Title: Biostatistics in Practice
 1Biostatistics in Practice
Session 6 Case Study
Peter D. Christenson Biostatistician http//gcrc
.humc.edu/Biostat 
 2Case Study
Hall S et al A comparative study of Carvedilol, 
 slow release Nifedipine, and Atenolol in the 
management of essential hypertension. J of 
Cardiovascular Pharmacology 199118(4)S35-38. Dat
a is available at the class website 
http//gcrc.humc.edu/Biostat Select Courses gt 
Biostatistics in Practice 2004 gt Session 6 gt 
Download Data 
 3Case Study Outline
Subjects randomized to one of 3 drugs for 
controlling hypertension A Carvedilol (new) 
 B Nifedipine (standard)  C Atenolol 
(standard) Blood pressure and HR measured at 
baseline and 5 post-treatment periods. Primary 
analysis ? The present study compares  A, B, 
and C for the management of  hypertension. 
 4Data Collected for Sitting dbp
 1 hour after 1st dose. We do not have data for 
this visit. 
 5Sitting dbp from Figure 2 of the Paper
Baseline
A Carvedilol B Nifedipine C Atenolol
A
B
2 Weeks
C 
 6Question 1
Describe dbp at baseline for the study 
population. Give an appropriate graphical 
display, and summarize dbp with just a few 
numbers. Is the mean appropriate? Would the 
median be better? Is a transformation necessary? 
 7Answer 1
N  255 Mean  102.68 SD  4.63 SEM  
0.29 Min  92 Max 117
Median  102. Log-transformation gives geometric 
mean  102.58. No transformation is necessary. 
Mean is best. 95 of subjects between  102.68  
2(4.63)  93.42 to 111.94 
 8Question 2
It appears that group B may have had lower dbp at 
baseline than group A, on the average. Is there 
evidence for this? Is the lower group B mean dbp 
lower (relative to A) than expected by 
chance? Write out a formal test for this 
question, and use software to perform the test. 
 9Answer 2, Part 1
 Drug Mean  SD A 102.9  4.8 
B 102.2  4.3 C 103.0  4.8
So, the mean for B is low, as in the earlier 
figure, but the overall distribution is similar 
to that for A and C, so this is entirely due to 
chance, but we will formally test B vs. A on the 
next slide. Would use ANOVA to include C. 
 10Answer 2, Part 2
We are formally testing, where µx represents the 
mean baseline dbp among those who eventually 
receive treatment x H0 µA  µB vs. HA µA ? 
µB Since µA  µB is estimated by 0.75 with a SE 
of 0.71 , tc  0.75/0.71  1.05 is not larger ( 
gt2) than expected by random fluctuation (p0.29), 
so there is not sufficient evidence that the A 
and B groups differed in their baseline dbp. Note 
that we do not expect A and B to differ at 
baseline due to the randomization in the study 
design. 
 11Question 3
How much can a patients dbp be expected to be 
lowered after 2 weeks of therapy with A? We are 
95 sure that this lowering will be between what 
two values? Repeat for drug C. Do the intervals 
for A and for C overlap considerably? Can this 
overlapping be used to compare A and C in their 
dbp lowering ability? 
 12Answer 3
How much can a patients dbp be expected to be 
lowered after 2 weeks of therapy with A? with 
C? We are 95 sure that this lowering will be 
between what two values? Ans Drug Estimated 
? 95 Prediction Interval A 8.13 8.13 
 29.1  -10.1 to 26.3 C 11.5 11.5  28.7 
 - 5.9 to 28.9 The intervals for A and for C 
do overlap considerably. However, to compare A 
and C, we need to examine not these expected 
intervals for individuals, but rather the 
precision of ?C  ?A estimated from this study, 
which incorporates the Ns. 
 13Question 4
Is there evidence that A and C differ in their 
dbp lowering ability at 2 weeks 
post-therapy? Formally test for this. Give a 95 
confidence interval for the C-A difference in 
change in dbp after 2 weeks. 
 14Answer 4
Is there evidence that A and C differ in their 
dbp lowering ability at 2 weeks 
post-therapy? Ans Test H0 ?A-?C  0 vs. 
HA ?A-?C ? 0 with t-test Estimate ?A-?C with 
3.39, with SE of 1.36. Since tc  3.39/1.36  
2.50 exceeds 2, choose HA. 95 CI for ?A-?C is 
3.3921.36  0.67 to 6.11, which does not 
include 0, so choose HA. 
 15Question 5
Is there evidence that B and A differ in their 
dbp lowering ability at 2 weeks post-therapy? We 
want to examine whether the study was large 
enough to detect a difference in 2 week changes 
in dbp between B and A. To do so, we need the SD 
of these changes among subjects receiving B and 
among subjects receiving A. Find these SDs. 
 16Answer 5
Is there evidence that B and C differ in their 
dbp lowering ability at 2 weeks 
post-therapy? Ans Test H0 ?B-?A  0 vs. 
HA ?B-?A ? 0 with t-test Estimate ?B-?A with 
0.96, with SE of 1.35. Since tc  0.96/1.35  
0.71 lt 2, choose H0 (p0.48). SD for B is 8.29 
and SD for A is 9.08. 
 17Question 6
- Estimate the true minimal difference in 2 week 
 changes in dbp between B and C that this study
 was able to detect.
- Use the conventional risks of making incorrect 
 conclusions that the FDA typically requires.
- Set both risks of an incorrect conclusion at 5. 
18Typical Statistical Power Software 
 19Answer 6
- Use the conventional risks of making incorrect 
 conclusions that the FDA typically requires.
-  
-  Use a0.05, power0.80, NA83, NB82, SDA9.08, 
 SDB8.29. Find ? from a power calculation to be
 3.8.
- Set both risks of an incorrect conclusion at 5. 
-  Use a0.05, power0.95, NA83, NB82, SDA9.08, 
 SDB8.29. Find ? from a power calculation to be
 4.9.
20Question 7
Suppose that differences in 2 week changes in dbp 
between B and C of lt2 mmHg is clinically 
irrelevant, but we would like to detect larger 
differences with 80 certainty. How large should 
such a study be? 
 21Answer 7
Suppose that differences in 2 week changes in dbp 
between B and C of lt2 mmHg is clinically 
irrelevant, but we would like to detect larger 
differences with 80 certainty. How large should 
such a study be? Ans Use a0.05, power0.80, 
SDA9.08, SDB8.29, ?2. From a power calculation 
, NA  NB  297.