Relevant activities in EMEP - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 30
About This Presentation
Title:

Relevant activities in EMEP

Description:

... to find national resources, most problems in Eastern Europe ... Data checking and validation -e.g calculate ion balance and time trends. Flagging data ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:22
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 31
Provided by: wench5
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Relevant activities in EMEP


1
Relevant activities in EMEP
  • EMEP Monitoring programme
  • Expansion to the EECCA region, HTAP
  • QA/QC

Wenche Aas EMEP/CCC (NILU)
2
Monitoring programme/strategy
  • Level 1
  • Main ions in precipitation and in air
  • heavy metals in precipitations
  • ozone
  • PM10 and PM2.5 mass
  • meteorology
  • at ca 125 sites
  • Level 2, supersite (joint EMEP/GAW)
  • POPs
  • Heavy metals in air and aerosols
  • VOC
  • EC/OC, OC speciation
  • Mineral Dust
  • PM speciation incl. gas particle ratio
  • all level 1 activities
  • 15-20 sites

Both levels are mandatory by all Parties
3
Challenges to implement the strategy
  • Level 1
  • Some Parties have difficulties to find national
    resources, most problems in Eastern Europe
  • Many sites lack a few parameters to get a
    complete measurement program of level 1
  • Level 2
  • POPs and Hg monitoring receives little attention
  • VOC receives little attention (but EU directive
    addressing PAHs offers assistance)
  • Full chemical speciation of particles is
    difficult. Its costly, and there are problems to
    harmonise methodology (i.e for EC/OC)

4
Intercontinental transport of Hg
Total annual Hg deposition in the Northern
Hemisphere
POPs and O3 are also important topics in HTAP
5
HTAP
  • Current integration initiatives
  • WMO-GAW SACs and WCCs
  • EECCA region, monitoring capacity
  • Capacity building and improvement in
    infrastructures
  • Field data resources meta data compilation
    (ACCENT)
  • Quality assurance documentation archive (ACCENT)
  • Initiatives towards data flow harmonisation
  • Harmonisation of monitoring strategies should be
    considered

6
New EMEP sites in the EECCA region
EECCA East Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia
Support from CAPACT http//www.unece.org/ie/capac
t Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs
KZ Borovoye
MD Leovo
GE Abastumani
AR Amberd
7
CAPACT project (2004 2007)
Capacity Building for Air Quality Management and
the Application of clean Coal Combustion
Technologies in Central Asia
  • Objective
  • The project will address the technological gaps
    and raise awareness of air quality management
    within the institutions in Central Asia.
    (Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan
    and Uzbekistan)
  • Improved policies for air quality management
    (emission, monitoring, reporting etc).
  • Investments in technologies for cleaner
    combustion of coal.
  • Improved national energy policies.

http//www.unece.org/ie/capact/
8
Expectations, EECCA countries
  • A very important region with very little
    monitoring today
  • High emissions
  • Strategic area for hemispheric transport issues
  • Links EMEP and EANET
  • Expected that most countries will sign the EMEP
    protocol soon.
  • Need to establish EMEP level 1 sites in each
    country.
  • Support can be found, i.e. from foreign aid
    money, EU, UNECE.
  • Training and capacity building is necessary.

9
WMO
ICP
10
Why QA/QC is vital
  • Comparable measurements needed to make regional
    and global assessments
  • Need methods that are easy to use, cheap and long
    lasting for trend analysis (changing methodology
    may affect the trend
  • A harmonisation of methodology has been developed
    during the last 30 years and are still developing

11
QA activities in EMEP
  • Site characterization
  • Documentation of methods and material
  • -detection limits, precision, accuracy,
  • -instructions for maintenance and calibration
  • Manual and standard operating procedures (SOPs)
  • Lab intercalibration
  • Co-located experiments (field comparison)
  • Training courses
  • Data checking and validation
  • -e.g calculate ion balance and time trends
  • Flagging data

12
Necessary national QA/QC activities
  • Proper siting for representative measurements
  • Use recommended field and lab methods
  • Follow QA/QC procedures in field and lab
  • Evaluate the data and flag or delete biased or
    erroneous data
  • Report data in proper format and meta data
  • information of methods
  • detection limits
  • Precisions
  • siting information

13
Plotting time trends
Plotting annual dataset
Plotting ion balance
14
All EANET sites is also included
http//www.nilu.no/trajectories/
15
Field inter-comparisons, SO4 in air
Estonia
Spain
16
Comparison of SO2 measurements (filterpack vs.
TCM) in Germany
Schauinsland (DE03)
Zingst (DE09)
17
Summary of co-located SO2 measurements
18
Measurement and model intercomparison
??
ES
NO
19
Lab intercomparisons annually
20
QA flags based on lab and field intercomp.
21
Intercomparison between networks
CAPMon / EMEP -2007
  • EANET / EMEP 2006
  • Global intercomparison
  • lab WMO GAW PC
  • Field nothing

22
Field intercomparisons, EMEP -EANET
NO3
SO4
NH4
Na
23
Summary
  • Global and hemispheric issues are more and more
    important
  • Lack of sites and measurements in several parts
    of the world
  • Need for further harmonisation of methods
  • QA/QC activities across the different regional
    networks are necessary
  • Initiative within the EU project ACCENT for a
    common meeting this autumn/winter

24
Passive sampler and low cost denuder to be used
in monitoring
Wenche Aas EMEP/CCC (NILU)
25
Passive samplers
  • Advantages
  • Excellent for high spatial resolution
  • Representativity studies
  • Inexpensive
  • Easy to use, and high flexibility
  • No need for electricity nor a real station /site
  • Long term exposure E.g cumulative uptake of
    ozone to forest
  • Disadvantages
  • Inaccurate compared to active sampler
  • Long sampling time (episodes not detected)
  • Should be checked against active sampler

26
Passive samplers can be an alternative method in
some cases
  • SO2 will be better taken from filterpack
  • NH3 and HNO3 is good supplements to filterpack
    to correct for gas/particle distribution low
    cost denuder even bettre alternative
  • Depending on purpose of monitoring
  • NO2 and O3 may be replace active sampler
  • But for health warnings and assessment hourly
    data are needed
  • POPs good alternative for spatial assessment

From IVL, Sweden
27
POP passive sampler campaign
  • Objectives
  • To gain new insight into the spatial patterns
  • consistent sampling and analytical methodologies
  • passive air samplers as a complementary
    measurements
  • supporting model validation

Selected POPs PAHs PCBs, HCHs, HCB, New POPs
(PBDEs)
28
Passive samplers for POP
  • samplers developed that provide weekly, monthly
    or yearly time integrated air conc.

Polyethylene
PUF
29
Accuracy
  • Passive samplers and active samplers deployed at
    the same site/duration
  • Within a factor of 2 for various PAHs
  • Including higher molecular weight compounds
    associated with particles

30
Nitrogen deposition
  • NOx dry deposition relatively small
  • NH3 and HNO3 dry dep is important and it
    necessary to study the gas particle distribution
    between NO3 vs HNO3 and NH3 and NH3. Vd between
    gas an particle is very different
  • Filterpack method can be biased due to NH3NO3
    evaporation from aerosol filet and/or HNO3 NH3
    deposition on humid aerosol filter
  • Low cost denuder measurements is a good
    supplement/alternative 1 month measurements
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com