John Quackenbush, Ph.D. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 8
About This Presentation
Title:

John Quackenbush, Ph.D.

Description:

... designs compare expression in two classes of samples to look for ... Where za/2 and zb are normal percentile values at significance level a and false ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:38
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 9
Provided by: fda
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: John Quackenbush, Ph.D.


1
Presented by John Quackenbush, Ph.D. at the
June 10, 2003 meeting of the Pharmacology
Toxicology Subcommittee of the Advisory
Committee for Pharmaceutical Science
2
The Experimental Design
  • The Experimental Design dictates a good deal of
    what you can do with the data
  • Good normalization and processing reflects the
    experimental design
  • The design also facilitates certain comparisons
    between samples and provides the statistical
    power you need for assigning confidence limits to
    individual measurements
  • The design must reflect experimental reality
  • The most straight-forward designs compare
    expression in two classes of samples to look for
    patterns that distinguish them.

3
Sample Pairing for Co-Hybridization Experiments
Direct Comparison with Dye Swap
A1
B1
A2
B2
A3
B3
A4
B4
A1
B1
A2
A3
B2
B3
A4
B4
  • RNA sample is not limiting (e.g. plenty of
    sample)
  • Flip dyes account for any gene-dye effects

Balanced Block Design
A1
B1
A2
B2
A4
B4
A3
B3
  • RNA sample is limiting
  • Balanced blocking accounts for any gene-dye
    effects

4
Multiple Sample Pairings
Reference Design (Indirect Comparison)
  • More than two samples are compared
  • (e.g. tumor classification, time course)
  • Flip dyes are not necessary but can be done to
    increase precision
  • Ratio values are inferred (indirect)
  • Suited for cluster analysis need common
    reference

Loop Design
5
Loops and Reference Designs
23 Hybs
10 hybs
Standard flip-dye expt
S. Wang , K. Kerr, J. Quackenbush, G. Churchill
6
Loops and Reference Designs
Both approaches can give equivalent results
S. Wang , K. Kerr, J. Quackenbush, G. Churchill
7
Loop vs. Reference Designs
  • Loop design
  • Can provide direct measurements
  • Give more data on each experimental sample with
    the same number of hybs
  • Require more RNA per sample
  • Can unwind with a bad sample or for a gene
    with bad data
  • Reference design
  • Easily extensible
  • Simple interpretation of all results
  • Requires less RNA per sample
  • Less sensitive to bad RNA samples and bad
    array elements

8
One Possible Experimental Paradigm
Examining Genotype, Phenotype, and Environment
Parental - stressed
Derived - stressed
Parental - unstressed
Derived - unstressed
9
Basic Design Principles
  • Biological replicas are more informative than
    correlated replicas (independent RNA, independent
    slides)
  • More replicas are better higher statistical
    power
  • For loops, hybridizations of individual samples
    should be balanced (as many Cy3 as Cy5
    labelings)
  • Self-self hybs add data on reproducibility and
    can be used to produce error models
  • At a minimum, should use dye swap replicates to
    compensate for any dye biases in labeling or
    detection

10
How Many Replicates?
(Simon et al., Genetic Epidemiology 23 21-36,
2002)
n 4(za/2 zb)2 / (d/1.4s)2
Where za/2 and zb are normal percentile values at
significance level a and false negative rate b
parameter d represents the minimum detectable
log2 ratio and s represents the SD of log ratio
values. For a 0.001 and b 0.05, then za/2
-3.29 and zb -1.65. Assume d 1.0 (2-fold
change) and s 0.25, Therefore n 12 samples
(6 query and 6 control).
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com