ONTARIO FOCUSED INTERVENTION PARTNERSHIP (OFIP) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 29
About This Presentation
Title:

ONTARIO FOCUSED INTERVENTION PARTNERSHIP (OFIP)

Description:

... living in low income households (provincially, 27% of schools meet the same criteria) ... have some university education (provincially, 23% of schools meet ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:74
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 30
Provided by: judith115
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: ONTARIO FOCUSED INTERVENTION PARTNERSHIP (OFIP)


1
ONTARIO FOCUSED INTERVENTION PARTNERSHIP (OFIP)
Dr. Avis E. Glaze Ruth Mattingley Ontarios
Education Commissioner Senior Executive
Officer Senior Adviser to the Minister of
Education The Literacy and Numeracy
Secretariat May 2008
2
What is the OFIP Strategy?
  • The goal of the OFIP program is to partner with
    boards and schools to improve student achievement
  • Schools identified to be low-performing and/or
    static (based on EQAO results in grades 3 and 6
    over three years) are provided targeted support
    in order to improve student achievement
  • Efforts are focused on the implementation of
    high-yield classroom and school strategies
    through school and board improvement planning
    processes
  • OFIP funds are used for professional learning
    opportunities, resources, release time to allow
    teachers to participate collaboratively in
    professional learning in their schools and also
    may be used for literacy and numeracy coaches and
    other high yield strategies.

3
Key Purposes of OFIP
  • Ensure equity of outcomes for all students across
    the province
  • Provide support for low-performing schools
  • Strengthen and support instructional leadership
    and classroom practices for implementing precise
    interventions
  • Build collective responsibility within the
    schools towards continuous student learning and
    improvement
  • Implement research-based strategies to improve
    student learning
  • Collaboratively build capacity in boards and
    schools to ensure long-term sustainability and
    high levels of student achievement

4
Components of the OFIP Strategy

OFIP
5
OFIP 1 Schools Criteria
  • OFIP 1 schools have less than 34 of students
    achieving Levels 3 and 4 on EQAO assessments of
    reading in any two of the past three years
  • In schools with both grades 3 and 6, where only
    one grade satisfies this criteria, the school is
    included in OFIP 1 if the achievement in the
    non-qualifying grade is less than 50.
  • A minimum number of students is required for the
    school to qualify.

6
OFIP 2 Schools Criteria
  • OFIP 2 schools have between 34 and 50 of
    students achieving Levels 3 and 4 on the most
    recent EQAO assessments of reading and show a
    three-year declining" or static" trend
  • In schools with both grades 3 and 6, achievement
    in both grades would have to have be in the 34-50
    range with any combination of declining or
    static trends in both grades 3 and 6
  • A minimum number of students is required for the
    school to qualify

7
OFIP 3 Schools Criteria
  • OFIP 3 schools have between 51 and 74 of
    students achieving Levels 3 and 4 on the most
    recent EQAO assessments of reading and show a
    three-year declining" or static" trend
  • Schools with both grades 3 and 6 can have with
    any combination of declining or static trends
    in reading for both grades 3 and 6
  • A minimum number of students is required for the
    school to qualify

8
Benefits of Involvement in OFIP
  • Direct support for low-performing schools and
    student groups
  • Support for improvement planning
  • Short-term resource support (human and financial)
  • Assistance in the use of assessment, monitoring
    and evaluation of improvement strategies
  • Capacity-building opportunities for school and
    board staff
  • Opportunities for staff to be active participants
    in professional learning communities in their
    school
  • Opportunities for networking and sharing within
    and across boards and schools

9
OFIP 1 and OFIP 2 School Strategy
  • The goal is to
  • Provide intensive support for low-performing
    schools (OFIP 1) and static and/or declining
    schools (OFIP 2)
  • Strengthen and support instructional leadership
    and classroom practices and implement precise
    interventions
  • Share best practices and implement focused
    strategies effective in supporting low
    performing, static and/or declining schools

10
OFIP 1 and OFIP 2 School Strategy
  • Student Achievement Officers will support OFIP 1
    and 2
  • schools by
  • Developing a plan for differentiated support for
    the school, including number and timing of visits
  • Reviewing and assisting in revising School
    Improvement Plans and targets for student
    achievement
  • Assisting with analysis of assessment data to
    identify strengths and weaknesses and ways to
    improve student achievement
  • Reviewing school timetables to ensure
    uninterrupted blocks of learning time for
    literacy and numeracy learning
  • Supporting the development of professional
    learning communities focused on student learning
    and achievement,
  • Monitoring the progress of individual schools and
    revising support (where necessary)

11
OFIP 3 Schools Strategy
  • The Secretariat Team Leader will work with OFIP
    Board Leads, Supervisory Officers and School
    Effectiveness Leads to
  • Identify the focus of the board-wide strategy
  • Prioritize the needs of schools
  • Review current board improvement plans and
    targets and assist in revising where necessary
  • Support board-wide use of The School
    Effectiveness Framework
  • Determine the deliverables and indicators of
    success
  • Develop monitoring strategies
  • Assess and identify progress of OFIP 1, 2, and 3
    schools
  • Determine specific intervention strategies for
    static or declining schools

12
OFIP 3 Schools Strategy (contd)
  • Develop and prioritize a differentiated approach
    to OFIP 3 schools drawing on the successes of
    strategies implemented in OFIP 1 and 2 schools in
    2006-07
  • Work with the board to develop and embed a plan
    for OFIP 3 schools into the Board Improvement
    Plan
  • Support the development and implementation of
    literacy/numeracy coaches
  • Advise on alignment of supports (human and
    resource) for schools
  • Work with Superintendents of Schools to support
    improvement in family/cluster of schools
  • Identify and implement capacity building
    strategies to strengthen instructional
    effectiveness for teachers, principals and
    supervisory officers
  • Foster professional learning networks within
    schools and across clusters of schools
  • Make school improvement and student achievement a
    whole school priority in every school

13
Expectations for Schools
  • Schools will be expected to have in place
  • Uninterrupted blocks of time for literacy and
    numeracy
  • A common assessment tool for primary and junior
    divisions
  • A School Improvement Team that uses the School
    Effectiveness Framework as a guide to examine
    data, identify instructional interventions and to
    plan for next steps in meeting ambitious targets
    for student learning
  • A School Improvement Plan (S.I.P.) revised based
    on the schools self-assessment and linked to the
    Board Improvement Plan (B.I.P)
  • Resources to implement a comprehensive literacy
    and numeracy program across the school
  • A process to regularly monitor the growth and
    progress of specific students to ensure equity of
    outcome
  • Interventions for struggling students

14
The School Effectiveness Frameworks Role within
OFIP
  • The School Effectiveness Framework will serve as
    a guide
  • the principals, school staff and school board
    staff to
  • Review school implementation of the essential
    components student learning and achievement
    instructional leadership assessment and
    evaluation strategies and curriculum and
    instructional strategies
  • Diagnose strengths and areas for growth and
    improvement
  • Identify key strategies to improve student
    achievement
  • Identify strategies for monitoring implementation
    and improvement

15
Role of OFIP Board Lead
  • The following are suggestions regarding the role
    of the
  • OFIP Board Lead
  • Collaborate with the district School
    Effectiveness Lead
  • Review board and school strategies and revise
    when necessary
  • Work with board personnel to build capacity of
    staff
  • Collaborate with board, school teams and
    Secretariat staff (SAOs) in the development of
    interventions for low- achieving and static
    schools
  • Ensure a common assessment tool is available to
    all schools in the strategy

16
Role of OFIP Board Lead (contd)
  • Provide guidance and support in the development
    and implementation of data-informed School
    Improvement Plans
  • Meet periodically with SAOs to review board and
    school progress and to discuss next steps
  • Ensure that resources are in place to achieve
    equity of outcomes for all students in all
    schools
  • Completes and forwards to The Secretariat the
    OFIP Final Report

17
Role of Superintendents with Responsibility for
Schools
  • Research indicates that the following actions of
    superintendents result in
  • improved student achievement
  • Visiting schools regularly to meet with
    principals to review school achievement data and
    implementation of high-yield strategies
  • Articulating high expectations for all students
    in all schools and ensuring strategies are in
    place to achieve equity of outcomes
  • Facilitate and monitor the District Review
    Process in schools
  • Supporting schools in the analysis of student
    achievement results including EQAO assessments
    and other relevant data
  • Ensuring that targeted interventions for
    low-achieving and static schools are
    implemented
  • Providing guidance and support in the development
    and implementation of data-informed School
    Improvement Plans
  • Monitoring School Improvement Plans and ensuring
    alignment with the Board Improvement Plan
  • Fostering professional learning networks across
    clusters of schools
  • Facilitating job-embedded capacity building

18
Role of Superintendents with Responsibility for
Schools (contd)
  • Posing critical questions to staff addressing
    equity issues, such as
  • Has achievement data been disaggregated to
    identify students who are not meeting the
    provincial standard (Level 3)?
  • Does the School Improvement Plan identify
    strategies to meet the needs of specific student
    populations?
  • Do professional learning opportunities address
    equity issues?
  • Have EQAO exemption rates been examined to ensure
    that optimum opportunities are provided for
    students that need to be assessed?
  • Does the budget provide additional resources for
    targeted groups?

19
Role of Principals
  • Research indicates that the following actions of
    principals result in
  • improved student achievement
  • Ensuring that strategies are in place to provide
    targeted interventions for specific groups of
    students who are not meeting their potential
  • Developing a School Improvement Plan aligned with
    the components of the School Effectiveness
    Framework, establishes ambitious targets for
    student achievement and identifies SMART goals,
    collaboratively with staff
  • Ensuring the effective use of data and assessment
    tools to inform instruction
  • Monitoring student progress

20
Role of Principals (contd)
  • Visiting classrooms on a regular basis to provide
    support and monitor progress
  • Overseeing the implementation of targeted
    interventions
  • Scheduling and monitoring the implementation of
    effective blocks of uninterrupted time for
    literacy and numeracy learning
  • Aligning budget and resources to the School
    Improvement Plan
  • Supporting capacity building for all staff to
    strengthen instructional effectiveness
  • Engaging parents and community in student
    learning and school initiatives

21
Role of Teachers
  • Research indicates that the following actions of
    teachers result in
  • improved student achievement
  • Communicating high expectations for all students
  • Using classroom assessment data to inform
    instruction
  • Implementing a range of strategies to meet the
    needs of diverse learners in order to narrow the
    achievement gap among specific groups of students
  • Establishing lesson plans that make optimum use
    of literacy and numeracy blocks of time
  • Organizing the classroom to ensure effective use
    of space and materials
  • Utilizing a tracking system to monitor the growth
    and development of each student
  • Participating in school improvement planning and
    target-setting

22
Role of Teachers (contd)
  • Sharing the responsibility for the implementation
    of the School Improvement Plan
  • Working collaboratively with colleagues to extend
    professional learning
  • Participating actively in professional
    development opportunities
  • Using resources that reflect ethno-cultural,
    linguistic and racial diversity in positive ways,
    encouraging children to value their own cultures
    and appreciate others
  • Engaging parents and the community in student
    learning

23
Role of Student Achievement Officer
  • To act as a critical friend to the school staff
  • To assist with school-self assessment to
    determine strengths and areas of greatest need
  • To assist in the implementation of high yield
    strategies
  • To meet with staff on a regular basis during
    professional learning time
  • To assist in the determination of resources
    required
  • To build capacity within the school for
    continuous improvement
  • To assist with school improvement planning and
    monitoring of progress
  • To provide pressure and support for improvement

24
Interventions and Strategies for Improvement
  • Improvement strategies focus on the
    implementation
  • of instructional and assessment practices
    outlined in the
  • School Effectiveness Framework. Some examples
  • include
  • Teacher moderation of samples of student learning
    which leads to instructional planning
  • School and classroom organization and scheduling
  • Building a school culture that makes school
    improvement a whole school priority
  • Professional development and capacity building
    for teachers and principals aligned to the SEF
    and the SIP that strengthens instructional
    practice
  • Parental involvement and community engagement

25
Overcoming Challenging Circumstances
  • ESL/ELD OFIP 1 schools have almost three times
    the proportion of students in ESL/ELD programs
    compared to the provincial average.
  • Over a fifth of OFIP1 schools have more than 20
    of their students in special education programs.
  • 65 of OFIP1 schools have more than 16 of their
    students living in low income households
    (provincially, 27 of schools meet the same
    criteria).
  • Only 1 of OFIP 1 schools have 46 or more
    students whose parents have some university
    education (provincially, 23 of schools meet the
    same criteria).

26
High Yield School and Classroom Strategies
  • Although each OFIP schools support program
    varies based on specific needs, the combination
    of strategies that make a difference include
  • access to appropriate books and other learning
    resources
  • effective professional learning teams, including
    use of teacher moderation activities and
    collaborative working to inform instructional
    strategies
  • school improvement planning with specific goals,
    actions and monitoring
  • raising higher expectations that all teachers can
    teach and all students can achieve (given
    sufficient time and supports)
  • engaging school principals and developing
    instructional leadership throughout the school.

27
High Yield School and Classroom Strategies
  • effective instruction in comprehensive literacy
    and numeracy programs
  • blocks of classroom time for literacy and
    numeracy teaching and learning
  • use of student data and assessment for learning
    strategies to review
  • student progress and inform classroom practices
  • identification and supports for struggling
    learners, including tutoring within classrooms
    and through before and after school opportunities

28
Year 1 Program Findings
  • Program had a positive impact on professional
    learning and student achievement
  • 74 identified the implementation of professional
    learning communities as a key strategy in the
    success of the program
  • 94 of the schools discussed developing or
    continuing to develop collaborative inquiry
    through professional learning communities for
    student improvement and learning

29
Demonstrating Improvement Through Focused Action
  • Provincial assessment show that in 2006-07
  • 76 of OFIP1 schools improved in Grade 6 Reading
  • 66 of OFIP 1 schools improved in Grade 3 Reading
  • 67 of OFIP 2 schools improved in Grade 6 Reading
  • 77 of OFIP 2 schools improved in Grade 3 Reading
  • Having a focused intervention leads to success!
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com