InSitu Habitat and Environmental Monitoring - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 20
About This Presentation
Title:

InSitu Habitat and Environmental Monitoring

Description:

RH 15 min 192 192. IR thermopile second 172800 8640 (95%) Thermistor second 172800 8640 (95 ... Monitor data collection, begin evaluation. August. Invited talk: ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:28
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 21
Provided by: Sean1171
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: InSitu Habitat and Environmental Monitoring


1
In-Situ Habitat and Environmental
Monitoring Alan Mainwaring, Joe Polastre and Rob
Szewczyk Intel Research - Berkeley Lablet
2
Talk Outline
  • Introduction to habitat monitoring
  • Field sites and application requirements
  • Establishing the design context
  • Summer milestones and wrap-up
  • Demo live data from two networks

3
Introduction
  • Habitat monitoring represents a class of sensor
    network applications enormous potential impact
    for scientific communities and society as a
    whole.
  • Instrumentation of natural spaces enables
    long-term data collection at scales and
    resolutions that are difficult, if not
    impossible, to obtain otherwise.
  • Intimate connection with physical environment
    allows sensor networks to provide local
    information that complements macroscopic remote
    sensing.

4
Application-Driven Sensor Network Research
  • Benefits to others
  • Computer scientists help life scientists
  • Small steps for us can be revolutionary for
    others
  • Provides design context
  • Eliminates some issues, constrains others
  • Can add new ones, e.g., packaging
  • Prioritizes issues
  • Low-power communication stacks
  • Run-time systems and VMs for re-tasking
  • Health and status monitoring systems
  • Tools deployment and on-site interaction

5
Habitat Monitoring
  • Goal Remote, in-situ system consisting of
  • Sensor networks in scientifically interesting
    areas
  • WLANs link sensor networks to base station (DB)
  • Internet link remote users to local resources
  • Access models
  • Remote DB, admin, health and status monitoring
  • Continuous data logger to DB for long-term
    analysis
  • Interactive inspection of sensor nodes (near
    real-time)
  • Sensors of interest too many to list
  • E,g., light, temperature, relative humidity,
    barometric pressure, infrared, O2, CO2, soil
    moisture, fluid flow, chemical detection, weight,
    sound pressure levels, vibration
  • Need both relative and absolute measurements with
    units

6
Field Sites and Application Requirements
7
Habitat Monitoring Field Sites
8
Application Requirements I
  • Internet access
  • 24x7
  • 3 to 4 sensor networks (habitats)
  • network of sensor networks
  • 128 stationary motes per network
  • 50 may miss interesting phenomena
  • 1 year lifetime -- minimum
  • standalone data-loggers run 1 to 10 years
  • Change and adaptation may take days
  • Static node locations, infrequent occlusions
  • Off-the-grid power its off, its big, or its
    solar
  • Disconnected operation possible at all levels

9
Application Requirements II
  • Field re-tasking (local or remote)
  • Adjust sampling rates, operational parameters,
  • Remote management (one site visit per year)
  • 1 person can locate/touch/service all motes in 1
    week
  • Inconspicuous packaging and operation
  • No bright colors, no sounds (buzzing) or blinking
    lights
  • Pack it out cannot deploy and forget
  • Must find motes in field after year(s) of
    operation
  • Cant leave 1000s of leaking Li/Cd batteries
  • Users want predictable system operation
  • Cannot burden users with more complexity

10
Sensing Requirements Weather Board
11
Some Non-Requirements
  • Localization
  • Oftentimes nodes are precisely placed
  • Data aggregation
  • Of readings on node (yes), across nodes (no)
  • Precise time synchronization (yet)
  • Depends on what precise means
  • Instantaneous adaptation to change
  • Prompt detection but not reaction
  • Object tracking
  • Unless its passive and over large distances

12
Establishing the Design Context
13
Design ContextPower Budget Basics
  • Batteries
  • 2xAA 2850 mAhr (est. 75 usable)
  • daily 5.86 mAhr (365 day target lifetime)
  • What can the mica do with 5.86 mAhr?
  • Compute for 46 minutes
  • Or send 70320 messages
  • Or take 281000 temp readings

14
Design ContextSensing Demands
  • Sensor frequency bytes/day compressed
  • Photo 1 min 2800 144 (95)
  • I2C temp 15 min 192 192
  • Baro/pressure 15 min 192 192
  • Baro/temp 15 min 192 192
  • RH 15 min 192 192
  • IR thermopile second 172800 8640 (95)
  • Thermistor second 172800 8640 (95)
  • Totals
  • 0.04 mAhr for sensing
  • 349KB/day or 11600 msgs
  • 18KB/day or 600 msgs (compressed)

15
Design Context TwoCommunications Budgets
  • (1) Low-power listening (2) Global scheduling
  • 98 idle 1.17 mAhr 99 idle 1.188 mAhr
  • 1 listen 3.60 mAhr listen time n/a
  • 1 runtime 1.08 mAhr 1 runtime 4.668 mAhr
  • sensing 0.044 mAhr sensing 0.044 mAhr
  • for comm 1.036 mAhr for comm 4.624 mAhr
  • Whats 1 mAhr worth? And 4.6 mAhr?
  • 12431 msg opportunities 55487 msg opportunities
  • 1 msg every 7 seconds 1 msg every 1.5 seconds
  • In 128 node network, In 128 node network,
  • 32 msgs/leaf-node/day 144
    msgs/leaf-node/day

16
Communications Design Challenge
  • Want network to last 1 year
  • Want uniform amount of data from motes
  • Route 18KB from each sensor to DB
  • 1 mAhr communication budget (low-power listening)
  • 4 mAhr communication budget (global scheduling)
  • The key design challenge for habitat monitoring
    with sensor networks is resolving the trade-off
    between globally-scheduled approaches to
    communications and alternative approaches based
    on local information.

17
Summer Milestones
18
Summer Milestones
  • June
  • Weather sensor board debug and SW
  • Low-power multi-hop routing for 1 duty cycle
  • Setup lab network with new sensors and SW (6/27)
  • July
  • Upgrade Great Duck Island network (7/8 7/12)
  • Upgrade James Reserve network (7/24 7/25)
  • Monitor data collection, begin evaluation
  • August
  • Invited talk COA board of trustees (8/1)
  • TR experiences and initial evaluation (8/25)
  • NPR segment / National Geographic article (tbd)

19
Conclusions
  • Habitat monitoring is broadly representative of a
    seemingly simple class of sensor network
    applications.
  • Reference for benchmarking and comparison
  • The habitat monitoring application domain makes
    some systems issues concrete yet leaves others
    open.
  • no mobility, 1 year longevity, resource budgets
  • We can pursue sensor network systems research
    while delivering significant value to life
    scientists, today.
  • whats trivial to one can be revolutionary to
    another
  • We need robust multi-hop routing on spanning
    trees
  • Youve got 1 to 4 mAhr per day to accomplish it

20
Demo?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com