Title: Distributed Loss Compensation for Low-latency On-chip Interconnects
1Distributed Loss Compensation for Low-latency
On-chip Interconnects
- Class Presentation For
- Advanced VLSI Design Course
- Instructor Dr.Fakhraie
- Presented By Fahimeh Alsadat Hoseini
- Winter 2006
- University of Tehran
- Dept. Electrical and Computer Enginerring
Major Reference ISSCC 2006 / SESSION 21 /
ADVANCED CLOCKING, LOGIC AND SIGNALING TECHNIQUES
/ 21.7
2Outline
- Scaling trends and motivation
- Prior work on low-latency repeater-less links by
exploiting transmission-line behavior - Negative-impedance converter (NIC)
- System architecture
- Transmitter design
- Receiver design
- Measurement results
- Summary and conclusions
- References
3Scaling Trends - ITRS Roadmap
- On-chip wire delay scaling more slowly than gate
delay. - Impact of scaling is worst on global wiring.
Jose et al., ISSCC, 2006.
4Motivation
- Wire delays (D) grow quadratically with wire
length, - - Unacceptably great for long wires.
- - Wire bandwidths,which are inversely
proportional to D, degrade. - Latency is controlled with repeater insertion
which allows linear scaling of delay with length. - Break long wires into N shorter segments
- Drive each one with an inverter or buffer
- Optimal number of repeaters can be determined to
minimize delay - Repeaters, often inserted with CAD tools, consume
a significant fraction of on-chip power and area
in microprocessors.
5Outline
- Scaling trends and motivation
- Prior work on low-latency repeater-less links by
exploiting transmission-line behavior - Negative-impedance converter (NIC)
- System architecture
- Transmitter design
- Receiver design
- Measurement results
- Summary and conclusions
- References
6Nearly speed-of-light wires
- The time-domain solution is
- In this case, A is a constant. Gamma, the
propagation constant, provides information about
the characteristics of this line. The imaginary
part of gamma, denoted by beta, is inversely
related to the phase velocity, and the real part
of gamma, denoted by alpha, is the attenuation
constant.
R. Chang ,Thesis, 2002.
7Nearly speed-of-light wires
RC region
LC dominated region
R. Chang ,Thesis, 2002.
8Nearly speed-of-light wires
- Take advantage of the inductance-dominated
high-frequency regime of on-chip interconnects - Peak phase velocity is speed of light in SiO2
- Reduce low-frequency spectral components of the
signal which introduce ISI and lag LC dominated
response
Chang et al., JSSC, 2003.
9Outline
- Scaling trends and motivation
- Prior work on low-latency repeater-less links by
exploiting transmission-line behavior - Negative-impedance converter (NIC)
- System architecture
- Transmitter design
- Receiver design
- Measurement results
- Summary and conclusions
- References
10Distributed Loss Compensation
- Used in long-distance telephone network before
the introduction of optics for long-haul
communications - Clock distribution networks
- Standing wave oscillators, O Mahony et al.,
JSSC 2003 - Rotary traveling-wave oscillator arrays, Wood et
al., JSSC 2001 - Distributed amplifiers use similar ideas to
extend the unity-gain bandwidth
11Negative Impedance Converter
- Pole -gm/(2C) zero 1/(2RC)
- Match frequency-dependent loss characteristics
Jose et al., ISSCC, 2006.
12NIC Attenuation Compensation - ?
Without NICs
With NICs
Increasing R, C50 fF
Increasing R, C600 fF
- A larger cap C increases the amount of loss
compensation at higher frequencies - Negative ? leads to instability which can lead
to excessive ringing or oscillations
Jose et al., ISSCC, 2006.
13Latency Comparison
Optimally buffered link
Length14mm
Latency (ps)
NIC Link
Width (µm)
- NIC links have lower latencies at higher widths
due to transmission-line behavior of
interconnects for widths gt 2 µm - For very small widths (large R), the interconnect
is predominantly in the RC domain
Jose et al., ISSCC, 2006.
14Power Comparison
Length14mm
Optimally buffered link
Energy (pJ/bit)
NIC Attenuation Compensation - ?
NIC Link
Width (µm)
- Power consumed increases rapidly for widths lt 4µm
due to the large number of NIC elements required - Increasing bit energy in the optimally repeated
case is due to large number of repeaters needed
to drive the additional C
Jose et al., ISSCC, 2006.
15Outline
- Scaling trends and motivation
- Prior work on low-latency repeater-less links by
exploiting transmission-line behavior - Negative-impedance converter (NIC)
- System architecture
- Transmitter design
- Receiver design
- Measurement results
- Summary and conclusions
- References
16Test-Chip Components
Serpentine serial link
LFSR
SRAM
Driver
1.67mm
Receiver
SRAM
PLL
Error Counter
5mm
- 3-Gbps link in 0.18-µm technology with a 1.5-GHz
system clock - 17-bit LFSR for generating PRBS and an error
counter for obtaining BER - Far-end and near-end waveforms obtained by
pico-probing
Jose et al., ISSCC, 2006.
17System Architecture
Data Bandwidth 2 / clock period bits/sec
Clock period 1.5 GHz
Jose et al., ISSCC, 2006.
18Transmitter Design
- Driver consists of M1-2 and termination resistor
RT - Predrivers use pseudo-nmos logic
- Id sets the bias point of the NICs
Jose et al., ISSCC, 2006.
19Receiver Design
70 mV far-end swing
- Modified StrongARM latch
- Low-swing differential receiver
- Small aperture time for high data-rate
- Line termination
- N-well resistor with value of 2Zo
- Excessive capacitive loading at receiver inputs
can introduce ISI
Calibration Caps
Jose et al., ISSCC, 2006.
20Receiver Sampling-point Calibration
- Calibration is performed at the receiver end
- Clock skew compensation between transmitter and
receiver - Link latency compensation
Jose et al., ISSCC, 2006.
21Outline
- Scaling trends and motivation
- Prior work on low-latency repeater-less links by
exploiting transmission-line behavior - Negative-impedance converter (NIC)
- System architecture
- Transmitter design
- Receiver design
- Measurement results
- Summary and conclusions
- References
22Measurement Results - ?
- ? obtained from measured S-parameters
- The NICs cause noticeable bandwidth reduction at
frequencies beyond 9 GHz - The NICs contribute towards a significant
reduction in ? from 50 MHz to 7 GHz
Jose et al., ISSCC, 2006.
23Measurement Results - ?
- ? obtained from measured S-parameters
- Phase velocity decreases (? increases) at high
frequencies
Jose et al., ISSCC, 2006.
24Outline
- Prior work on low-latency repeater-less links by
exploiting transmission-line behavior - Negative-impedance converter (NIC)
- System architecture
- Transmitter design
- Receiver design
- Measurement results
- Summary and conclusions
- References
25Summary
Distributed loss compensation (DDR)
Optimally repeated link (DDR)
Optimally repeated link (DDR)
Throughput 3 Gbps 3 Gbps 3 Gbps
Clock frequency 1.5 GHz 1.5 GHz 1.5 GHz
Width/ Length 8 µm / 14 mm 0.3 µm / 14 mm 8 µm / 14 mm
Link-latency 12.1 ps/mm 55 ps/mm 18.6 ps/mm
Number of NICs/repeaters 7 18 5
Power consumed 0.16 pJ/bit/mm 0.17 pJ/bit/mm 0.5 pJ/bit/mm
Jose et al., ISSCC, 2006.
26Conclusions
- As technology scales, on-chip latencies are
increasingly becoming a bottleneck for on-chip
performance - Optimally repeated RC delays represent latencies
that are as much as 3 X those determined by the
speed of light in SiO2 - Repeaters consume a growing fraction of power and
silicon area - Using distributed loss compensation with NICs
leads to arbitrarily long links with a
significant latency and energy/bit/mm advantage
over optimally repeated RC links
27References
- A. P. Jose and K. L. Shepard, Distributed Loss
Compensation for Low-latency On-chip
Interconnects, IEEE International Solid-State
Circuits Conference, 2006. - A. P. Jose, G. Patounakis and K. L. Shepard,
Near Speed-of-light Onchip Interconnects using
Pulsed Current-mode Signaling, Symp. VLSI
Circuits, June, 2005. - R. T. Chang, et al, Near speed-of-light
signaling over on-chip electrical interconnects,
IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits, vol. 38, no. 5,
May, 2003. - R. Chang , Near Speed-of-Light On-Chip
Electrical Interconnects, - A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE DEPARTMENT
OF ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING AND THE COMMITTEE ON
GRADUATE STUDIES OF STANFORD UNIVERSITY IN
PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE
DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY, November 2002.