Aucun titre de diapositive

1
SRC
2
Safety Regulation Commission

• TENTH MEETING
• Brussels, 13/14 February, 2001

3
Agenda Item 2 - Approval of Draft Agenda
WP SRC10.1 Draft Agenda
4
Agenda Item 3 - Draft Report of SRC9 Review of
Actions
WP SRC10.2 Draft Report of SRC9 Review of
Actions
5
Agenda Item 3 - Draft Report of SRC9 Review of
Actions
WP SRC10.23 Review of Actions carried
forward from SRC7 SRC8
6
Agenda Item 4 - SRC Work Programme Update
WP SRC10.3 SRC Work Programme Update
7
EUROCONTROL SAFETY REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS(ESARR
s)

• ESARR 2 - Safety Occurrence Reporting and
  Analysis
• ESARR 3 - Safety Management Systems
• ESARR 5 - ATM Services Personnel
• ESARR 4 - Risk Assessment and Mitigation
• ESARR 6 - Software-based ATM systems
• ESARR 7 - GNSS

8
SRC Policy Documents

• Pol Doc 1 ECAC Safety Minima for ATM
• Pol Doc 2 Use of Safety Nets
• Pol Doc 3 National Safety Regulatory
  Framework
• Pol Doc 4 EUROCONTROL Safety Regulatory
  Framework
• Pol Doc 5 Guidelines for SRC Commissioners
• Pol Doc 6 External Relations Policy
• Pol Doc 7 Implementation of ESARRs

9
SRC Documents

• Doc 1 Safety Minima - existing standards
• Doc 2 Review of Historical Occurrence Data
• Doc 3 SRC Work Programme
• Doc 4 Terms, Definitions and Acronyms
• Doc 5 Consistency ESARR 5 / Annex 1
• Doc 6 SRC-EATMP Interface
• Doc 7 Outdoor Laser Operations
• Doc 8 National Safety Arrangements

10
SRC Work Programme

• January 2001 Review
• Reflects update of existing tasks and
  priorities, and including
• Clarification of Areas A and B
• Integrated Systems Requirements
• National Safety Regulatory Framework
• Forms the basis of budget planning

11
SRC Work Programme

• Review timing -
• December - Full review
• January - draw up propsals
• February - present for SRC approval
• March - submit initial input into
  EUROCONTROL Budget System
• May - initial AFG consideration
• June/July - SRC mid-year review
• July / Nov - PC approval

12
Agenda Item 5 - Staffing Budget
WP SRC10.4 Staffing Budget
13
SRC/SRU Budget Proposals

• Based on January 2001 WP Review
• Now go through AFG to the PC
• Possibility for SRC-specific budget
  parameters, but
• We will have to make the case at PC

14
Agenda Item 6 - Target Levels of Safety
WP SRC10.5 SRC Policy Doc 1
15
Risk Assessment MitigationSRC9 outcome
SRC9 decision Comments received during the
EUROCONTROL Consultation period should be
further addressed, and revised versions of ESARR
4 and associated SRC POL DOC1 should be produced
for a working meeting with national
experts Objective The quantified safety
minima developed in SRC POL DOC 1, and used in
ESARR 4, are sufficiently stable, and comparable
to other aviation safety targets
16
Main Element of ChangesPurpose of SRC POL DOC 1

• A baseline to monitor achieved ATM safety
  levels in ECAC
• An historical baseline providing justifications
  for the quantified elements contained in ESARR 4

17
ECAC Safety Minima for ATM
(According to ICAO ADREP Statistics)
(According to app. 2 of ATM direct
contribution to accidents)
(According to CFMU data for 1996-1999)
(According to max. STATFOR predicted increase of
traffic volume by 6,7 per year)
18
Relative Minima
Absolute Minima
ECAC Safety Minimum-ATM Absolute Number
0,623
4,38 10-8
Progressive Increase (here assuming 6,7
annual traffic increase )
Year
1999
2015
19
Relative Minima
Absolute Minima
ECAC Safety Minimum-ATM Absolute Number
4,38 10-8
0,623
ESARR 4- 1,55. 10-8 (Stepped increase assuming
6,7 annual traffic increase )
1,55 10-8
Year
2004
1999
2015
20
SRC POL DOC 1
Consultation Process
MID JULY 00
JANUARY 00
13 FEBRUARY 01
SRC Consultation
Creation
PROPOSED ISSUE
SRC 10
SRC POL DOC 1 Edition 0.01
SRC WP8.6
SRC8
21
SRC POLICY DOC 1
Implementation Aspects - Next Steps

EUROCONTROL WORK
EATMP

Safety Performance Framework
SRC SRC Policy DOC 1

CO-ORDINATION
IMPLEMENTATION
22
Recommendations
SRC10 is invited to

• approve the attached version of SRC POLICY DOC 1
  (proposed Issue 1.0)
• approve that its contents be used as an
  historical baseline providing justifications
  for the quantified elements contained in ESARR
  4.

23
Agenda Item 6 - Target Levels of Safety
Verbal report Strategic Performance Framework
24
Agenda Item 7 - ESARRs
WP SRC10.6 Status Implementation Work
25
Agenda Item 7 - ESARRs
WP SRC10.7 ESARR 3 Implementation
26
ESARR 3 - Implementation

• Identification of needs for guidance and
  implementation
• ESARR 3 Implementation Programme
• Small organisation concept

27
ESARR 3 - Needs for Guidance Implementation

• Consultation
• List of possible areas of Consideration
• Action to provide views about the ESARR 3
  Implementation Programme outlined at SRC9

28
ESARR 3 - Needs for Guidance Implementation

• Results
• General agreement with what was proposed at
  SRC9
• No many detailed comments were received

29
ESARR 3 - Needs for Guidance Implementation

• Issues Underlined
• Guidance on how regulators should conduct
  control functions
• Safety Improvement Culture
• Aerodromes-ATM interfacing issues in small
  organisations

30
ESARR 3 Implementation Programme
31
ESARR 3 IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAMME
32
ESARR 3 IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAMME
ESARR 3 IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAMME
TASK P (To Promote)
TASK S (To Support)
TASK D (To Develop)
TASK D (To Develop)
ESARR 3 GUIDANCE MATERIAL Series including at
least 4 documents To be released in the first
months of 2001 1. THE ROLE OF ESARR 3 IN ATM
REGULATION 2. EXPLANATORY MATERIAL ON ESARR
3 To be developed and released by the end of
2001 3. SMALL ORGANISATIONS To be
developed and released by mid 2002 4. SAFETY
REGULATORY AUDITING
Purpose TO PROMOTE AND DISSEMINATE THE
REQUIREMENT
Purpose TO SUPPORT NATIONAL IMPLEMENTATION PROCE
SSES
Purpose TO DEVELOP THE REQUIREMENT AND
PROVIDE INTERPRETATION ON ITS MEANING
Purpose TO DEVELOP THE REQUIREMENT AND
PROVIDE INTERPRETATION ON ITS MEANING
ACTION To produce, develop and
maintain Guidance Material
33
ESARR 3 IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAMME
ESARR 3 IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAMME
TASK P (To Promote)
TASK S (To Support)
TASK D (To Develop)
TASK D (To Develop)
Purpose TO PROMOTE AND DISSEMINATE THE
REQUIREMENT
Purpose TO SUPPORT NATIONAL IMPLEMENTATION PROCE
SSES
Purpose TO DEVELOP THE REQUIREMENT AND
PROVIDE INTERPRETATION ON ITS MEANING
Purpose TO DEVELOP THE REQUIREMENT AND
PROVIDE INTERPRETATION ON ITS MEANING
Start process after the approval by SRC of an
assessment procedure EATMP Safety Approach as
an acceptable means of compliance during 2001

ACTION To assess the EATMP Safety Approach as
a means of compliance
34
ESARR 3 IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAMME
ESARR 3 IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAMME
TASK D (To Develop)
TASK P (To Promote)
TASK S (To Support)
TASK P (To Promote)
Purpose TO DEVELOP THE REQUIREMENT AND
PROVIDE INTERPRETATION ON ITS MEANING
Purpose TO PROMOTE AND DISSEMINATE THE
REQUIREMENT
Purpose TO SUPPORT NATIONAL IMPLEMENTATION PROCE
SSES
Purpose TO PROMOTE AND DISSEMINATE THE
REQUIREMENT

• Development after SRC10
• First workshop before the Summer
• Two workshops after the Summer

• To release during 2001
• Brochure and web-site updates
• To consider during 2002
• Additional materials

35
ESARR 3 IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAMME
ESARR 3 IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAMME
TASK D (To Develop)
TASK P (To Promote)
TASK S (To Support)
TASK S (To Support)
Purpose TO DEVELOP THE REQUIREMENT AND
PROVIDE INTERPRETATION ON ITS MEANING
Purpose TO PROMOTE AND DISSEMINATE THE
REQUIREMENT
Purpose TO SUPPORT NATIONAL IMPLEMENTATION PROCE
SSES
Purpose TO SUPPORT NATIONAL IMPLEMENTATION PROCE
SSES

• ACTION
• To provide Member States with advice to define
  and develop national implementation processes
• 1. Drafting of National Regulations
• 2. Advice and recommendations on
• organisational aspects
• processes to be set up
• resources and training needed

Possible actions in 2002 only if enough resources
are available
36
ESARR 3 IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAMME
TASK D (To Develop)
TASK P (To Promote)
TASK S (To Support)
Purpose TO DEVELOP THE REQUIREMENT AND
PROVIDE INTERPRETATION ON ITS MEANING
Purpose TO PROMOTE AND DISSEMINATE THE
REQUIREMENT
Purpose TO SUPPORT NATIONAL IMPLEMENTATION PROCE
SSES
ISSUES UNDERLINED Safety
Regulatory Auditing Guidance
Material Safety Improvement Culture
Workshop Aerodrome-ATM interfaces Guidance
Material in small organisations
37
ESARR 3 - ImplementationProgramme

• Initial Implementation Programme
• Initial set of actions
• Tentative time-frame
• Need of review and update actions and time-frame
  in the light of new developments
• Safety Improvement Culture
• Aerodromes-ATM interfacing issues in small
  organisations

38
Small Organisation Definition
39
ESARR 3 - Small Organisation Definition

• The development of ESARR 3 assumed that the
  concept referred to the size of the
  organisation, mainly in terms of human
  resources available

40
ESARR 3 - Small Organisation Definition

• There are differences in the understanding of
  this concept
• Organisations providing services within a low
  level of traffic environment

41
ESARR 3 - Small Organisation Definition

• Small Organisation
• Any ATM service-provider organisation with a
  limited size in terms of human and financial
  resources available.

42
Recommendations

• SRC is invited to
• Consider and approve the proposals for action to
  be developed as part of an initial ESARR 3
  Implementation Programme as presented in
  Attachment 1.
• In next SRC meetings, to update and review the
  content of this initial programme in the light
  of new developments

43
Recommendations

• SRC is invited to
• Consider the resources needed if actions to
  support national implementation activities are
  to be undertaken
• Consider and approve the definition proposed for
  the small organisation concept as presented in
  Attachment 2.

44
Agenda Item 7 - ESARRs
WP SRC10.26 ESARR 5 Implementation
45
ESARR 5 IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAMME
46
ESARR 5 IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAMME
ESARR 5 IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAMME
TASK P (To Promote)
TASK S (To Support)
TASK D (To Develop)
TASK D (To Develop)
Purpose TO PROMOTE AND DISSEMINATE THE
REQUIREMENT
Purpose TO SUPPORT NATIONAL IMPLEMENTATION PROCE
SSES
Purpose TO DEVELOP THE REQUIREMENT AND
PROVIDE INTERPRETATION ON ITS MEANING
Purpose TO DEVELOP THE REQUIREMENT AND
PROVIDE INTERPRETATION ON ITS MEANING
ESARR 5 FAQ Delivered in December
2000 ESARR 5 GUIDANCE MATERIAL
to be developed upon SRC reaction 1.
EXPLANATORY MATERIAL FOR SECTION 5 2.
Additional issues as identified in attachment of
SRC WP 10.6 section 7 ESARR 5 - EAM -
TBD
ACTION To produce, develop and
maintain Guidance Material
47
ESARR 5 IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAMME
ESARR 5 IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAMME
TASK D (To Develop)
TASK P (To Promote)
TASK S (To Support)
TASK P (To Promote)
Purpose TO DEVELOP THE REQUIREMENT AND
PROVIDE INTERPRETATION ON ITS MEANING
Purpose TO PROMOTE AND DISSEMINATE THE
REQUIREMENT
Purpose TO SUPPORT NATIONAL IMPLEMENTATION PROCE
SSES
Purpose TO PROMOTE AND DISSEMINATE THE
REQUIREMENT

• Brochure
• CD
• Video
• Web-site
• Poster
• Helpdesk
• Synergy with Agency HUM Unit

48
ESARR 5 IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAMME
ESARR 5 IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAMME
TASK D (To Develop)
TASK P (To Promote)
TASK S (To Support)
TASK S (To Support)
Purpose TO DEVELOP THE REQUIREMENT AND
PROVIDE INTERPRETATION ON ITS MEANING
Purpose TO PROMOTE AND DISSEMINATE THE
REQUIREMENT
Purpose TO SUPPORT NATIONAL IMPLEMENTATION PROCE
SSES
Purpose TO SUPPORT NATIONAL IMPLEMENTATION PROCE
SSES

• ACTION
• To support Member States providing advice to
  define and develop national implementation
  processes
• 1. Drafting of National Regulations
• 2. Providing advice and recommendations on
• processes / procedures to be set up
• resources needed
• phased approach implementation ...

Working together with the national regulator -
to know and assess the local context - to
discuss and draft the necessary documents - to
suggest specific solutions and actions. Through
SRC Licensing Co-ordination Group involving SRU,
HRT LWG personnel of the concerned State
implementing ESARR 5, external support, others...

49
ESARR 5 IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAMME
TASK D (To Develop)
TASK P (To Promote)
TASK S (To Support)

• The scope of these activities may vary depending
  on needs identified by SRC
• Support to States as a new activity for SRC/SRU
• Resources depending on the scope of actions
• decided

50
Implementation Indicators 1/2

• I1.Identification of the national institutional
  arrangements set-up in place to implement ESARR
  5
• I2.Assessment of national regulations vs. ESARR 5
  (comparison between ESARR 5 and existing
  appropriate national regulations)
• I3.Document and address the identified
  differences
• I4.Draft new legislation

51
Implementation Indicators 2/2

• I5.Allow period of convertibility between old and
  new legislation
• I6. Publish new legislation
• I7. Verify of the application of the new
  legislation

Track the indicators
52
SRC10
SRC13
SRC11
SRC.
SRC...
SRC...
SRC...
SRC...
SRC12
Example
10.11.2000
10.11.2003
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
ESARR5 Implementation Draft Plan
1st Draft
ESARR 5 Implementation Approved Plan
Released
I1
Identify
I2
Assess
I3
Document
I4
Draft
I5
Allow
I6
Publish
I7
Verify
53
Holding List 1/2

• State regulatory responsibility (impact on
  legislation)
• Arrangements authority/service provider
• Notifying differences to ICAO/ ICAO implications
• Selection standards
• Minimum Training Requirements
• Common examination standards/procedures
• Examiners qualifications
• Introduction of competence scheme

54
Holding List 2/2

• Introduction of the unit training plan
• Regulation of training establishments, standards
  for training establishments
• Administrative issue of licence including
  data-base administration, confidentiality issues,
  licence format, content, numbering, standard
  exchange of licensing information
• Medical requirements issues
• Legal consequences

55
Recommendations

• SRC is invited to
• Note the current status of ESARR 5 and the work
  developed in its area of implementation
• Consider the need to define an ESARR 5
  Implementation Programme, as proposed by SRU, to
  plan a complete range of actions for the next
  three years
• Send comments in SRU by mid March 2001 in order
  to identify additional needs and to finalise the
  implementation programme
• Support further co-ordination efforts between
  SRU, DIS/HUM, IANS and STS

56
Agenda Item 7 - ESARRs
WP SRC10.24 ATCO Licensing Implementation
Questionnaire
57
ATCO Licensing Implementation Questionnaire

• Analyse the intentions and commitment of State
  Licensing Authorities to implement the proposed
  licensing scheme
• Highlight areas where particular problems may be
  encountered in implementation
• Determine in what areas, and to what extent,
  EUROCONTROL can provide, or seek to make
  available, assistance to facilitate
  implementation
• Maintain an overview of progress in ATCO
  licensing implementation in ECAC states

58
Recommendations
SRC is requested, if not yet already done, to
ensure that questionnaire is distributed to the
responsible person(s) within State, and that
completed questionnaires are returned in
EUROCONTROL DIS/HUM by 2nd of March 2001.
59
Agenda Item 7 - ESARRs
WP SRC10.8 Submission of ESARR 4 to PC
60
Risk Assessment MitigationSRC9 outcome
SRC9 decision Comments received during the
EUROCONTROL Consultation period should be
further addressed, and revised versions of ESARR
4 and associated SRC POL DOC1 should be produced
for a working meeting with national
experts Objective The quantified safety
minima developed in SRC POL DOC 1, and used in
ESARR 4, are sufficiently stable, and comparable
to other aviation safety targets
61
Risk Assessment Mitigation Modifications

• Fig A-1 where top row made fully consistent
  with ESARR 2 (that was the intent of
  previous drafts)
• Section A-2 reviewed
• Clarification on what is meant-
• ( we do not directly place requirements at hazard
  level )
• Deletion of quantified elements for the incidents
  categories
• Definitions

62
ESARR 4
Consultation Process
MID SEPTEMBER 99
EARLY MARCH 00
MID JULY 00
13 FEBRUARY 01
SRC Consultation
EUROCONTROL Consultation
SRC Consultation
SRC APPROVAL
CMIC10
PROPOSED ISSUE
ESARR 4 Edition 0.08
ESARR 4 Edition 0.50
ESARR 4 Edition 0.13
PC10
SRC6
63
Risk Assessment Mitigation Outcome of CMIC 10

• CMIC members
• To note that CMIC had not received ESARR 4
• for comments
• To comment ESARR 4 (applicability section)
• by the end of February
• To provide their PC rep. with residual issues
  but to try and identify/resolve before PC 10
• EMEU and SRU
• To develop a procedure for the CMIC
  consultation of ESARRs

64
Risk Assessment Mitigation
Implementation Aspects - Next Steps

EUROCONTROL WORK
EATMP Safety Assessment Methodology

Safety Performance Framework
SRC SRC Policy DOC 1 ESARR 4

CO-ORDINATION
IMPLEMENTATION
65
Recommendations
SRC10 is invited to

• approve the presentation of ESARR 4 at Attachment
  B to this Paper to the Provisional Council and
  EUROCONTROL Commission for their approval and
  endorsement respectively
• if approved, agree with the draft Action Paper at
  Attachment A to this Paper, proposed to be
  submitted to the Provisional Council and
  EUROCONTROL Commission at their next meetings
• discuss on whether or not to go to PC 10 with
  ESARR 4 even if CMIC has some comments on ESARR
  4 (applicability section/ others).

66
Agenda Item 7 - ESARRs
WP SRC10.9 ESARR Future Developments
67
Agenda Item 8 - SRC Safety Reporting in
EUROCONTROL
Verbal Report National Detachments
68
Agenda Item 8 - SRC Safety Reporting in
EUROCONTROL
WP SRC10.10 Reporting Timescales
69
Agenda Item 8 - SRC Safety Reporting in
EUROCONTROL
Verbal Report Update ESARR 2 Reporting
Mechanism
70
Meeting with ASP Focal Points

• Currently we are covering 28 States MAUC AST
  Focal Points
• Not yet nominated AST FP in
• 5 EUROCONTROL - SRC
• Bulgaria, Croatia, Greece, Hungary, Turkey
• 5 ECAC States (1 EUROCONTROL)
• Albania, Armenia, Latvia, Iceland, Malta

71
Meeting with ASP FP contd

• For 2000 collection (and following years as
  well)
• AST focal points will send to SRU by March 31st
  2001 one updated version of AST with 1999 safety
  data including those occurrences for which the
  investigation has been finalised
• AST focal points will also send by March 31st
  2001an AST with 2000 safety data, including an
  indication of how many occurrences are still
  under investigation.

72
Recommendations
States not yet having an AST FP are urged to
send ASP their nomination in SRU by end of
February (31st of MARCH 2001 is the target date
for the safety data collection in 2001 !!!)
73
Agenda Item 8 - SRC Safety Reporting in
EUROCONTROL
Annual Summary Template (Edition 2.0)
74
(No Transcript)
75
(No Transcript)
76
Recommendations
SRC is invited to note the new edition of the
AST (Edition 2.0) and to incorporate this into
national ESARR 2 reporting frameworks.
77
Agenda Item 9 - AGC Report
WP SRC10.11 Acceptable Means of Compliance
78
Agenda Item 9 - AGC Report
Verbal report Functional Guidelines for
Commissioners
79
Agenda Item 9 - AGC Report
Verbal report Approach to SRC Monitoring
80
Agenda Item 9 - AGC Report
WP SRC10.14 Organisational Approvals
81
Agenda Item 9 - AGC Report
WP SRC10.22 Questionnaire to States
82
(No Transcript)
83

• SRC Decision 7/11/1
• The resulting information substantially updates a
  similar exercise carried out by SRC in 1998,
• Though the scope has been widened to prepare for
  specific safety interfaces resulting from EATMP
  programmes, especially RVSM
• 25 answers including Canada

84
Q1

• Is there a safety regulator for Air Traffic
  Management aspects of Civil Air Transport?

85
Q2

• Is the ATM Safety Regulator in your State a
  separate organisation from
• a) The ATS En-route Service Provider
  Organisation(s) ?
• b) The Aerodrome ATS Service Provider ?

86
Q3

• Is there an action plan in place to achieve
  separation of ATM Safety regulator function from
  ATS Service Provider function ?

87
Q4

• Does the ATM Safety Regulator regulate
• a)Civil ATS only ?
• b)Civil and Military ATS ?

88
Q6 -1

• Will the safety regulator provide a formal
  approval of changes to ATM operations ? (E.g.
  prior to the local implementation of the RVSM,
  Data-Link, GNSS, ACAS, etc.)

• Q6-2 - formal approval for equipment
• Q6-3 - formal approval for procedures
• Q6-4 - formal approval for training

89
Q7

• Does the safety regulator require evidence that
  the risks to aircraft-under-control of Air
  Traffic Control failures are assessed and managed?

90
Q8
Q9

• To provide any further details of the safety
  regulation of ATM that you believe are relevant.

• To provide reference to any international or
  national guidance material on the subject of
  functional safety of the ATM service that the
  safety regulator uses or requires the ATM Service
  Provider to consider in their implementation of,
  or changes to, the ATM service

91
Recommendations

• SRC are invited to
• a)Note the contents of attached SRC DOC 8, and
  approved it for release
• b)Consider a regular reassessment of this
  information on a two-yearly basis, to be
  published in re-issues for SRC DOC 8.

92
Agenda Item 9 - AGC Report
Verbal report SRC Marketing
93
Agenda Item 9 - AGC Report
Verbal report AGC Chairmanship
94
Agenda Item 10 - EATMP Issues
WP SRC10.15 SRC - EATMP Process
95
Agenda Item 10 - EATMP Issues
WP SRC10.16 RVSM Progress
96
RVSM within SRC WP

• RVSM is identified within SRC Work Programme Area
  C Safety Regulation of Programmes as Task C.4
  as follows
• The objective of this subtask is to develop a
  harmonised SRC position on the safety regulatory
  aspects of the RVSM Programme, to develop safety
  regulatory requirements (where these are needed
  to supplement the generic ESARRs), and to
  co-ordinate SRC views on the acceptability of
  RVSM implementation

97
Successive Review Cycles
98
HARMONIZED REGULATORY CRITERIA FOR THERVSM
INTRODUCTION WITHIN ECAC REGION

• This paper introduces an initial draft list of
  harmonized safety regulatory criteria for the
  introduction of RVSM within the ECAC Region.
• Regulatory Model

• SRVG - SRC RVSM Co-ordination WG

• First Meeting on 23rd of February 2001
• Composition.

99
RVSM Regulatory Model
100
WP16 Structure

• Appendix A Draft Harmonised regulatory Criteria
• Appendix B Time Schedule
• Appendix C Reference Material
• Appendix D Glossary
• Appendix E RVSM Area of Applicability
• Appendix F Regulatory Model
• Appendix G States Readiness

101
Area of Applicability
102
DEC1
SRC11
24/02
Go/ Delay
SRC10
SRC12
Review
DEC2
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
Feb
January
RVSM Pre-Implementation Safety Case
Ed. 2.0 Released
Ed0.2 Draft
Ed1.0 Released
SRC Meetings
SRC10
SRC11
SRC12
SRU Technical Support Contract
Del 7
Kick-Off
Del 1 2
Del 3 4
Del 5 6
Del 8 9
Del 10
SRVG
SRVG2
SRVG1
SRVG3
SRVG4
SRC Recommendations to PC
SRC REC 1
SRC REC 2
PC Meetings Go/Delay Decision
PC10
PC12
PC11
RVSM SWITCHOVER
Time Schedule
103
(No Transcript)
104
2/2
105
Recommendations

• SRC is invited to
• Support the SRVG in achieving a harmonized safety
  regulatory view on the acceptability of RVSM
  introduction within ECAC region on 24th January
  2002
• Comment, by the end of February 2001, on the
  first draft of the harmonized safety regulatory
  criteria for RVSM introduction within ECAC.

106
Agenda Item 10 - EATMP Issues
Verbal report Mode S
107
Agenda Item 10 - EATMP Issues
Verbal report FRAP
108
Successive FRAP Review Cycles
INTERFACE PROCESS
END of APRIL
109
Recommendations

• SRU to deliver Phase 1 FRAP SC by 20th of
  February
• SRC by 15th March
• to send initial comments
• to decide if a specialised group to review the
  FRAP safety case or remain via correspondence
• if YES above to send nominations for attendance
• STR to decide on a time-scale for drafting the
  SRC response to the Phase 1 FRAP SC (preferably
  by end of April 2001)

110
Agenda Item 10 - EATMP Issues
Verbal report Link 2000
111
Agenda Item 11 - Automated Tools

WP SRC10.17 Automated Tools
112
Agenda Item 12 - JAA Interface
JSSI Update - Verbal Report WP SRC10.18
113
Joint Safety Strategy Initiative
Content 1. General Overview2. JSSI Action
Plans Team3. Runway Incursion4. FAST
114
1. General OverviewThe JSSI
Joint Safety Strategy Initiative
115
Joint Safety Strategy Initiative

• WHAT IS THE JSSI
• Co-operative initiative involving the whole
  aviation community
• Launched by the JAA
• Dealing specifically with Aviation Safety

• PURPOSE
• Support the JAAs aim for safety by providing a
  focused safety agenda

116
Joint Safety Strategy Initiative

• LIST OF FOCUS AREAS
• Controlled Flight Into Terrain (CFIT)
• Approach and Landing
• Loss of Control
• Design related
• Runway Incursions
• Weather
• Occupant Safety and Survivability

117
Joint Safety Strategy Initiative

• IN ADDITION
• Future Hazards concept
• Voluntary Reporting Policy Statement
• Communication on Safety

118
Joint Safety Strategy Initiative
US CAST Input
Co-ordination, planning and follow-up of the
implementation
Recommendations
119
Joint Safety Strategy Initiative
2. Action Plans Team(APT)
120
Purpose of JSSI APT
Define workable Action Plans for the top two
safety issues 1. Controlled Flight Into
Terrain (CFIT) 2. Approach and Landing for
which JSSI provided INTERVENTIONS
121
JSSI Action Plans Team
JSSI INTERVENTIONS (meaning) Actions that
minimise the probability of occurrence of an
event and/or its consequences.
122
JSSI Action Plans Team

• Define WHAT should be done
• WHO are the interested parties
• WHO should implement
• Associated TIME SCALE for implementation

123
(No Transcript)
124
Controlled Flight Into Terrain(CFIT) Plans

• Terrain Avoidance Warning Systems (TAWS)
• Implementation
• ATC CFIT Training
• Precision-like Approach Implementation
• CRM Training
• Standard Operating Procedures (SOP)
• Minimum Safe Altitude Warning (MSAW)
• Airline Proactive Safety Programmes

125
Approach and Landing Accident Reduction (ALAR)
Plans

• Flight Crew Training
• Flight Deck equipment upgrade/installation
• Maintenance Procedures
• Aircraft design
• ALAR Safety Culture

126
Actions taken by EUROCONTROL (SRU SQS)

• JSSI CFIT report taken on board - a list of ATM
  related recommendations was prepared
• SRU/SQS co-ordination - actions decided
• WP 10.18 prepared for SRC/10
• Recommendations to SRC in WP 10.18 regarding
  safety regulatory position

127
Joint Safety Strategy Initiative
3. Runway Incursion
128
JSSI Runway Incursion

• Letter from JAA to launch a Joint Activity was
  sent to
• Group of Aerodrome Safety Regulators (GASR)
• Safety Regulation Commission (SRC)
• DSA/SQS
• ICAO EUROPE

129
JSSI Runway Incursion

• JAA prepared a document named Runway
  Incursions Possible Way Forward
• Purpose of the document
• Propose that runway incursions are included into
  the list of JSSI focus areas
• Propose a process to handle runway incursions
  issues

130
JSSI Runway Incursion
One definition for Runway Incursions is
proposed within the document Any occurrence
at an airport involving an a/c, vehicle, person
or object on the ground that creates a collision
hazard or result in a loss of separation with an
a/c taking off, intending to take off, landing or
intending to land
131
JSSI Runway Incursion
ESARR 2 definition for Runway Incursion where
(no) avoiding action was necessary Any
unauthorised presence on a runway of aircraft,
vehicle, person or object where an (no) avoiding
action was required to prevent a collision with
an aircraft
132
RWY Incursion Occurrences - Estimation

• London Heathrow
• 6.7x10-6 (98) 6.55x10-6 (99) / operation
• London Gatwick
• 1.6x10-6 (98) 3.1x10-6 (99) / operation
• Glasgow Airport
• 2.4x10-6 (98) 4.9x10-6 (99) / operation
• Schiphol Airport
• 6.6x10-6 (98) / movement
• Paris Charles de Gaulle
• 18.6x10-6 (98) / movement
• US 4.7x10-6 (99) - FAA Aviation Safety
  Statistical Handbook, Feb 2000, Vol. 8 no.2

133
Conclusions

• A failure condition with a probability of 10-6
  should have the following consequences
• Significant reduction in safety margins
• Difficulties for crew to cope with adverse
  conditions
• Passenger injuries.
• (AMJ 25-1309)

134
Conclusions
RWY Incursions can have catastrophic
consequences (hull loss, multiple fatalities)
although in Europe actual consequences are
classified as hazardous
135
Joint Safety Strategy Initiative
4. Future Aviation Safety Team(FAST)The
Future Hazards concept
136
FAST - Future Hazards

• Two complementary approaches used to develop the
  JSSI focused agenda
• Approach based on past accident analysis
• Future hazards approach based on an analysis of
  ongoing or future changes affecting the aviation
  system

137
FAST - Future Hazards

• JSSI established the
• Future Hazards Working Group (FHWG)
• To develop the future hazards concept, and
• To produce a methodology to identify and address
  future hazards.
• FHWG is now known as FAST

138
FAST - Future Hazards

• FAST is not going to provide immediate results
  or recommendations in the short term,
• FAST is not going to replace the data driven
  approach

139
FAST - Future Hazards
From changes...
.to Future Hazards
140
FAST - Future Hazards

• TO DEVELOP A METHODOLOGY
• Input
• Future changes and possible trends covering
  several aspects.
• Output
• Identification of future hazards
• Recommendations and interventions

141
FAST - Future Hazards

• TO USE THAT METHODOLOGY
• Providing a first set of identified future
  hazards

142
FAST - Future Hazards
WORK DONE SO FAR

• FAST has produced the basic steps of a generic
  methodology
• Only the first steps have been fully determined

143
FAST - Future Hazards
GENERIC METHODOLOGY

• Identify areas of change
• Prioritise and select areas of change
• Define methodology to determine and prioritise
  future hazards for each selected area of change
• Synthesis of future hazards from each area
• Validate, prioritise and select synthesised
  future hazards
• Develop, validate, prioritise and select
  intervention
• Propose actions
• Monitor the effect of intervention and iterate
  the process from the beginning

144
FAST - Future Hazards
WORK DONE SO FAR

• FAST has finalised a list of areas of change
• 145 specific changes
• Organised into 11 categories
• These Areas of Change are to be the inputs to be
  used in the methodology

145
FAST - Future Hazards
CURRENT WORK

• Prioritisation of already identified areas of
  change
• An expert group is working to prioritise the
  areas of change,

146
FAST - Future Hazards
CURRENT WORK

• The group uses the the Analytic Hierarchy Process
  (AHP)
• Decision making tool that considers subjective
  and objective factors
• Decomposes a problem into multiple bite size
  comparisons
• Permits each person to influence the decision
• It is based on matrix algebra

147
FAST - Future Hazards
FUTURE WORK

• To work on at least the Top Ten areas of change
  in the prioritised ranking
• Ensuring that interactions are analysed taking
  into account the 145 areas of change
• using expert panels
• need of a well balanced representation

148
FAST - Future Hazards
ATM Weight IN FAST

• EUROCONTROL representation (SRU)
• 1 out of 20 FAST Members
• 23 areas of change, out of 145, identified in the
  Air Navigation System category
• Current workshops to perform AHP
• 2 out of 30 participants, after presentation to
  the Agencys Safety Group

149
FAST - Future Hazards
CONCLUSIONS

• ATM involvement in next phases of the activity
  is going to become critical
• Within FAST, EUROCONTROL seems to be the only
  organisation with capacity to ensure that ATM is
  properly considered throughout the exercise

150
FAST - Future Hazards
CONCLUSIONS

• The success of the activity might be totally
  impossible without appropriate ATM involvement
• As part of our commitment with JSSI, the SRC
  should foster and support the ATM involvement in
  this activity

151
FAST - Future Hazards
CONTACT

• JAA - JSSI
• SRU
• juan.vazquez-sanz_at_eurocontrol.be

152
Agenda Item 12 - JAA Interface
Verbal report CNS/ATM Steering Group
153
Agenda Item 13 - Safety Oversight
WP SRC10.19 Safety Oversight
154
ICAO Universal Safety Oversight Programme-
IUSOAP

• Some proposed amendments to Annex 11 and 14
  related to SMS, setting safety targets and risk
  assessment of changes to the ANS system.
• Proposed extensions to Annex 11 and 14
  (possibly 13) to be decided in Autumn 2001
  (phased approach) at ICAO 33rd General
  Assembly
• Proposed audits of national authorities to start
  in 2002 (development of audit protocols in
  2001).

155
ECAC TASK FORCE on Safety Oversight Issues

• By March 2001 A paper to ECAC DGAC on how to
  address/react to results of current audits
• By June 2001 A paper to ECAC DGAC on
  expansions
• Participants ECAC States, JAA, EU,
  EUROCONTROL

156
ECAC TASK FORCE on Safety Oversight Issues

• SRU took an action to provide SOI/3 with the SRC
• views with regard to-
• the scope and schedule of the expansion of
  IUSOAP
• the feasibility of SRC member States
  contributing experts to the ICAO Safety
  Oversight Programme, at least when audits
• of ECAC States are concerned.
• SRU took an action to provide inputs to the
  phased implementation of the expansion along
  the implementation dates of related ESARR
  (mainly ESARR 3 and ESARR 4).

157
Proposal to SRC (3.1)-SYNERGY between ICAO SRC

• ESARRs (plus other SRC deliverables as required)
• as inputs to development of ICAO auditing
• protocols-
• consistency between ICAO and EUROCONTROL
  requirements and benchmarks
• enabling States to monitor national
  implementation of ESARRs in addition to
  ICAO Annexes
• SRC States as contributors of experts to the ICAO
  auditing teams in ECAC
• (of interest to ECAC SOI/TF)

158
Recommendations
SRC10 is invited to

• approve the proposal developed in section 3.1 of
  SRC 10.19
• if accepted, agrees that SRU takes all
  appropriate supporting actions and initiatives
• provides, by no later than February 23rd, views
  to be input by SRU when attending ICAO and ECAC
  meetings, on the scope and schedule of the
  IUSOAP. (plus specific response related to the
  contribution of national experts to ICAO
  audits).

159
Agenda Item 14 - Scope of SRC Activities

Verbal report Scope of SRC Activities (Gate to
Gate)
160
Agenda Item 15 - Web site Update

WP SRC10.20 Web site Update (New Developments
Status)
161
Monthly Breakdown visits
162
Daily Breakdown visits
163
Hourly Breakdown
164
Monthly Download Breakdown
165
Visit Duration Breakdown
166
Page View Breakdown
167
Most Requested Pages
168
Most Frequent Visitors (Hosts)
169
Most Popular Robot/Spiders
170
SRC site vis-à-vis ECNTL site(MB transferred)
171
SRC site vis-à-vis ECNTL site(no of pages viewed)
172
SRC site vis-à-vis ECNTL site(no of estimated
visits)
173
SRC site vis-à-vis ECNTL site(no of pages per
visit)
174
Recommendations

• SRC are invited to
• a) Note the content of the web-site statistics
• b)Send comments to SRU about the content of the
  SRC web-site by mid March 2001
• c)Encourage the marketing of SRC/SRU within
  States and at the international level
• d)Agree that the extensive use of
  Internet/Intranet, should continue as an
  essential central part of SRCs marketing
  strategy, allowing quick and relevant access to
  the SRC mission, work, terms of reference, and
  documentation

175
Agenda Item 16 - External Relations Policy
WP SRC10.21 External Relations Policy
176
Agenda Item 17 - Laser Operations
WP SRC10.14 Laser Operations
177
Agenda Item 18 -Any Other Business

Verbal report Locations of meetings
178
Agenda Item 19 -Next SRC Meetings

SRC11 29/30 May SRC12 25/26 September
(?)
179
SRC