Earthquake Engineering GE CEE 479679 Topic 13' Wave Propagation 2 PowerPoint PPT Presentation

presentation player overlay
1 / 61
About This Presentation
Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Earthquake Engineering GE CEE 479679 Topic 13' Wave Propagation 2


1
Earthquake EngineeringGE / CEE - 479/679Topic
13. Wave Propagation 2
  • John G. Anderson
  • Professor of Geophysics

2
Combining in Fma
  • In this equation, Xi is a body force acting on
    the point, if any.

3
(No Transcript)
4
(No Transcript)
5
The Free Surface
SH
  • S-waves can have two polarizations
  • SH - wave motion is parallel to the surface.
    Causes only horizontal shaking.
  • SV - wave motion is oriented to cause vertical
    motion on the surface.
  • Amplitudes are approximately doubled

Motion in and out of the plane of this figure -
hard to draw.
SV
Motion perpendicular to the direction of
propagation causes vertical motion of the free
surface.
6
Two Media in Contact
  • This way of drawing is consistent with horizontal
    layers in the Earth.
  • Lower velocities near the surface imply wave
    propagation direction is bent towards the
    vertical as the waves near the surface.

i1
i2
7
Two Media in Contact
Transmitted SV
  • For an incoming SV wave, the situation gets even
    more complex.
  • In this case, both P- and SV-waves are
    transmitted and reflected from the boundary.
  • The P- and SV-waves are coupled by the
    deformation of the boundary.

Transmitted P
i1
j1
i2
i2
Reflected P
j2
Incoming SV
Reflected SV
Generalized Snells Law
8
Realistic Earth Model
p is the ray parameter. It is constant along
the ray
i1
i2
  • Eventually, as the velocity increases with depth,
    rays are bent back towards the surface.
  • Waves cannot penetrate into layers where ß is too
    large.

ß increases
9
Body Waves Discussion
  • The travel time curves of body waves can be
    inverted to find the velocity structure of the
    path.

10
Seismic Refraction
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?

i1
Refracted wave
i2
  • Because velocity increases with depth, rays are
    bent back towards the surface.
  • Apparent velocity at the array of sensors is the
    same as the velocity of the refracted ray along
    the top of the refracting layer.
  • Records from a profile of sensors radial from an
    explosion can thus be inverted to find velocity
    with depth.

ß increases
p is constant along the ray
11
(No Transcript)
12
(No Transcript)
13
(No Transcript)
14
Realistic Earth Model
i1
i2
  • Due to Snells law, energy gets trapped near the
    surface.
  • This trapped energy organizes into surface waves.

ß increases
15
Four types of seismic waves Body Waves P Waves
Compressional, Primary S Waves Shear,
Secondary Surface Waves Love Waves Rayleigh
Waves
16
Surface Waves
  • Love waves trapped SH energy.
  • Rayleigh waves combination of trapped P- and SV-
    energy.

17
Surface Waves
  • For surface waves, geometrical spreading is
    changed.
  • For body waves, spreading is 1/r.
  • For surface waves, spreading is 1/r0.5.

18
Surface Waves Discussion
  • Body waves are not dispersed.
  • Surface waves are dispersed, meaning that
    different frequencies travel at different speeds.
  • Typically, low frequencies travel faster. These
    have a longer wavelength, and penetrate deeper
    into the Earth, where velocities are faster.
  • Typically, Love waves travel faster than Rayleigh
    waves.

19
(No Transcript)
20
(No Transcript)
21
(No Transcript)
22
Surface Waves
  • Surface wave dispersion curves can be inverted to
    find the velocity structure of the path crossed
    by the surface waves.

23
Surface Waves Discussion
  • Particle motion in S-waves is normal to the
    direction of propagation.
  • This is also true of Love waves.
  • However, Love waves would show changes in phase
    along the direction of propagation that would not
    appear in vertically propagating S waves.

24
Surface Waves Discussion
  • Motion of Rayleigh waves is retrograde
    elliptical.

25
Site Response
  • What is site response
  • What causes it
  • What are its characteristics.

26
Classic example of site effect Mexico City
  • Mexico City, Mexico

27
(No Transcript)
28
(No Transcript)
29
(No Transcript)
30
Figure 2
31
Physics of Site Response
  • Layer over half space
  • Multiple layers over half space
  • Basins
  • Topography

32
(No Transcript)
33
(No Transcript)
34
(No Transcript)
35
(No Transcript)
36
(No Transcript)
37
(No Transcript)
38
Multiple flat layers
39
Basins major phenomena
  • Amplification
  • Energy trapped
  • Conversion to surface waves at basin edge
  • Longer duration

40
(No Transcript)
41
  • Basin edge
  • Kobe, Japan earthquake disaster.

42
Liu and Heaton, 1980 Study of strong motion
from the San Fernando earthquake. Published in
Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. Demonstration of a basin
effect.
43
(No Transcript)
44
Site Characterization
  • Goal characterize the average effect of geology
    on strong motion, and use this to improve
    predictions.
  • The shallow geology is an almost miniscule part
    of the total path from the earthquake to the
    station.
  • However, it has a strong effect on the ground
    motions, because it is the closest to the
    station.
  • Geophysical measurements, using wave propagation
    techniques, are used to measure near-surface site
    characteristics.
  • Also need to know basin geometry, depth.

45
Geotechnical Site Classification
  • Many schemes to classify the site.
  • Encroaching into the territory that Prof.
    Siddharthan will discuss later.
  • But its good to introduce the subject from the
    viewpoint of the seismologist.

46
Seed and Idriss (1982)
  • 1. Rock sites
  • 2. Stiff soil sites (lt 60 m deep)
  • 3. Deep cohesionless soil sites (gt 75 m deep)
  • 4. Sites underlain by soft to medium stiff clays

Problem with this approach Does not recognize
that the spectral shape also depends on the
earthquake magnitude.
47
Geotechnical Classification Schemes
  • Geology
  • Material on a geological map
  • For example, for California one simple approach
    is the QTM approach, using the age of the
    material.
  • Q Quaternary
  • T Tertiary
  • M Mesozoic
  • Whether the location is erosion-dominated or
    sedimentation-dominated (rock, soil)

48
NEHRP ClassificationShear velocity of
near-surface materials
49
Empirical site response and comparison with
measured site conditions at ANSS sites in the
Reno area
  • Pancha, Anderson, Biasi, Anooshepor, Louie

50
Results from Panchas ReMi studies in the Central
Truckee Meadows
51
Figure 1a
52
Figure 3
53
(No Transcript)
54
Figure 1b
55
Figure 5
56
Alternate Figure 9
57
(No Transcript)
58
Figure 3
59
Figure 2
60
Figure 6
61
OLD Figure 7
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com