An Environmental Data Model for the OneSAF Objective System PowerPoint PPT Presentation

presentation player overlay
1 / 33
About This Presentation
Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: An Environmental Data Model for the OneSAF Objective System


1
An Environmental Data Model for the OneSAF
Objective System
  • Dale D. Miller, Ph.D.
  • Annette C. Janett
  • Melissa E. Nakanishi
  • Richard Schaffer
  • Deborah Wilbert
  • Lockheed Martin Information Systems
  • Advanced Simulation Center
  • September 11, 2002

2
Subject Matter Experts
odyssey (od'i-se) n., An intellectual or
spiritual quest an odyssey of discovery.
  • LTC Dave Vaden (TPO OneSAF)
  • John Thomas (AMSAA RDA)
  • George L. Mason (ERDC WES)
  • Paul Richmond (ERDC CRREL)
  • David Durda (TRAC WSMR ACR)
  • Roy Ramsey (NSC TEMO)
  • Jeff Bittel (TPO OneSAF)
  • Frank Bush (TEMO)
  • Mike Humphrey (KA/KE)
  • Doug Brooks (JSIMS ASNE MSEA Liaison)

3
Environmental Data Model (EDM)Purpose and Scope
  • High level specification of environmental
    phenomena
  • To bound all possible environmental
    representations within OOS
  • Features, attributes, attribute values,
    relationships
  • Parameters to drive physical models and outputs
    of such models
  • Logical data model
  • Silent on the specific run-time data structures
  • Supports interoperability with other systems
  • JSIMS Land Component, CCTT
  • Includes all environmental domains
  • Terrain, Atmosphere, Ocean, Space
  • Includes data elements targeted for efficient SAF
    reasoning

4
Environmental Data Models (EDMs)

2002
5
Common Data Model Framework
  • Consistent approach to capturing EDMs
  • Allows meaningful and effective comparisons
  • Neutral representation methodology
  • Independent of IDEF1X or UML
  • Convertible to either, depending on audience
  • Realized using a relational information model
  • Well-defined schema MS Access 2000-based
    portable extendable
  • Leverages community standards
  • SEDRIS Environmental Data Coding Specification
  • Implements a suite of task-centric tools
  • Data capture, review, editing, and configuration
    management
  • Report(s) generation (e.g., EDM-centric,
    cross-EDM comparisons)
  • Automated generation of IDEF1x diagrams using MS
    Visio
  • Data export (e.g., XML)
  • Coupled to other tools (e.g., WARSIM TDFS, SEE-IT)

6
Benefits of Formalizing and Standardizing EDMs
  • EDMs document environmental requirements
  • provide lineage to their source
  • e.g., course of action analysis
  • Provide definitive data requirements to
    authoritative providers
  • Identify deltas for value adding from other
    sources, planning research initiatives
  • Support interoperability
  • in a live simulation, what aspects of the
    environment are required from the simulator to
    drive the operational systems?

7
EDM Complexity
8
Data Dictionary EDCS
  • Classifications, attributes, enumerants, units of
    measure
  • ISO/IEC Committee Draft (ISO/IEC 18025)
  • Qualified attributes
  • EDCS extensions
  • Labels vs Codes

9
OOS EDM Realized as Four Microsoft Access
Databases
  • Terrain (EDM-T)
  • Ultra High Resolution Buildings (EDM-UHRB)
  • Atmosphere, Ocean and Space (EDM-AOS)
  • Capstone (union) (OOS-EDM)

EDCS Access Database incorporated via table
linkages
10
Feature Types
11
EDM-T
  • Physical Models related to the terrain
  • Features
  • Attributes
  • Relationships

12
Military Functional Uses
  • Extended WARSIM Military Functional Uses to meet
    OOS requirements
  • Explicitly identify all MFUs in which each
    feature participates

13
Physical Models Related to Terrain
  • Mobility
  • Thermal
  • Seismic and acoustic
  • Freeze / thaw
  • Sky glow
  • NBC contamination inside buildings
  • Flooding
  • Nuclear contamination from damaged or destroyed
    reactor
  • Dust
  • Underwater mine detection
  • From an EDM perspective, ideally, models would be
    selected and never changed
  • then the inputs and/or output data elements of
    the models would be added to the EDM
  • but this would negate the overarching goal of
    composability
  • Strategy
  • Examine existing models and add sufficient
    attribution to drive them
  • Interact with model SMEs to provide sufficient
    description of the environment to drive future
    models

14
NATO Reference Mobility Model II (NRMM II)
  • Validated model for mobility of vehicles on and
    off road
  • WARSIM and CCTT use mobility models driven by
    tables derived from offline runs
  • OOS attributes trafficable features with the
    input parameters to NRMM II

15
EDM-T Features
  • Building representations
  • Points
  • Area footprints
  • Polygonal Shell
  • Three resolutions
  • Medium (EDM-T)
  • High (EDM-UHRB)
  • Ultra High (EDM-UHRB)

Each building instance must have all three
Must be indistinguishable from an exterior visual
or sensor view
16
Roads
  • SAF vehicles traditionally have poor drivers
  • Lane features added to constrain vehicle
    movement
  • Attributed with control information
  • Multiresolution approach
  • Road centerlines for planning
  • Lanes for driving

Based upon approach of Longtin et al.,
01S-SIW-060
17
EDM-T Features (cont.)
  • Bridges / Overpasses as LINE features
  • Shares geometry with associated road
  • Spans, piers, towers as POINT features
  • All tied together via relationships
  • Underground structures
  • Sewers systems SEWER, MANHOLE_RISER and
    MANHOLE_COVER and ENTRANCE_AND_OR_EXIT
  • Subways and tunnels have related
    ENTRANCE_AND_OR_EXIT (NODE) features
  • Caves originally modeled like an underground
    room
  • Later, cave networks were judged important
  • ENTRANCE_AND_OR_EXIT (NODE)
  • CAVE (AREA)
  • CAVE (3DLINE)
  • CAVE_CENTRELINE (LINE)

18
New Classifications Developed to Support EDM-T
19
EDM-T Example Attribution BUILT_UP_REGION
20
EDM-T Relationships
  • Aggregation, adjacency, over/under, connectedness

21
EDM-UHRB
  • Requirements
  • ORD not specific
  • TEMO training command vs. squad level
  • Use case small force clearing single building
  • Solicited requirements from Combined Arms MOUT
    Task Force (CAMTF), Infantry Center, Ft. Benning
  • Results rooms, floors, walls, windows, doors,
    furniture, basements, attics, shafts, ducts,
    stairs, breach holes, wall fortification, .

22
UHRB Objectification
  • Added generalization features
  • Inheritance of attribution
  • Inheritance of relationships
  • Multi-level hierarchy
  • Examples
  • Building has layers
  • Layers have compartments
  • Compartments have horizontal and vertical
    partitions
  • Partitions have openings
  • Layers are connected by vertical passages

23
UHRB Category Relationships (generalization
features in yellow)
24
UHRB Attributes
  • Categories of attributes
  • Human mobility
  • General geometry
  • Material composition
  • Construction type
  • Visual and thermal characteristics
  • Information to support breaching and damage
    assessment

Example Attributes of EXTERIOR_WALL
25
UHRB Relationships
  • Building assembled from its components via
    relationships
  • Buildings have layers,
  • layers have rooms,
  • rooms have walls, floors and ceilings,
  • walls may have doors,
  • exterior walls may have windows,
  • floors may have trap doors,
  • ceilings may have skylights and trapdoors

26
Example IDEF1X Partitions and Openings
27
EDM-AOS
  • Quite different than EDM-T
  • Terrain focuses on things and their attributes
  • Bridges, buildings, vegetated regions
  • Any attribute can change over time, but many
    attributes change rarely
  • AOS focuses on metrics which vary in time and
    space
  • Temperature, water current direction, ionospheric
    scintillation
  • AOS attributes may be derivable from others
  • EDM contains a rationalized subset of possible
    attributes from which others can be derived
  • If derivation of an auxiliary attribute is not
    trivial, the auxiliary attribute is included
  • E.g., air density
  • AOS has relatively few features
  • Which support complex feature types and rich sets
    of attributes

28
Atmosphere Features
  • 2D and 3D grids
  • 2D for
  • Surface phenomena (2 m above ground)
  • e.g., surface wind speed and direction
  • Phenomena which are not a function of altitude
  • e.g., CLOUD_CEILING_ALTITUDE, THUNDERSTORM_PROBABI
    LITY
  • 3D for characteristics which vary in all
    dimensions
  • E.g., ATM_PRESSURE, DEWPOINT_TEMPERATURE,
    PRECIPITATION_RATE
  • Low, medium and high resolution grids
  • Low (50 km) available as input to initialize
    the BFM model (e.g, MM5)
  • Medium (10 km) resolution of IMETS/BFM output
  • High (1 km) high resolution gridded wind data,
    to support the high fidelity propagation of
    chemical and biological clouds

29
Atmosphere Features (cont.)
  • 2D and 3D models
  • Algorithms implemented in software which may be
    queried at any 2D or 3D geospatial location
  • e.g., MAGNETIC_FIELD, ILLUMINANCE,
    TRANSMISSIVITY_QD_BY_EM_BAND
  • Dynamic points
  • Localized AOS features which can move
  • e.g., sun and moon, smoke puffs, local
    illumination sources

30
Example Atmosphere Attributes
31
Ocean Features
32
Space Features
33
Conclusions
  • OneSAF EDM is most complex to date of MS EDMs
  • Encompasses terrain, building interiors,
    atmosphere, ocean and space
  • Building environmental database instances
    compliant with this EDM will be challenging
  • For more information
  • CD containing
  • 20 EDMs for MS, C4ISR and authoritative source
    products
  • Rationale Documents
  • CDMF
  • Contact
  • Denise Hovanec
  • US Army Topographic Engineering Center
  • dhovanec_at_tec.army.mil
  • Acknowledgements STRICOM, DMSO, TEC, Paul Birkel
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com