Title: Steering Committee Meeting
1Steering Committee Meeting
2Agenda
- Current business
- Feedback and evaluation
- functioning of the Network.
- functioning of the Steering Committee
- functioning of the Network Office / Coordinators
- Adding new partners
- Call for new activities,
- Policy and criteria for adding affiliate and full
partners - Review Procedure for month 21
- Budget Reallocation
- Procedure for Consumables budget allocation
- Discussion about continuation of the network
- Feedback from advisors
- Next annual meeting date and place
3Current business
- consumable requests
- JRA5 (ETHz-ULP) 11K
- JRA8 (COM) 13 K
- FAA3 (IMEC) 25K
- JRA3 (FVB-MBI) 9.3K
- JRA2 (ETHz-CPG) 14K
- JRA7 (TUB) 21K
- Total 94K
- PHOREMOST Meeting
4Feedback and evaluation functioning of the
Network
- Comments about the first year.
- Too bureaucratic? Any suggestions?
- More participation?
- More information? (whats going on mails,
decisions, problems of the activity coordinators
gender meeting, etc..) - Suggestions for year 2?
5Feedback and evaluation functioning of the
Steering Committee
- Good way to decide about consumables, adding
partners? - Too bureaucratic? Any suggestions?
- Enough information?
functioning of the Network Office
6Rules Criteria for new partnersDiscussion
- For Affiliate partners
- Switch to By invitation only ?
- Academic Affiliate partners should be excellent
(prove!). - Industrial Affiliate Partners need to be relevant
- At most one or two partners from each
non-European country.That partner should be one
of the top institutes for its country. - For full partners
- No plans for year 2
- New partners can come in in year three (approval
by General Assembly needed). Budget will be
changed accordingly
7Rules Criteria for new partners
- Affiliate partners that join an activity have to
sign an NDA
8Adding new partners activities
- New Call on month 15?
- Call for what?
- New Activities
- Which new activities
- Merge with old activities?
- Policy and criteria for adding
- affiliate partners
- full partners
- Who decides about the new partners?
9Review Procedure for month 21
- Decision about continuation
- Who will decide?
- Continuation or new structure?
M18 Deliverable -Achievements-Response of call
Activity Targets
Decision about continuation M21
Updated workplan for next 2 years
M15 Call
3
6
12
18
25
36
48
Year 2
Year 1
Year 4
Year 3
10Budget
11Information discussion aboutPlanned budget
allocation
Budget distribution year one (rough estimates)
12Budget proposed year 2 allocation motivation
- Adding Partners
- Budget 40 k
- Spent 3 k
- Underspending will be used in years 3 and 4. No
change proposed. - Senior Exchange
- Spent 4 k
- Budget 35 k
- Proposal Allow also one-time exchanges with a
duration of at least two weeks. Lower budget to
20K
13Budget proposed year 2 allocation motivation
- Network Annual Meeting
- Venue catering
- Spent 2 k
- Budget 25 k).
- Underspending was incidental (kickoff very
cheap). - Proposal lower budget to 20K
- Travel
- Spent 40 k (rough estimate)
- Budget 62.5 k
- Other way of distribution See WP7-20 Junior
Exchange
14Budget proposed year 2 allocation motivation
- Junior Researcher Exchanges
- Spent41 k ?
- Budget 307 k!!!
- This is the 4k per partner per activity
- Obviously budgeted too high
- We realised close to 100 of our target,
- But for less than 20 of the budget.
- Proposed action (after yesterdays discussions)
- 5k per research group (NOT per activity)
- 4k per junior researcher exchange realised (to
be divided over the two partners involved by the
AC) - these budgets can be used freely (travel,
consumables etc) -
15Budget proposed year 2 allocation motivation
- Consumable requests
- Used229 k (including 4th quarter)
- Budget 262 k
- Keep budget unchanged. Stimulate (correct) use of
these funds (point of discussion better criteria
needed) - Education
- Spent14 k
- Budget 50k
- Increase funding winter school-2006 from 25 to 40
k (including 20 indirect costs)
16Budget proposed year 2 allocation motivation
- Dissemination
- Spent 3 k
- Budget 15 k
- No change proposed. Increase activity
-
- Gender Issues
- Spent 14 k
- Budget 20 k
- No change proposed
- Network management
- Spent 105 k
- Budget105 k
- No change proposed
17Budget proposed year 2 allocation motivation
- Unspent year one budget
- All partners can spend their own unspent year one
budget in year 2 - After year 2 all unspent budgets (of year 1 2)
go back to the central pot - NOTE PO has made clear that transfer of unused
budgets is NOT automatic requires contract
amendment!!
18Budget proposed year 2 allocation motivation
discussion
19Procedure for Consumables budget allocation
- Problems hard to evaluate
- Suggestions for a fair and meaningful
distribution?
20Discussion about continuation of the network
- Self support after 2008 - policy document.
- Policy document for collaboration with external
organisations, including list of external
organisations to be contacted - Contacts established with EPIC, ePHOTON/ONe,
NEMO, PhoreMost, Dutch and Belgian Technology
Foundations - Deliverable ready on M12
21Feedback from Advisors?
22Next annual meeting