Preliminary Result of AN Measurement in pp Elastic Scattering at RHIC, at s 200 GeV Wlodek Guryn for

1
Preliminary Result of AN Measurement in p?p?
Elastic Scattering at RHIC, at ? s 200 GeV
Wlodek Gurynfor pp2pp collaboration
Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY, USA

• OUTLINE of the TALK
• Description of the experiment
• Comparison of run 2002 vs 2003
• Description of analysis
• Results and interpretation
• Where do we go from here?

2
Total and Differential Cross Sections, and
Polarization Effects in pp Elastic Scattering at
RHIC

• S. Bültmann, I. H. Chiang, R.E. Chrien, A. Drees,
  R. Gill, W. Guryn, J. Landgraf, T.A. Ljubicic,
  D. Lynn, C. Pearson, P. Pile, A. Rusek, M.
  Sakitt, S. Tepikian, K. Yip
• Brookhaven National Laboratory, USA
• J. Chwastowski, B. Pawlik
• Institute of Nuclear Physics, Cracow, Poland
• M. Haguenauer
• Ecole Polytechnique/IN2P3-CNRS, Palaiseau, France
• A. A. Bogdanov, S.B. Nurushev, M.F Runtzo, M. N.
  Strikhanov
• Moscow Engineering Physics Institute (MEPHI),
  Moscow, Russia
• I. G. Alekseev, V. P. Kanavets, L. I. Koroleva,
  B. V. Morozov, D. N. Svirida
• ITEP, Moscow, Russia
• S. Khodinov, M. Rijssenbeek, L. Whitehead
• SUNY Stony Brook, USA
• K. De, N. Ozturk

3
Spin Dependence in Elastic Scattering
Five helicity amplitudes describe proton-proton
elastic scattering
F1(s,t ) ? ltMgt F2(s,t ) ? ltM--gt F3(s,t
) ? lt-M-gt F4(s,t ) ? lt-M-gt F5(s,t ) ?
ltM-gt
Fj(s,t ) ? lth3 h4 Mh1 h2gt Femj(s,t
) Fhadj(s,t ) with hx s-channel
helicity F(s,t ) ½ ( F1(s,t ) F3(s,t ) )
Measure
4
Source of single spin analyzing power AN
5
The world data (HE pp)
6
Experimental Determination of AN
Use Square-Root-Formula to calculate spin ( ??,
?? ) and false asymmetries (??, ?? .) This
formula cancels luminosity dependence.
Since AN is a relative measurement the
efficiencies e(t, f) cancel
7
Polarized Proton Collisions in RHIC
Absolute Polarimeter (H jet)
RHIC pC Polarimeters
BRAHMS PP2PP (p)
e 16 ? 10-6m after scraping
PHENIX (p)
STAR (p)
Siberian Snakes
Spin Rotators
Partial Siberian Snake
Pol. Proton Source 500 mA, 300 ms
Strong AGS Snake
2 ? 1011 Pol. Protons / Bunch e 20 p mm mrad
LINAC
BOOSTER
AGS
200 MeV Polarimeter
AGS Internal Polarimeter
Rf Dipoles
AGS pC Polarimeters
8
Comparison Run 2002 and 2003
9
Principle of the Measurement

• Elastically scattered protons have very small
  scattering angle ?, hence beam transport magnets
  determine trajectory scattered protons
• The optimal position for the detectors is where
  scattered protons are well separated from beam
  protons
• Need Roman Pot to measure scattered protons close
  to the beam without breaking accelerator vacuum

Beam transport equations relate measured position
at the detector to scattering angle.
x0,y0 Position at Interaction Point Tx Ty
Scattering Angle at IP xD, yD Position at
Detector TxD, TyD Angle at Detector
10
The pp2pp Experimental Setup
11
The Setup
12
Trigger Active
area
Only inner pots used for trigger and analysis,
biggest acceptance Analyze the data for the
closest position (¾ of all data)
13
Si detectors
14
Angle (hit) Correlations Before the Cuts
Note the background appears enhanced because of
the saturation of the main band
15
Elastic Evenet IdentificationAdjacent planes
Find hits in the adjacent planes in the Roman Pot
(x1,x2) and (y1,y2) D x1-x2 lt 2 strips and D
y1-y2 lt 2 strips
16
Fiducial and dE/dx cuts
17
Hit selection

• Pedestal value, pedestal width (s) and dead
  channels, only six, were determined
• Valid hit, single strip, has dE/dx gt 5s above the
  pedestal
• Cluster size is ? 5 consecutive strips above
  pedestal cut
• Valid hit in the Si plane for event
  reconstruction
• is a cluster whose dE/dx gt 20 ADC counts above
  pedestal and
• is within fiducial area of the detector (slide)
• has for a y-plane y gt 0.2mm from the edge of the
  detector.
• Coordinate for x and y formed from adjacent hits
  in Sin for each Roman Pot

18
Elastic Events Display Dave Morse
19
Background Events Display Dave Morse
20
Elastic Event Selection IUp Down Corerlations
Use the correlation between coordinates from two
opposite RPs (RP1U RP3D) or (RP1D RP3U) to
define candidate tracks.
21
Elastic Event Selection II
Use natural widths of the distributions -
s(x1-x2) vs (x1x2)
22
Elastic Event Selection III

• After finding matching hits in x and y
• Choose events with one track in x and one track
  in y and ? 6hits.
• Veto on the Sc signal in the opposite arm, TDC
  cut.
• Choose collinear tracks within 3s in angles.
• Plot dN/dt and calculate asymmetries.

23
Calculation of Scattering Angle

• Using matched hits scattering angels can be
  calculated.
• Use transport and and average (x0, y0) and beam
  angles obtained from vectors reconstructed using
  all eight RPs.
• Make z-vertex correction using ToF.

24
CollinearityDQx before and after z-correction,
and DQy
25
Elastic Events after Cuts (x,y) Disrtibutions
26
dN/dt
27
Event Yields after Cuts
28
Determination of AN
Use Square-Root-Formula to calculate raw and
false asymmetries, since it cancel luminosity
dependence. It uses ??, ?? and ??, ?? bunch
combinations.
29
F angle distributions for spin combinations
30
Preliminary Results Full bin 0.011 lt -t lt 0.029
(GeV/c)2
Fit AN cos(j) dependence to obtain AN
31
Results PYellow PBlue 0.67 and CNI curve
(stot , r from world data, B from pp2pp result)
Note PYellow PBlue 0.67 can vary by 15 ( a
working number)
32
Future Possibility Big Improvement
33
Summary

• We have measured the single spin analyzing power
  AN in polarized pp elastic scattering at ?s 200
  GeV in t-range 0.011,0.29 (GeV/c)2.
• The AN is ? SD away from a CNI curve, which does
  not have hadronic spin flip amplitude.
• We received preliminary interpretation of the
  result from Larry Trueman and Boris Kopeliovich,
  to be discussed at the RSC meeting this Thursday.
• RHIC is a great and unique place to do this
  physics!

34
Preliminary Results
Subtract f-bin by f-bin false asymmetry and fit
AN cos(f) dependence to obtain AN
35
Theoretical Interpretation Boris Kopeliovich
In all cases I fixed the nonflip
Re/Im\pi/2\epsilon0.15, where \epsilon 0.1,
is the power of s in energy dependence of
sig_tot. is the 1) The dashed curve is
calculation with central values for r5 as was
published by E950. 2) The dotted curve r50
(should be the same as the Larry's) 3) The
dash-dotted uses Imr5-0.12, as I found it from
pi-p and pp data at low energies. This is my talk
at SPIN2002 (hep-ph/0211061) The phase is assumed
to be the same as for the non-flip amplitude,
i.e. Rer5/Imr50.15. 4) The solid curve assume
the energy dependence of r5 rising as s\epsilon,
i.e. the spin-flip amplitude rises as
s2\epsilon. Then r5 doubles compared to low
energies I used in my analysis of pi-N and pp
data. So I used Imr5-0.24. Correspondingly, I
used Rer5\pi/22\epsilonImr5-0.075. K-P
prediction in Mod.Phys.Lett.A133033-3038,1998
(hep-ph/9806284) You can see that in spite of
large errors, your data are quite decisive. They
are hardly compatible with no spin-flip Pomeron,
reject positive Rer5. They might even vote for a
rising energy dependence of r5 as Povh and me
predicted.
36
Theoretical Interpretation Larry Trueman
37
Cuts
38
Elastic Identification
Find hits in the adjacent planes in the Roman Pot
(x1,x2) and (y1,y2) D x1-x2 lt 2 strips and D
y1-y2 lt 2 strips