Top Quark Results from D - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 26
About This Presentation
Title:

Top Quark Results from D

Description:

Final cut: NN 0.75. stt = 7.7 3.4 (stat.) 4.7 (syst.) 0.5 (lum.) pb -3.3 -3.8 ... Cut-based selection. Neural network (best so far, results are reported ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:23
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 27
Provided by: herbertg6
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Top Quark Results from D


1
Top Quark Results from DØ
  • 40th Rencontres de Moriond
  • Electroweak Interactions and Unified Theories

Herbert Greenlee Fermilab Mar. 8, 2005
2
Outline
  • Overview.
  • Top quark pair production cross section.
  • Top quark mass.
  • Single top production.
  • Updated in 2005.

3
The Top Quark
  • Discovered at Fermilab in 1995.
  • Feb. 24, 1995 papers submitted to PRL.
  • Mar. 2, 1995 First public presentations at
    fnal.
  • Heavier by far than any other fundamental
    fermion.
  • mt Electroweak scale.
  • Top quark research.
  • Does the top quark exist with properties
    predicted by SM?
  • Are top-like signals seen at the Tevatron due
    exclusively to SM top quark?
  • Measure fundamental parameters
  • mt, spin, couplings, etc.

4
Top Quark Pair Production Decay
  • Top quarks are pair-produced by the strong
    interaction.
  • At the Tevatron, top quark pairs are produced
    nearly at rest.

B(tWb) 100 (according to SM)
  • Top Quark Pair Signatures
  • Dilepton (ee, em, mm) 5
  • Lepton (e,m) jets 30
  • All jets 44
  • ts 21
  • All channels include 2 b quarks.
  • Goal measure stt in as many channels
  • as possible, with and without b-tagging.

5
Run II Integrated Luminosity
D0 560 pb-1 on tape
230 pb-1
160 pb-1
6
Pair Production Dilepton
150 pb-1
D0 Run II Preliminary
  • Signature
  • Two leptons (ee, em, mm).
  • Missing ET
  • Two jets.
  • Major backgrounds.
  • WW.
  • Ztt.
  • Z ee, mm (fake missing ET).
  • Fake leptons (Wjets, multijets).

stt 14.35.1 (stat.)2.6 (syst.)0.9 (lum.) pb
-4.3
-1.9
7
Pair Production Lepton jets
  • Signature (preselection)
  • One isolated lepton (e or m). pT gt 20 GeV/c,
    h lt 1.1 (e) or 2.0 (m).
  • Missing ET. ET gt 17
    or 20 GeV.
  • ³ 3 or ³ 4 jets. ET gt 15
    GeV, h lt 2.5.
  • Major backgrounds.
  • W jets.
  • Jets misidentified as leptons.
  • Final selection
  • Event topology.
  • Lifetime b-tag.
  • Secondary vertex b-tag.
  • Impact parameter b-tag.
  • Cross Section Likelihood fit.

8
Topological Lepton Jets Results
D0 Run II Preliminary

Combined stt 7.2 2.6 (stat.) 1.6 (syst.)
0.5 (lum.) pb
-2.4
-1.7
9
b-Tagged Lepton Jets Results
Secondary vertex b-tag jet multiplicity
160 pb-1
Single tagged
Double tagged

SVT stt 8.2 1.3 (stat.) 1.9 (syst.) 0.5
(lum.) pb
-1.3
-1.6
IP stt 7.2 1.3 (stat.) 1.9 (syst.) 0.5
(lum.) pb
-1.2
-1.4
10
Pair Production All Jets
  • Signature (preselection)
  • ³ 6 jets. ET gt 15 GeV, h lt 2.5.
  • One sec vertex b-tag.
  • Major backgrounds
  • QCD multijets.
  • Final selection
  • Neural network event shape analysis based on 13
    variables.
  • Final cut NN gt 0.75.

160 pb-1
220 events observed 186514 expected
background
stt 7.7 3.4 (stat.) 4.7 (syst.) 0.5 (lum.)
pb
-3.3
-3.8
11
Pair Production Summary
  • Top quark pair production has been observed in
    many channels.
  • So far, all cross section measurements are
    consistent with each other and with SM top quark.

12
Tevatron Average Top Quark MassSummer 2004
Update (Run I)
  • Run I Tevatron average top quark mass.
  • mt 178.04.3 GeV/c2.
  • Updated April, 2004 to include improved D0
    leptonjets mass.

13
Top Quark Mass Dilepton
  • Mass estimator.
  • Dilepton events can not be fully reconstructed.
    Usually, candidate events are consistent with a
    continuum of top quark masses.
  • But different mass hypotheses are not equally
    likely.
  • Use Dalitz-Goldstein-Kondo (DGK) likelihood to
    find the top quark mass that is most consistent
    with each event.
  • Likelihood fit.
  • Likehood fit with signal and background templates
    to extract top quark mass and error.
  • Event sample 8 em, 5 ee, 0 mm.
  • Expected background (1.0 em, 0.9 ee, 1.4 mm).

14
DGK Candidate Likelihoods
em Candidates
Smearing
No Smearing
Likelihood Fit
D0 Run II Preliminary
ee Candidates
mt 155 14 7 GeV/c2
-13
Best mt extracted for each event
8 CL with respect to 175 GeV/c2
15
Top Quark Mass Lepton Jets
  • Template method (updated winter 2005, 230 pb-1).
  • Event preselection W 4 jets.
  • Final selection
  • Topological analysis Low-mass-bias multivariate
    discriminator (four variables, not strongly
    energy-related).
  • B-tagged analysis Require one b-tagged jet (SVT
    tag).
  • Top quark mass is estimated by fully
    reconstructing candidate events to top-antitop
    hypothesis (kinematic fit).
  • 12 possible permutations (6 with b-tag, 2 with
    double b-tag).
  • Mass estimator taken from best fit.
  • Top quark mass result based on likelihood fit of
    data to signal and background templates.

16
Lepton Jets Mass (Template Method)
Topological Event Selection
B-tagged Event Selection
mt 170.6 4.2 6.0 GeV/c2
mt 169.9 5.8 7.8 GeV/c2
-7.1
17
Lepton Jets Mass (Errors)
Source Topological (GeV/c2) b-tagged (GeV/c2)
Statistical 5.8 4.2
Jet Energy Scale 6.8 -6.5 4.7 -5.3
Jet Resolution 0.9 0.9
Gluon Radiation 2.6 2.4
Signal Model 2.3 2.3
Background Model 0.7 0.8
b-tagging 0.7
Calibration (fitting bias) 0.5 0.5
Trigger 0.5 0.5
MC Statistics 0.5 0.5
Total Systematic 7.8 -7.1 6.0
  • Lepton jets top mass is currently
    systematic-limited.
  • Largest systematic is Jet Energy Scale.

18
Jet Energy Scale
  • Calorimeter jets are corrected to have the same
    energy as hard scatter particle jets for the same
    jet algorithm (e.g. cone algorithm). Correction
    is the same for all D0 analyses.
  • Offset correction (O). Remove energy not
    associated with hard scatter (spectators,
    multiple interactions, calorimeter noise).
    Luminosity dependent.
  • Showering correction (S). Particles inside jet
    cone can deposit energy outside jet cone (or vice
    versa) due to showering in calorimeter or
    magnetic bend.
  • Response correction (R).
  • EM scale calibrated using resonances (Z, J/y,
    etc.).
  • EM scale transferred to hadron calorimeter using
    ET balance in g jet events. Missing ET
    Projection (MPF) method.
  • Largest correction and largest contributor to JES
    systematic error.
  • Parton level correction. Correct particle jet
    energy to parton energy. Pure MC based.
  • Not considered part of JES systematic error per
    se (included in modeling error).

19
Jet Energy Scale Error
  • For Run I, jet energy scale systematic error was
    2.5 0.5 GeV.
  • For Run II top quark mass results (so far), jet
    energy scale error is (conservatively) 5 for
    jets with ETgt30 GeV (newer version of JES has
    significantly reduced uncertainty).

Run I 2.5 0.5 GeV
20
Top Quark Mass Summary
  • D0 Run II results are consistent with Run I world
    average.

21
Single Top Quark Search
s-channel s 0.9 pb
t-channel s 2.0 pb
  • Single top quarks produced by weak interaction
    are a direct probe of top quark weak couplings.
  • Measure Vtb without assuming three-generation
    unitarity.
  • Cross section is close to top quark pair
    production cross section (2.9 pb vs. 6.7 pb), but
    background is much larger because there are fewer
    jets.

22
Single Top
  • Event selection
  • One isolated lepton (e or m). pT gt 15 GeV/c,
    h lt 1.1 (e) or 2.0 (m).
  • Missing ET. ET gt 15
    GeV.
  • Leading jet. ET gt 25
    GeV, h lt 2.5.
  • 1-3 additional jets. ET gt 15
    GeV, h lt 3.4.
  • 1 or 2 SVT b-tags.
  • Major backgrounds.
  • Wjets.
  • Top quark pairs.
  • Jets misidentified as leptons.
  • Multivariate analysis using 11 variables
  • Energy-related (pT, HT, etc.).
  • Reconstructed top quark mass.
  • Angular/spin-related.

23
Single Top Event Shape Analysis
  • Multivariate analyses (all using same variables)
  • Cut-based selection.
  • Neural network (best so far, results are reported
    here).

s-channel
t-channel
Signal vs. Wjets
Signal vs. tt
24
Single Top - Results
  • Previous Limits (95 CL)
  • s-channel
  • s lt 17 pb (D0 Run I)
  • s lt 18 pb (CDF Run I)
  • s lt 13.6 pb (CDF Run II)
  • t-channel
  • s lt 22 pb (D0 Run I)
  • s lt 13 pb (CDF Run I)
  • s lt 10.1 pb (CDF Run II)
  • st combined
  • s lt 14 pb (CDF Run I)
  • s lt 17.8 pb (CDF Run II)

Limit from 2D binned likelihood (NN vs. NN)
s-channel s lt 6.4 pb (95 CL) (expected limit
4.5 pb)
t-channel s lt 5.0 pb (95 CL) (expected limit
5.8 pb)
25
Summary and Conclusions
  • So far, all top quark results are consistent with
    Standard Model predictions.
  • Statistics are still limited.
  • New results for top quark mass and single top
    production.
  • The Tevatron is running very well. D0 currently
    has 560 pb-1 of data. Ultimately expect 4-8
    fb-1.
  • Many opportunities for new top results with
    greatly increased statistics.
  • Single top production should be seen in Run II.

26
References
  • Pair Production Cross Section.
  • Dilepton http//www-d0.fnal.gov/Run2Physics/WWW/
    results/prelim/TOP/T03/T03.pdf
  • Ljets (b-tag) http//www-d0.fnal.gov/Run2Physics
    /WWW/results/prelim/TOP/T04/T04.pdf
  • All jets http//www-d0.fnal.gov/Run2Physics/WWW/
    results/prelim/TOP/T02/T02.pdf
  • Top Quark Mass.
  • Tevatron Average http//arxiv.org/pdf/hep-ex/040
    4010
  • Dilepton http//www-d0.fnal.gov/Run2Physics/WWW/
    results/prelim/TOP/T11/T11.pdf
  • Ljets http//www-d0.fnal.gov/Run2Physics/WWW/re
    sults/prelim/TOP/T12/T12.pdf
  • Single Top.
  • Cross Section http//www-d0.fnal.gov/Run2Physics/
    WWW/results/prelim/TOP/T13/T13.pdf
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com