Title: Prospects for Higher p Intensities at CERN R. CAPPI / CERN / 18.10.01
1Prospects for Higher p Intensities at CERNR.
CAPPI / CERN / 18.10.01
- Introduction
- Main limitations (some of)
- acceptances vs emittances
- space-charge
- 5 t Continuos Transfer
- Example double batch injection
- List of various schemes
- Conclusion
2Introduction
- a simplified summary of the paper CERN/PS
2001-041 (AE) - which is also a summary of few brainstorming
meetings between PS and SPS specialists - trying to answer the question is it possible to
increase the intensity of the CNGS beam by a
factor 2 or 3 ? - the talk will be mainly devoted to Linac-PSB-PS
and CNGS beam oriented - speculations gt studies gt design
- All figures are PRELIMINARY and OPTIMISTIC
- I will not talk about collective effects ( xpt.
sp. ch.), longit. beam dynamics issues ,
transition crossing, etc.
3Acceptance vs emittance
PS acceptance Ax60mm, Ay20mm ex2 lt 22mm,
ey2 lt 9mm
Ex2
Ax limit
Ey2
Ay limit
4Space charge
Self field tune shift
To be safe , in the PS
NB
55 turn Continuos Transfer
- It is the way the PS uses to fill the SPS
CSPS 11 x CPS
PS
PS
SPS
X
Present system it works - it is lossy (20)
2
Q6.25
1
3
5
X
4
ES blade
6Proposal for a new 5t CT
- The beam is adiabatically captured into 4 islands
of a 4th order resonance excited with sextupoles
and octupoles. - Then it is extracted similarly to the present
scheme. - should be less lossy (5?)
- - has to be tested experimentally
7present scenario with associated problems
50 MeV
L2
Limit
Nt 3.3
exlt 22 eylt 9
1.4 GeV, hlt0.9
DQ x,y 0.13 0.23
ex 25 ey 12
Nt 3
14 GeV/c 5t CT h0.8
NB in these transparencies 1) ex4sx2/bx
in mm 2) intensities Nt are in 1013 p 3) h is
the transfer efficiency 4) yp is the p flux on
target in 1013p/s
Limit
X
ex 4.2/3 1.4 ey 2.5
exlt 3 eylt 2
Nt 4.8
filling time 1.2s yp 4.8/6 0.8 G
1
8Example double batch injection into PS
L2
50 MeV
Limit
Nt 2 x 2.4
exlt 22 eylt 9
1.4 GeV h1
ex 21 ey 9.2
DQ x,y 0.21 0.35
Nt 4.8 gt Intensity limit for a PS _at_ 1.4 GeV
14 GeV/c old 5t CT h0.8
Limit
exlt 3 eylt 2
ex 3.4/3 1.13 ey 1.4
...2 days ago, in a PS MD, E. and G. Metral et
al. have reached 4e13 ppp with moderate losses...
Nt 7.7
filling time 2.4s yp 7.7/7.2 1.07
G 1.34 yp 7.7/6.6 1.17 if PSB_at_.6s, G 1.46
9Table (rev.) of various schemes
10Conclusion
- a gain of 1.5 seems feasible though difficult
(cost 0-3MCHF) - a gain of 2 is maybe possible but will be more
expensive (50MCHF) and very difficult - a gain of 3 will be VERY expensive ( 400MCHF)
and almost technically unrealistic - first studies (concerning 1.1, 1.1a and 1.2) are
encouraging, but we need clear priorities to
continue at efficient speed