Academic self-organization on the Internet. The example of RePEc PowerPoint PPT Presentation

presentation player overlay
About This Presentation
Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Academic self-organization on the Internet. The example of RePEc


1
Academic self-organization on the Internet. The
example of RePEc
  • Thomas Krichel
  • 2006-04-07

2
about me
  • trained economists
  • started to work as a leisure librarian organizing
    academic documents on the Internet
  • moved on the become a professor in a library
    school
  • in research concerned with digital libraries
  • in teaching concerned with web site architecture
    and design.

3
today I say
  • ICT revolution does not only allow for existing
    organizations/institutions to change the way they
    work.
  • It also allows some organizations to appear.
  • Today I give an example for an organization that
    entirely virtual. I look at RePEc as an
    organization.
  • RePEc is active in scholarly communication.

4
scholarly communication
  • Is mainly about scholars communicating
  • between themselves
  • to students, occasionally
  • Thus it is essentially a community activity.
  • Traditionally, there have been two intermediaries
    acting as external agents.
  • libraries
  • publishers

5
how does it work
  • In most discipline, scholarly journals are the
    backbone of scholarly communication.
  • Authors of articles usually do not receive any
    financial payment.
  • Usually they have to pay a submission fee.
  • All the income from the sales of journals goes to
    publishers, not authors.
  • Publishers enjoy much monopoly powers.

6
the serials crisis
  • Personal subscriptions by academics are rare.
  • Publishers face a market where pretty much their
    only customers are libraries.
  • Library spending has been flat.
  • So how do publisher raise profits?

7
price spiral
  • Prices rises by publishers lead to
  • cancellations by libraries lead
  • more price rises by publishers
  • Most extreme example in economics journal of
    economic studies
  • receives no citations, has no credibility
  • costs almost 10,000 per annum
  • probably only subscribed to by 1 or 2 libraries.

8
when tradition ends
  • Two external shock
  • There comes the Internet and reduces distribution
    costs to zero
  • There comes computer technology and reduces
    storage costs somewhat
  • opportunity sets of community members and
    external agents increases
  • Proposition the future depends much on what the
    community members decide. External agents have
    little impact.

9
discipline communities
  • Scholars of various disciplines have varying
    habits of research, publication, and evaluation
  • It is likely that the Internet will emphasize
    those differences rather than reducing them.

10
Open libraries and scholarly communication
  • RePEc is an example for an Open Library.
  • An Open Library is loosely defined an application
    of the open source software principles to
    libraries.
  • vague
  • in the making
  • but has some history
  • Looking at RePEc will fix ideas.

11
RePEc History
  • It started with me as a research assistant an in
    the Economics Department of Loughborough
    University of Technology in 1990.
  • a predecessor of the Internet allowed me to
    download free software without effort
  • but academic papers had to be gathered in a
    painful way

12
CoREJ
  • published by HMSO
  • Photocopied lists of contents tables recently
    published economics journal received at the
    Department of Trade and Industry
  • Typed list of the recently received working
    papers received by the University of Warwick
    library
  • The latter was the more interesting.

13
working papers
  • early accounts of research findings
  • published by economics departments
  • in universities
  • in research centers
  • in some government offices
  • in multinational administrations
  • disseminated through exchange agreements
  • important because of 4 year publishing delay

14
1991-1992
  • I planned to circulate the Warwick working paper
    list over listserv lists
  • I argued it would be good for them
  • increase incentives to contribute
  • increase revenue for ILL
  • After many trials, Warwick refused.
  • During the end of that time, I was offered a
    lectureship, and decided to get working on my own
    collection.

15
1993 BibEc and WoPEc
  • Fethy Mili of Université de Montréal had a good
    collection of papers and gave me his data.
  • I put his bibliographic data on a gopher and
    called the service "BibEc"
  • I also gathered the first ever online electronic
    working papers on a gopher and called the service
    "WoPEc".

16
NetEc consortium
  • BibEc printed papers
  • WoPEc electronic papers
  • CodEc software
  • WebEc web resource listings
  • JokEc jokes
  • HoPEc
  • a lot of Ec!

17
WoPEc to RePEc
  • WoPEc was a catalog record collection
  • WoPEc remained largest web access point
  • but getting contributions was tough
  • In 1996 I wrote basic architecture for RePEc.
  • ReDIF
  • Guildford Protocol

18
1997 RePEc principle
  • Many archives
  • archives offer metadata about digital objects
    (mainly working papers)
  • One database
  • The data from all archives forms one single
    logical database despite the fact that it is held
    on different servers.
  • Many services
  • users can access the data through many
    interfaces.
  • providers of archives offer their data to all
    interfaces at the same time. This provides for an
    optimal distribution.

19
RePEc is based on 560 archives
  • WoPEc
  • EconWPA
  • DEGREE
  • S-WoPEc
  • NBER
  • CEPR
  • Blackwell
  • US Fed in Print
  • IMF
  • OECD
  • MIT
  • University of Surrey
  • CO PAH
  • Elsevier

20
to form a 362k item dataset
  • 171,000 working papers
  • 187,000 journal articles
  • 1,300 software components
  • 2,100 book and chapter listings
  • 9,000 author contact and publication
    listings
  • 9,300 institutional contact listings

21
RePEc is used in many services
  • BibEc and WoPEc
  • Decomate Z39.50 service
  • EconPapers
  • NEP New Economics Papers
  • Inomics
  • RePEc author service
  • IDEAS
  • RuPEc
  • EDIRC
  • LogEc

22
describes documents
  • Template-Type ReDIF-Paper 1.0
  • Title Dynamic Aspect of Growth and Fiscal Policy
  • Author-Name Thomas Krichel
  • Author-Person RePEcper1965-06-05thomas_kriche
    l
  • Author-Email T.Krichel_at_surrey.ac.uk
  • Author-Name Paul Levine
  • Author-Email P.Levine_at_surrey.ac.uk
  • Author-WorkPlace-Name University of Surrey
  • Classification-JEL C61 E21 E23 E62 O41
  • File-URL ftp//www.econ.surrey.ac.uk/
    pub/RePEc/sur/surrec/surrec9601.pdf
  • File-Format application/pdf
  • Creation-Date 199603
  • Revision-Date 199711
  • Handle RePEcsursurrec9601

23
describes persons (HoPEc)
  • template-type ReDIF-Person 1.0
  • name-full MANKIW, N. GREGORY
  • name-last MANKIW
  • name-first N. GREGORY
  • handle RePEcper1984-06-16N__GREGORY_MANKIW
  • email ngmankiw_at_harvard.edu
  • homepagehttp//post.economics.harvard.edu/faculty
    /
  • mankiw/mankiw.html
  • workplace-institution RePEcedideharus
  • workplace-institution RePEcedinberrus
  • Author-Article RePEcaeaaecrevv76y1986i4p
    676-91
  • Author-Article RePEcaeaaecrevv77y1987i3p
    358-74
  • Author-Article RePEcaeaaecrevv78y1988i2p
    173-77
  • .

24
describes institutions
  • Template-Type ReDIF-Institution 1.0
  • Primary-Name University of Surrey
  • Primary-Location Guildford
  • Secondary-Name Department of Economics
  • Secondary-Phone (01483) 259380
  • Secondary-Email economics_at_surrey.ac.uk
  • Secondary-Fax (01483) 259548
  • Secondary-Postal Guildford, Surrey GU2 5XH
  • Secondary-Homepage
  • http//www.econ.surrey.ac.uk/
  • Handle RePEcedidesuruk

25
how does RePEc operate?
  • no formal organization
  • a group of volunteers communicates through a
    list, sometimes privately
  • Each volunteer has an area that he is specialized
    in. There is, however, no formal list of
    responsibilities.

26
key to success
  • Disseminate as widely as possible
  • Demonstrate to authors and institutions that it
    works for them.
  • institutional registration
  • author registration

27
institutional registration
  • It started by one sad geezer making a list of
    departments that have a web site.
  • I persuaded him that his data would be more
    widely used if integrated into the RePEc
    database.
  • Now he is a happy geezer and one of our three
    crucial volunteers.

28
RePEc author service
  • RePEc document data has author names as strings.
  • The authors register with RAS to list contact
    details and identify the papers they wrote.
  • This is classic access control, but done by the
    authors.

29
author registration
  • It started when funding allowed us to hire a
    crazy programmer to write an author registration
    system.
  • The system went online as "HoPEc" in late 2000.
  • It has been renamed "RePEc author service" (RAS)
  • A recent grant from OSI allows for a rewrite and
    expansion.

30
(No Transcript)
31
LogEc
  • It is a service by Sune Karlsson that tracks
    usage of items in the RePEc database
  • abstract views
  • downloads
  • There is mail that is sent by Christian
    Zimmermann to
  • archive maintainers
  • RAS registrants
  • that contains a monthly usage summary.

32
authors' incentives
  • Authors perceive the registration as a way to
    achieve common advertising for their papers.
  • Author records are used to aggregate usage logs
    across RePEc user services for all papers of an
    author.
  • Stimulates a "I am bigger than you are"
    mentality. Size matters!

33
recently
  • In 2004, Peter Jasco compared RePEc services with
    the EconLit proprietary professional database.
  • IDEAS and LogEc were Peters pick
  • EconLit was Peters pan.
  • He slammed the working paper coverage of EconLit.
  • He could have slammed other things.

34
RePEc / EconLit partnership
  • RePEc now delivers all its working paper data to
    EconLit, without getting the journal data of
    EconLit in return.
  • This may seem absolutely perverse! A bunch of
    volunteers laboring for a multi-million
    concern!
  • In fact it serves RePEc well because it adds
    officialdom.

35
summary keys to success
  • Have a small group of volunteers
  • Disseminate as widely as possible
  • Demonstrate to authors and institutions that it
    works for them.
  • institutional registration
  • author registration

36
KEY idea 1
  • RePEc attracts a community of users and
    contributors
  • The community itself is the focus of attention
  • RePEc describes the living rather than the dead.
  • Forget about documents!

37
KEY idea 2
  • Forget about users!
  • Disseminate widely
  • Users will come through Google anyway.
  • And Google loves RePEc services
  • puts RePEc services top when the query consists
    of the name of an author

38
obstacles to open libraries
  • lack of imagination entrepreneurship
  • inability to form alliances
  • user-centered thinking
  • document-centered thinking
  • technical competence required
  • OAI PMH
  • XML and XML Schema
  • Unicode
  • the "C" word

39
does RePEc address the serials crises
  • Well, not directly!
  • RePEc acts as boost to non-traditional, most of
    the time open access publishing.
  • It illustrates open access as a way to improve
    exposure of papers.
  • It reduces the cost of maintaining open access
    channels.

40
what I do for open libraries
  • Create an open library for library science the
    rclis (reckless) dataset.
  • Create a supporting organization
  • the open library society.
  • co-workers welcome!

41
http//openlib.org/home/krichel
  • Thank you for your attention!
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com