people
    with powerful negotiation skills. They tend to
    have an indefinable trait that goes beyond what
    they say, that makes others want to agree with
    them.
  • (Wikipedia)

12
Where does brokering happen?
  • Brokering can be done in a variety of settings
  • Knowledge brokering organizations
  • Individuals or teams in research organizations
  • Individuals or teams in decision-making
    organizations

13
The State of Brokering
  • A significant amount of brokering is happening in
    the Canadian health system
  • Brokering is rarely called brokering, and a great
    deal of what is now being called brokering is not
    really brokering
  • Very little brokering is formal
  • Much brokering goes completely unrecognized and
    unrewarded
  • Little brokering is done by full-time workers
  • Few resources are attached to these people /
    roles
  • Virtually no evaluation has been done on the
    importance of brokering

14
There is no one-size-fits-all
  • What brokering entails (skills and activities)
    will be dependant on the context in which it
    occurs
  • Research vs. decision-making environment
  • Organizations with rich KT strategies vs...
  • Existing research (recombinant?) vs
  • But if the true goal is to bridge communities,
    brokering is built on a solid understanding of
    all the relevant environments

15
Brokering Demonstration Sites
  • Intent was to test the hypothesis that knowledge
    brokering is a useful way to encourage and
    increase the effectiveness of knowledge transfer
    activities.
  • Goal1 To stimulate the implementation of
    structures, processes or people in
    decision-making organizations dedicated to
    linking researchers and decision-makers and
    facilitating their interaction
  • Goal 2 To increase the appropriate use of
    quality research in the decision-making processes
    of successful applicant organizations

16
Six Brokering Experiments
  • A pediatric health centre in a large urban
    centre, which sought to manage knowledge more
    effectively for policymakers and managers
    involved in improving childrens health
  • A coalition of aboriginal health organizations
    which wanted to improve the cultural
    sensitivity of the organization and delivery of
    healthcare to aboriginals
  • A provincial long-term care system in which tried
    to nurture relationships between policymakers and
    planners with researchers, so as to encourage
    greater respect for the contribution of research
    in the activities of this organization

17
Six Brokering Experiments
  • A partnership of two regional health authorities,
    which wanted to collect and share data that could
    improve service planning and management
  • A large health and social services agency, which
    implemented 11 service networks with the
    mandate of enhancing the management of health and
    social services by producing and sharing vital
    information to the directors of these networks,
    and
  • A rural hospital that hired two knowledge brokers
    responsible for helping hospital staff pursue
    personal learning activities aimed at generating
    ideas for healthcare improvement and identifying
    the relevant knowledge in the area.

18
(No Transcript)
19
Evaluation
  • Draft formative evaluation focuses on whether the
    design and delivery of the program was
    appropriate to facilitate effective knowledge
    brokering by the sites, and how the experimental
    nature of the program impacted the sites.
  • Addressed three questions
  • Was the design of the program appropriate and
    effective?
  • What factors led to effective delivery and what
    factors impeded program delivery?
  • What effects did the experimental nature of the
    program have on success in achieving intended
    outcomes?
  • Summative evaluation due in late 2008

20
Evaluation Key Messages
  • The highly adventurous and experimental nature of
    the knowledge brokering demonstration site
    program allowed for each site to adapt to local
    context, and also helped many knowledge brokers
    to formalize the informal nature of their work
  • The benefits of the requirement for co-funding
    from sponsoring organizations, which helped
    brokers to support and sustain relationships
  • Potential lost opportunities related for a
    community of practice of knowledge brokers that
    could have been better nurtured.

21
Informing CHSRF Programming
  • CHSRF focusing more explicitly on tools, training
    and capacity-building for research use.
  • Knowledge brokers are an identifiable audience
    for
  • Funded exchanges and learning events
  • Support for knowledge networks
  • Targeted research summaries
  • Tools inventory (www.chsrf.ca/tools)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com