Title: Physics and fate of jet related emission line regions
1Physics and fate of jet related emission line
regions
- Martin Krause
- Volcano - 20th May 2008
- Paul Alexander, David Heath, Martin
Huarte-espinosa, Nicole Nesvadba, Volker gaibler,
Max Camenzind
2Overview
- Introduction Jet related emission line regions
- 3D Multiphase turbulence simulations
- Long term evolution May jets distribute the
metals in clusters?
3Emission Line Regions in Extragalactic Jet Flows
- High redshift radio galaxies
- Historically often RG most distant objects
- From zgt1/2 extended (lt100 kpc)narrow emission
line regions (ENLR) - ENLR Aligned with radio Alignment effect
- Jet induced star formation? Little evidence
(spectral stellar features)
Redshift 1 radio galaxies
blue radio cons
red radio cons
Linear scale, 50 kpc
4Emission Line Regions in Extragalactic Jet Flows
High redshift radio galaxies
Redshift 1 radio galaxies
blue radio cons
red radio cons
Linear scale, 50 kpc
5Emission Line Regions in Extragalactic Jet Flows
0406-242 z2.4, OIII, Hß, gt1010 M?, v1000
km/s (Nesvadba et al. 2008, prep.)
3C305 Nearby, Ha, HI absorption, 106 M?,
v1000 km/s (Morganti 2007)
6Emission Line Regions in Extragalactic Jet Flows
- Giant Lyman alpha haloes
- Strongest line at high z
- up to z gt 5
- Aligned X-ray IC, highlights cocoon of faint,
backflowing radio plasma - Morphology suggest ENLR cocoon
4C 41.17, z3.8 (Michiel Reuland) Blue Lymana,
Green radio, Red X-ray
7Jet Interaction Model
Krause (2005), 3D bipolar jet simulation
Shocked ambient gas (red)
Hotspot
Beams (pink / green)
Origin of two jets
Cocoon (blue, back- flowing jet plasma)
8Jet Interaction Model
Simulation (2.5D) of an FR I jet
Krause (2005), 3D bipolar jet simulation
Shocked ambient gas (red)
Hotspot
Beams (pink / green)
Origin of two jets
Cocoon (blue, back- flowing jet plasma)
9Extended Emission line Regions Observational
Summary
- Size up to 100 kpc anticorrelated w. radio size
- EL-power ? Radio power
- Line width 500-1000 km/s ? (radio size)-1
- bulk flow few 100 km / s
- Volume 103-4 kpc3
- EL-power density
1041 erg/s/kpc3 - EL-Temperature 104 K
- EL-Density 102-103 cm-3
- EL-Mass density 107
M?/kpc3 entrained gas mass - EL-gas filling factor 10-4-10-3 (poorly
constrained)
10Cocoon or Shocked Ambient Where is the
emission line gas?
Cocoon co-spatial with radio or in between
lobes, filled Shocked ambient hollow shell
surrounding radio, like X-ray cavieties
0316-257, z3.3 (Nicole Nesvadba)
-gt Morphology suggests Cocoon
2.5D-Sim. EL-gas radio contours Gaibler et al.
in prep.
11Simulation jet with cooling
(smooth back- ground)
Density
Temperature
1 Myr
Before cooling some mixing in the central regions
3 Myr
- Most EL power ( jet power) from shell, profile
rarely observed
Immediately after cooling Thin Shell has formed.
7 Myr
Long after cooling Shell fragments, cool clouds,
SF
- Need very high resolution to see cool clouds in
cocoon at all gtgt reality more coc. cl.
- If we start with smooth background, we always get
a shell structure (from cooled amient)
12The three gas phases in radio galaxies
Cygnus A X-ray radio contours (z0, courtesy
C. Carilli, P. Strub)
3C 368 Optical radio contours (z1, Best et
al. 1996)
Phase 1 radio hot, Tgt1011K always
detected Phase 2 X-ray warm,
107KltTlt108K low-z, few high-z detections Phase
3 opt. etc.cold, Tlt105K becomes
prominent for zgt0.6 alignment
effect
13Multiphase turbulence in radio cocoons ?
Simulations
- Setup
- Start with Kelvin-Helmholtz instability plus
dense clouds - Compressible 2D 3D hydrodynamics cooling,
codes Nirvana, Flash - Density ratios 10-4, Mach 0.8 (80 in warm
medium) - Here vary warm gas Temperature and cloud
density, ctrl no clouds
14Multiphase turbulence in radio cocoons ? 3D
Results
Emissivity
Vertical Integral
Horizontal Integral
15Multiphase turbulence in radio cocoons ? 3D
Results
Slices of log. density
- Cool gas tends to form small cloudlets
- clouds shielded by intermediate material
- 2D filaments
16Data Analysis Kinematics
2D
Slow cooling M const
Rapid cooling M ?1/2
- Same in 2D 3D
- hot subsonic, cold supersonic
- mixing faster in 3D, res lower
- can compute EL-gas velocities from env. jet
parameters (ok)
17Data Analysis Energy 3D
- Results Readjustment 2Myrs, ctrl then conserved
- Energy drops due to clouds
- Energy drops faster with higher cloud mass
18Numerical issues
- No natural heat conduction (so far) gt too little
heat transfer to cold clouds, evaporation? No!
(gtunresolved scales) - Artificial numerical heat conduction. Is cooling
dominated by smeared out contact surface? No -
next slide. Expect correlation of EL-power with
kinetic energy for shock transport (what we want
to see), or warm gas temp., respectively
19Data Analysis EL-pow - Ekin
Both correlations seen Best one with kinetic
energy gt We simulate a realisation of the shock
ionisation scenario
startup mess
20Data Analysis EL-pow - Ekin
Etot correlates with cloud density gt increased
pressure compresses clouds n Etot too small
wrt obs.
high n also contributes to Etot - EL-pow
correlation gt little effect of art. heat
conduction
21Data Analysis Temperature Distribution
14,000 K
- Realisation of shock ionisation scenario
equilibrium temperature 14,000 K independent of
simulation details - Mixing different in 2D and 3D (also resolution
- Signal above mixing level evident in both cases
- Evidence for cooler gas (1000 K, molecular?)
2D
3D
14,000 K
22Data Analysis Elgas dens. - Temp
Observations
Temperature ok n too low -gt Total energy in box
too small
23Data Analysis EL-pow - vel.
Observations
- dominated by time evolution
- no obvious correlation
- but some dependence on amb. temperature, more dv
gt tot. Ener. matters
24Data Analysis Eelgasfrac - Time
- 2D suggested that 10 up to nearly all energy in
cold gas - 3D small fraction, 0.1 - 1
- unfortunately 3D not converged res x 2 gt
Ecoldfrac x 3
25Data Analysis Tcool,dyn - Etot
Observations Tcool,dyn 70 Myr This is
reasonable, if Elgas to be obs. Would get this
for Eelgas Etot
Observations
Would hires 3D models get us back to Eelgas
Etot ?
26Data Analysis Mcoldfrac-Time
- 2D very fast growth
- 3D res x 2 gt loss -gt growth
- not enough res yet to start at low cold mass
fraction
3D
2D
- same start cold frac, same res low T_amb
increase, high T_amb decrease - Obs low redshift RG higher T_amb gt no Elgas
27Summary - 3d multiphase turbulence
- ELgas (often) in cocoon
- Presented 3D sims of multiphase turbulence in
jet cocoons, varied res., amb. Temp. and init.
cold gas fraction - Presented statistics of intensive
(n,T,dv,Ecoldfrac, Mcoldfrac) and extensive
(Etot, Mcold, EL-power) variables - Honest try, but res. problems, wrong par. regime
28Summary - 3d multiphase turbulence
- We do find
- Equilibrium T 14,000 K
- Etot decreases i.e. MPT-enhanced system cooling
- Mcold increases i.e. MPT-enhanced condensation,
more for low amb. temp., meaning - Much of EL-gas could be cooled IGM gas rather
than wrapped up galactic gas - Higher amb. temp. at low z, gtgt no EL-gas
- Correlations (P_elgas-E_kin, dv- E_tot) argue
not dom. by num. effects
29Enrichment of galaxy clusters - may jets do the
job?
Abundance in Perseus Sanders et al. 2005
Perseus cluster core Chandra homepage
- Gas in galaxy clusters is highly enriched.
- Jets upset gas when active - but what happens in
the long run? - Jets set up large scale flows for long times.
- Can jets contribute to the metal distribution?
Basson Alexander 2003 rad. Velocity _at_ 0.4,
0.5 1.9 Gyr
30Mpc-scale simulation with tracer particles
- Advected in shocked ambient gas entrained into
cocoon during active phase - Rises with jet remnant up to Mpc scale
31Resulting metallicity Distribution
- After 3 Gyr, flat distribution
- up to Mpc scale
- about 1/10th initial core metallicity
- works with powerful jets only
- i.e. at redshift gt 1
- works with powerful jets only
- i.e. at redshift gt 1
- all consistent with observations
32Summary Cluster Metal enrichment
- Powerful jets (high z) may do the job
- Reach roughly flat profile
- Need long timescales, Gyr