Title: Output, Unemployment,
1Output, Unemployment, Inflation
Three Relations
- Phillips Curve unemployment and the change in
inflation - Okuns Law growth and the change in unemployment
- Aggregate Demand Money, output, and prices
2Output, Unemployment, Inflation
The Phillips Curve Unemployment and the Change
in Inflation
3Output, Unemployment, Inflation
Okuns Law The Data
4Output, Unemployment, Inflation
Okuns Law The Equation
ut-ut-1 -0.4(gyt-3)
- gyt must be at least 3 to keep
- unemployment from rising
- WHY?
- Two factors
- Growth in the labor force
- Increases in the productivity of labor
5Output, Unemployment, Inflation
?u ut - ut-1 - 0.4(gyt - 3)
- Why is the coefficient only 0.4?
- Firms hoard labor and there is a
minimum number of workers - Changes in labor force participation
- Okuns Law Coefficients Across Countries
- Country 1960-1980 1981-1998
- United States 0.39 0.42United Kingdom 0.15
0.51Germany 0.20 0.32Japan 0.10
0.20
6Output, Unemployment, Inflation
Okuns Law
In general, the relation between changes in
unem-ployment and output growth is
7Output, Unemployment, Inflation
The Aggregate Demand Relation Money Growth,
Inflation, and Output Growth
8- Or going straight to the equation of exchange
- MV PY
- VdM MdV YdP PdY
- dM/M dV/V dP/P dY/Y
- gmt dV/V pt gyt
9Output, Unemployment, Inflation
The Aggregate Demand Relation Money Growth,
Inflation, and Output Growth
When velocity is constant, dV/V 0
10Our Three Relations
- Phillips Curve (AS)
- ??t - a (ut ut)
- Okuns Law
- ? ut - ß (gyt - gn)
- Equation of exchange (AD)
- gyt gmt - pt
11Output, Unemployment, Inflation
A Scenario The money growth rate falls
(short-run)
According to
- The AD relation, given inflation, output will
fall - From Okuns Law, a decrease in growth will
increase unemployment - From the Phillips Curve, higher unemployment
implies lower inflation
Will the impact end herewhat about the medium
run?
12Output, Unemployment, Inflation
13Output, Unemployment, InflationThe Medium Run
Adjusting to a decrease in nominal money growth
Inflation Rate, ?
Unemployment Rate, u
14Output, Unemployment, Inflation
Disinflation How much unemployment? And for how
long?
Scenario Reduce inflation from 14 to 4 percent
? 1
Conclusion Point years of excess unemployment
equals 10
15Output, Unemployment, Inflation
Disinflation How much unemployment? And for how
long?
If ? 1, what is the sacrifice ratio?
16Output, Unemployment, Inflation
Working on the required path of money growth
A Scenario Reduce inflation from 14 to 4 in 5
years
17Output, Unemployment, Inflation
The disinflation path
18Output, Unemployment, Inflation
The Disinflation Path
Conclusions
- The transition to lower money growth and
inflation is associated with a period of higher
unemployment - Regardless of the path, the number of point-years
of excess unemployment is the same - In the medium run output and unemployment
return to normal
19Output, Unemployment, Inflation
This model indicates that policy can change the
timing but not number of point-years of excess
unemployment.
- Two challenges to this model
- Expectations, credibility
- Lucas Rat-X
- Sargent Low sacrifice in history
- Nominal rigidities and contracts
- Fischer sticky wages
- Taylor staggered contracts
20Output, Unemployment, Inflation
Expectations Credibility The Lucas Critique
- The previous model assumed ? te ? t-1
- What if ? te is based on an expectation that Fed
policy would reduce inflation from 14 to 4.
Then
4 4 - 0
- Inflation falls to 4 and unemployment remains at
the natural rate - Reduction in money growth could be neutral
21Output, Unemployment, Inflation
Disinflation Without Unemployment in the Taylor
Model
22Output, Unemployment, Inflation
The U.S. Disinflation, 1979-1985
1979
- Unemployment 5.8
- GDP growth 2.5
- Inflation 13.3
- The Fed shifted from targeting interest to
targeting the growth rate of nominal money
23Output, Unemployment, Inflation
The U.S. Disinflation, 1979-1984
24Output, Unemployment, Inflation
The U.S. Disinflation, 1979-1984
25Output, Unemployment, Inflation
The U.S. Disinflation, 1979-1984
Observations
- Disinflation was associated with high
unemployment - The sacrifice ratio was very close to 10
disinflation with 10 point-years of excess
unemployment - Phillips Curve relation was very robust
26Output, Unemployment, Inflation
Disinflation Experiences in 19 OECD Countries
- Disinflation leads to higher unemployment
- Faster disinflations are associated with small
sacrifice ratios (Lucas/Sargent) - Sacrifice ratios are smaller in countries that
have shorter wage contracts (Fischer Taylor)