JD Edwards Real Estate and Workplace Services Project Management the JDE approach April 2003 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 12
About This Presentation
Title:

JD Edwards Real Estate and Workplace Services Project Management the JDE approach April 2003

Description:

Misalignment between expectation setting and delivery ... How do the two approaches differ. Multiple Touch points. Single Point ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:100
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 13
Provided by: jde75
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: JD Edwards Real Estate and Workplace Services Project Management the JDE approach April 2003


1
JD EdwardsReal Estate and Workplace
ServicesProject Management the JDE
approachApril 2003
2
What is Project Management
Is it .
  • Scope, schedule budget
  • The implementation of consistent, measurable,
    processes across a global real estate portfolio
  • Adopting best practice methodologies for the
    delivery of real estate initiatives across an
    enterprise
  • Completing specific tasks to meet stated project
    objectives
  • These are all a portion of the equation but you
    cant stop there, it is A LOT MORE

3
The JDE Approach
At JDE we believe Project Management is the
SINGLE POINT OF ACCOUNTABILITY and mechanism by
which all REAL ESTATE INITIATIVES ARE IMPLEMENTED
across the enterprise
All other aspects of the service delivery model
are simple inputs into the project

4
How did we arrive at our model
  • Traditional real estate delivery system

5
Issues with Traditional Model
  • Too many touch points with our customers
  • Very tactical, project specific orientation
  • Misalignment between expectation setting and
    delivery
  • Protracted project timeline to the detriment of
    the PM team
  • At JDE the PM where the junior member of the
    team, yet their success or failure was the
    visible result by which the customer measure the
    entire REW organizations success
  • PM had little alignment with CRE strategy or more
    importantly corporate strategy it was all about
    the project

6
End to end process orientation
Project Manager
7
How do the two approaches differ
Traditional Approach
End to End Process
8
Tools of the Model
  • Performance Metrics
  • All decisions are based on portfolio performance
  • Portfolio-wide targets
  • Customer Satisfaction
  • Benchmarking project specific metrics

4.75
Total Occupancy Expense (millions)
Acceptable Range - Occupancy as a of Revenue
(4.75-3.5)
Occ. Expense as a of Rev.
3.5
2003
Target
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003 (Target)
(Forecast)

Total Occupancy
Occupancy Rev
9
Tools of the Model
  • Vendor Consolidation
  • Streamline supply chain reposition outsourced
    relationships from tactical to strategic
    orientation
  • Single global provider
  • Local implementation
  • Defined project toolbox (standards,processes and
    procedures) no need to reinvent the wheel each
    time

10
Tools of the Model
  • Web enabled technology a portal for every
    occasion

11
Tools of the Model
  • Web enabled technology single depository for
    Standards, Process flow, Documentation and
    Procedures

12
Take away
  • Project Management cannot operate in a vacuum
  • Single point of accountability with an end to end
    process orientation
  • Need to fully embrace technology
  • Streamline the supply chain
  • Projects and ultimately CRE function can only be
    successful if PM measurements are aligned with
    overall CRE and Corporate Strategy
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com