Title: Transition of Inpatient Hospital Review Workload
1Transition of Inpatient Hospital Review Workload
An Overview of Changes to the Review of Acute
Inpatient Prospective Payment System (IPPS)
Hospital and Long Term Care Hospital (LTCH)
Claims
- Office of Financial Management
- Program Integrity Group
- Date June 2008
Also includes claims from any hospital that
would be subject to the IPPS or LTCH PPSÂ had it
not been granted a waiver
2Outline
- The Old Environment
- The New Environment
- Roles under the New Environment
- Why the Change?
- When will the Transition occur?
- What will be Different?
- What will be the Same?
3Acute IPPS Hospital and LTCH Claim Review The
Old Environment
- In the past, QIO1 responsibility included
- Hospital Payment Monitoring Program (HPMP)
reviews - Conducting utilization reviews for payment
purposes - Measurement of the accuracy of Medicare FFS
payments for short- and long-term acute care
hospitals - Quality of care reviews to ensure that care
provided to Medicare beneficiaries meets
professionally recognized standards of healthcare - Performance of provider-requested higher-weighted
DRG reviews - Review of Emergency Medical Treatment Active
Labor Act (EMTALA) cases - Performance of Expedited Determinations
- Medicare Part A claims processing contractors,
called FIs2 and MACs3 had no acute care inpatient
hospital claim review responsibility - CERT4 program had no acute care inpatient
hospital claims improper payment measurement
responsibility
1 Quality Improvement Organizations 2
Fiscal Intermediaries 3 Medicare
Administrative Contractors 4 Comprehensive
Error Rate Testing
4Acute IPPS Hospital and LTCH Claim Review The
New Environment
- QIOs will focus their efforts on quality
improvement and continue to perform quality
reviews, certain utilization reviews, such as,
provider-requested higher-weighted DRG and EMTALA
reviews, and expedited determinations.5 - FIs and MACs will perform most utilization
reviews of acute care inpatient hospital claims - CERT will measure the inpatient hospital paid
claims error rate
5 The QIO 9th Statement of Work provides a full
listing of activities and is available at
http//www.cms.hhs.gov/QualityIMprovementOrgs/04_9
thsow.asp
5Acute IPPS Hospital and LTCH Claim ReviewWhy
the Change?
- CMS initiated the change in response to
recommendations by OIG6 - and the Institute of Medicine7
- There are 3 primary benefits to the transition
- Consistency
- Acute long- and short-term hospitals have been
the only Medicare Fee For Service (FFS) settings
not reviewed by FIs and MACs - These hospitals have been the only settings not
included in the CERT error rate measurement - Efficiency
- The entities that process claims will be
responsible for preventing improper payments - We anticipate the new strategy will be more cost
effective since fewer contractors will be
conducting the non-quality reviews - Mitigation of the Perception of a Potential
Conflict of Interest - There is the perception of a potential conflict
of interest created by having the QIOs measure
the payment error rate for claims on which they
themselves made payment determinations. - The transition will enable QIOs to focus efforts
on quality improvement and maintenance.
6 Office of Inspector General Report Oversight
and Evaluation of the Fiscal Year 2005
Comprehensive Error Rate Testing Program
(A-03-05-00006) (http//oig.hhs.gov/oas/reports/r
egion3/30500006.pdf) 7 Institute of Medicine
Report Medicares Quality Improvement
Organization Program, Maximizing Potential
(http//www.iom.edu/CMS/3809/19805/33411.aspx)
6Acute Care Inpatient Hospital Claim ReviewWhen
will the transition occur?
- CERT began reviewing acute care hospital claims
for improper payment measurement in April 2008 - This corresponds with the beginning of the
November 2009 Medicare FFS Improper payment
report period. - CERT will review claims submitted April 1, 2008
forward - We anticipate FIs and MACs will begin performing
reviews on acute care inpatient hospital claims
for improper payment prevention/reduction in the
Summer 2008 - FIs and MACs would be allowed to review claims
submitted January 1, 2008 forward.
7Acute IPPS Hospital and LTCH Claim Review How
will reviews be different?
Because of varying statutory requirements, the
FI/MAC, CERT, and QIO review procedures differ.
The review procedures for acute inpatient
hospital claims will be consistent with the
procedures used by FIs/MACs and CERT for review
of outpatient hospital claims and all other
Medicare FFS claims.
- Claim Selection
- After the first phase of review, FIs/MACs will
perform targeted medical review, based on data
analysis, not random review like QIOs have done. - During the first phase, FIs/MACs will have the
option to perform targeted or random medical
review. - FIs/MACs can perform medical review on a
prepayment OR postpayment basis, unlike QIOs who
only performed postpayment review - CERT performs random reviews and utilizes
different sampling, review, and calculation
methodologies than those used by the QIOs to
establish and report an error rate. Because of
the difference in approach, CERT error rates will
not be comparable to previous QIO-calculated
error rates.
8Acute IPPS Hospital and LTCH Claim Review How
will reviews be different? (cont)
- Medical Record Requests
- The CERT Documentation Contractor will notify
providers that claims have been selected for CERT
review via letter or telephone contact. - The medical record request letter will be mailed
or faxed according to the hospitals preference - Hospitals may submit medical records via mail or
fax. The CERT Documentation Contractor also
accepts CDs with imaged medical records. - The FIs and MACs will send an automated letter or
provide instructions for how to access FISS (the
claims processing system) for Additional
Documentation Requests (ADRs). Providers may use
the claim inquiry screen in Direct Data Entry
(DDE) to verify the status of claims suspended
for medical review, as they currently do for
outpatient claims and other types of claims. - Hospitals submit hardcopy medical records via
mail
9Acute IPPS Hospital and LTCH Claim ReviewHow
will Reviews be Different? (cont)
- Physician Involvement in Reviews
- As with any claim reviewed by FIs/MACs or CERT,
physicians will be utilized in acute inpatient
hospital claim review to the extent that it is
necessary. Qualified clinicians, such as nurses
and therapists, will perform the reviews,
consulting with physicians or other specialists
as needed. - Reimbursement for Photocopy Costs
- Neither CERT nor the FIs/MACs reimburse for
photocopying expenses for medical record
requested from any setting. - Appeals
- Appeals of claim denials will occur after the
payment denial is issued. Like all other
Medicare claims, providers and beneficiaries will
have appeal rights.
10Acute IPPS Hospital and LTCH Claim ReviewWhat
will Remain the Same?
- Review Criteria
- The coverage and payment guidelines used by
FIs/MACs and CERT will be the same as used in the
past by QIOs. - Like the QIOs, FIs/MACs will adhere to CMS
national policy and contractor local coverage
determinations (LCDs) in making payment
decisions. - FI/MAC reviewers will utilize clinical judgment
in making payment determinations, as the QIOs
did. - Use of Screening Tool
- We anticipate that FIs/MACs and the CERT
contractor will continue to use a screening tool
for claims review, before making a determination
on an individual claim basis. Like QIOs,
FIs/MACs will not be required to use a specific
tool.
11Acute IPPS Hospital and LTCH Claim Review
Comparison At a Glance
12Acute IPPS Hospital and LTCH Claim Review Roles
of Review Entities in the New Environment
13Information About the CERT Program and FI/MAC
Review Process
- CERT Fact Sheet www.cms.hhs.gov/MLNProducts/downl
oads/certfactsheetv1-3.pdf - Medicare FFS Improper Payment reports
www.cms.hhs.gov/CERT - CERT Documentation Contractor website
www.certprovider.org
- Medical Review Fact Sheet (being revised)
www.cms.hhs.gov/MedicalReviewProcess/Downloads/mrf
actsheet.pdf - Program Integrity Manual Publication 100-08
http//www.cms.hhs.gov/Manuals/IOM/list.asp
14Questions?