Title: Asian Gypsy Moth A Case Study
1Asian Gypsy MothA Case Study
Donna Leonard USDA Forest Service Forest Health
Protection
2AcknowledgementsUSDA AGM Offshore Team Members
- APHIS
- Vic Mastro, Lab Director, Center for Plant Health
Science and Technology - Weyman Fussell, National Program Leader for Gypsy
Moth - Michael Simon, Senior Staff Officer, Quarantine
Policy, Analysis and Support - Joann Cruse, State Plant Health Director, WI
- Forest Service
- Steve Munson, Entomologist, Forest Health
Protection - Joel McMillan, Entomologist, Forest Health
Protection
3Gypsy MothLepidoptera Lymantria dispar
- Native to Europe and Asia
- Univoltine
- Hatch in spring
- Ballooning
- Feed and develop for 2 months
- Pupate
- Adults active in summer
4Gypsy Moth (continued)
- Broad range of host species
- Spring defoliator
- Impacts
- Decreased growth
- Tree mortality
- Nuisance factor
5European Gypsy Moth Introduced
- Abundant host
- Suitable climate
- EGM thrived and spread
6Gypsy Moth Infested Area Defoliation in US
88 million acres since 1924 (earliest records) 76
million acres since 1970
70
14
60
12
Defoliation
50
10
40
8
Area Infested
Acres Defoliated (millions)
Acres Infested (millions)
30
6
20
4
10
2
0
0
1920
1940
1960
1980
2000
Year
7Forest Susceptibility
EGM Current Range Less than 30 of the
susceptible host is infested 100 years after the
introduction
8USDA Gypsy Moth Management Programs
STS reduce spread
Suppression mitigate local impacts
Eradication eliminate isolated populations
9Pheromone traps
- STS and eradication programs use pheromone traps
to detect and delineate infestations - Pheromone traps capture males only
10(No Transcript)
11Gypsy Moth Native Range
European Gypsy Moth
Asian Gypsy Moth
12EGM vs AGM
- European (EGM)
- Females are flightless
- Natural dispersal limited to ballooning (short
range) - Long range dispersal is human aided
- Females smaller
- Not attracted to light
- 250 hosts primarily oaks
- Eggs laid on tree boles
- Asian (AGM)
- Females are strong flyers (up to 40 km)
- Disperse after mating
- Natural dispersal is both short and long range
- Females much larger
- Attracted to lights
- 600 hosts oaks and conifers
- Eggs laid on foliage
13Significance of Differences
- AGMs broader host range
- Higher probability of establishment in the US
- Potential for greater damage
- AGMs female flight
- Increased spread rates
- Impacts survey programs (STS and eradication)
because management is based on survey for males
using pheromone traps
14AGM in Russian ports during outbreaks
15Incoming ships are pathways for introduction of
AGM to the U.S.
16History of the AGM Problem
- In early 1990s, AGM came into the Pacific
northwest on ships. - Eradication efforts were implemented in
- Oregon and Washington (USA)
- Vancouver, British Columbia (Canada)
- Another introduction in North Carolina
eradication in 1994-95 - Total cost of eradication 30 million
- Multiple small eradications since 1995
17USDAs Response to AGM
- Eradications response guidelines
- Began monitoring high risk introduction sites
(ports, waterways, and cargo receiving areas)
with pheromone traps - Identify moths using molecular techniques
- Established cooperative monitoring programs in
source countries - Russia 1993
- Japan 2004
- South Korea 2007
- Identify high risk ships for inspection
18AGM Detection History
Year State (s)
1991 OR. WA
1993 NC
1994 WA
1995 WA
1996 WA
1997 WA
1999 WA
2000 OR
2003 CA
2004 ID
2005 CA, TX
2006 CA, OR
19AGM Detections
Primarily associated with ports Some associated
with rail lines, presumably from containers
20Russian Far East Monitoring Program1993 - present
- Monitor Lymantriid populations in high risk ports
and surrounding forests - Establish flight period ( risk period for ships)
- Adjust port lighting during peak flight periods
- Identify and record all ships in ports during the
flight period - Require phytosanitary certificates for ships with
N. American destinations - Provide early warning of high risk years (??)
213 Lymantriids Monitored
- Asian gypsy moth
- L. dispar
- Nun moth
- L. monacha
- Rosy gypsy moth
- L. mathura
Photos Forestry Images - UGA
22(No Transcript)
23(No Transcript)
24Japan
- 2004 present
- AGM only
- High risk ports identified
- US ship inspections
25(No Transcript)
26South Korea
- 2007 1st year
- AGM only
- 2 ports monitored
27 Thank You!