U. S. Risk-Based Capital Requirements and Their Context - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

U. S. Risk-Based Capital Requirements and Their Context

Description:

Basic formula compares reported capital to risk-based capital requirement ... Document results in a manner useful in focusing regulatory oversight ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:28
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 21
Provided by: KCAR77
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: U. S. Risk-Based Capital Requirements and Their Context


1
U. S. Risk-BasedCapital Requirements and Their
Context
Alfred W. Gross Virginia Commissioner of
Insurance National Association of Insurance
Commissioners October 11, 2002
2
What is RBC?
  • Basic formula compares reported capital to
    risk-based capital requirement
  • Requirement calculated by applying factors to
    various asset, credit, reserve and off-balance
    sheet items
  • taken from NAIC Financial Analysis Handbook
    Property/Casualty Edition, 2001 Annual

3
What is RBC? (continued)
  • Factor is higher for those items with greater
    underlying risk
  • Risk-based capital ratio is defined as a ratio of
    actual capital (i.e. total adjusted capital)
    divided by required capital (i.e. authorized
    control level risked based capital)
  • Regulatory action taken on basis of this ratio

4
Standard U. S. Regulatory FilingsFinancial
Reporting
  • Annual Statements
  • Quarterly Statements
  • Management Discussion and Analysis
  • Actuarial Opinion
  • Annual Audited Financial Statements
  • Risk-Based Capital Report

5
Standardized Risk-BasedCapital (RBC) Report
  • Uniform Approach Across Companies and U. S.
    Jurisdictions
  • Based on U. S. Statutory Annual Statement Blank
    (A.S.)
  • Values are taken from A.S. and have no meaning
    outside of A.S. context U. S. statutory
    accounting model
  • Formulas and calibration of results are based
    aggregate industry statistics taken from A.S.
    reporting

6
Standardized RBC Report (continued)
  • Based on historical financial reporting, not
    forward looking
  • Dependent on accounting definition of solvency
    (asset-liabilities)
  • Works within the surplus geography of the A.S.,
    e.g., hidden margins in conservatively valued
    assets and technical provisions

7
The RBC System
  • Background
  • 1993 Life
  • 1994 Property/Casualty
  • 1998 Health
  • Designed to provide regulators with some degree
    of control in monitoring risks taken by insurers
  • Designed to provide companies with some
    cost-benefit mindset in their asset allocation
    decisions

8
The RBC System (continued)
  • Tensions in Capital Regulation and Standards
  • Desire to minimize free surplus so as to focus
    investment in underwriting business and to use
    financial leverage (e.g., debt) to provide
    greater returns (management perspective)
  • VS.
  • Need to hold a minimum amount as free surplus
    to ensure company performance (regulator
    perspective)

9
The RBC System (continued)
  • Need for a straight-forward, transparent, legally
    workable and fair approach across all companies
    in a competitive market
  • VS.
  • Need to be sensitive to individual company
    characteristics, e.g., types of risks, levels of
    exposure, and management capabilities

10
The RBC System (continued)
  • RBC is a Regulatory Tool
  • Signaling mechanism between regulators and
    insurance companies as to poorly capitalized
    companies
  • Act as a tripwire providing clear regulatory
    authority for intervention at defined action
    levels
  • RBC is not
  • A silver bullet to stop insolvencies
  • A system for ranking or rating companies
  • A precise diagnostic tool to define problematic
    companies

11
RBC Formulas
  • Life and Health
  • Property and Casualty
  • Health

12
Life RBC - Components
  • Insurance Affiliate Investment and Non-Derivative
    off-balance Sheet Risk (C0)
  • Invested Asset Risk - Common Stock (C1cs)
  • Invested Asset Risk - Other (C1o)
  • Insurance Risk or Pricing Risk (C2)
  • Interest Rate Risk (C3a)
  • Health Provider Credit Risk (C3b)
  • Business Risk - Guaranty Fund Assessment Risk
    (C4a)
  • Business Risk - Health Administration Expense
    Risk (C4b)
  • Covariance Adjustment

13
RBC - Action LevelsTotal Adjusted
Capital/Authorized Control Level RBC
  • No Action Level
  • Company Action Level
  • Regulatory Action Level
  • Authorized Control Level
  • Mandatory Control Level
  • 200
  • 150 - 200
  • 100 - 150
  • 70 - 100
  • Under 70

14
Historical RBC Results(Life, Property and Health)
  • 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000
  • No Action 3,799 3,740 3,707 3,870 3,953
  • Company 59 54 54 84 92
  • Regulatory 22 14 31 64
    67
  • Authorized 11 8 22 23
    28
  • Mandatory 31 27 43 46
    53
  • Total 3,922 3,843 3,857 4,087 4,193
  • (Life - 1993 Property - 1994 Health - 1998)

15
Life RBC - RBC Requirement Percentage After
Covariance
  • Asset Risk-Affiliate (C0)
  • Asset Risk-All Other (C1)
  • Insurance Risk (C2)
  • Interest Rate Risk (C3a)
  • Health Credit Risk (C3b)
  • Total (C3) Risk
  • Business Risk-Prem/Liab (C4a)
  • Business Risk-Health (C4b)
  • Total (C4) Risk
  • RBC After Covariance
  • Authorized Control Level RBC
  • 22.0 billion 23
  • 51.1 billion 53
  • 19.1 billion 20
  • 10.9 billion 11
  • 32.0 million lt1
  • 10.9 billion 11
  • 3.7 billion 4
  • 533.6 million lt1
  • 4.3 billion 4
  • 96.1 billion 100
  • 48.0 billion

16
NAIC Accreditation Base - LineLaws and
Regulations
  • Key standards include
  • 1. Examination Authority
  • 2. Corrective Action
  • 3. Risked Based Capital
  • 4. Reinsurance
  • 5. Investments
  • 6. Reserves
  • 7. Receiverships
  • 8. Guaranty Funds
  • 9. Accounting Practices

17
Risk Assessment Working Group
  • Recognition of new financial services
    marketplace rapid product innovation,
    convergence among the sectors, global
    competition, role of technology
  • Need for a forward-looking perspective
    responsive to the specific risk exposures of a
    companys operations

18
General Goals
  • To create a framework for identifying and
    assessing risk exposures
  • Categorize risks
  • Analyze and evaluate risk exposures, both
    inherent and control risks
  • Document results in a manner useful in focusing
    regulatory oversight
  • Produce a type of risk profile or matrix for each
    company

19
General Goals (continued)
  • To make more effective current approaches to
    on-site examinations and on-going financial
    analysis by targeting resources to material risk
    exposures
  • To encourage insurers to establish effective risk
    management systems

20
Challenging Assumptions
  • Regulators reliance on internal company
    processes to identify, evaluate, and manage the
    risks. Has top management the ability to
    circumvent internal controls?
  • Increased reliance on work of outside auditors
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com