Title: Resistance and Tropism - Maraviroc
1Resistance and Tropism - Maraviroc
- Lisa K. Naeger, Ph.D.
- Division of Antiviral Products
- Food and Drug Administration
FDA Antiviral Advisory Committee Meeting
April 24, 2007
2Maraviroc Resistance and Tropism
- Novel Target
- host receptor
- Unique Resistance Issues
- resistance to MVC
- tropism switching
- outgrowth of CXCR4-tropic virus
3Baseline Analyses Studies 1027 and 1028
- Genotypic susceptibility scores (GSS) and
phenotypic susceptibility scores (PSS) were
balanced across treatment groups - median GSS 1
- median PSS 2
- Heavily treatment-experienced population
- 67 had overall susceptibility scores lt2
- 30 had one potentially active drug in their OBT
- 14 had no potentially active drug in their OBT
4Tropism at Baseline
- 2560 screened 56 were CCR5-tropic
- 90 of enrolled subjects had CCR5-tropic virus at
Baseline - 4 had Dual-mixed tropic virus
- 5 had non-typable virus
5Why Did Subjects Fail MVC Treatment in Studies
1027 and 1028?
- CCR5 to CXCR4 co-receptor switch through virus
mutation - Outgrowth of MVC resistant CCR5-tropic viruses
- Outgrowth of CXCR4-tropic viruses undetected at
baseline - Resistance to Optimized Background Therapy
- Host CCR5 genotype
6FDA Censored Dataset for As-Treated Analyses
Studies 1027 and 1028
Overall Number of subjects in Pfizer virology dataset 1050
Overall number of subjects in virology dataset from FDA 962
FDA Censored 88
- FDA Censored
- Subjects who
- Discontinued while suppressed (lt400 copies/mL)
- Discontinued with gt400 copies/mL between
Baseline and Week 4 - Discontinued between Baseline and Week 8 with at
least - 0.5 log decrease and no rebound (previous 2
log decrease - with 1 log increase)
7Tropism at Failure
8Tropism at Time of Failure
Percentage of Virologic Failures (gt400 copies/mL)
with CCR5-tropic and CXCR4-tropic virus at Week 24
Tropism MVC QD n154 MVC BID n143 Placebo n146
CCR5 47 34 84
Dual-Mixed 31 43 8
CXCR4 12 14 1
NR/NP 10 10 8
9Resistance to Optimized Background Therapy
10Responders (lt400 copies/mL) by Susceptibility
Score at Baseline
Overall Susceptibility Score
11Optimized Background in Treatment Failures
QD N154 BID N143 Placebo N143
No Susceptible Drugs at Baseline 29 29 27
Changes in OBT on therapy 43 42 46
12Enfuvirtide Use inTreatment Failures
QD N154 BID N143 Placebo N143
ENF Use 45 45 45
ENF Resistance Mutations at Failure 71 52 74
13Overall Susceptibility Scores of Treatment
Failures by Tropism
OSS CXCR4-tropic n29 CCR5-tropic n163 Dual/Mixed n94 All n320
0-1 80 55 63 60
2 17 24 23 23
3 3 19 11 15
14Virology Sub-Studies
- Comprehensive analysis requested
- Treatment failures and/or
- Change in HIV co-receptor tropism
15Failure with CCR5-Tropic Virus
- Determine maraviroc susceptibility in cell
culture - Nucleotide sequence analysis of the gp120 region
to identify amino acid substitutions - Nucleotide sequence analysis of protease and RT
regions
16Failure with CXCR4-Tropic Virus
- Baseline and on-treatment clonal evaluation of
virus to determine the relative number of
CXCR4-tropic and CCR5-tropic viral isolates. - Nucleotide sequence analysis of the gp120 region
to identify amino acid changes that may
contribute to a co-receptor switch to CXCR4 - Phylogenetic analysis to determine the
relationship of emerging CXCR4-tropic virus to
the CCR5-tropic virus at baseline - Nucleotide sequence analysis of protease and RT
17Virology Subgroup Analysis
- Selected 267 subjects on blinded therapy from
Studies 1027 and 1028
38 failures with CCR5-tropic virus (13 MVC 25
PLC)
20 failures with CXCR4- tropic virus (16 MVC 4
PLC)
18Virology Subgroup Analysis
- Selected 267 subjects on blinded therapy from
Studies 1027 and 1028
38 failures with CCR5-tropic virus (13 MVC 25
PLC)
20 failures with CXCR4- tropic virus (16 MVC 4
PLC)
19Subjects Failing with CCR5-Tropic Virus
- Virus from 2 subjects had 3-fold shifts in MVC
susceptibility at failure - All other subjects on maraviroc had EC50 FC
values lt2-fold within the normal range of the
Monogram assay (0.32-1.95)
20Subjects Failing with CCR5-Tropic Virus
- Viruses from 5 subjects showed evidence of a
lower plateau in maximum percentage inhibition - All had novel amino acid changes in the V3 loop
at time of failure
21Genotypic Changes on Maraviroc in gp120
- V3 loop sequences were heterogeneous
- with multiple substitutions
- Changes at either amino position 13 or 26 were
seen in the V3 loop in 5/5 subjects with
MVC-associated lower plateaus in MPI
22Role of the V3 Loop Amino Acid Substitutions in
MVC Resistance
- Site-Directed Mutagenesis
- In 2 subjects
- Mutating amino acids in baseline clones resulted
in the MVC resistance phenotype of lt95 MPI - Back-mutation of the amino acid changes of the
failure clones resulted in a MVC-sensitive
phenotype
23Some Subjects had No Phenotypic Markers of MVC
Resistance
- 7 subjects receiving MVC showed no phenotypic
markers of MVC resistance - 5/7 had evidence of reduced susceptibility to 1
or more drugs in OBT at screening and/or failure
24Virology Subgroup Analysis
- Selected 267 subjects on blinded therapy from
Studies 1027 and 1028
38 failures with CCR5-tropic virus (13 MVC 25
PLC)
20 failures with CXCR4- tropic virus (16 MVC 4
PLC)
25Clonal Evaluation
Pink R5 Green X4 Blue dual/mixed
One subject
192 pre-treatment clones
48 on-treatment clones
2620 Treatment Failure Subjects with CXCR4-Tropic
Virus
- 14 subjects
- CXCR4-tropic on-treatment clones shared a
common ancestor with a pre-treatment CXCR4-tropic
virus. - 6 subjects
- CXCR4-tropic on-treatment clones were
genetically distinct from both the
pre-treatment and on-treatment R5 population.
- The V3 loop sequences differed by 7-17 amino acid
residues from the nearest R5 sequence on the
phylogenetic tree.
27Greatest Proportion of MVC Failures had
Dual-Mixed or CXCR4-Tropic Virus
- Mutation from a CCR5 progenitor -Tropism switch
- Outgrowth of undetected CXCR4-virus at screening
28Why Did Subjects Fail Treatment in MVC Studies
1027 and 1028?
- Outgrowth of CXCR4-using viruses not detected at
screening - CCR5-using viruses some are resistance to MVC
- Resistance to OBT
- CCR5 receptor genotype?
29What is the Outcome of Failures who had
CXCR4-Tropic Virus Emerge on MVC Treatment?
- Evolution to a CXCR4-utilizing HIV may result in
a more virulent virus - Concern that MVC use will result in worse
outcomes for patients because of outgrowth of
CXCR4-tropic virus
30CD4 Cell Counts
Mean (median) Change in CD4 counts from Baseline
LOCF24
Tropism at Failure QD N154 BID N143 Placebo N146
R5 123 (93) N72 128 (110) N48 38 (11) N122
CXCR4 60 (33) N18 52 (31) N20 76 N1
Dual-Mixed 47 (25) N48 63 (58) N61 43 (14) N11
NR/NP 70 (70) N16 99 (103) N14 63 (29) N12
31Follow-Up on Failures with CXCR4-Tropic Virus
- Viral load
- CD4 cell counts
- HIV co-receptor tropism
- AIDS defining events
32Follow-Up Data (n20)
- 2/3 had changed tropism back to CCR5 or
dual-mixed - For the subjects with CCR5- or dual/mixed-tropic
virus at end of follow-up, the median time to
last follow-up was approximately 5 months (range
18 days to 8 months). - In contrast, the follow-up time for the subjects
who remained CXCR4-tropic at the last follow-up
visit was one month or less (median time was
approximately 11 days).
Number X4-tropic Virus at Follow-up Decreased CD4 cells Mean change CD4 cells
20 35 (7) 50 (10) -21
33Follow-Up Data (n20)
- Viral loads remained similar to the value at
treatment failure - No new category C AIDS-defining events were
reported - 4 subjects went on a new ARV treatment
- viral loads decreased
- CD4 cell count increased
34Tropism Summary
- 50-60 subjects failed with CXCR4- or
dual/mixed-tropic virus in the MVC arms - Prominent reason for failure in these studies was
outgrowth of a minor CXCR4-tropic virus
population not detected at screening
35Resistance Summary
- Maraviroc treatment failure with CCR5-tropic
virus also occurred - phenotypic and genotypic resistance to MVC
- resistance to Optimized Background Therapy
- CCR5 host receptor genotype?
36Maraviroc Resistance
- Lower plateaus in MPI were detected in viruses
from 5 subjects failing maraviroc regimens - Changes in the V3 sequence of gp160 correlated
with the presence of lower plateaus and maraviroc
resistance
37Back-Up Slides
- Lisa K. Naeger, Ph.D.
- Division of Antiviral Products
- Food and Drug Administration
FDA Antiviral Advisory Committee Meeting
April 24, 2007
38Failures with D32 Deletion/WT or CCR5 Promoter
Haplotypes
QD BID Placebo
D32/WT 8 (13/154) 3 (5/143) 6 (9/143)
WT/WT 84 (130/154) 89 (127/143) 85 (122/143)
P1 46 (71/154) 41 (59/143) 46 (31/143)
P4 11 (17/154) 12 (17/143) 12 (143)
P1/P4 33 (51/143) 34 (49/143) 31 (45/143)