Title: Lessons Learned for Part B Quality Programs: Experiences from HABNQC Part B Collaboratives Aug 25, 2
1Lessons Learned for Part B Quality Programs
Experiences from HAB/NQC Part B
CollaborativesAug 25, 2008
- Clemens Steinbock, MBA
- Director, National Quality Center
- Panel Rosemary Donnelly, MSN, APRN-BC, ACRN Jay
Adams, MA - Jamie Cotnoir, MPH Susan DiCocco, RN
2Todays Agenda
- Role of the State (Part B Programs)
- Overview of HAB/NQC Part B Collaboratives Part B
Collaborative and Part B Low Incidence Initiative - Lessons Learned and Tips for Part B Programs
- Words of Wisdom from Collaborative Participants
- QA
- Workshop Evaluation
3Role of the State
- As State Health Departments, Part B programs play
the dual role of sponsoring their own quality
management programs and of championing quality
improvement for subgrantees and other providers
in the state. -
- Its dominant role provides an impetus to lead
across the entire Ryan White HIV/AIDS
Program-funded continuum and to build bridges
between Ryan White HIV/AIDS Program-funded
grantees within their constituency.
4HAB/NQC Part B Collaborative
- Managed by the National Quality Center (NQC)
- Initiated in November 2004, and ended in November
2006 - 3 Face-to-face Learning Sessions
- 8 Ryan White Part B grantees Alabama, District
of Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Michigan,
Missouri, Ohio, Oregon - Potential impact 129,000 people living with
HIV/AIDS
5 Part B Collaborative Aim
- Improve the quality of care for people living
with HIV in the state or jurisdiction through
creating an effective quality management programs
in the following four domains - Alignment across jurisdictions and resources
- Optimization and management of resources
- Integration of data and information systems
- Improving access to care and retention of
HIV/AIDS clients
6Part B Collaborative Timeline
- Vanguard Meeting - November 2004
- Expert Meeting - January 2005
- Planning Group Meeting - May 2005
- Learning Session 1 - June 2005
- Learning Session 2 - November 2005
- Virtual Meeting - May 2006
- Learning Session 3 - November 2006
- Synthesis Meeting - March 2007
7Part B Collaborative Measures
- Percent of ADAP applicants approved/denied for
ADAP enrollment within two weeks of receiving a
complete application - Percent of ADAP enrollees recertified for ADAP
eligibility criteria annually - Percent of individuals newly reported with HIV
infection who also have AIDS diagnosis - Percent of individuals newly reported with HIV
infection who progress to AIDS diagnosis within
12 months of HIV diagnosis
8Part B Collaborative Measures (cont)
- Ratio of individuals who die within 12 months of
HIV diagnosis to the number of individuals newly
reported with HIV infection - Percent of individuals with at least two general
HIV medical care visits in the last 12 months - Percent of individuals with either a CD4 or viral
load in the last 6 months
9Part B Collaborative QM Program Assessments
A.1 quality management plan A.2 performance
measures A.3 work plan B.1 organizational
structure B.2 QM committee B.3 involvement of
stakeholders B.4 evaluation processes C.1
performance data collection C.2 QI projects C.3
QI training and TA
10Part B Collaborative
Percentage of newly applying state ADAP clients
approved or denied for ADAP services within 2
weeks of ADAP receiving a complete application
11Part B Collaborative
Percent of clients with an AIDS diagnosis at
first HIV disease report
12Part B Collaborative
Percent of clients who progress to AIDS diagnosis
within 12 months of HIV diagnosis
13Part B Collaborative
Percent of clients who die within 12 months of
HIV diagnosis
14Part B Collaborative
Percent of clients with two (2) primary care
visits in the last 12
months
15Part B Collaborative
Percentage of newly applying state ADAP clients
approved or denied for ADAP services within 2
weeks of ADAP receiving a complete application.
16HAB/NQC Part B Low Incidence Initiative
- Managed by the National Quality Center (NQC)
- Jun 2006 - May 2008
- 2 face-to-face and 1 virtual Learning Session
- 17 states Alaska, Hawaii, Idaho, Iowa, Kansas,
Maine, Montana, Nebraska, New Hampshire, New
Mexico, North Dakota, Rhode Island, South Dakota,
Utah, Vermont, West Virginia, and Wyoming - Potential impact over 20,000 people living with
HIV/AIDS
17Part B Low Incidence Initiative Aim
- Development or refinement an effective quality
management plan and program for the state or
territory in accordance with the Ryan White
Program legislation, and implementation of
processes to ensure and demonstrate quality of
care and services.
18Part B Low Incidence Initiative Timeline
- Major Milestones
- Jun 06 - Consultative Meeting, Washington, DC
- Dec 06 - Draft of needs assessment report
- Apr 07 - Kick-off Meeting in Washington, DC
- Aug 07 - Face-to-face QI training in Chicago, IL
- Aug 07 - First performance data report (17 out of
17 submitted) - Feb 08 - Virtual Meeting
- May 08 - Final face-to-face meeting-
19Low Incidence Initiative Goals
- Completion of a comprehensive Quality Management
Plan. - Development and/or strengthening of a Quality
Management Committee within their
State/Jurisdiction. - Ability to regularly collect, trend and report
quality data. - Initiation of at least one improvement project
within the 12-month period. - Improvement in the Quality Management Program
core criteria self-assessment.
20Low Incidence Initiative Key Measures
- Percent of Ryan White funded clients who have a
CD4 test done at least every six months - Percent of applying state ADAP clients
approved/denied for ADAP services within two
weeks of ADAP receiving a complete application - Percent of clients with at least two general HIV
medical care visits in the last 12 months who are
enrolled in case management
21Low Incidence Initiative Results
- States have developed/improved performance
measurement systems to collect data for quality
management and report on Initiative measures
bi-monthly - 13 states submitted written QM Plans for review
- All states formed QM Committees and 9 have met
- States are beginning to initiate quality
improvement projects to react to data - Several developing relationships with Part C
- Several sharing data with stakeholders
22Low Incidence Initiative CD 4 Tests at least
every six months
23Low Incidence Initiative of ADAP clients
approved/denied within 2 weeks of application
24Low Incidence Initiative of clients with at
least 2 HIV medical care visits in last 12 mths,
enrolled in CM
25Map of all Part B Programs Engaged (2007) NQC
has recently also received TA requests from
Michigan, Pennsylvania, Texas and Nevada Part B
Programs
Part B Collaborative
Low Incidence Initiative
On-site TA Request
Regional Trainings
26What Weve Learned and Gathered
- Real-World Tips on
- Focusing on Key Activities
- Staffing for Quality
- Engaging Key Leaders
- Integrating Quality Management Across Departments
- Involving Senior Clinicians
- Involving Consumers
- Keeping Performance Measurement Simple
- Planning Your Cross-Part Quality Meeting
- Celebrating Success
27Real-World Tips Focusing on Key Activities
- Develop a Part B QM Plan and QM Committee
- Identify measures, data sources, and indicators
- Collect and analyze data
- Interpret results
- Identify and implement programmatic changes
- Communicate outcomes of QM activities to leaders,
subgrantees and others
28 Real-World Tips Staffing for Quality
- Designate a single person to be responsible for
QM activities - Determine how much time is necessary to fulfill
the requirements of the position (i.e.,
full-time, part-time) - Develop a job description
- If unable to hire staff, explore use of a
consultant with expertise in QM
29Real-World Tips How to Engage Key Leaders
- Emphasize that QM is a requirement for funding
and use HABs quality language. - Share key performance data in clear and simple
formats (e.g., graphs, charts, storyboards, etc.)
as well as QI projects and outcomes. - Provide training on quality improvement make it
a required activity if possible or provide it at
regular meetings of senior management. - Share success stories from other states invite
out-of-state speakers. - Ask senior leadership to officially sign off on
the QM plan if they sign off on it, they are
more interested in its success.
30Real-World Tips How to Engage Key Leaders
(cont)
- Turnover in senior management can make it
difficult to sustain interest in QM cultivate
mid-level staff, these members are less prone to
political turnover. - Routinely bring up quality issues in meetings
with senior leadership. - Show cost benefit and resource savings (taking
money away from direct services can SAVE money
and make more money available for direct
services) consider focusing initially on
high-cost areas where QM may result in larger
savings. - Invite key leaders to give a presentation or
participate on a panel at a QM-related meeting. - Work with others in your jurisdiction (e.g., Part
A or Part C grantees, local health departments,
other service providers) that may have more
influence with senior leadership.
31Real-World Tips Integrating Quality Management
Across Departments
- Link QM activities the Statewide Coordinated
Statement of Need (SCSN) process. - Link QM to other health department priorities,
such as reducing health disparities. - Attend other quality-related meetings within the
health department. - Link Part B QM to other QM efforts in the state
(e.g., Healthy People 2010, public health
accreditation). - Use QM as an opportunity to increase alignment
across Ryan White HIV/AIDS Program grantees in
the jurisdiction. - Integrate QM across diseases (e.g., STD, TB,
chronic disease) and bureaus/departments. - Communicate your successes to other departments,
especially those related to saving money or
improving client outcomes.
32Real-World Tips Involving Senior Clinicians
- Convene a medical advisory panel that meet via
email ask for volunteers as they are the most
motivated to participate. - Start a dialogue with providers to engage them in
the process with a communication process in
place, providers will be more likely to provide
advice on how to facilitate their involvement. - Include a clinician as a consultant to your
program to provide advice and serve as a model
for other providers. - Network with medical schools to reach future
providers.
33Real-World Tips Involving Consumers
- Include consumers on your QM committee ask
subgrantees and providers to recommend consumers
for this purpose as a starting point consider
developing an orientation package for this
purpose. - Establish a state-wide consumer advisory
committee for consumers to communicate concerns
and ideas for improving quality of care be sure
to follow-up on recommendations, where
appropriate, and develop a communication link to
your statewide QM committee. - Involve consumers in the process of developing
quality performance indicators, often consumers
and clinicians prioritize needs differently.
34Real-World Tips Involving Consumers (cont)
- Use patient satisfaction surveys, focus groups,
and/or key informant interviews to obtain
feedback on quality of care issues. - Include consumers on specific quality improvement
projects and teams to improve specific HIV care
issues. - Include consumers as staff for regular consumer
feedback to your program and to
facilitate/moderate other forms of consumer
feedback in your state. - Build the capacity of consumers for quality
improvement by provide learning opportunities and
opportunities to meet key stakeholders.
35Real-World Tips Keeping Performance Measurement
Simple
- Realize that there is no perfect indicator.
- Beg, borrow, and steal indicators (HAB, HIVQUAL,
NQC, NY State, National Quality Measures
Clearinghouse, etc.) - Use only as much data as necessary.
- Train staff in data collection processes and
address data interpretation issues. - Limit data analysis to the achievement of
identified indicators. - Communicate project data early on dont wait to
get perfect results. - Performance measurement is only the first
stepuse your data for quality improvement.
36Real World Tips Data Collection Techniques
- Data collection should be coordinated for
multiple projects, with different projects using
the same datacollect mutually beneficial data. - Create a part-time data position to collect data
from various efforts such as performance
management, subgrantees, and client satisfaction
surveys. - Make the data gathering process formal, either
through letters of agreement with agencies or
through a contract that provides access to data. - Engage clinicians and frontline staff through
regular feedback on QM efforts. - Demonstrate how poor data reporting from staff
and subgranteess can misinform decisions for
example, show how incomplete forms submitted by
clinicians can misrepresent who is being served
and the services provided. - Provide consistent training on data collection.
37Real World TipsPlanning Your Cross-Part Quality
Meeting
- Use existing cross-Part meetings to initiate
discussion around QM (i.e. statewide HIV/AIDS
conferences, etc). - Consider the use of an external facilitator with
expertise in QM for your first meeting. - Form a planning group with representatives from
each Part to develop the goals of meeting and to
set the agenda and continue momentum after the
meeting. - Develop common QM goals and priorities and
measures. - Develop a cross-Part written QM plan and
implementation plan with assigned roles and a
timeline to ensure momentum is implemented.
38Real World TipsPlanning Your Cross-Part Quality
Meeting (cont)
- Develop a final product/outcome from your initial
meeting (i.e., an action plan) and use
workgroups/breakout groups during meeting to get
work done. - Have all Parts sign-off on shared documents
created. - Include senior leaders from each Part to make the
decision-making process easier. - Engage providers of HIV care who are not funded
by the Ryan White HIV/AIDS Program in the QM
effort in order to make it a truly state-wide
improvement effort. - Include consumer input in the state-wide QM
effort to strengthen efforts.
39Real World Tip Celebrate Success!
- Build excitement for quality by publicizing
success stories in newsletters and journals. - Mount success storyboards openly so that
providers and patients can see them. - Establish an annual awards program for quality
improvement. - Report successes to funders and in reports to
internal and external councils and stakeholders.
40Stay Tuned for
- NQC Guide for Statewide Quality Management
Programs Practical Approaches to Build the
Capacity of Ryan White HIV/AIDS Program Part B
Grantees - to be published September 2008
41Words of Wisdom from Collaborative Participants
- Rosemary Donnelly, MSN, APRN-BC, ACRN
- PHSO Nurse Consultant
- HIV Division, Georgia Division of Public Health
- rdonnelly_at_dhr.state.ga.us (404) 463-0415
- Jay Adams, MA
- HIV Care Coordinator
- West Virginia Ryan White Part B Programs
- jayadams3_at_sbcglobal.net (304) 232-6822
- Jamie Cotnoir, MPH
- Maine Center for Disease Control
- jamie.cotnoir_at_maine.gov (207)287-5539
- Susan DiCocco, RN
- Quality Management Administrator
- Ohio Part B Program
- Susan.DiCocco_at_odh.ohio.gov (614)644-5686
42National Quality Center (NQC) NYSDOH AIDS
Institute 90 Church Street13th Floor New York,
NY 10007-2919 888-NQC-QI-TA Info_at_NationalQualityCe
nter.org www.NationalQualityCenter.org