Not robbing Peter to pay Paul... - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Not robbing Peter to pay Paul...

Description:

Institutional-focus user-focus. Wasted money economies of scale. Short-term sustainability ... framework at programme level. Promote shared development ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:17
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 28
Provided by: mrssusiw
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Not robbing Peter to pay Paul...


1
Not robbing Peter to pay Paul...
  • Interoperability and the content funding
    landscape
  • Susi Woodhouse
  • Senior Network Adviser
  • Resource the Council for Museums, Archives and
    Libraries

Interoperability at the coal-face, November 2000
2
Agenda
  • Map making
  • Challenges and opportunities
  • Ways forward

3
Government agenda
  • Re-skilling, employability
  • Educational opportunities
  • Learning for life
  • Social inclusion
  • Universal access
  • Economic development (e-business)
  • Knowledge economy
  • e-gvt the 2005 target

4
Content landscape
Peoples Network
CGfLs
UK Online
NGfL
Home Countries
Regional Broadbands
English Regions
NOF
NLN
UfI
DNER
NeLH
Commercial
Broad- casting
..and the rest
Culture Online
5
Some of the funding streams.
  • Capital Modernisation Fund
  • Invest to Save Budget
  • Lottery programmes NOF/HLF
  • DfEE Standards Fund
  • DCMS challenge funds
  • Higher Education Funding Councils JISC/RSLP
  • BL CPP
  • Commercial partners
  • Europe...

6
  • Integrate to interoperate...

7
The world of Cyberspace
services
Funding streams
services
content
Funding streams
services
Funding streams
Content
Funding streams
The user community
8
The world of Cyberspace
services
services
content
content
Strategic alliances
Funding streams
Content
Funding streams
Funding streams
Funding streams
Funding streams
The user community
9
Strategic interoperability
  • Separate silos joined-up working
  • Competitive attitudes co-operative
    developments
  • Single agendas shared purpose
  • Duplicated effort best use of resources
  • Institutional-focus user-focus
  • Wasted money economies of scale
  • Short-term sustainability
  • .accessibility.

10
Value of the managed programme
  • Everyone wins
  • Addresses Government agenda
  • Output-focused
  • Has strategic impact
  • Demonstrates added value
  • Achieves additionality
  • Ensures coherence
  • Is sustainable

11
  • Nof-digitise as an example
  • www.nof.org.uk

12
A vision for digi
  • To offer new opportunities to improve the quality
    of life for all citizens through the imaginative
    and innovative use of Internet and digital
    technologies to create a coherent body of content
    that will unlock the rich resources of our
    knowledge organisations to support learning for
    life.

13
The context for digi
  • the Government agenda...
  • the whole content landscape

14
The nature of the beast
  • A true New Opportunity
  • Unprecedented scale and scope
  • Whole continuum of experience
  • A green field site
  • A ground-breaking experiment
  • Map-making for the broader cultural sector
  • Creating digital content for self-directed and
    informal learningNOT just digital soup
  • Showcase potential

15
Story so far
  • 343 bids _at_ Stage One
  • 143 million in total (for 50 million fund)
  • 239 invited forward to Stage Two
  • 40 proposed consortia
  • Funding on stream from summer 2001

16
Basic assumptions _at_ Stage Two
  • Not a competitive approach
  • Output-based
  • Partnership based
  • Technical consistency
  • Themed-approach
  • Maximum accessibility

17
Critical success factors For Stage Two
  • Realisation of diversity of resources
  • Demonstrate excellence and best practice
  • Coherent approach
  • Value for money
  • cost efficiency
  • minimise duplication
  • economies of scale

18
Themed Bid approach
  • Six reasons (at least)
  • Partnership focus
  • Natural synergies
  • Encourages innovation and imagination
  • Resource -efficient development
  • Coherent, cohesive output
  • Improved sustainability

19
Synergies
  • Building a framework at programme level
  • Promote shared development
  • Permutations/combinations
  • Of theme
  • Of place
  • Of materials
  • Of output

20
Levels of integration creating opportunities
  • A flexible approach
  • NOT a straitjacket
  • Innovation, imagination, initiative
  • Outward-facing, learner-focus
  • Unexpected links
  • Lateral thinking

21
Integrated whole
Lead partner manages all
Lead Partner
Partner A
Partner B
Partner C
22
Partial integration
Lead partner co-ordinates overall. Others take
on selected roles
Lead Partner
Digitisation Partner
Publicity Partner
Web design Partner
23
Informal collaboration
Partners largely independent lead has overall
co-ordination role
A
B
Lead
C
D
24
Stand alone
Applicants work on stand-alone bids but recognise
overall theme
25
Programme support
  • NOF/Resource/UKOLN partnership
  • general support Peoples Network website
  • technical support UKOLN website
  • FAQs
  • Issue papers
  • Worked examples
  • Programme materials
  • Technical standards
  • e-mail discussion list
  • workshops
  • evaluation

26
The way forward
  • Strategic alliances and interoperability
  • Create a new sense of community for new
    communities
  • Remove barriers
  • Push out the envelope of debate
  • Help develop new economic models
  • Encourage shared development frameworks and the
    adoption of a managed environment

27
Outcomes...
  • Celebration of UK culture, creativity and
    communities
  • Interoperable building blocks for the networked
    learning space
  • Confident advocates forconfident communities
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com