Trigger Meister Report - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 10
About This Presentation
Title:

Trigger Meister Report

Description:

... caps are based on DAQ limitations. keep FEB 5% keep the system running ... Kyle starting today to make some v12 entries. 29 April 2003 TM ... group set a ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:41
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 11
Provided by: d0serve
Category:
Tags: make | meister | report | trigger

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Trigger Meister Report


1
Trigger Meister Report
  • Kyle Stevenson
  • Elizabeth Gallas
  • Terry Toole
  • Trigger Board Meeting
  • May 13, 2003

2
global_CMT-11.04 Week 1
  • MarkAndPass monitor stream is enabled
  • All triggers satisfying a L3FMarkAndPass filter
    are written to this stream (inclusively)
  • 176869 - no store - 1.05 hours using 13E30 --
    final test run
  • 176874 - store 2540 - 3.21 hours using 40E30
  • 176875 - store 2540 - 3.98 hours using 30E30
  • No surprise initial lum is now consistently in
    40E30 range
  • NOTE this is NOT high luminosity by Run 2 specs.
  • Run startup at beginning of Store have been
    smooth.
  • Fewer trigger/DAQ problems than last week.

3
global_CMT this week
  • Peak rates during stable Runs during Stores this
    week
  • (New peak lum 43 in store 2538)
  • Store 2540 2538 2536 2529 2523
    2521 2511
  • Init L (E30) 42 43 30 40
    40 37 40
  • L1 Accept 850 850 1170 1100 1150 1200
    900
  • L2 Accept 510 370 440 490 500
    520 580
  • L3 Accept 58 54 53 50
    55 gt60 gt65

4
Rate Caps and Prescales
  • Rate caps remain (1100 / 800 / 50)
  • L1 and L2 rate caps are based on DAQ limitations
  • keep FEBlt5
  • keep the system running
  • L3 rate cap IS NOT A DAQ (online) limitation
  • (though it occasionally affects DAQ stability)
  • it is a limitation based on offline processing
    and reprocessing
  • Prescales
  • 99 of time are dominated by rate to tape (true
    for over a year)
  • if your new trigger's rate to tape is too high
    relative to your priority due to
  • Rate to tape is too high
  • your MarkAndPass rate is too high (MP rate L2
    accept / pass_1_of_n)
  • 'temporary' L3 rate to tape limitation (collector
    router ...)
  • high luminosity (accelerator performance is on
    upward climb)
  • decrease in rate cap by the powers that be (goal
    is to average 25Hz now)
  • your trigger will be prescaled at L1.

5
TM Activity in last week
  • Special Runs in various stages of preparation
  • Cosmic Ray, Alignment, CPS calib, Jet_Gap, new L1
    muon and CTT A/O Terms
  • Database Changes
  • needed now to enter special run trigger list and
    for v12
  • keep track of 2 releases
  • need to be in before the end of the week
  • Limited manpower is addressing the following
  • commissioning triggers to be added
  • special run requests (commissioning and special
    runs),
  • prescale adjustments
  • rate monitoring
  • resolving requests for v12 (asking for some help
    from requesters),
  • These things take considerable time and have
    higher priority.
  • When requests can be resolved, we enter v12
    triggers (lower priority).
  • A reasonable resolution of all trigger parameters
    must be arrived at before triggers can be entered
    because TM's do not have time to define 150
    triggers multiple times.
  • Kyle starting today to make some v12 entries

6
Specific Progress on v12.00
  • General comments
  • Many triggers are being added.
  • Have some triggers to delete (Nikos has standing
    request for all groups to report ?)
  • Ultimate list may exceed 150 triggers - note
    this is a huge number (thousands of parameters).
  • Changes are extensive, probably NO existing
    trigger unchanged due to tool and filter changes
    in L3 or change in low lying tools and
    L3FPrescale being replaced by PassFraction
    filter.
  • An example
  • 29 new tool definitions for EM request alone
  • About 7 minutes per tool (based on 3.5 hours
    entering 29 tools withVolker with some
    interruptions, then about half the time spent
    resolving parameters/values with available
    experts)
  • typical rates will be higher due to expertise of
    requester

7
Strategy for v12.00
  • Define groups of triggers that have a common
    representative. For Example
  • EM triggers (Volker) now has one set of EM
    triggers with a full suite of L3 scripts (this
    took over a day of Volker and TM time to
    resolve/enter into database due to large number
    of elements to be entered into the database).
  • In the process of making the above definitions,
    many questions have arisen that must be
  • resolved - what are the (real) effects, consult
    with experts
  • agreed upon - by the representative known to be
    associated with requests
  • announced - to the TB
  • These groups of triggers must ultimately be
    combined into v12 trigger list with a minimum of
    changes/conflicts.

8
Examples of Issues for v12
  • Calorimeter unpacking (TB too cavalier about
    multiple unpackers)
  • L3 expert advise (friday) don't run more than 1
  • many groups have informally agreed on non-linear
    corrections making this public
  • 'option of NADA' should be enabled - making this
    public
  • Calorimeter clustering (must run multiple
    clustering tools
  • clustering cone size
  • vertex or no vertex.
  • if vertex based on tracks with what criteria ?
  • L3 TOOL changes
  • 3 new and 3 changing parameters for electron
    tool
  • A reasonable resolution must be arrived at before
    further triggers can be entered because TM's do
    not have time to define 150 triggers multiple
    times.
  • We encourage requesters to play a proactive role
    in resolving these requests with all concerned
    groups and circulate decisions widely -- this
    will speed up the process.

9
Outlook (1)
  • Lots of progress on pieces of v12
  • Some groups just becoming aware of issues
  • TM's remain optimistic
  • We have some good triggers in 11.04, but some are
    being prescaled due to fat cats (gorillas or
    guerrillas).
  • We have some good triggers going into 12.00 (some
    triggers moving in right direction)
  • Proposed triggers must include a rate estimate
    but ultimately rates are measured online to
    determine your real rates and these rates are
    used to calculate prescales.
  • TM's experience
  • prediction based on all previous major trigger
    list changes V12 will not relieve us of the
    existing rate to tape problems
  • requests for unprescaled triggers will not
    withstand the test of reality

10
Outlook
  • Advise
  • Please include some ultra low rate triggers in
    your triggering strategy which minimize rate to
    tape (less than 1 Hz at highest luminosity).
  • QCD group set a good example
  • QCD triggers implemented 9 months ago can run up
    to 60E30 unprescaled because of excellent
    rejection.
  • An additional advantage of their strategy is that
    their triggers changed very little over the
    course of the last year.
  • Discussion
  • Andrew Brandt email on recent prescale changes,
    makes some good points. QCD is not low priority.
    Highest ET jet triggers have highest priority
    but all QCD triggers have low rates. Specific
    request
  • reinstate gap triggers at 30E30 and above (now
    prescaled away). During Run 176607 previous
    40E30 file at 40E30 Gap triggers had total of
    0.6Hz to tape.
  • We need more rate reduction to tape. Any
    reduction in prescale must come with an increase
    in some other trigger.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com