Internet Congestion Control Research Group (ICCRG) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 7
About This Presentation
Title:

Internet Congestion Control Research Group (ICCRG)

Description:

Vijay Subramanian Update on Loss-Tolerant TCP Work (20 minutes) ... Make safety statements similar to those in QuickStart or HighSpeed RFCs (4782 & 3649) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:35
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 8
Provided by: root67
Learn more at: https://www.ietf.org
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Internet Congestion Control Research Group (ICCRG)


1
Internet Congestion Control Research Group (ICCRG)
  • IETF 69 Chicago July 2007

2
Agenda
  • Chairs draft-irtf-iccrg-cc-rfcs (5 minutes)
  • Dimitri Papadimitriou ICCRG Open Research
    Problems draft (20 minutes)
  • Chairs ICCRG Expert Reviews for the IETF (10
    minutes)
  • Murari Sridharan Compound TCP (20 minutes)
  • Cesar Marcondes Recent Congestion Control Work
    at UCLA (20 minutes)
  • Vijay Subramanian Update on Loss-Tolerant TCP
    Work (20 minutes)
  • Dirceu Cavendish Lossless Congestion Control
    (20 minutes)

3
draft-irtf-iccrg-cc-rfcs
  • Comments on -01 draft from Sally Floyd, Stephen
    Farrell, Gorry Fairhurst, Lars Eggert, Mark
    Allman
  • For -02, in several places we added supporting
    references and/or reworded text
  • Added more historic RFCs (970 and 1016)
  • Thinking about whether/how to add more on QoS

4
Open Research Issues Document
  • Our charter says well document open issues in
    congestion control
  • List of issues was gathered at our meeting
    earlier this year and on mailing list
  • draft-irtf-iccrg-welzl-congestion-control-open-res
    earch-00
  • Dimitri will discuss

5
ICCRG Expert Reviewsfor the IETF
  • Basis is ion-tsv-alt-cc
  • TCPM, TSVWG, and others will redirect
    experimental congestion control proposals to us
    first
  • we analyze under what conditions the proposals
    seem safe to use
  • the IETF ultimately decides whether to adopt
    proposals and publish them as RFCs
  • several proposals are expected to take this path
    in the coming months toward Experimental RFCs

6
Review Content
  • Answer question
  • In what environments does this seem safe?
  • Make safety statements similar to those in
    QuickStart or HighSpeed RFCs (4782 3649)
  • Evaluate each proposal independently
  • not a deathmatch competition!
  • Some guidelines
  • draft-irtf-tmrg-metrics
  • draft-ietf-tsvwg-cc-alt

7
Timelines
  • Would like to get these done relatively fast
  • Need to be responsive to both WGs and authors of
    proposals
  • IETF process may take longer
  • changes might be iterated back through us
  • Workload may increase review times
  • Set a goal for 4 months from the time were asked
    to start
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com