Saravanan%20Govindan - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Saravanan%20Govindan

Description:

Local-MAC and split-MAC designs to work together ... Configuration Consistency (Mandatory) Regular exchange of WTP configuration information ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:25
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 14
Provided by: Saravanan
Learn more at: https://www.ietf.org
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Saravanan%20Govindan


1
CAPWAP Objectives
  • Saravanan Govindan
  • March 2005
  • ltdraft-ietf-capwap-objectives-00.txtgt

2
Background
  • WG draft
  • Combines objectives from individual submissions
  • Includes inputs from IETF 61 discussions
  • Structure from CAPWAP charter
  • Prioritization of Objectives
  • Mandatory Accepted, Desirable, Rejected
  • Classification
  • Architecture, Operations, Security, Operator
    requirements

3
Architecture Objectives (1/2)
  • Logical Groups (Mandatory)
  • Logical divisions of physical WTP
  • Protocol used to manage WLAN in terms of logical
    groups
  • Support for Future Wireless Technologies
    (Desirable)
  • Protocol messages to be extensible for different
    layer 2 wireless technologies
  • Support for New IEEE Extensions (Desirable)
  • Accommodate definitions by IEEE groups
  • e.g. APF AHC

4
Architecture Objectives (2/2)
  • Interoperability Objective
  • Local-MAC and split-MAC designs to work together
  • Protocol involves negotiations to determine
    appropriate split
  • Interconnection Objective
  • Protocol operations to be independent of
    underlying transport technology
  • Multiple Authentication Mechanisms (Desirable)
  • IEEE 802.11i support
  • Support for other mechanisms e.g. web
    authentication

5
Operational Objectives (1/3)
  • Support for Traffic Separation (Mandatory)
  • User data and control traffic are mutually
    separated
  • Simplifies protocol operation
  • Device Transparency (Mandatory)
  • CAPWAP protocol between AC and WTPs
  • Does not affect wireless terminals
  • Configuration Consistency (Mandatory)
  • Regular exchange of WTP configuration information
  • e.g. WTP load, operational state
  • Firmware Distribution

6
Operational Objectives (2/3)
  • System-wide Resource State (Mandatory)
  • Exchange of network state information switching
    segment wireless medium segment
  • e.g. congestion, interference levels
  • Resource Control (Mandatory)
  • Protocol to maintain IEEE 802.11e QoS mapping
    across switching and wireless medium segments
  • IEEE 802.11i Considerations
  • Authenticator and encryption points distinctly
    located
  • Key distribution among them (Mandatory)

7
Operational Objectives (3/3)
  • STA Admission Control
  • Access control needs to be based on both
    switching and wireless medium segments
  • e.g. control based on congestion and radio
    interference
  • Trust Model Definition
  • Considerations for separation of authenticator
    and encryption locations
  • Security Borderline Control (Desirable)
  • Mutual security between logical groups
  • Centralized WTP Management (Rejected)
  • Protocol to be provisioned for WTPs not managed
    by AC

8
Security Objectives
  • CAPWAP Protocol Security (Mandatory)
  • Mutual authentication
  • Secure exchanges between AC and WTPs
  • System-wide Security (Mandatory)
  • Prevention against outside threats
  • e.g. rouge wireless terminals PMK sharing

9
Discussions so far (1/3)
  • Future Wireless Technologies
  • Protocol messages need to be extensible for other
    (non-IEEE 802.11) layer 2 technologies
  • CAPWAP Protocol Security
  • Key establishment protocol to be secured
    against possible post-establishment compromises
  • Transport Layer Independence
  • CAPWAP operations to be independent of IP
    versions
  • Protocol to operate over intermediate networks
  • With possibly many hops
  • Possibly under administrations

10
Discussions so far (2/3)
  • Interoperability Objective
  • Managing different split-MAC local-MAC
    variations
  • Protocol can provide simple capabilities exchange
  • AC can then decide if variations can/will be
    supported
  • Traffic Separation
  • Control traffic not to be combined with data
    traffic
  • Resource Control
  • QoS mapping for IEEE 802.11e and other IEEE TG
    semantics (TGk, TGu, TGv)

11
Discussions so far (3/3)
  • Statistics
  • Protocol to allow exchange of various statistics
    information WTP load, loss rates etc.
  • Device Transparency
  • Protocol to be transparent to wireless devices
    instead of users

12
Next Steps
  • Discuss objectives further
  • Categorization
  • Consider any additional objectives
  • Finalize requirements and gain consensus

13
  • Questions?
  • Comments?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com