Prospects for Higher p Intensities at CERN R. CAPPI / CERN / 18.10.01 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Prospects for Higher p Intensities at CERN R. CAPPI / CERN / 18.10.01

Description:

Self field tune shift. To be safe , in the PS: NB: 5. 5 turn Continuos Transfer ... 2 days ago, in a PS MD, E. and G. Metral et al. have reached 4e13 ppp with ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:24
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 11
Provided by: ppi4
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Prospects for Higher p Intensities at CERN R. CAPPI / CERN / 18.10.01


1
Prospects for Higher p Intensities at CERNR.
CAPPI / CERN / 18.10.01
  • Introduction
  • Main limitations (some of)
  • acceptances vs emittances
  • space-charge
  • 5 t Continuos Transfer
  • Example double batch injection
  • List of various schemes
  • Conclusion

2
Introduction
  • a simplified summary of the paper CERN/PS
    2001-041 (AE)
  • which is also a summary of few brainstorming
    meetings between PS and SPS specialists
  • trying to answer the question is it possible to
    increase the intensity of the CNGS beam by a
    factor 2 or 3 ?
  • the talk will be mainly devoted to Linac-PSB-PS
    and CNGS beam oriented
  • speculations gt studies gt design
  • All figures are PRELIMINARY and OPTIMISTIC
  • I will not talk about collective effects ( xpt.
    sp. ch.), longit. beam dynamics issues ,
    transition crossing, etc.

3
Acceptance vs emittance
PS acceptance Ax60mm, Ay20mm ex2 lt 22mm,
ey2 lt 9mm
Ex2
Ax limit
Ey2
Ay limit
4
Space charge
Self field tune shift
To be safe , in the PS
NB
5
5 turn Continuos Transfer
  • It is the way the PS uses to fill the SPS

CSPS 11 x CPS
PS
PS
SPS
X
Present system it works - it is lossy (20)
2
Q6.25
1
3
5
X
4
ES blade
6
Proposal for a new 5t CT
  • The beam is adiabatically captured into 4 islands
    of a 4th order resonance excited with sextupoles
    and octupoles.
  • Then it is extracted similarly to the present
    scheme.
  • should be less lossy (5?)
  • - has to be tested experimentally

7
present scenario with associated problems
50 MeV
L2
Limit
Nt 3.3
exlt 22 eylt 9
1.4 GeV, hlt0.9
DQ x,y 0.13 0.23
ex 25 ey 12
Nt 3
14 GeV/c 5t CT h0.8
NB in these transparencies 1) ex4sx2/bx
in mm 2) intensities Nt are in 1013 p 3) h is
the transfer efficiency 4) yp is the p flux on
target in 1013p/s
Limit
X
ex 4.2/3 1.4 ey 2.5
exlt 3 eylt 2
Nt 4.8
filling time 1.2s yp 4.8/6 0.8 G
1
8
Example double batch injection into PS
L2
50 MeV
Limit
Nt 2 x 2.4
exlt 22 eylt 9
1.4 GeV h1
ex 21 ey 9.2
DQ x,y 0.21 0.35
Nt 4.8 gt Intensity limit for a PS _at_ 1.4 GeV
14 GeV/c old 5t CT h0.8
Limit
exlt 3 eylt 2
ex 3.4/3 1.13 ey 1.4
...2 days ago, in a PS MD, E. and G. Metral et
al. have reached 4e13 ppp with moderate losses...
Nt 7.7
filling time 2.4s yp 7.7/7.2 1.07
G 1.34 yp 7.7/6.6 1.17 if PSB_at_.6s, G 1.46
9
Table (rev.) of various schemes
10
Conclusion
  • a gain of 1.5 seems feasible though difficult
    (cost 0-3MCHF)
  • a gain of 2 is maybe possible but will be more
    expensive (50MCHF) and very difficult
  • a gain of 3 will be VERY expensive ( 400MCHF)
    and almost technically unrealistic
  • first studies (concerning 1.1, 1.1a and 1.2) are
    encouraging, but we need clear priorities to
    continue at efficient speed
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com