CIMS/CSL - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 18
About This Presentation
Title:

CIMS/CSL

Description:

After inter-agency discussions, NSF agrees in early July to entertain an ' ... Legislative and budgetary success is rarely achieved the first year it is proposed. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:12
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 19
Provided by: meis7
Category:
Tags: cims | csl | first | may | of

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: CIMS/CSL


1
Florida Summit on Mathematics and Science
Education
  • Gerry G. Meisels
  • Chairman, Florida Coalition for Improving
    Mathematics and Science Literacy (CIMS)
  • Director, Coalition for Science Literacy at USF
    (CSL at USF)
  • meisels_at_csl.usf.edu

2
Secretary's Summit on MathematicsFebruary 6,
2003http//www.ed.gov/rschstat/research/progs/mat
hscience/agenda.html
The National Summits(Participation at Either by
Invitation Only)
Secretary's Summit on ScienceMarch 16,
2004http//www.ed.gov/rschstat/research/progs/mat
hscience/scienceagenda.html
3
Secretary's Summit on Science(Marsha Winegarner
and Gerry Meisels Present)
  • Among the Conclusions
  • Coordinated Action in the States is Essential
  • Dr. Sclafani recommended
  • Statewide Summits

4
Florida Summit on Mathematics and Science
Education
  • Lunch discussion at the Secretarys Summit
  • There has been no Florida concerted action since
    Science FCAT and MSPD ca. 1998
  • US DOE (ED) encouraged us to plan and proceed,
    and promised help
  • Consensus adequate funding in excess of 100,000
    would be necessary to conduct an effective Summit
    in a state as large as Florida

5
Core Planning Group of CIMS Members
  • Robert Bedford, Emergent Design, Inc.
  • Penelope Haskins, Radiation Technologies, Inc.
  • Marsha Winegarner, Florida Dept. of Education
  • Robert Potter, University of South Florida
  • Gerry Meisels, Chair CIMS Chair and Director of
    CSL at USF

6
Securing the Resources
  • Federal support is necessary
  • There are no established programs for Summits in
    major agencies
  • Special initiatives must be taken

7
Discussions Held
  • US DOE
  • Florida DOE
  • NASSMC (National Alliance of State Science and
    Mathematics Coalitions)
  • NSF

8
Discussion Basis and Outcome
  • Concept Paper (distributed in May 2004)
  • After inter-agency discussions, NSF agrees in
    early July to entertain an out-of-the-ordinary
    proposal, to be submitted by August 5
  • Proposal to NSF submitted August 5
  • NASSMC commits funds August 1
  • Building a Presence formally commits funds
    September 15
  • NSF Proposal funded at full request level
    September 22 (funding begins Oct. 15)

9
Resources
  • National Science Foundation
  • Building a Presence Florida DOE
  • National Alliance of State Science and
    Mathematics Coalitions (NASSMC)
  • US DOE (through NASSMC)
  • NASA (through NASSMC)
  • Florida Coalition for Improving Mathematics and
    Science
  • Coalition for Science Literacy at the University
    of South Florida

10
Steering Committee
  • Individuals Representing
  • Business/Industry
  • State Government
  • K-12 Teachers and Supervisors, and
    Superintendents
  • Higher Education
  • Government Agencies

11
Outcomes Objectives
  • 1. A well designed, comprehensive set of
  • plans,
  • policies,
  • draft legislation, and
  • incremental budget allocations
  • that will substantially and measurably
    strengthen learning of K-12 students in Science
    and Mathematics
  • 2. Legislators and policy-makers WILL to
    implement them and to provide sufficient funding
    for statewide, systemic strengthening of M/S
    learning

12
Target Audience For Action
  • The knowledge of how to improve m/s education
    resides primarily in education professionals at
    all levels
  • The resources and policies needed are controlled
    primarily by legislators and high level
    administrators (Governor, FDOE, superintendents)

13
Four Major Components
  1. Pre-Summit - Preparation for the Summit Jan. 5
    and Feb. 2 (am)
  2. Summit The Main Event (Feb. 2 3)
  3. Post-Summit Work Plan Development (Feb. 4)
  4. Post-Summit Follow-up 2005-2007 legislative
    sessions

14
Pre-SummitParticipants Educators and
Business-Industry
  • Jan. 5 a one-day, statewide meeting of 60 S/M
    education professionals and business partners to
  • Build consensus to speak with one voice
  • Develop position (white) papers if necessary
  • Write position papers, distribute Jan. 28
  • Feb. 2, morning 60 S/M education professionals
    and business partners to
  • Discuss position papers
  • Review main messages to target audience

15
2. The Summit (Main Event)Participants All
  • Feb. 2 afternoon
  • S/M in the workforce and the economy
  • Feb. 2 evening
  • Conference Social Event and Dinner
  • Feb. 3 morning
  • The school environment with which teachers must
    now deal
  • Feb. 3 afternoon
  • Dimensions of needed actions
  • Strategies for assisting teachers what matters?

16
3. Post-Summit Work PlanParticipants Educators,
Government and District Staff
  • Designing Policies and Legislation for Action by
  • Legislators
  • Governors Office
  • Florida Department of Education
  • District administrative leaders (such as
    superintendents)

17
4. Follow-up
  • Legislative and budgetary success is rarely
    achieved the first year it is proposed.
    Therefore, continued advocacy in key offices is
    planned for three years
  • The 2005 session promises to be fiscally very
    tight, partly because of our four storms, so
    pursuit in better years must be planned.

18
Keys to Success
  • Getting good representation of the target
    audience to the Summit
  • Providing a consistent message
  • Avoiding public disagreements on implementation
    details
  • Tight organization and action orientation
    concise, to the point, down-to-earth briefings
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com