AMS02 Thermal Test - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 51
About This Presentation
Title:

AMS02 Thermal Test

Description:

Marco Molina, Christian Vettore, Massimiliano Olivier (CGS) Serena Borsini ... have more power supply units for contingency (to oversupply the lamps, as needed) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:21
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 52
Provided by: mmol6
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: AMS02 Thermal Test


1
AMS02 Thermal Test
  • Marco Molina, Christian Vettore, Massimiliano
    Olivier (CGS)
  • Serena Borsini (UNIPG)

2
Test specification
  • TVTB Test specification issue 1
  • November 2007
  • Subdetectors test requirements collected
  • TIM, February 2008
  • TVTB Test specification issue 2
  • Apr 14th 2008
  • Comments received and implemented from AMS
  • TVTB Test specification issue 2 rev H
  • June 29th 2008
  • Last comments have been gathered, will be
    incorporated before issuing the final one

3
Apr 2008- Jul 2008
  • Steady state thermal analysis have been done (S.
    Borsini , UNI PG)
  • Maximum and minimum temperature achievable on the
    detectors
  • IR lamps design has been consolidated
  • Assessment on gradients on the gondola has been
    completed
  • Power density has been calculated for the lamp to
    generate thermal gradients
  • Transient analysis (cooling down) has been
    started

4
Thermal test principle
  • Thermal test conditions are NOT representative of
    the extremes AMS will experience on orbit
  • Thermal test conditions, in general, are NOT
    representative for the entire detector of any
    specific on-orbit condition
  • AMS will be in equilibrium with the impinging
    fluxes varying view factors to the ISS deep
    space unobstructed view

5
T MAX
Thermal requirements for detector A
On orbit
Test
T MIN
6
Thermal requirements for detector B
T MAX
Test
On orbit
T MIN
7
T MAX, B
Thermal requirements for detector B
Test
On orbit
Thermal requirements for detector A
T MAX, A
On orbit
Test
T MIN, A
T MIN, B
8
Isochronous snapshot (same time), on orbit
T MAX, B
Thermal requirements for detector B
Test
On orbit
Thermal requirements for detector A
T MAX, A
On orbit
Test
T MIN, A
T MIN, B
9
Isochronous snapshot (same time) Cold case in the
LSS
T MAX, B
Thermal requirements for detector B
Test
On orbit
Thermal requirements for detector A
T MAX, A
On orbit
Test
T MIN, A
T MIN, B
10
Isochronous snapshot (same time) Hot case in the
LSS
T MAX, B
Thermal requirements for detector B
Test
On orbit
Thermal requirements for detector A
T MAX, A
On orbit
Test
T MIN, A
T MIN, B
11
Isochronous snapshot (same time), Temperature
swing in the LSS
T MAX, B
Thermal requirements for detector B
Test
On orbit
Thermal requirements for detector A
T MAX, A
On orbit
Test
T MIN, A
T MIN, B
12
What is it representative the TV test of?
  • For each detector, a cold and a hot environment
    will be provided for performance evaluation in
    vacuum in the two conditions
  • Transition between hot and cold
  • Model correlation

13
Model correlation in 2 steps
  • Not being possible to reproduce entirely the ISS
    environment, an isothermal environment is used
    for model parameters identification
  • The so called validated model (with identified
    parameters) is then used for on-orbit predictions

14
?
LSS
15
Test data
Parameters tuning (identification)
Test data?Model data VALIDATED MODEL
Model data
16
On orbit predictions (final)
On-orbit temperature are predicted with higher
reliability
AMS VALIDATED MODEL is integrated with ISS
model
  • Overall uncertainty in the temperature prediction
    will be reduced
  • BUT
  • Environment-related uncertainty cannot be reduced
    by the TVTB test

17
Thermal extremes prediction in the LSS
  • LSS analysis conditions
  • COLD shroud at -90C, see next page for the
    other conditions
  • HOT shroud at -10C, lamps OFF, AMS ON
  • Nominal operations (power)

18
COLD case analysis
  • Transient to -90C for 20 hrs
  • Heaters TRD and TRDGB ENABLED
  • Heaters RAM set 1 on
  • Lamps on Lower USS ON with a power of 500 W per
    module (1 module 8 lamps)
  • AMS02 electronics on

19
Temperature ranges during test
  • TRD
  • side panel from -5 C to 20C
  • M-structure (corner bracket) from -14C to 16
    C
  • M structure (center) from 1C to 20C
  • Lower TOF from -16C to 14C
  • Upper TOF from -6C to 24C
  • Ecal from 5C to 38C
  • Rich from -16C to 15C
  • Tracker
  • Hybrids from -18C to -12C
  • Silicon tracker from -13C to 5C
  • Cryocoolers from -17C to 18C
  • TRD temperatures are not stabilized after 20
    hours longer transients needs to be run

20
Temperature ranges during test
  • CAB from -12C to 18C
  • TTCB
  • Baseplate from -20C to 5C
  • Start-up radiator from -17C to -4C
  • Star tracker electronics from -4C to 8C
  • Acc from -19C to 20C
  • Tracker radiator
  • Ram side from -54 to 4C
  • Wake side from -52C to 3C

21
  • TRD GB baseplate from -18C to 14C
  • XPD from -14C to TBD in the hot case
  • Crates from -5C to 33C
  • PDS from 12C to 39C
  • E-crates from -9C to 8C
  • UPS from -30C to 12C
  • HV on lower USS from -50C to 5C
  • By switching on the lamps, can be raised up
    to 30C

22
  • Hottest temperature is driven by ECAL (38C)
  • Coldest temperature is driven by UPS (-30C)

23
LAMPS POWER FLUXES ESTIMATION
24
LAMPS ON TRACKER WAKE RADIATOR
LAMPS POWER EVALUATION
25
LAMPS ON TRACKER WAKE RADIATOR
Lamp power from TD 0,19 x Plamos if Plamps
1000 W ? 300 W/m2 if Plamps 1960 W ? 600
W/m2 if Plamps 2776 W ? 820 W/m2
Number of lamps on the tracker radiator will be
doubled
26
LAMPS ON TRD
LAMPS POWER EVALUATION
27
LAMPS ON TRD
Lamp power from TD 0,25 x Plamos if Plamps
1000 W ? 600 W/m2 if Plamps 1960 W ? 1100
W/m2 if Plamps 2776 W ? 1600 W/m2
Number of lamps on the TRD will be doubled
28
LAMPS ON ECAL
LAMPS POWER EVALUATION
29
LAMPS ON ECAL
NODE 90400
Lamp power from TD 0,04 x Plamos if Plamps
1000 W ? 440 W/m2 if Plamps 1960 W ? 870
W/m2 if Plamps 2776 W ? 1200 W/m2
Number of lamps on the ECAL will be incremented
by 50 (for accomodation reasons)
30
Total IR lamps
  • 92 lamps (30 spares)
  • 32 independent controllable power supply (10 A
    max)
  • It is recommended by NASA/Jacobs to have more
    power supply units for contingency (to oversupply
    the lamps, as needed)
  • Final number of power supply and feed lines will
    be given to ESTEC in September

31
Test sequence
32
(No Transcript)
33
Test sequence
  • Functional checkout before vacuum
  • Bake out
  • Initial cooling down
  • Switch on
  • CCEB (for monitoring Pt1000 sensors)
  • M (for monitoring various temperatures)
  • UG (to monitor TRD TEMPERATURE)
  • The Upper TOF is switched on for thermal reasons.
  • TRD GAS is switched on
  • Cryocoolers are switched ON, to follow the
    recommendation by the Magnet group of running
    them as much as possible
  • Before Magnet charging everything will be ON with
    exception of
  • TRD
  • RICH
  • ECAL
  • TRACKER

34
  • Magnet charge
  • Cold thermal balance
  • Cold start
  • PDS
  • J-crate
  • CCEB (For monitoring)
  • M-crate
  • UG-crate
  • TOF
  • TRDGB (For operational and thermal)
  • Cryocoolers
  • TRACKER, RICH, ECAL, TRD are switched on with no
    priority driven by thermal considerations

35
  • Cold to hot transition
  • Hot thermal balance
  • Hot start
  • PDS
  • J-crate
  • CCEB
  • M-crate
  • UG-crate
  • All the other detectors (TOF, TRD GAS BOX,
    Cryocoolers , TRACKER, RICH, ECAL, TRD)
  • Hot to cold transition
  • Cold thermal balance number 2
  • Hot thermal balance number 2
  • Magnet discharge
  • Re-pressurization
  • Functional checkout at ambient conditions
  • End of the test

36
Example of transient analysis
37
PDS
38
RICH
39
Conclusions
  • TVTB test spec document can be found at
  • ftp//ftp.cgspace.it/Projects/AMS/TWG/DOC/SPEC/1-L
    SS/TVTB-TEST-SPEC/
  • Coming next TVTB workshop in Milano in September
    23-24 2008
  • Test duration estimate
  • Thermal transient calculations from Thermal group
  • Time estimate for each detector tests from AMS
    subdetectors see next page
  • Draft step-by-step procedure (S. Lucidi)
  • Test procedure to ESTEC Nov 1st 2008

40
REQUEST TO SUBDETECTORS
  • Functional test duration (including activation of
    the subdetector) has been estimated 2 hours.
  • Subdetectors needing more time should let us
    know, as well as any critical parameters to
    monitor.

41
(No Transcript)
42
TV test scope
  • Functional performance verification of the entire
    detector
  • Under vacuum conditions
  • At the extreme achievable thermal environment
    (hot and cold)
  • Respecting the flight hardware limits (WITHIN
    ACCEPTANCE LEVELS)
  • Driven by the test configuration
  • TVT stand
  • IR lamps
  • SUCCESS CRITERION Proper functioning of sub
    detectors and electronics.
  • REMARK IT IS NOT A (PROTO)-QUALIFICATION TEST
  • Equipments and detectors will not necessarily go
    to their flight extremes

43
MATERIALS COMPATIBILITY with vacuum
  • NASA-gtESTEC
  • AMS flight hardware DML
  • AMS-gt ESTEC
  • TVT test stand and all hardware used for the test
    outgassing data
  • AMS-provided cables
  • scaffolding
  • AMS-provided piping
  • valves
  • ESTEC -gt NASA/AMS
  • ESA-provided hardware outgassing data
  • Lamps and their rigs
  • Test MLI
  • Test heaters
  • ESTEC provided pipes

44
ITEMS TO BE PROVIDED BY ESTEC
  • 450 Temperature sensors (thermocouples) (50
    spares)
  • Some of them, according to Tab. 8-1 will be
    needed in advance for being pre-installed at CERN
  • IR lamps with power supply, controllers and
    cabling, as specified in 7.2.3
  • 106 Lamps 30 spares
  • 18 independent power supply and controllers for
    the IR lamps
  • IR Lamps cabling
  • IR lamps rigs
  • Venting lines
  • TRD gas BOX vent line
  • Pipe inside and outside the LSS
  • Test MLI (0.05 effective emittance) to wrap-up
    the pipe
  • Heaters (2 W / m) underneath the MLI and power
    supply
  • Cryogenic system venting (see paragraph 7.5 )
  • Feed-through
  • AMS Power, Command and Data (see paragraph 7.3 )
  • For Helium lines (see figure Fig. 7-2)
  • For TRD vent lines
  • Test MLI for the LSS floor (as specified in
    paragraph 7.2 )

45
Temperature sensors
  • 350 thermocouples are foreseen for the test
    article.
  • LSS shroud temperature shall be monitored with
    50 sensors to provide information on temperature
    uniformity.
  • 50 sensors shall be used to monitor the TVT
    stand temperature

46
At the end of the test each subdetector will have
undergone
  • Partial functional test
  • At ambient before the test
  • In a cold environment (twice)
  • In a hot environment (twice)
  • Transient data (cooling down in case of a power
    loss) will be collected
  • In a cold environment (twice)
  • In a hot environment (twice)
  • Response of some subdetctors (TRD, TOF) to
    environment variation will
  • AMS02 Activation sequence is tested
  • Magnet charge and discharge is tested
  • High beta-angle (heat unbalance) is tested for
    RICH, ECAL and TRD
  • RAM-WAKE unbalance is tested for the TTCS

47
Overall duration
  • Bake out and thermostats check-out (initial
    cooling down) 200 hours
  • Cold thermal balance (5 plateau) 300 hours
  • Power outage in a cold case 10 hours
  • Hot thermal balance 100 hours
  • Power outage in a hot case 10 hours
  • Cold TB number 2 80 hours
  • Hot TB number 2 80 hours
  • Magnet discharge 5 hours
  • LSS chamber re-pressurization 30 hours
    .
  • TOTAL 815 hours 34 days

48
Lamp group 1 (AMS bottom)
49
LAMP GROUP 2 (ECAL/RICH side)
50
LAMP GROUP 3 (TRD side)
51
LAMP GROUP 4 (Tracker radiator)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com