Skills Development Provinces and SETAs 2006

1
Skills Development Provinces and SETAs 2006
2007 - 2008
2
AGENDA
Briefing by the Department of Labour on Progress report on Skills Development and SETAs involvement Progress report on budget allocations to SETAs (under/overspending) per province Audits of learnerships per programme
3
Situation Analysis Where from ? Where to?
No of Years
S/C Skills / ESSA
NQF / QCTO
ASGI-SA/JIPSA
NIPF / IPAP
SDA-Bill
NSDS3
SETA3
NSDS2
SETA2
SDA-A
NSDS1
SETA1
SDLA
SDA
Past Future
Footnote Refer Acronyms Handout
4
SETA Performance Management Framework

• Policy/Mandate Skills Development Act
• Strategy NSDS Current 2005-2010
• Regulations Service Level Agreement
• Performance Assessment Scorecard
• ESSA based Performance and Governance Management
  System

5
Performance AssessmentScorecard

• 5 x KRAs endorsed by the National Skills
  Authority
• NSDS 2005 - 2010 Success Indicators
• 16 out of 20 apply to SETAs
• 2005 2006 could only measure 7 out 16
• 2006 2007 could only measure 14 out of 16
• 2007 2008 will only measure 15 out of 15 16
• SI 2.4 National Standard in Good SD Practice
  Now Annulled
• SI 5.3 Quality of Learning dependent on SAQA-
• NSDS 2005 - 2010 Equity Principles
• NSDS 2005 -2010 Governance
• NSDS 2005 - 2010 Funds Management
• NSDS 2005 - 2010 Provincial Linkages
• Reported for 2005 2006
• Measured for 2006 2007 onwards

6
NSDS 2005-2010 SUCCESS INDICATOR 1.1

• Target
• Signed updated SSP (annual) is submitted to DoL
  on the 31 August 2007
• a) Signature of SETA Board Chairperson appended
  to the SSP
• b) Signature of the SETA agreed growth,
  development and equity strategy drivers and
  skills development bodies at national
  levelappended to the SSP
• c) SETA SSP to be evaluated and approved by DoL
  Executive Manager responsible for quality
  assurance.
• Performance Status
• All SETAs submitted their SSPs timely and have
  loaded the OFO Coded Scarce and Critical list
  onto ESSA as required and the list is published
  on the DoL Website. 19 SETA SSPs were approved
  outright with additional 3 SETAs having received
  conditional approval of their SSPs.

7
NSDS 2005-2010 SUCCESS INDICATOR 1.2
SETA Collective Target 8847 SDFs and/or Sector
Specialists (SS) SETA Collective Achievement
16850 SDFs and/or SS Trained Collective Over
Achievement 8003 SDFs and/or SS Trained The
following four SETAs CETA, HWSETA, THETA and
TETA underperformed due to lack of Sector Guides
and/or SDFs and Sector Specialists not trained in
accordance to minimum required standards. Figure
1.2 (A) Number of SDFs and Sector Specialists
trained in 2005/2006 2006/2007
8
NSDS 2005-2010 SUCCESS INDICATOR 2.1
SETA Collective Target 3270 Large Firms and
4279 Medium Firms SETA Collective Achievement
4385 Large Firms and 5380 Medium Firms Collective
Over Achievement 1115 Large Firms and 110
Medium Firms Only Services SETA has under
performed on this indicator in terms of
supporting medium firms in terms of the minimum
required standards required due to non
participation in the mandatory grant process by
medium firms in the sector Figure 2.1 (A)
Number of Large and Medium Firms Supported
2005/2006 2006/2007
9
NSDS 2005-2010 SUCCESS INDICATOR 2.2
SETA Collective Target 21882 Small Levy Paying
Firms to be Supported SETA Collective Achievement
26553 Small Levy Paying Firms to be
Supported Collective Over Achievement 4671
Shortfall of Small Levy Paying Firms The
following nine SETAs CHIETA, CTFL, CETA, HWSETA,
LGSETA, MQA, THETA, TETA and WRSETA have under
performed in terms of the minimum required
standards due to non participation of small levy
paying firms in the mandatory levy grant process
Figure 2.2 (A) Number of Small Levy Paying
Firms Supported 2005/2006 2006/2007
10
NSDS 2005-2010 SUCCESS INDICATOR 2.3

• PSETA is the only SETA that is required to
  conclude a Service Level Agreement with DoL on
  this Success Indicator.
• Target 138 National and Provincial Government
  Departments spend at least 1 personal budget on
  training
• 92 National and Provincial Government Departments
  reported on the expenditure of 1 personal budget
  on training
• PSETA has performed below average in terms of
  accessing information from Government Departments
  as required due to lack of support from some
  Government Departments.
• Note A process has been established by PSETA
  in which detailed information is being collected
  for this purpose outside the normal WSP/ATR
  submissions process

11
NSDS 2005-2010 SUCCESS INDICATOR 2.5

• SETA Collective Target 2571 BEE Firms and BEE
  Co-Operatives to be Supported
• SETA Collective Achievement 1293 BEE Firms and
  BEE Co-Operatives Supported
• Collective Underperformance 4671 Shortfall of
  BEE Firms and BEE Co-Operatives
• The following eleven SETAs BANKSETA, CHIETA,
  ESETA,FOODBEV, HWSETA, INSETA, LGSETA, MQA,
  SASSETA, THETA and TETA have under performed in
  terms of the minimum required standards due to
  amongst other things lack of policies in the
  SETAs to ensure support is provided to BEE Firms
  and BEE Co-Operatives.
• Figure 2.5 (A) Number of Small BEE Firms
  Supported 2005/2006 2006/2007

12
NSDS 2005-2010 SUCCESS INDICATOR 2.7
SETA Collective Target 60652 and 43612 Learners
to Enter/Complete ABET Learning Programmes SETA
Collective Achievement 46095 and 12748 Learners
Entered/Completed Learning Programmes Collective
Underperformance 17040 and 33347 shortfall of
ABET Learners not Entered/Completed Learning
Programmes The following ten SETAs BANKSETA,
CHIETA, CETA, ESETA, LGSETA, MAPPP, MERSETA,
SASSETA, THETA and TETA have under performed in
terms of the minimum required standards
attributed by amongst others, lack of
participation by employers in ABET initiatives
and participation by workers as ABET is mostly
implemented after working hours. Figure 2.7
(A) Number of learners who entered and completed
ABET programmes 2005/2006 2006/2007
13
NSDS 2005-2010 SUCCESS INDICATOR 2.8
SETA Collective Target 32479 and 17672 Workers
to Enter/Complete Learning Programmes SETA
Collective Achievement 57577 and 21423 Workers
Entered/Completed Learning Programmes Collective
Over Achievement 32479 and 17672 Workers
Entered/Completed Learning Programmes The
following four SETAs CETA, MAPPP, SASSETA and
THETA have under performed in terms of the
minimum required standards due to various factors
including in some SETAs the effect of governance
related problems and lack of/or inadequate
systems Figure 2.8 (A) Number of workers
entered and completed learning programmes
2005/2006 2006/2007
14
NSDS 2005-2010 SUCCESS INDICATOR 3.2
SETA Collective Target 2585 Small NLPEs, NGOs,
CBOs and CBCs to be Supported SETA Collective
Achievement 4204 Small NLPEs, NGOs, CBOs and
CBCs Supported Collective Over Performance 1619
Small NLPEs, NGOs, CBOs and CBCs Supported The
following six SETAs CETA, ESETA, FIETA, LGSETA,
TETA and WRSETA have under performed in terms of
the minimum required standards due lack of
policies and strategic interventions to support
Small NLPEs, NGOs, CBOs and CBCs. Figure 3.2
(A) Number of NLPEs, NGOs, CBOs and CBCs
supported 2005/2006 2006/2007
15
NSDS 2005-2010 SUCCESS INDICATOR 4.1
SETA Collective Target 30258 and 15129
Unemployed Learners to Enter/Complete Learning
Programmes SETA Collective Achievement 41011
and 12251 Unemployed Learners Entered/Completed
Learning Programmes Collective Over Achievement
25098 and 3751 Unemployed Learners
Entered/Completed Learning Programmes The
following two SETAs CETA and WRSETA have under
performed in terms of the minimum required
standards. Figure 4.1 (A) Number of unemployed
learners entered and completed learning
programmes 2005/2006 2006/2007
16
NSDS 2005-2010 SUCCESS INDICATOR 4.2
SETA Collective Target 9454 and 8695 Learners
to be Supported to Gain Work Experiential
Learning and be Placed SETA Collective
Achievement 6618 and 3 Learners Supported to
Gain Work Experiential Learning and be
Placed Collective Underperformance Shortfall of
2836 and 8692 Learners not Supported to Gain Work
Experiential Learning and be Placed The following
twelve SETAs CHIETA, CTFL, CETA, ESETA, HWSETA,
INSETA, MQA, MERSETA, AGRISETA, PSETA, SERVICES
SETA and THETA have under performed in terms of
the minimum required standards due to lack of
appropriate Sector agreements and inadequate
support by the companies to ensure that learners
are supported accordingly. Figure 4.2 (A)
Number of learners gained work experiential
learning and placed 2005/2006 2006/2007
17
NSDS 2005-2010 SUCCESS INDICATOR 4.3
SETA Collective Target 2207 and 1544 NVC
Learners to be Trained and Mentored to Establish
Sustainable Businesses SETA Collective
Achievement 3287 and 755 NVC Learners Trained
and Mentored to Establish Sustainable
Businesses Collective Over Achievement 1080 NVC
Learners Trained and Mentored Collective
Underperformance Shortfall of 789 Sustainable
Businesses Established The following eleven
SETAs CHIETA, CTFL, CETA, ESETA, INSETA, LGSETA,
MERSETA, SASSETA, THETA and TETA have under
performed in terms of the minimum required
standards due to number of factors including the
lack of partnerships with relevant stakeholders
to ensure learners trained and mentored can
ultimately establish sustainable businesses
Figure 4.3 (A) Number of learners gained work
experiential learning and placed 2005/2006
2006/2007
18
NSDS 2005-2010 SUCCESS INDICATOR 5.1
SETA Collective Target 296 ISOEs to be
Supported SETA Collective Achievement 476 ISOEs
Supported Collective Over Performance 189
additional ISOEs Supported The following eight
SETAs ETDPSETA, ESETA, LGSETA, MERSETA,
AGRISETA, PSETA, THETA and TETA have under
performed in terms of the minimum required
standards due to lack of policy guidelines and it
is expected that the ISOE policy developed by DoL
will provide a framework that will assist to
improve the current situation for the future.
Figure 5.1 (A) Number of ISOEs supported in
2005/2006 2006/2007
19
NSDS 2005-2010 SUCCESS INDICATOR 5.2
SETA Collective Target 94 accredited providers
to manage the delivery of NVC qualification to be
Supported SETA Collective Achievement 476
accredited providers to manage the delivery of
NVC qualification Supported Collective Over
Performance 39 additional accredited providers
to manage the delivery of NVC qualification
Supported The following eight SETAs CHIETA,
CETA, ESETA, HWSETA, MQA, MERSETA, SASSETA,
AGRISETA and PSETA have under performed in terms
of the minimum required standards due to lack of
policy guidelines on accreditation of NVC
providers could be inhibiting good performance in
some SETAs. Figure 5.2 (A) Number of NVC
providers supported 2005/2006 2006/2007
20
NSDS 2005 2010 SETA PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT
RATING SCALE
Percentage 0 - 60 61 - 80 81 - 100 101 - 120 gt120
Score Rating 1 2 3 4 5
Performance Description Performance is Poor Performance is Below Requirements Performance Meets Requirements Performance is Above Requirements Performance is Excellent
21
KRA 2 NSDS 2005-2010 EQUITY PRINCIPLES
The SETAs are being measured against all learners
participating in skills development supported by
SETAs against a target of 85 Black, 54 Women
and 4 People with Disabilities. The following
ten SETAs CHIETA, CETA, ESETA, INSETA, MERSETA,
SASSETA, SERVICES SETA, THETA, TETA and WRSETA
have underperformed in terms of the minimum
required standards to measure performance of
SETAs. Lack of participation and support by firms
in different sectors has attributed to the
underperformance of some SETAs to meet and
perform according to performance requirements.
22
KRA 3 NSDS 2005-2010 GOVERNANCE
Performance of SETAs is measured against
governance related issues including Audit Reports
by the Auditor General incorporated in SETA
Annual Reports, compliance to PFMA reporting
requirements to DoL on Financial and Non
Financial issues, and the status of operation of
Audit Committees in SETAs. The following two
SETAs LGSETA and PSETA have underperformed in
terms of the minimum required standards to
measure performance of SETAs.
23
KRA 4 NSDS 2005-2010 FUNDS MANAGEMENT

• Performance of SETAs is measured against the
  level of expenditure of the
• 10 Administration Funds
• 50 Mandatory Levy Grant Funds
• 20 Discretionary Grant Annual Funds Grants
  Surplus Reserves.
• Only HWSETA has performed poorly in terms of the
  minimum standards required due to lack of
  participation by firms in the mandatory levy
  grant process and lack of capacity within the
  SETA.

24
KRA 5 NSDS 2005-2010 PROVINCIAL LINKAGES

• The KRA requires SETAs increase their visibility
  and participation in all provinces through
• Physical and/or indirect permanent presence in
  the provinces
• Indirect temporary and/or non physical presence
  in the provinces
• Active participation in the PSDF coordinated by
  DoL in the provinces
• Active participation with the PGDS coordinated
  by offices of Premiers in the provinces.
• During the financial year under review the
  following five SETAs FIETA, INSETA, SASSETA,
  PSETA and THETA have underperformed in terms of
  the minimum required standards which may have
  been attributed by lack of resources and adequate
  planning to ensure visibility in provinces.

25
DIRECT/INDIRECT PERMANENT PRESENCE DIRECT/INDIRECT PERMANENT PRESENCE DIRECT/INDIRECT PERMANENT PRESENCE DIRECT/INDIRECT PERMANENT PRESENCE DIRECT/INDIRECT PERMANENT PRESENCE DIRECT/INDIRECT PERMANENT PRESENCE DIRECT/INDIRECT PERMANENT PRESENCE DIRECT/INDIRECT PERMANENT PRESENCE DIRECT/INDIRECT PERMANENT PRESENCE DIRECT/INDIRECT PERMANENT PRESENCE DIRECT/INDIRECT PERMANENT PRESENCE
SETA E/CAPE FREE STATE G/NORTH G/SOUTH KZN LIMPOPO MPUMALANGA N/WEST N/CAPE W/CAPE
FASSET 5 1 5 5 5 1 1 1 1 5
BANKSETA 1 1 5 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
CHIETA 5 1 5 5 5 1 1 1 1 5
CTFLSETA 1 1 5 5 5 1 1 1 1 5
CETA 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
ETDPSETA 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
ESETA 5 1 5 5 5 1 1 1 1 5
FOODBEV 1 1 5 5 1 1 1 1 1 1
FIETA 1 1 1 5 5 1 5 1 1 3
HWSETA 1 1 1 5 5 1 1 1 1 5
ISETT 5 5 5 1 5 5 5 5 5 5
INSETA 5 1 5 5 5 1 1 1 1 5
LGSETA 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
MAPPP 1 1 1 5 5 1 1 1 1 5
MQA 5 1 5 5 5 5 5 1 1 1
MERSETA 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
SASSETA 1 1 1 5 1 1 1 1 1 1
AgriSETA 1 1 5 1 1 1 1 1 1 5
PSETA 1 1 1 5 1 1 1 1 1 1
SERVICES 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
THETA 1 1 1 5 1 1 1 1 1 1
TETA 1 1 5 5 5 1 1 1 1 5
WRSETA 5 5 5 5 5 1 5 1 1 5
71 51 91 103 91 51 59 47 47 89
26
INDIRECT/ TEMPORARY AND/OR NON PHYSICAL PRESENCE INDIRECT/ TEMPORARY AND/OR NON PHYSICAL PRESENCE INDIRECT/ TEMPORARY AND/OR NON PHYSICAL PRESENCE INDIRECT/ TEMPORARY AND/OR NON PHYSICAL PRESENCE INDIRECT/ TEMPORARY AND/OR NON PHYSICAL PRESENCE INDIRECT/ TEMPORARY AND/OR NON PHYSICAL PRESENCE INDIRECT/ TEMPORARY AND/OR NON PHYSICAL PRESENCE INDIRECT/ TEMPORARY AND/OR NON PHYSICAL PRESENCE INDIRECT/ TEMPORARY AND/OR NON PHYSICAL PRESENCE INDIRECT/ TEMPORARY AND/OR NON PHYSICAL PRESENCE INDIRECT/ TEMPORARY AND/OR NON PHYSICAL PRESENCE
SETA E/CAPE FREE STATE G/NORTH G/SOUTH KZN LIMPOPO MPUMALANGA N/WEST N/CAPE W/CAPE
FASSET 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
BANKSETA 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
CHIETA 1 5 1 1 1 5 5 5 5 1
CTFLSETA 5 5 5 5 5 1 1 1 1 5
CETA 1 1 1 5 1 1 5 5 5 1
ETDPSETA 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
ESETA 5 5 5 5 5 1 1 5 5 5
FOODBEV 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
FIETA 1 1 1 5 5 1 5 1 1 5
HWSETA 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
ISETT 1 5 5 1 1 5 1 5 5 1
INSETA 1 5 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
LGSETA 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
MAPPP 5 5 5 1 1 5 5 5 5 5
MQA 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
MERSETA 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
SASSETA 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
AgriSETA 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
PSETA 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
SERVICES 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
THETA 1 1 1 1 5 1 5 5 1 5
TETA 5 5 5 5 1 5 5 5 5 1
WRSETA 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
TOTAL 83 95 87 87 83 83 91 95 91 87
27
ACTIVE WITH SKILLS DEVELOPMENT FORUM IN PROVINCE ACTIVE WITH SKILLS DEVELOPMENT FORUM IN PROVINCE ACTIVE WITH SKILLS DEVELOPMENT FORUM IN PROVINCE ACTIVE WITH SKILLS DEVELOPMENT FORUM IN PROVINCE ACTIVE WITH SKILLS DEVELOPMENT FORUM IN PROVINCE ACTIVE WITH SKILLS DEVELOPMENT FORUM IN PROVINCE ACTIVE WITH SKILLS DEVELOPMENT FORUM IN PROVINCE ACTIVE WITH SKILLS DEVELOPMENT FORUM IN PROVINCE ACTIVE WITH SKILLS DEVELOPMENT FORUM IN PROVINCE ACTIVE WITH SKILLS DEVELOPMENT FORUM IN PROVINCE ACTIVE WITH SKILLS DEVELOPMENT FORUM IN PROVINCE
SETA E/CAPE FREE STATE G/NORTH G/SOUTH KZN LIMPOPO MPUMALANGA N/WEST N/CAPE W/CAPE
FASSET 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
BANKSETA 1 1 5 5 1 1 1 1 1 5
CHIETA 5 5 5 5 5 1 5 5 1 5
CTFLSETA 1 1 5 5 5 1 1 1 1 5
CETA 1 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
ETDPSETA 5 1 1 1 5 5 1 5 1 1
ESETA 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
FOODBEV 5 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 5
FIETA 1 1 1 1 5 5 5 1 1 1
HWSETA 5 1 5 5 5 1 1 5 5 1
ISETT 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 1 5
INSETA 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
LGSETA 1 5 5 5 5 5 1 1 5 5
MAPPP 5 1 5 5 5 1 1 1 1 5
MQA 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
MERSETA 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
SASSETA 1 1 5 5 1 1 1 1 1 1
AgriSETA 1 1 5 5 1 1 1 1 1 5
PSETA 1 1 5 5 1 1 1 1 1 1
SERVICES 5 5 5 5 5 1 5 1 1 5
THETA 5 1 1 1 1 5 1 5 1 1
TETA 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 1 1 5
WRSETA 1 1 5 5 5 5 5 5 1 5
TOTAL 71 59 91 91 83 67 63 63 47 83
28
ACTIVELY USING PGDS ACTIVELY USING PGDS ACTIVELY USING PGDS ACTIVELY USING PGDS ACTIVELY USING PGDS ACTIVELY USING PGDS ACTIVELY USING PGDS ACTIVELY USING PGDS ACTIVELY USING PGDS ACTIVELY USING PGDS ACTIVELY USING PGDS
SETA E/CAPE FREE STATE G/NORTH G/SOUTH KZN LIMPOPO MPUMALANGA N/WEST N/CAPE W/CAPE
FASSET 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
BANKSETA 5 1 5 5 1 1 1 1 1 5
CHIETA 5 5 1 1 5 1 5 1 1 5
CTFLSETA 1 1 1 1 5 1 1 1 1 5
CETA 1 1 5 5 5 5 5 5 1 5
ETDPSETA 5 5 1 1 1 1 1 5 1 1
ESETA 5 1 5 5 1 5 1 5 1 5
FOODBEV 5 5 1 1 1 1 1 5 1 5
FIETA 1 1 1 5 1 1 1 1 1 1
HWSETA 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
ISETT 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 1 5
INSETA 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
LGSETA 5 1 5 5 5 5 1 5 1 1
MAPPP 1 1 1 1 1 1 5 1 1 5
MQA 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
MERSETA 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
SASSETA 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
AgriSETA 5 1 1 1 1 1 1 5 5 1
PSETA 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
SERVICES 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
THETA 5 1 1 1 1 1 1 5 1 1
TETA 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 1 1 5
WRSETA 1 1 1 1 1 1 5 1 1 1
TOTAL 83 63 67 71 67 63 67 75 47 79
29
First SLA Scorecard Results for 2005 - 2006 First SLA Scorecard Results for 2005 - 2006 First SLA Scorecard Results for 2005 - 2006 First SLA Scorecard Results for 2005 - 2006
SETA Acronym Final Score Achieved SETA Acronym Final Score Achieved
BANKSETA 4.90 ISETT 3.87
FOODBEV 4.87 THETA 3.87
CHIETA 4.82 MAPPP 3.85
FASSET 4.66 MERSETA 3.62
INSETA 4.60 CTFL 3.63
AGRISETA 4.62 TETA 3.32
SERVICES 4.62 SASSETA 3.40
LGSETA 4.44 CETA 3.32
WRSETA 4.45 HWSETA 3.27
MQA 4.24 ETDPSETA 2.64
FIETA 4.02 ESETA 2.40
PSETA 0.97
30
Final Results for 2005 2006 Final Results for 2005 2006 Final Results for 2005 2006 Final Results for 2005 2006
SETA Acronym Final Score Achieved SETA Acronym Final Score Achieved
BANKSETA 5 ISETT 4
FOODBEV 5 THETA 4
CHIETA 5 MAPPP 4
FASSET 5 MERSETA 4
INSETA 5 CTFL 4
AGRISETA 5 TETA 3
SERVICES 5 SASSETA 3
LGSETA 4 CETA 3
WRSETA 4 HWSETA 3
MQA 4 ETDPSETA 3
FIETA 4 ESETA 2
PSETA 1
31
Second SLA Scorecard Results for 2006 2007 Second SLA Scorecard Results for 2006 2007 Second SLA Scorecard Results for 2006 2007 Second SLA Scorecard Results for 2006 2007
SETA Acronym Final Score Achieved SETA Acronym Final Score Achieved
FASSET 4.74 MQA 4.00
BANKSETA 4.70 MERSETA 3.75
FIETA 4.55 SERVICES 3.84
ISETT 4.79 WRSETA 3.96
CHIETA 3.81 LGSETA 3.28
CTFL 3.75 THETA 3.20
ETDPSETA 4.10 SASSETA 3.18
FOODBEV 4.42 CETA 2.80
INSETA 4.03 HWSETA 2.90
AGRISETA 3.96 TETA 3.20
MAPPP 3.62 ESETA 3.40
PSETA 2.97
32
Final Results for 2006 2007 Final Results for 2006 2007 Final Results for 2006 2007 Final Results for 2006 2007
SETA Acronym Final Score Achieved SETA Acronym Final Score Achieved
FASSET 5 MQA 4
BANKSETA 5 MERSETA 4
FIETA 5 SERVICES 4
ISETT 5 WRSETA 4
CHIETA 4 LGSETA 3
CTFL 4 THETA 3
ETDPSETA 4 SASSETA 3
FOODBEV 4 CETA 3
INSETA 4 HWSETA 3
AGRISETA 4 TETA 3
MAPPP 4 ESETA 3
PSETA 3
33
Two Year Comparative Analysis
Score Rating Percentage Performance Description 2005 - 2006 2006 - 2007
5 gt120 Performance is Excellent 7 SETAs 4 SETAs
4 101 - 120 Performance is Above Requirements 9 SETAs 11 SETAs
3 81 - 100 Performance Meets Requirements 5 SETAs 8 SETAs
2 61 - 80 Performance is Below Requirements SETA None
1 0 - 60 Performance is Poor 1 SETA none
34
SETA specific Performance Management Action
Plans implemented by DoL

• Encourage/Reward SETAs that performed well and
  ensure continuous improvement to sustain
  benchmarks
• Engage with individual SETAs regarding specific
  deficiencies and ensure implementation of
  remedial action
• Implement ESSA based Performance and Governance
  Management System

35
ESSA based Performance and Governance Management
System
Phase 1 13 Steps
Phase 2 8 Steps
Phase 3 11 Steps
Monthly Operational Processes
Ministerial Instruction Process
SETA Administration rocesses
SDA Section 10A
SDA Section 14A
SDA Section 15/9A
SLA MS Management
Improvement Management
Crisis Management
20 SETAs 1
SETAs 2 SETAs
36
AGENDA
Briefing by the Department of Labour on Progress report on Skills Development and SETAs involvement Progress report on budget allocations to SETAs (under/overspending) per province Audits of learnerships per programme
37
Current SETA Legislated Governance Funding Model

• Section 9 (2) of SDA requires SETAs to be
  established within discrete sectors (economic)
  Nationally not Provincially
• Result is that funding model is a national
  economic sector funding model
• Raised as a Scope and Mandate issue in NEDLAC
  SETA Review Report

38
SETA Levy Income Admin Mandatory Discretionary Balance Cash Commitments Surplus Cash Surplus in Months
MERSETA 559,689 62,921 219,809 216,760 598,175 363,816 234,359 5.02
SERVICES 467,516 53,624 121,775 170,036 305,669 223,111 82,558 2.12
MQA 358,045 34,419 196,012 127,131 193,147 93,287 99,860 3.35
WRSETA 352,163 39,568 164,115 115,751 471,284 392,275 79,009 2.69
ISETT 258,467 22,848 140,748 113,026 81,632 91,475 -9,843 -0.46
BANKSETA 243,565 23,254 147,805 74,474 83,622 69,536 14,086 0.69
TETA 239,842 265,441 94,678 84,632 130,460 190,242 -59,782 -2.99
CETA 216,593 23,564 76,311 35,246 80,997 19,357 61,640 3.42
CHIETA 182,679 21,241 94,417 54,668 109,332 8,969 100,363 6.59
LGSETA 170,966 19,148 85,866 27,542 259,547 78,509 181,038 12.71
INSETA 153,119 17,046 83,963 41,874 95,376 84,580 10,796 0.85
HWSETA 142,448 32,348 61,804 47,933 220,824 44,386 176,438 14.86
ETDP 142,008 49,876 58,207 69,372 278,237 114,063 164,174 13.87
FASSET 138,609 14,258 71,716 63,015 70,063 68,113 1,950 0.17
MAPPP 131,875 37,722 57,877 64,303 110,697 92,604 18,093 1.65
SASSETA 116,888 33,834 38,726 41,467 155,849 111,918 43,931 4.51
AGRISETA 116,801 15,588 55,450 69,049 96,063 79,544 16,519 1.70
THETA 116,564 18,267 45,013 72,526 123,172 105,056 18,116 1.87
FOODBEV 112,651 13,003 63,151 27,595 84,384 75,606 8,778 0.94
ESETA 85,626 11,592 45,354 33,301 77,942 34,578 43,364 6.08
CTFL 63,752 8,325 27,481 29,845 32,722 24,043 8,679 1.63
FIETA 55,227 6,713 21,783 18,666 59,494 46,331 13,163 2.86
Total 4,425,093 824,600 1,972,061 1,598,212 3,718,688 2,411,399 1,307,289 3.55
39
How can SETAs be required to Legislatively
allocate and report on spend per province?
No of Years
S/C Skills / ESSA
SDA-Bill
NQF / QCTO
ASGI-SA/JIPSA
NIPF / IPAP
NSDS3
SETA3
NSDS2
SETA2
SDA-A
NSDS1
SETA1
SDLA
SDA
Past Future
Footnote Refer Acronyms Handout
40
SDA Amendment Bill 2008Section 36 Regulations

• Addition to empower for provinces
• The Minister may, after consulting with the NSA,
  make regulations regarding the establishment of
  skills development forums in respect of each
  provincial office and specifying the operation,
  composition and functions of the forums

41
National Skills FundSocial Development Funding
Window
2010 Target 450 000 trained (90 000 per
year) 70 placed 25 accredited
training 2005/06 Trained 103 168
114 Placed 55 376 54 10 accredited
training 2006/07 Trained 118 153 131 Placed
90 691 77 36accredited training Total
trained 221 321 (49 of 2010 Target) Total
placed 146 067 (46 of 2010 Target)
42
National Skills FundStrategic Projects

• Aim
• To support skills development initiatives from
  provincial governments in line with their
  Provincial Growth and Development Strategies
  (PGDS)s to drive and sustain provincial macro
  economic, social and development strategies
• Progress
• A total of 7,400 learners have been recruited and
  are in training in the various provincial
  strategic projects during the reporting period.
  The total amount of R141 m was spent against the
  allocated R886 million
• Key Challenges
• Provinces have continued to be challenged by the
  task of setting up the projects. These included
  inter alia setting up project management
  structures, appointing providers and negotiating
  workplaces for learners.
• Recommendations
• High level intervention that can be also linked
  to future plans

43
AGENDA
Briefing by the Department of Labour on Progress report on Skills Development and SETAs involvement Progress report on budget allocations to SETAs (under/overspending) per province Audits of learnerships per programme
44
SETA Learning Programme Audit
SETA Employed Learners SETA Employed Learners SETA Employed Learners
Period Learnerships Bursaries S13 Apprenticeships S 28 Apprenticeships Internships Skills Programmes Totals
2005 - 2006 15,513 - 4,552 3,695 - 46,602 70,362
2006 - 2007 18,349 3,387 3,069 161 376 33,120 58,462
Target by 2010 125,000
Balance -3,824
SETA Unemployed Learners SETA Unemployed Learners SETA Unemployed Learners
Period Learnerships Bursaries S13 Apprenticeships S 28 Apprenticeships Internships Skills Programmes Totals
2005 - 2006 21,818 - 5,920 - - 18,938 46,676
2006 - 2007 31,194 2,835 435 452 1,097 6,742 42,755
Target by 2010 125,000
Balance 35,569
82 Completion Rate
19 Completion Rate
45
Learnership Impact Evaluation

• Study 1 December 2004
• 77 placement of unemployed learners
• 73 placement at actual learning places
• Study 2 About to be completed by HSRC
• Broader scope, 8000 learners across all SETAs
• In depth analysis by age, race, gender, province
• Detailed presentation to be shared with
  Parliamentary Committees in near future
• Integral to Economic Cluster PoA APEX Project 9
• Recommendations on the Learnership impact
  evaluation report implemented by 31st March 2009

46
Thank You