Future prospects for K experiments - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 25
About This Presentation
Title:

Future prospects for K experiments

Description:

Better experimental information on KL ,ee ,eeee,ee needed to ... results ... Great potentialities of two new ambitious projects for studies of the FCNC ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:47
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 26
Provided by: nel102
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Future prospects for K experiments


1
Future prospects for K experiments
  • A. Nappi
  • University of Perugia and INFN
  • EPS HEP 2001 - Budapest 13/7/01

2
Outline
  • What is still to be learned from the K system
  • Prospects of ongoing programs
  • KLOE _at_ DAPHNE
  • NA48 _at_ CERN
  • E949 _at_ BNL
  • E391a _at_ KEK
  • New projects
  • KOPIO _at_ BNL
  • KAMI _at_ FNAL
  • CKM _at_ FNAL

?
3
Physics issues
  • Overconstrain flavour structure of S.M.
  • FCNC decay channels
  • exploit suppressions ( 2nd order weak
    interactions, GIM , CP violation ) for enhanced
    sensitivity to new physics
  • Simmetry violations
  • CP, T narrow the gap between experiment and
    predictions using improved experimental
    techniques
  • Charge asymmetries , T violating observables
  • CPT Tighten constraints from Bell-Steinberger
    sum rule KS/KL semileptonic decays ?
  • Sharpen the theoretical tools
  • ?PT tests parameter determination
  • framework for interpretation of more fundamental
    processes

4
A few loop diagrams ...
K0 ? l?l
5
FCNC decays (1)
  • KL???
  • Experimental effort concluded
    B.R.(7.18?0.17)10-9
  • Information on short range contribution limited
    by interpretation
  • Dominating absorptive contribution from gg
  • (7.07?0.18)10-9
  • Better experimental information on
    KL????,ee?,eeee,ee?? needed to constrain long
    range dispersive contributions
  • KL???0ee?,?0?? ?
  • Direct CP violation component has to be
    disentangled from
  • Indirect CP
  • 2 g CP conserving long range contribution
  • Experimental information on KS???0ee? , KL???0
    ?? valuable
  • Prohibitive physical background from ??ee? ,
    ???? ?

6
FCNC decays (2)
h
  • K??????
  • Unique theoretical cleanliness
  • no long range contribution
  • matrix elements of quark operators related to Ke3
    decays
  • KL decay dominated by direct CP
  • Experiments challenging
  • B.R. 1011 , kinematics underconstrained,
    background from channels with much larger decay
    rates

rih
1-r-ih
a
b
g
r
1
Known to 2 precision
Small additional uncertainty from mC
7
CPT tests
  • CPT violation in K0 mass matrix L M iG/2
    characterized by
  • PDG 2000
  • from
  • CPLEAR error 3.3104
  • neglecting CPT in pp decay amplitude
  • known to precision 2.5105
  • from B.S. sum rule Im D to 5105

ImD
ReD
8
CPT tests
  • Bell-Steinberger sum rule ( unitarity )
  • ImD limited by
  • h000 and Re e
  • Semileptonic charge asymmetries KS vs KL
  • dL(32.71.2)104
  • ( 1974 5107Kl3 decays )
  • dS from KLOE ?
  • error 103 with design L

0 if no DS DQ , CPT violating
9
KLOE
  • Tagged KL/KS decays from ?? KL/KS
  • design luminosity 51032cm2/s
  • even before that has interesting program of KS
    measurements
  • branching ratios for dominating decays
  • KS semileptonic branching ratios
  • rare KS decays
  • Machine performance improved
  • 21031cm2/s peak L , 1 pb 1/day reached, but
    large backgr.
  • 35 pb1 logged
  • Performance demonstrated by preliminary data on
    KS??e?
  • 283 events in 11.5 pb1 sample
  • 4 present world statistics ( CMD-2 75 ev.)
  • 200 pb1 goal for 2000 running

10
data yield for 200pb1
11
CERN NA48
  • 2001 ends ?/? program
  • 2 extensions approved
  • NA48/1 ( 2002 )
  • KS rare decays
  • NA48/2 ( 2003 ... )
  • K/K CP asymmetries
  • High statistics study of K?e??? pp
    scattering length ? ?0??q q ?0?
  • Drift chambers rebuilt ( operational from 2001 )
  • TRD will be installed before NA48/2

12
NA48 KS rare decays
  • 31010 decays in typical 1 year run
  • KS???0ee with a SES 6 1010
  • 1.51012lt BRCPdir(KL???0ee? )lt51012
  • BRCPind(KL???0ee ) ?
  • 3103 BR(KS???0ee)
  • 51010lt BR(KS???0ee )lt5108
  • 7 events with B.R. in the middle of expected
    range
  • Sizable samples for channels of interest for ?PT
    phenomenology
  • KS???
  • exp BR 2.1106
  • 24000 events
  • KS??0??
  • exp BR 3.8108 (mgggt220MeV/c2)
  • 114 ev.
  • . . .
  • Bounds on h000 of 102
  • 8106 events for 1.2tS lt t0 lt 4.7tS
  • Control of acceptance to 10 3/ctS
  • Precision of B.S. sum rule to 2102

13
NA48 K program
  • Main goal ??? Dalitz plot slope asymmetry
  • Present experimental limit Ag(-75)103 Ford
    .. 70
  • HyperCP has 3.9/1.6?108 K/K decays yielding
    DAg 5104 stat, gt103 syst
  • S.M. theoretical predictions range from 106 to
    104
  • no DI1/2 rule suppression
  • FSI phases
  • NA48 aims at 104 DAg
  • 7.3/4.4?109 / decays/year
  • DAg0.7104(stat)
  • Simultaneous K beams B field reversal to
    symmetrize efficiencies
  • DAg 0.5104(sys)

14
KEK E391a
  • Ground breaking experiment for KL???0???
  • Approved december 97 . Addressing relevant
    experimental issues in a systematic way
  • Detector inefficiency measurements ( physics
    limited)
  • Beam survey ( Dec. 2000 )
  • Prospects
  • Data taking from Oct 2003, aiming at sensitivity
    1?10-10
  • Test bed for experiment at JHF aiming at
    sensitivity 3?10-14

15
BNL E949
  • Upgrade of E787
  • with 1 event in 1995-97
  • 98 data of comparable size
  • Key features
  • Redundant kinematic information on p
  • hermetic veto coverage
  • looks for p above end point for K?pp0
  • E 949
  • improved sensitivity ( 14 )
  • data for 2 additional years
  • expect to reach 1011/ evt by 2004 ( 7 events for
    S.M. BR prediction)

16
Progress in K?? ???
  • Dedicated FNAL expt CKM
  • aims at 100 events with S.M. branching ratio
  • approved ( end june )
  • TDR in 12-18 months

( courtesy of L.Littenberg)
17
CKM at FNAL M.I.
  • Features
  • First attempt of in-flight measurement of K??
    ???
  • Superconducting RF separated beam
  • Hadron purity gt 70
  • 33MHz 22GeV/c K
  • redundant determination of K and p momentum
  • spectrometer RICH
  • veto with total inefficiency for p0 from p p0
    107
  • expects 100 signal with 10 background events

18
KAMI
  • Aiming at 100 ??0??? events with SB 41
  • Veto inefficiencies 106 required
  • Recently discussed by FNAL PAC and not recommended

19
KOPIO new way to ?0???
  • In addition to vetos as many kinematical
    constraints as possible
  • photon energy, position and angle
  • KL momentum via TOF allows transformation to CM
    system
  • RF bunched beam , ltpgt 0.8GeV/c
  • Tracking preradiator for g direction measurement
  • E measurement combining prerad Shashlik
  • Hermetic veto coverage including beam hole

20
KOPIO layout
21
KOPIO existence proofs
  • Many critical parameters established by test
    measurements
  • Beam bunching 280 ps achieved with 33MHz, 30 kV
    cavity
  • final scheme with 25MHz, 150kV additional
    harmonic cavity at 100MHz
  • Preradiator angle resolution 25-30 mr for 250 MeV
    ??
  • Energy resolution in Shashlik 6.7 for 250MeV ?
  • In combination with preradiator Monte-Carlo
    indicates
  • Veto efficiencies from E787 measurements, only
    slightly upgraded for better sampling ( low E )
    and larger number of radiation lengths ( high E )

22
KOPIO kinematics at work
  • Transformation to CM and full g reconstruction
    provides region where 2p0 background negligible
  • kinematics complementary to vetos ( small Ep ?
    higher veto efficiency)

23
KOPIO expected results
24
KOPIO discovery potential
Expected error band for B.R.2.2?10-9
Expected error band for B.R.3?10-11
90 UL for 0 events
25
Conclusions
  • K system still has potentialities for exciting
    physics
  • With the e/e saga come to an end, the next few
    years will see
  • polishing of precision results
  • a more complete phenomenological picture of K
    decays and CP violation
  • room for surprises
  • Great potentialities of two new ambitious
    projects for studies of the FCNC in the K sector
  • Together with B results, capable to put severe
    constraints on the flavour structure of the S.M.
  • No technical show stopper
  • It would be a pity if they are missed for lack of
    funding
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com