Aucun titre de diapositive

1
WP5 Progress Report
S_at_S PMC Meeting London 13-14th November 2003
For the benefit of business and people
2
SUMMARY

• 1 Status of Parameters List
• 2 Status of Models
• Status of Integration
• Workplan
• eTIP

3
1

• gt Status of Parameters List

4
Initial Schedule
1
Status of Parameters List

• Initial Schedule
• 2003/09/08 Standard format for the parameters
  list issued by WP5
• 2003/09/22 Parameters List to be updated by the
  WPs
• 2003/10/13 Final list of parameters
• Implementation of user forms

5
Status Report
1
Status of Parameters List

• Status Report
• Since mid-September, WP5 has collected the
  parameters of WP1 to 4
• a draft list has been produced
• Partners have found difficult to issue the list
  of parameters before finalising their models.
• Some parameters are still missing
• Vibration
• Noise
• Indoor climate

6
Work Plan
1
Status of Parameters List

• Work Plan
• gather missing parameters
• Vibration
• Noise
• Indoor climate
• classify the parameters with WP6 into
• background,
• project specification,
• design parameters (concept, preliminary,
  detailed)
• derived parameters
• implementation of user forms (in parallel with
  the project tool development)

7
WP5 WP6 New Schedule
1
Status of Parameters List

• WP5 WP6 New Schedule
• gather missing parameters
• Date 2003/11/14
• classify the parameters with WP6
• Date 2003/12/01
• implementation of user forms
• Date 2003/12/31

8
2

• gt Status of Models

9
Initial Schedule
2
Status of Models

• Initial Schedule
• 2003/10/31 deadline for Final Models (WP1 to
  WP4)
• It was agreed in Genoa that models that were not
  on time wouldnt be integrated in the project
  tool.

10
Status Report
2
Status of Models

• Status Report
• Since mid-September, WP5 has collected the models
  of WP1 to 4
• models are available on S_at_S website which is
  updated regularly thanks to Jeppe.
• Some models are still missing
• Global Comfort Model in particular
• Vibration
• Noise
• Indoor climate
• WP1 Models in particular
• Model for Manoeuvring error

11
Work Plan
2
Status of Models

• Work Plan
• gather missing models update the S_at_S Website
• WP1 models
• WP2 models
• WP5 Integration development of the project tool
  methodology user guide.

12
Requirements
2
Status of Models

• Requirements
• All models should be described by a self-content
  user guide (separately from the deliverable)
• available on the website,
• to help WP6 and WP5 to understand / run the
  models.
• WP5 is seeking agreement from the consortium that
  for the tool to be produced, WP will be available
  to answer any requests or questions from WP5
  WP6.

13
WP5 WP6 New Schedule
2
Status of Models

• WP5 WP6 New Schedule
• gather missing models update the S_at_S Website
• Date 2003/11/17
• WP5 Integration development of the project tool
  Handbook
• Date 2004/02/15

14
3

• gt Status of Integration

15
Initial Schedule
3
Status of Integration

• Initial Schedule
• 2004/01/31 First Version of the project tool
  Handbook

16
Status Report
3
Status of Integration

• Status Report
• Development of the project tool under progress
• As there are no major alterations to be made to
  models and all outstanding models will be
  delivered on the 17th November then there should
  be no delays in the integration process.

17
Work Plan
3
Status of Integration

• Work Plan
• Parameters Userforms to be developed
• Specifications to be defined with WP6
• Project tool Handbook

18
WP5 WP6 New Schedule
3
Status of Integration

• WP5 WP6 New Schedule
• Parameters Userforms to be developed
• Date 2003/31/12
• Project tool Handbook
• Date 2004/02/15

19
4

• gt Workplan

20
Progress /Workplan
4
Workplan
21
5

• gt eTIP

22
5
eTIP

• Owner/CoOwner
• A comprehensive and consistent methodology for
  the design of High Speed Crafts based on a
  risk/cost approach /DTU, BV
• Design procedure for improving safety of
  passengers during HSC operations /DTU,
  BV
• Operational guidelines for improving safety of
  passengers during HSC operations
  /DTU, BV
• Methods for assessing controllability of HSCs
  /BV
• Specific risk/cost models for controllability of
  HSCs /BV
• A methodological framework for the design of
  safer HSCs at
• reduced cost /BV
• A baseline for design for safety methodology
  /BV
• Generic Safety Model for HSC BV/
• Tool for Early Design of Safe and Cost effective
  HSC and Comparison of Alternatives
  BV/
• BV Contact Person Pierre BESSE