Steering Committee Meeting - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 22
About This Presentation
Title:

Steering Committee Meeting

Description:

Spent: 2 k. Budget: 25 k ). Underspending was incidental (kickoff very cheap) ... Travel. Spent 40 k (rough estimate) Budget 62.5 k ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:76
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 23
Provided by: lie25
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Steering Committee Meeting


1
Steering Committee Meeting
  • Month 12

2
Agenda
  • Current business
  • Feedback and evaluation
  • functioning of the Network.
  • functioning of the Steering Committee
  • functioning of the Network Office / Coordinators
  • Adding new partners
  • Call for new activities,
  • Policy and criteria for adding affiliate and full
    partners
  • Review Procedure for month 21
  • Budget Reallocation
  • Procedure for Consumables budget allocation
  • Discussion about continuation of the network
  • Feedback from advisors
  • Next annual meeting date and place

3
Current business
  • consumable requests
  • JRA5 (ETHz-ULP) 11K
  • JRA8 (COM) 13 K
  • FAA3 (IMEC) 25K
  • JRA3 (FVB-MBI) 9.3K
  • JRA2 (ETHz-CPG) 14K
  • JRA7 (TUB) 21K
  • Total 94K
  • PHOREMOST Meeting

4
Feedback and evaluation functioning of the
Network
  • Comments about the first year.
  • Too bureaucratic? Any suggestions?
  • More participation?
  • More information? (whats going on mails,
    decisions, problems of the activity coordinators
    gender meeting, etc..)
  • Suggestions for year 2?

5
Feedback and evaluation functioning of the
Steering Committee
  • Good way to decide about consumables, adding
    partners?
  • Too bureaucratic? Any suggestions?
  • Enough information?

functioning of the Network Office

6
Rules Criteria for new partnersDiscussion
  • For Affiliate partners
  • Switch to By invitation only ?
  • Academic Affiliate partners should be excellent
    (prove!).
  • Industrial Affiliate Partners need to be relevant
  • At most one or two partners from each
    non-European country.That partner should be one
    of the top institutes for its country.
  • For full partners
  • No plans for year 2
  • New partners can come in in year three (approval
    by General Assembly needed). Budget will be
    changed accordingly

7
Rules Criteria for new partners
  • Affiliate partners that join an activity have to
    sign an NDA

8
Adding new partners activities
  • New Call on month 15?
  • Call for what?
  • New Activities
  • Which new activities
  • Merge with old activities?
  • Policy and criteria for adding
  • affiliate partners
  • full partners
  • Who decides about the new partners?

9
Review Procedure for month 21
  • Decision about continuation
  • Who will decide?
  • Continuation or new structure?

M18 Deliverable -Achievements-Response of call
Activity Targets
Decision about continuation M21
Updated workplan for next 2 years
M15 Call
3
6
12
18
25
36
48
Year 2
Year 1
Year 4
Year 3
10
Budget
11
Information discussion aboutPlanned budget
allocation
Budget distribution year one (rough estimates)
12
Budget proposed year 2 allocation motivation
  • Adding Partners
  • Budget 40 k
  • Spent 3 k
  • Underspending will be used in years 3 and 4. No
    change proposed.
  • Senior Exchange
  • Spent 4 k
  • Budget 35 k
  • Proposal Allow also one-time exchanges with a
    duration of at least two weeks. Lower budget to
    20K

13
Budget proposed year 2 allocation motivation
  • Network Annual Meeting
  • Venue catering
  • Spent 2 k
  • Budget 25 k).
  • Underspending was incidental (kickoff very
    cheap).
  • Proposal lower budget to 20K
  • Travel
  • Spent 40 k (rough estimate)
  • Budget 62.5 k
  • Other way of distribution See WP7-20 Junior
    Exchange

14
Budget proposed year 2 allocation motivation
  • Junior Researcher Exchanges
  • Spent41 k ?
  • Budget 307 k!!!
  • This is the 4k per partner per activity
  • Obviously budgeted too high
  • We realised close to 100 of our target,
  • But for less than 20 of the budget.
  • Proposed action (after yesterdays discussions)
  • 5k per research group (NOT per activity)
  • 4k per junior researcher exchange realised (to
    be divided over the two partners involved by the
    AC)
  • these budgets can be used freely (travel,
    consumables etc)

15
Budget proposed year 2 allocation motivation
  • Consumable requests
  • Used229 k (including 4th quarter)
  • Budget 262 k
  • Keep budget unchanged. Stimulate (correct) use of
    these funds (point of discussion better criteria
    needed)
  • Education
  • Spent14 k
  • Budget 50k
  • Increase funding winter school-2006 from 25 to 40
    k (including 20 indirect costs)

16
Budget proposed year 2 allocation motivation
  • Dissemination
  • Spent 3 k
  • Budget 15 k
  • No change proposed. Increase activity
  • Gender Issues
  • Spent 14 k
  • Budget 20 k
  • No change proposed
  • Network management
  • Spent 105 k
  • Budget105 k
  • No change proposed

17
Budget proposed year 2 allocation motivation
  • Unspent year one budget
  • All partners can spend their own unspent year one
    budget in year 2
  • After year 2 all unspent budgets (of year 1 2)
    go back to the central pot
  • NOTE PO has made clear that transfer of unused
    budgets is NOT automatic requires contract
    amendment!!

18
Budget proposed year 2 allocation motivation
discussion
19
Procedure for Consumables budget allocation
  • Problems hard to evaluate
  • Suggestions for a fair and meaningful
    distribution?

20
Discussion about continuation of the network
  • Self support after 2008 - policy document.
  • Policy document for collaboration with external
    organisations, including list of external
    organisations to be contacted
  • Contacts established with EPIC, ePHOTON/ONe,
    NEMO, PhoreMost, Dutch and Belgian Technology
    Foundations
  • Deliverable ready on M12

21
Feedback from Advisors?
22
Next annual meeting
  • place?
  • date?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com