Title: 5'2 The Role of Num 1114
15.2 The Role of Num 11-14
21. The Beginning
- 1.0 How it was meant to be!
- Numbers 101-10 Trumpet
- Numbers 1011-28 - The Journey Begins
- Number 1029-32 Hobab (Jethro Hobab are the
same person. Reuel is his father. See Exod 218
Exod 18) - The Wilderness of Paran
3Num 101-10 - Silver Trumpets
4Arch of Titus
5(No Transcript)
6(No Transcript)
7The Wilderness of Paran
8The Wilderness of Paran
9The Wilderness of Paran
102. The Beginning the End
- Two Ark Snippets as Enclosures
- Numbers 1033-36
- Numbers 1439-45
113. Theologies of the Ark
- 3.1 The Ark as a Box
- Deut 101-5 Accent on the Tablets
- Deut 3124-26
- Exod 2510-22 371-9
- 3.2 The Ark as a War Palladium
- Num 1035-36 Divine Warrior Motif (Ps 681,
7-8, 11-12, 17-18 Judg 54-5 Deut 322-3 Hab
33-6) - Conquest Narratives Josh 3-4 6 830-35 the
problem of 1 Sam 41-72
123. Theologies of the Ark
- 3.3 The Kapporeth
- The Meaning of Kapporeth?
- Cover lid
- Greek hilasterion (Lev 16)
- Görg kp (n) rdwi sole of the foot or
footplate - 3.4 A Throne Footstool
- 1 Sam 44 (2 Sam 62, 18 78, 26, 27 Ps 247-10
- 1 Kgs 81-13
- Isa 61-3
134. Murmuring in the Wilderness
- 4.1 Numbers 111-3
- What were the people complaining about?
- The possible Exod 1522-26 parallel Water.
- Paradigmatic?
14(No Transcript)
15(No Transcript)
164. Murmuring in the Wilderness
- 4.2 Murmuring vs. Laments
- Laments Complaint, Confession of Trust,
Petition, Vow to Praise - Praise in a Minor Key B. Anderson
- Almost 50 of the Psalter (Individual Communal)
17Structure of 114-35
- A. Peoples Complaint Meat Num 114-10
- B. Moses Complaint Assistance Num 1110-15
- X. Gods Answer to Both Complaints Num 1116-24
- B. God Authorizes Elders Num 1124-30
- A. God Supplies Meat Punishes Complainers Num
1131-34
185. Peoples Complaint Meat Num 114-10
- Num 114 Rabble/Riffraff? . . . . strong
craving fish, cucumbers, melons, leeks, onions,
garlic vs. manna - Food in Egypt
- Fish Meat (fish wild poultry geese, ducks,
quails, cranes, etc.) - Bread
- Vegetables (beans, chick peas, lentils, green
peas, leeks, Egyptian lettuce, and garlic) - Fruit (figs, grapes, pomegranates, plums peaches )
19Fish Meat
20Bread
21Fruit
22Dairy Products Oils
236. Moses Complaint Assistance Num 1110-15
- Num 1110b Yahweh was very angry, and Moses was
distressed. - . . . not found favor in your sight (Exod
3312, 13, 16, 17 348) - this people
- Nursing-father imagery
- If this is the way you are going to treat me,
put me to death at once, if I have found favor in
your sight and do not let me see my misery.
247. Gods Answer to Both Complaints Num 1116-24
- 70 Elders to bear the burden with Moses take
some of the spirit that is on you and put it on
them - Meat enough for a whole month Consecrate
yourselves (Exod 1910-15) - Num 1121-22 A further complaint by Moses
- Num 1123 A further Answer by Yahweh
258. God Authorizes Elders Num 1124-30
- . . . and took some of the spirit that was on
him and put it on the seventy elders and when
the spirit rested on them, they prophesied. - But they did not do so again or they did not
cease . . . . - Eldad Medad
- Would that all the people of Yahweh were
prophets, and that Yahweh would put his spirit on
them.
268. God Authorizes Elders
- Prophet
- 1. Called
- 2. Messenger of Yahweh
- 3. Intercession
- 4. Worker of Miracles
- 5. Anointer of Kings Political leaders
- Priest
- 1. Hereditary
- 2. Cult functionary sacrifices, praise,
atoning, etc. - 3. Teach the Torah
279. God Supplies Meat Punishes Complainers Num
1131-34
- . . . quails . . . two cubits deep on the
ground - But while the meat was still between their
teeth, before it was consumed, the anger of
Yahweh was kindled against the people, and Yahweh
struck the people with a very great plague. - Kibroth-hattaavah
2810. Miriam Aarons Complaint
- Num 121-5 Complaint of Miriam . . . and Aaron
- Num 126-8 Yahwehs Response
- . . . your prophets of Yahweh
- . . . my servant Moses he is entrusted with all
my house. - Num 129-15 Miriam becomes white
- Num 12.16 from Hazeroth in the Wilderness of Paran
29A Cushite Woman 18 Dynasty Egypt (1570-1320
B.C.)
- Queen Hatshepsut
- Queen Tiye, mother of Akhenanten
- Queen Nefertiti, wife of Akhenanten
3011. Overall Structure of Num 13-14
- A. The Scouts Expedition Num 131-24
- B. The Scouts Report Num 1325-33
- X. The Peoples Response Num 141-10a
- B. Yahwehs Response Num 1410b-38
- A. The Peoples Expedition Num 1439-45
31A. The Scouts Expedition Num 131-24
- 1. God decides on reconnaissance (and conquest)
(vv. 1-2) - 2. Moses chooses and instructs scouts (vv. 3-20)
- 3. Expedition fulfilled (vv. 21-24)
- a. All of Canaan (vv. 21)
- b. The Hebron area (vv. 22-24)
32(No Transcript)
33B. The Scouts Report Num 1325-33
- 1. Majority report objective (vv. 25-29)
- 2. Calebs counter-report (v. 30)
- 3. Majority report subjective (vv. 31-33)
34Spy Stories
- "In addition to Numbers 13-14, there are other
scouting expeditions attributed to Israel during
the wilderness and conquest period at Jazer in
Transjordan (Num. 2132), Jericho (Josh. 2), Ai
(Josh. 72-5), Bethel (Judg. 123), and Dan
(Judg. 18). Milgrom
35Ten Parallels with Judg 18
- Danites are an unsettled group, living in
temporary encampments. - Scouts selected from tribal notables are
commissioned to gather intelligence in
preparation for a military campaign. - In deliberate contrast to Num 13, the Danite
scouts bring in a unanimous, favorable report.
36Ten Parallels with Judg 18
- The Danites are momentarily hesitant, but they
speedily proceed to the attack. - The campaign is conducted in stages, employing
the same vocabulary as Num 10-14. - An entire ethnic grouping accompanies the
soldiers, including women, children, the aged,
and their cattle chattels.
37Ten Parallels with Judg 18
- Danites bring their cultic apparatus . . . .
- A Levite priest is engaged for oracular
consultation. - Levite priest is identified as Jonathan the son
of Gershom the son of Moses . . . - Places conquered and resettled are renamed . . . .
38X. The Peoples Response Num 141-10a
- 1. Majority response abandon project (vv. 1-5)
- 2. Joshua and Calebs counter-response (vv. 6-9)
- 3. Majority response stone opposition (v. 10a)
39B. Yahwehs Response Num 1410b-38
- 1. Destroy Israel except Moses (vv. 10b-12)
- 2. Moses intercedes (vv. 13-19)
- 3. God mitigates decree (vv. 20-35)
- a. Adults die save Caleb (vv. 20-25)
- b. Adults die except Joshua and Caleb (vv.
26-35) - -anticipation of fulfillment (death of spies)
(vv. 36-38)
40Num 1418 vs. Exod 346-7
- The LORD! the LORD! a God compassionate and
gracious, slow to anger, abounding in kindness
and faithfulness, - extending kindness to the thousandth generation,
forgiving iniquity, transgression, and sin - yet He does not remit all punishment, but visits
the iniquity of parents upon children and
children's children, upon the third and fourth
generations.
- The LORD! slow to anger and abounding in
kindness - forgiving iniquity and transgression
- yet not remitting all punishment, but visiting
the iniquity of fathers upon children, upon the
third and fourth generations.
41Num 1418 vs. Exod 346-7
- The major omissions in the first two sections
deal with the nature of Moses plea. He did not
ask for the cancellation of punishment but only
for its postponement or for its executing as long
as God would maintain His covenant with Israel.
Milgrom - Faithfulness, i.e. truth would deal with
Gods justice and not appropriate for Moses
plea. - Sin quite often deals with inadvertent sin
which is also not appropriate here.
42Forgiveness in Num 14
- First in the usual liturgical statement, h9esed
is placed in parallelism with "merciful and
gracious," and is coupled with "slow to anger."
This does not mean that h9esed is simply equated
with forgiveness, as it can still in other
contexts be used to mean a particular act of
deliverance. But since the word was repeatedly
connected with attitudes which do not presume a
quid pro quo relationship between God and Israel
it would tend to shift in focus.
43Chesed
- 1. Introduction
- 1.1 Occurs over 250x
- 1.2 Three Important Factors
- 1.2.1 First, chesed is not associated with
inanimate objects or concepts (contrast love
ahab of silver or righteousness) it always
involves persons. - 1.2.2 Second, chesed is requested of or done for
another with whom one is already in relationship
the term does not appear in contexts where no
relationship between the parties has been
established. -
44Chesed
- 1.2 Three Important Factors
- 1.2.3 Third, chesed in its most basic form is a
specific action, but from a series of such
actions the term may also be abstracted to refer
to an attitude that is given concrete shape in
such actions.
45Chesed
- 2. Secular Usage
- 2.1 Chesed between individuals
- 2.1.1 Chesed in intimately personal
relationships, usually familial (Gen 20.13
24.49 47.29 Ruth 3.10 2 Sam 3.8 16.17) - First, the help of another is essential the
person in need cannot perform the action. - Second, help itself is essential the needy
persons situation will turn drastically for the
worse if help is not received. - Third, the circumstances dictate that one person
is uniquely able to provide the needed
assistance there is no ready alternative if help
is not forthcoming from this source.
46Chesed
- Fourth, the person in need has no control over
the decision of the person who is in a position
to help, and there are no legal sanctions for
failure to provide help often no one else will
even know of a negative decision. The potential
helper must make a free moral decision, based
essentially on commitment to the needy person
within the relationship. While self-interest
might occasionally encourage a positive response,
the term chesed focuses the rationale for action
on commitment to the other, not on advantage to
the actor.
47Chesed
- 2.1.2 Chesed in Secondary, Non-intimate
Relationships (Gen 40.14 1 Kgs 20.31 Jos
2.12-14 Gen 21.23 2 Sam 10.1-2) - In these narratives the person requesting chesed
is careful to show that the relationship between
the parties is in good repair, sometimes by
pointing to an act of chesed done by the
suppliant on a prior occasion when the relative
circumstances of need of the parties were
reversed. This overt emphasis on the quality of
the relationship stands in contrast to the
narratives featuring intimate personal ties,
where requests for chesed are simply made and no
reason for compliance is proposed the requests
in such cases are based on the very nature of the
relationship, which need not be mentioned.
48Chesed
- In the secondary relationships there is more
frequently a potential for self-interest in an
actors willingness to offer chesed (although the
focus remains on commitment to the other) and in
some of the examples the strength or even
existence of a prior relationship between the
parties has been disputed. - The central features of critical situational
need, unique opportunity to assist, and freedom
of decision are common to chesed in both intimate
and secondary relationships.
49Chesed
- 3. Theological Usage God's Chesed
- 3.1 Israel understood God to be committed to the
community in covenant relationship as the One who
provided for all needs, yet One also always free
and uncoercible. The Hebrew term chesed compactly
incorporates all three of these dimensions
(commitment, provision for need, freedom) in a
single word. This shorthand theological claim is
given various emphases, however, in different
streams of OT literature. - 3.2 Key aspects of the concrete manifestations of
Gods chesed (ranging from maintaining the
created order to provision of descendants,
sustenance, land, leadership, and especially
forgiveness) . . . .
50Chesed
- 3.3 These are reinforced and supplemented by
attention to the many references to divine chesed
in the Psalter (over 70 times scattered through
over 45 psalms). Most frequently associated with
chesed is a plea for deliverance from enemies
(e.g., Ps 177 14312) or thanksgiving for such
deliverance (e.g., Ps 1382). - 3.4 "For individuals as much as for the community
corporately, Gods forgiveness as an act of
chesed that continues the divine-human
relationship is foundational to life itself and
undergirds all other manifestations of chesed."
51Forgiveness in Num 14
- A second, indirect clue toward this shift to
connection with forgiveness lies in the special
usage of the expression "great of h9esed
(rab-h9esed) in this same formula. This
expression is restricted in use it refers only
to Yahweh. This specialization may indicate that
divine h9esed was recognized as qualitatively (or
quantitatively) different from that of men in
their interpersonal relationships, in that God is
more willing than men to do acts of h9esed, even
under circumstances in which his people are not
morally deserving. Such an interpretation of
rab-h9esed suggests that forgiveness could be
understood as an act of h9esed (particular act)
and at the same time an act grounded in h9esed
(attitude which issues in act). The word never
completely loses its action connotation, yet it
takes on the sense of a basic attitude.
52Forgiveness in Num 14
- A third consideration in the shift of h9esed to
connotations including forgiveness is its
liturgical connection with the expression Xpw
!w aXn, "forgiver of iniquity and
transgression," here and in Ex 34. The connection
is heightened in the usage in Num 14 because
h9esed is again set alongside of aXn in the
climax and recapitulation of Moses' plea in vs.
19. In an unpublished paper, D. N. Freedman has
shown that the verb aXn is used of God in three
general ways (1) "bearing the burden of the
people (sustaining, guiding, bearing with),"
(2)"being gracious to his people (from the idiom
'to lift up the face')," and (3) "forgiveness" of
the people (especially obvious in idiomatic use
when the object of the verb is !w ). In 1419
the verb shows nuances of all three of the
meanings Freedman points out, and it should be
observed that h9esed likewise could be
appropriately understood in connection with all
three, especially the first and the last. The
greatness (rab) of God's h9esed is evidenced by
and concretized in his forgiveness of iniquity.
53A. The Peoples Expedition Num 1439-45
- 1. People decide on conquest (vv. 39-40)
- 2. Moses protests (vv. 41-43)
- 3. Expedition aborted (vv. 44-45)