Title: Course: IRC Wall Bracing Requirements and Narrow Wall Bracing Options
1CourseIRC Wall Bracing Requirements and Narrow
Wall Bracing Options
- Texas Residential Construction Commision
- Course Number 2008-05-0222
2- Presented by
- Ed Underwood
- Engineered Wood Specialist
972/840-6479 ed.underwood_at_apawood.org
3(No Transcript)
4(No Transcript)
5QSD
TSD
FSD
6Wall Bracing for the International Residential
Code SDC A Wind less than 100 mph A TECHNICAL
SEMINAR FOR ENGINEERS, ARCHITECTS,BUILDING
DESIGNERS, CODE OFFICIALS, AND CONTRACTORS
7IntroductionWhy Bracing?
8IntroductionWhy Bracing?
9(No Transcript)
10(No Transcript)
11(No Transcript)
12(No Transcript)
13(No Transcript)
14(No Transcript)
15Hold down examples (versus) Anchor bolts
16(No Transcript)
17APA The Engineered Wood Association
- Why Bracing?
- Narrow Bracing in the Code
- The APA Narrow Wall Bracing Method Solution
18Why Brace Walls?
Prevent Racking
1971 San Fernando
19(No Transcript)
20Lateral Loads National Issue
21(No Transcript)
22F-5 Tornado Path
1999 Moore, OK
23Fujita Damage Scale
24Percentage of Occurrence
25Safe Rooms
26Suggested ReferenceAvailable at www.fema.gov
27(No Transcript)
28 2003 Missouri
29 2003 Missouri
30Tornado Report
www.apawood.org
31Vertical Load Path
32Lateral Load Path
Why Bracing Units?
33Wind Forces Acting on Area
34Prescriptive vs.Engineered Construction
Prescriptive Construction
- Buildings up to 3 stories
- Maximum wall height of 10
- For normal lateral loads
- Calculations are NOT needed
- Prescriptive bracing the norm
35Prescriptive vs.Engineered Construction
Prescriptive Construction
- Buildings up to 3 stories
- Maximum wall height of 10
- For normal lateral loads
- Calculations are NOT needed
- Prescriptive bracing the norm
36Prescriptive vs.Engineered Construction
Engineered Construction
Prescriptive Construction
- Any building size
- Wind speeds gt 110 mph
- Typically Seismic Zones D E
- Irregular, large geometries
- Calculations required
- Utilizes shear walls
- Buildings up to 3 stories
- Maximum wall height of 10
- For normal lateral loads
- Calculations are NOT needed
- Prescriptive bracing the norm
37Braced Wall Methods (IRC 602.10.3)
38Bracing Units (IBC 2308.9.3, IRC 602.10.3)
- Let-in bracing
- Diagonal lumber boards
- Wood structural panels
- Fiberboard sheathing
- Gypsum sheathing
- Particleboard
- Plaster
- Hardboard
39Bracing Unit Widths
8 foot
8 foot
4 foot
40Bracing BasicsDefinitions
BRACED WALL PANEL (BWP)
48" BWP
3.7
BRACED WALL LINE (BWL)
R202
41Table R602.10.1Wall Bracing
Note Discuss loads on 3-story walls.
Note Method 3 is wood structural panels (plywood
or OSB)
42Bracing Basics Braced Panel Construction Methods
Method 3 - Wood Structural Panel
48"
48"
48"
R602.10.3
43Bracing Basics Wall Panel Spacing
DOES THIS MEET CODE ?
NO, 25' MAXIMUM EXCEEDED
48"
48"
36'
R602.10.1, Table R602.10.1
44Bracing Basics Wall Panel Spacing
DOES THIS MEET CODE ?
YES, 25' MAXIMUM NOT EXCEEDED
20'
48"
48"
48"
36'
R602.10.1, Table R602.10.1
45Bracing Basics Wall Panel Spacing
MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS
48"
48"
R602.10.1, Table R602.10.1
46Bracing Basics Wall Panel Spacing
DOES THIS MEET CODE ?
NO
48"
48"
3.7
18'
R602.10.1, Table R602.10.1
47Bracing Basics Wall Panel Spacing
Does this meet code?
?
?
?
?
No
R602.10.1, Table R602.10.1
4848 Bracing Units
1970 UBC
48"
48"
48"
49Minimum Bracing Unit Width
When using infill sheathing
48"
48"
50Minimum Bracing Unit Width
When using infill sheathing
48"
48"
51Bracing Unit Widths
Windows
52Alt. Braced Wall Panels (IRC 602.10.6)
48 or 96
32 2003 28 2006 IRC
3322222
32
53Narrow Solutions (IBC 2308.9.3.1, IRC 602.10.6)
- 28 Inch Bracing Units (2006 IRC)
With Hold Downs
With Hold Downs
54Bracing Basics Alternate Panel Construction
Methods
R602.10.6
5528 Bracing
56Braced Wall Methods (IRC 602.10.3)
24
48 or 96
28
572003/6 International Residential Code (Fully
Sheathed Method)
58(No Transcript)
59 High-Wind Event
Fully Sheathed
Foam Sheathed
2003 Missouri
60IRC 24" Fully Sheathed Method
IRC R602.10.5
- Submitted by NAHB Research Center
- Simple and builder friendly
- Not for every wall sheathing type
61IRC 24" Fully Sheathed Method
IRC R602.10.5
- For fully sheathed walls only
62IRC 24" Fully Sheathed Method
IRC R602.10.5
- For fully sheathed walls only
OSB/Plywood Wall Sheathing Shares
63IRC 24" Fully Sheathed Method
24"
24"
24"
64IRC 24" Fully Sheathed Method
24"
24"
24"
65Continuous Sheathing
24"
24"
24"
66Continuous Sheathing
- No hold-downs
- Full Sheathing
- Corner Detail
24"
24"
24"
67Corner Framing Detail (Typ.)
16d nail at 24" o.c.
68Fully Sheathed Homes
69IRC 24" Fully Sheathed Method
70Continuous WSP SheathingTable R602.10.5
8 wall Window (65) 24 Door (85) 32
21
31
41
71IRC 24" Fully Sheathed Method
IRC R602.10.5
- For fully sheathed walls, IF
- Max opening height next to bracing
is 65 of wall height - permits use of
- 5-0 window
- Corner details are
- followed as given
72Continuous WSP SheathingTable R602.10.5
- Max opening height 85 of H
- 85 X 8 81.6 or 6 9
- 9 91.8 or 7 8
- 10 102 or 8 6
- a door or
- large window
73Corner Framing Detail (Typ.)
16d nail at 24" o.c.
74Depends on the Infill Panels Used
Fully Sheathed in Structural Panels (R602.10.5)
Infill with foam, fiberboard, laminated kraft
paper.
24 wide bracing
48 wide bracing
75Depends on the Infill Panels Used
Fully Sheathed in Structural Panels (R602.10.5)
Infill with foam, fiberboard, laminated kraft
paper.
24 wide bracing
48 wide bracing
76Narrower Than 24 Inches?
77Narrower Than 24 Inches?
78Narrower Than 24 Inches?
- Prefabricated Bracing
- APA Narrow Wall Bracing Method
79APA Narrow Wall Bracing Method
- Developed at the request of builders who wanted
site built narrow bracing solutions
80APA Narrow Wall Bracing Method
- 1991 - King County, WA Recognition
- Western Washington
- Seattle to Portland
- Utah
- Kansas City
- Texas
81APA Narrow Wall Bracing Method
- 2004 Adopted by the International Residential
Code - Passed final hearings
- May 2004
82APA Narrow Wall Bracing Method
2004 Supplement to the 2003 IRC and The 2006 IRC
83IRC 2006See page 140, Fig. R602.10.6.2Flip
back to page 138 Table R602.10.5Read footnote
c. It describes the APA Method
84Alternate Braced Method Extended Header
85Alternate Braced Method APA Narrow Wall
Bracing Method
Inside Elevation
86Outside Elevation
87IRC 24 Wide Bracing (Fully Sheathed Method)
24"
24"
24"
Comparison to what is in the IRC
88Summary Of Test Results
- IRC Braced Wall Segment
- Average Maximum Load 3004 lb
- APA Narrow Wall Bracing Method
- Average Maximum Load 4351 lb
- Source APA Report T2003-48
-
89 Summary Of Test Results
Load
(lbs)
Displacement - Inches
90APA Narrow Wall Bracing Method
Outside Elevation
3" x 11-1/4" min. header built-up, solid sawn,
glulam, etc.)
16" min. for 8' height 18" min. for 9' height
20" min. for 10' height
See typ. Corner framing detail.
Anchor bolts and plate washers, typ.
91APA Narrow Wall Bracing Method
Outside Elevation
3" x 11-1/4" min. header built-up, solid sawn,
glulam, etc.)
16" min. for 8' height 18" min. for 9' height
20" min. for 10' height
See typ. Corner framing detail.
Anchor bolts and plate washers, typ.
92Braced Wall Segments
One braced wall segment
Braced wall segment per R602.10.5
No. of jack studs per code
93Sheathing/Header Nailing
94Top Corner(Front View)
8d nails in 3" o.c. grid pattern
8d nails 3" o.c. to each stud
11 ΒΌ"
95Top Corner(Back View)
16d nails at 24 inches o.c.
1000 Strap
Fasten top plate to header w/ two rows of 16d
sinkers 3" o.c.
96Corner Details (APA Method)
16d nail at 24" o.c.
Portal frame wall segment
97Corner Details (APA Method)
16d nail at 12" o.c.
Portal frame wall segment
98Corner Details (APA Method)
16d nail at 24" o.c.
Portal frame wall segment
99Corner Details (APA Method)
16d nail at 12" o.c.
Portal frame wall segment
100IRC 24" Fully Sheathed Method (Corner Framing)
16d _at_ 12" o.c.
(No portal frame)
101IRC 24" Fully Sheathed Method (Corner Framing)
16d _at_ 12" o.c.
8d _at_ 6" o.c.
(No portal frame)
102Base View
103Inside Base View
3/16" x 2" x 2" plate washers
Anchor bolts per code
104Header Between Openings(If Counted as a Bracing
Unit)
105Header Between Openings(If Counted as a Bracing
Unit)
3" o.c. nailing
16" minimum
106Code Accepted System
Continuous Foundation
107Continuous Foundations (Sill Plate Connections)
c
108Continuous Foundations (Sill Plate Connections)
109What About Raised Floors?
Requests from Builders
- Over basements and crawl spaces
- Second story bracing
- Sunrooms, etc.
Approved 2007 Suppl. to 2006 IRC
110APA Raised Floor Testing
111APA Raised Floor Testing
Lumber Joists Rim
112APA Raised Floor Testing
I-joists OSB Rimboard
113APA Raised Floor Testing
I-joists I-joist Rim
114Raised Floor Sill Connections(Framing Anchor
Option)
c
115Raised Floor Sill Connections(Framing Anchor
Option)
116Raised Floor Testing
117Raised Floor Sill Connections(Framing Anchor
Option)
118Raised Floor Sill Connections(Panel Overlap
Option)
c
119Raised Floor Sill Connections(Panel Overlap
Option)
3" o.c. nailing
120Raised Floor Sill Connections(Panel Overlap
Option)
Nailing into band joist
121Raised Floor Sill Connections(Panel Overlap
Option)
Nail sole plate, per R602.3(1)
122(No Transcript)
123What About Raised Floors?
Check Local Building Officials
124Alternative material, design and methodsR104.11
- Allows for material that can be shown to be
equivalent to what is currently in the existing
code.
125Summary of Bracing Widths
Nonstructural panel infill sheathing
48"
48"
R602.10.1
126Summary of Bracing Widths
Nonstructural panel infill sheathing
Solutions for houses that are fully sheathed w/
structural panels
48"
24"
48"
24"
R602.10.1
R602.10.5
127Summary of Bracing Widths (8 tall walls shown)
Nonstructural panel infill sheathing
Solutions for houses that are fully sheathed w/
structural panels
48"
24"
16"
16"
48"
24"
R602.10.1
R602.10.5
APA Method
128Summary APA Method
Fully sheathed walls are required
129Limitations
Limited to -Garages only -Low seismic (SDC
A-C) -1st story or 1st of 2 story
130Fully-Sheathed Bracing Methods
Summary
- Builder Focused
- NAHB RC Developed (IRC 24" Method)
- Builder requested (APA Method)
- Framer friendly
- Typical construction methods and materials
- Easy to inspect
- Helps solves the narrow bracing problem
131Benefits of Fully Sheathed Homes
- Stronger walls minimize racking
132Benefits of Fully Sheathed Homes
- Stronger walls minimize racking
- Provides solid nail base for siding
133Benefits of Fully Sheathed Homes
- Stronger walls minimize racking
- Provides solid nail base for siding
- Helps reduce callbacks
- Drywall cracks / nail pops
134Benefits of Fully Sheathed Homes
- Stronger walls minimize racking
- Provides solid nail base for siding
- Helps reduce callbacks
- Drywall cracks / nail pops
- Siding waviness
135Benefits of Fully Sheathed Homes
- Stronger walls minimize racking
- Provides solid nail base for siding
- Helps reduce callbacks
- Drywall cracks / nail pops
- Siding waviness
136Benefits of Fully Sheathed Homes
- Stronger walls minimize racking
- Provides solid nail base for siding
- Helps reduce callbacks
- Drywall cracks / nail pops
- Siding waviness
- Reduces jobsite damage and vandalism
- Reduces "hidden" costs of repairs
- and replacement
137(No Transcript)
138For Maximum Design Flexibility
- Fully Sheath with Plywood or OSB
139Continuous Sheathing Garage Openings
FULLY SHEATHED
Garage only, supporting roofwith 3 psf covering.
41 Aspect Ratio (24" min.) Table R602.10.5,
footnote b
140Continuous Sheathing Garage Openings Extended
Header Option
Garage only, permitsstory above
2006
61 Aspect Ratio (16" min.) Table R602.10.5,
footnote c
141Continuous Sheathing Whole House, R104.11
142www.apawood.org
143www.APACAD.org
144Order from ICC 800/786-4452
or www.iccsafe.org/store
145APA Wood Universitywww.wooduniversity.org
- Web-based instructional courses
- Modules on various engineered wood topics
- Self-paced with test your knowledge questions
- Earn AIA or AIBD credits
146(No Transcript)
147Questions?
Apawood.org
148Research and Development
- 1989 - Narrow wall testing
149Portal Frame with Hold-downs
150Portal Frame with Hold-downs
151Sturd-I-Frame with Hold-downs
152(No Transcript)
15316 APA Sturd-I-Frame (w/ Hold-downs)
15424 APA Sturd-I-Frame (w/ Hold-downs)
155Engineering Values
- Design values were derived. These are based on
the load and deflection behavior observed, making
the Sturd-I-Frame suitable for engineered
applications too.
156(No Transcript)
157IRC Wall Bracing Solutions