Nic T Brown Inspection Manager - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 63
About This Presentation
Title:

Nic T Brown Inspection Manager

Description:

More flexible New Deal choices. Closer co-operation between JC and LSC ... Visits take place over single day with two full-time inspectors ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:31
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 64
Provided by: narinder3
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Nic T Brown Inspection Manager


1
Nic T Brown Inspection Manager
2
CommentaryMoving in the right direction
  • An improving picture on quality
  • WBL inadequacy rate fallen from 60 to 29 per cent
    and still falling
  • JC provision, with exception of Workstep, now
    has similar rate to WBL
  • ACL inadequacy rate fallen from 46 to 33 per cent
  • College inadequacy steady at 14 per cent
  • Prisons inadequacy 69 to 54 per cent

3
CommentaryMoving in the right direction
  • A range of factors behind improvement
  • Clear identification by the ALI of strengths and
    weaknesses of provision
  • ALIs Provider Development Unit
  • Dissemination of good practice through Excalibur,
    the ALIs learning network
  • Decisive intervention by funding bodies

4
CommentaryMoving in the right direction
  • Mobilisation of employers through MA Task Force
  • Simplification of awards structure by QCA
  • Determined response of providers to issues
    identified through inspection

5
CommentaryMoving in the right direction
  • Inadequacy rates unlikely to fall to zero
  • Estimate that the practical minimum rate across
    the sector will be around 15 per cent
  • Targets over next few years
  • - cut inadequacy rates at least by half
  • - higher success rates
  • Past few years has shown what can be achieved

6
CommentaryInfrastructure improvements
  • Restructured LSC with regional tier and
    demand-led ethos aimed at purchasing
    high-quality provision
  • More flexible New Deal choices
  • Closer co-operation between JC and LSC
  • QCAs rapid development of CATS framework
  • Many SSCs now becoming influential

7
CommentaryInfrastructure improvements
  • ALIs report publication time reduced from 12 to
    six weeks last year 99
  • Overwhelmingly positive impact of PDU
  • Excalibur Good Practice Database, Inspection
    Toolkit, road shows, Quality Champions
  • Commissioned inspections by ALI
  • Series of ALI survey reports

8
CommentaryTop providers CIAR 2004
  • 78 providers received grades 1 or 2 for all
    aspects of provision, 17 per cent of total
    inspected
  • 34 were WBL providers
  • Commercial training companies and employers
    prominent amongst best WBL providers
  • Some regional variations in WBL top providers
    more prevalent in north, less so in Midlands

9
CommentaryTop providers
  • Only four ACL providers among top 78
  • Smaller, specialist ACL providers did best
  • 21 FE colleges among top 78
  • Many top providers were small and offer a single
    area of learning

10
CommentaryPoor providers
  • 47 providers awarded grades 4 or 5 for all
    aspects of provision
  • Number has nearly halved since 2002-03 but, at 10
    per cent, proportion still too high
  • Greatest improvement among WBL providers
  • Weak WBL provision disproportionately common in
    Midlands
  • Only one ACL provider and one learndirect hub
    among poorest providers

11
CommentaryReinspection and monitoring
  • Reinspection over time continues to bear fruit
  • 90 per cent recovery rate at reinspection
  • Workstep (50 inadequate) particularly good
  • Quality monitoring inspections introduced to
    check that recovery continued
  • Reinspection and quality monitoring useful tools
    in encouraging coasting providers to improve

12
CommentaryCharacteristics of best and worst
  • Hallmarks of best provision
  • High retention, achievements, progression to
    employment
  • Good teaching, training, skills development
  • Good learning resources
  • Good use of data to assure quality and ensure
    equality of opportunity

13
CommentaryCharacteristics of best and worst
  • Defining characteristics of worst provision
  • Weak quality management
  • Little protection of equality of opportunity
  • Low retention, achievement, progression to
    employment
  • Weak assessment of needs of disadvantaged
    learners
  • Poor management and control of subcontractors

14
CommentaryQualifications
  • Emerging national qualifications framework
    essential for the success of many adult learning
    programmes
  • Few general awards meant specifically for adults
  • 60 per cent of the one million ACL learners do
    not take qualifications
  • Many regard qualifications as a distractionWhat
    is needed is a confirmation of progress which is
    also formative
  • Without an apprenticeship diploma, the
    apprenticeship remains simply a collection of
    parts

15
CommentaryIndividual and group achievement
  • Older workforce 55 over 40 by 2015
  • FE Colleges 83 over 19
  • 850,000 in ACL, 500,000 learndirect
  • Employers spent 14,500,000 on off-the-job
  • CIF identifies quality with individual learners
  • In ACL, community development and family learning
    strands require evaluation of benefits to groups,
    rather than individuals
  • If achieving these benefits warrants funding,
    then achievement goals need to be set more
    explicitly

16
CommentaryIndividual and group achievement
  • Employers sometimes concerned about the CIF
    emphasis on individuals
  • In reality, ALI inspectors have little difficulty
    in using individual benefit as a proxy for
    benefit to the employer

17
CommentarySelf-assessment
  • Some way to go on self-assessment
  • Substantial over-grading at upper end of scale in
    SARs
  • Reluctance to admit poor performance
  • Caution needed in using self-assessment as an
    accurate measure of quality

18
CommentaryKey and basic skills
  • Concentration on basic and key skills has brought
    success
  • Skills for Life and E2E given large numbers of
    adults a new chance
  • Basic skills deficits identified among 26 million
    adults could pose overwhelming challenge

19
CommentaryKey and basic skills
  • WBL providers now offer reasonable key skills
    training
  • Up-front teaching of key/basic skills
    particularly successful for those with the most
    serious deficits
  • Despite improvements on key/basic skills front,
    much foundation studies provision mediocre or poor

20
CommentaryAreas of learning
  • Marked variability of provision across AoLs
  • High standards commonplace in land-based learning
    programmes
  • Serious problems in construction with declining
    success rates
  • Likely that strong employment rates leads to
    learners leaving training to take highly-paid
    jobs

21
CommentaryAreas of learning
  • ICT single biggest AoL
  • Ever improving technology
  • ICT in prisons improving enormously
  • Much of work at entry level and level 1
  • Little between this and high level computer
    science
  • Improved standards of care teaching
  • Rapid achievement of NVQ level 2 accompanied by
    neglect of apprenticeship framework completion

22
CommentaryLeadership and management
  • CIF focuses on LM of curriculum managers,
    teaching staff and learner support staff as well
    as senior managers
  • In this regard, FE colleges often judged to be
    effectively managed
  • In ACL, grades 1 and 2 for LM increased
    threefold over last couple of years
  • LEAs have quickly assimilated the messages from
    inspection of ACL and kick-started improvement in
    LM overall
  • QA in ACL remains weak

23
CommentaryFurther Education Colleges
  • FE colleges, with exception of SFCs, buffeted by
    change
  • Many are big, diverse and subjected to frequent
    demands to be more responsive
  • High-quality provision not always consistent with
    constantly developing provision that
    responsiveness demands

24
CommentaryFurther Education Colleges
  • Much WBL in colleges remains poor
  • Often a lack of understanding of essential nature
    of WBL that it takes place, and is tested, at
    work
  • Infrastructure with which colleges have to work
    is over-complicated
  • Colleges have right to demand simpler working
    relationships with organisations which support
    them

25
CommentaryFurther Education Colleges
  • Colleges, like other organisations, have a
    natural life cycle
  • ALIs analysis shows few colleges can sustain
    high standards for long
  • This situation probably best addressed by
    combining a market-based system with an element
    of supportive intervention

26
KeynotesAdult and community learning
  • More polarised quality of provision
  • Resources characterised by extremes
  • Better strategic planning stronger focus on
    widening participation
  • QA still weak
  • Often poorly-managed curriculum
  • Often no formal assessment of learners skills
    and knowledge

27
KeynotesAdult and community learning
  • Most adults achieved personal goals and had a
    good learning experience
  • Wide range of enrichment activities which
    enthused learners
  • Family learning and community development
    programmes generally successful
  • Much good teaching

28
KeynotesFurther education colleges
  • Teaching and learning for adults better than for
    younger learners
  • Colleges worked increasingly collaboratively with
    HE institutions and other providers
  • Better inspection grades in SFC
  • Adults acquired new and useful skills

29
KeynotesFurther education colleges
  • Support not always available for part-time
    learners
  • Few colleges responded successfully to employers
    needs
  • Weak support for literacy, numeracy, language
    development

30
Keynoteslearndirect
  • Good LM at hub level leading to steady
    improvement in a period of change
  • Some good retention and achievement rates
  • Under-represented groups attracted
  • Learners enjoyed their learning
  • Ineffectively applied QA processes
  • Insufficient qualified literacy, numeracy,
    language development staff

31
KeynotesWork-based learning
  • Improved grades
  • Fewer than a third of apprentices completed full
    framework
  • Successful reinspection outcomes in 90 per cent
    of providers
  • Good development of work-related skills
  • Learning sessions generally well managed and
    professionally delivered

32
KeynotesWork-based learning
  • Equality and diversity effectively promoted
  • Significant advances in employer-led provision
  • Inadequate support for literacy, numeracy and
    language development needs
  • Poor management of many essential elements of
    learning process
  • Poor evaluation of quality of provision by
    providers

33
Business Admin by provider type
34
Business Admin FE by year
35
Business Admin WBL by year
36
Areas of Learning AoL 5 Business
administration, management and professional
  • Best grades in SFCs over three-quarters
    outstanding or good and only one out of 23
    unsatisfactory
  • JC grades also strong
  • In GFEs, around one-third of grades outstanding
    or good
  • Weakest area of provision was ACL where a third
    of grades unsatisfactory

37
Areas of Learning AoL 5 Business
administration, management and professional
  • Improving WBL grades but still a long way to go
  • Poor management of WBL
  • Slight decline in overall standard of provision
    in colleges
  • High-quality work placements
  • Particularly good pastoral support for individual
    learners

38
Areas of Learning AoL 5 Business
administration, management and professional
  • Adequate assessment
  • Competent teaching
  • Most programmes met needs and interests of
    learners
  • Many learners characterised by a lack of
    certainty about career direction

39
Quality improvementThe ALIs Approach
  • Share more effectively messages from, and about,
    inspection
  • PDU and revised reinspection model led to high
    recovery rate amongst providers
  • Quality monitoring visits a further encouragement
    to continuous improvement
  • Excalibur learning network - a vital part of ALI
    strategy

40
(No Transcript)
41
Excalibur sharing knowledge to raise standards
42
What is Excalibur?
Key strand of the ALIs commitment to building a
national quality community
Products
Sharing knowledge from inspection to raise
standards across the learning and skills sector
Events
Activities
Unique knowledge based resource
43
The Inspection Toolkit
  • designed to help providers to understand the
    inspection process
  • and to prepare for inspection more effectively

44
The Inspection Toolkit
  • gives detailed information and guidance about
    what needs to be done
  • in the weeks immediately after notification
  • in planning and preparing for the inspection
  • during the inspection

45
Good practice database
46
(No Transcript)
47
Building Better Practice
48
Building Better Practice
Good Practice Database
Building Better Practice
Inspection Toolkit
49
Building Better Practice
  • Matched to Common Inspection Framework
  • Information, not instructions
  • Structure
  • key messages
  • hints and tips
  • healthcheck
  • Links with Good Practice Database
  • Disseminate regionally through conferences and
    events

50
Building Better Practice
National quality community
Quality improvement
Quality assurance
51
Quality Champions
52
Excalibur Quality Champions
ALI inspection experience
Quality improvement activities within
own organisation
Contribution to national quality community
53
Quality improvementReinspection
  • 206 reinspections, 173 of them full reinspections
  • Bulk of reinspections, 142, were of WBL providers
  • Reinspection over time well established
  • Very high reinspection recovery rate 89 per
    cent of WBL providers, over 90 per cent of JC
    providers

54
Quality improvementQuality monitoring inspection
visits
  • Visits introduced in January 2004
  • Following providers selected
  • - those with grade 3 in LM and/or grade 3 in
    one-third or more areas of learning
  • - providers judged adequate at reinspection
  • - providers which had gone through
  • substantial change since previous inspection
  • - providers that had recovered following
    implementation of an emergency action plan

55
Quality improvementQuality monitoring inspection
visits
  • Visits take place over single day with two
    full-time inspectors
  • Visit to review how effective post-inspection
    plan in maintaining or improving quality of
    provision
  • Overall quality of provision had improved in 86
    per cent of providers

56
Innovation
  • Innovation in inspection
  • Duty of Care
  • Probation Officer training, Police training
  • Prison Officer training,
  • LSC workforce development
  • DfES employer training pilot
  • learndirect how may I help you
  • SfLSU pilot evaluation
  • Inspection is a catalyst for change
  • Inspection can celebrate not stifle innovation

57
SfLSU innovation sample
  • Fund learning into the workplace
  • ALI commissioned to
  • Evaluate
  • Give support to the providers
  • Make recommendations

58
LEARNERS VIEWS
  • it has helped me get back into a learning
  • the literacy course built my confidence and now
    I am more confident with numbers
  • I would not have made the effort to go to night
    school, but at work we know each other already
  • the tutor is very encouraging
  • it helps with applying for jobs and its free
  • this will make a great difference to me when my
    job is upgraded to supervisor
  • it is useful to be able to help the children at
    home
  • using the computer is much more interesting than
    doing tasks on paper
  • I like the confidentiality of working at home
  • I like the privacy of individual attention

59
EMPLOYERS VIEWS
  • it would be difficult for staff to go to regular
    classes at college as shift patterns are a
    problem
  • its helping motivation and improving
    communications in the company
  • it enables staff of all abilities to improve
    their skills
  • staff enjoy the sense of achievement
  • the workforce is more confident and
    better-skilled
  • the work provides an additional measure of
    ability for job promotion decisions
  • it is good for staff to work towards nationally
    recognised qualifications
  • the provider manages confidential issues very
    well
  • we use this organisation because they understand
    working with our industry

60
CommentaryConclusion
  • Business Administration steadily improving
  • Overall areas, ALI helped providers double
    chances of learner in WBL
  • Helped raise numbers of apprentices
  • ALIs emphasis on quality improvement working
    with funders and providers (not regulatory nor
    authoritarian)
  • ALI increasingly broadening its range of partners
    in government
  • ALI extending partnerships with employers funding
    their own training

61
CommentaryConclusion
  • ALI developing its approach to inspection to
    further assist quality improvement in sector
  • Right Touch inspection is a more flexible,
    focused process
  • focuses more explicitly on the specific needs of
    providers and funding bodies
  • Adopt a more customer-service approach
  • Right Touch inspection is accompanied by 25 per
    cent cut in inspection days
  • This must not damage the focus of inspection

62
The future of the ALI
  • The Chancellor of the Exchequer proposed in March
    2005 to consult with employers on the creation of
    a single inspectorate for childrens services,
    education and skills

63
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com