Marsden SOC process - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 7
About This Presentation
Title:

Marsden SOC process

Description:

Standards are generally for 3 years, typically for c $6-800k ... written for an intelligent lay panel with a premium on clarity and purposiveness ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:19
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 8
Provided by: geogCant
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Marsden SOC process


1
Marsden SOC process
  • There are Standard and Fast Start
    applications
  • Standards are generally for 3 years, typically
    for c 6-800k
  • Fast Starts are for 2 years, for those within 7
    years of PhD completion for c 160k
  • There are two rounds preliminary and full
    proposals

2
Initial proposal
  • Panel has about nine members, drawn from a range
    of SOC disciplines (education, business,
    sociology, social policy, human geography)
  • Proposals must therefore be written for an
    intelligent lay panel with a premium on clarity
    and purposiveness
  • About 25 make it through to the next stage. The
    reason is to save 75 the effort of full proposal
    preparation

3
What needs to be in an initial proposal?
  • Its short so the argument must be clear
  • What is being done, why, whats its significance
    (theoretical, empirical, national)?
  • Is there is an obvious aim, question?
  • Does the research matter? Will it grab a SOC
    panel?

4
Full proposal
  • Something between 25 and 50 of full proposals
    will be successful
  • The credibility of the proposal is critical
  • So too is the credibility of the applicants
  • Even successful proposals may not be fully
    funded to give over the odds to one proposal
    will mean the demise of another

5
Credibility of the proposal
  • Research question, aim or objective
  • (The aim of this proposal is..)
  • Why are you doing this?
  • What is its purpose?
  • What is its significance?
  • Is it situated in a relevant literature does it
    draw on, contribute to pertinent theory?
  • Has there been a pilot project will it work?

6
Credibility of the team
  • Does the team have a track record?
  • Is the strongest person/s leading it?
  • Is the topic one that sits with the track record
    of the team?
  • Is the team selling itself and its proposal on
    merit and the strength of its argument, or is it
    bolding unnecessary claims to originality or
    innovation?

7
What if it fails?
  • Then persist!
  • To not succeed means that the proposal is not yet
    good enough
  • Work on it develop the argument, workshop it,
    try again
  • Dont give up for ever, or come back next time
    with something completely different
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com