Chapter 1' case study - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 8
About This Presentation
Title:

Chapter 1' case study

Description:

... role of information systems in the way ShopKo and Pamida run their business. ... ShopKo implemented Markdown Optimizer from Spotlight Solutions in Mason, Ohio, ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:525
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 9
Provided by: greenS5
Category:
Tags: case | chapter | shopko | study

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Chapter 1' case study


1
Chapter 1. case study
  • 200224007 ???
  • 200224010 ???
  • 200224015 ???

2
1. Evaluate the role of information systems in
the way ShopKo and Pamida run their business. How
important are they?(1)
  • ShopKo implemented Markdown Optimizer from
    Spotlight Solutions in Mason, Ohio, which helps
    companies price leftovers so that the products
    will sell faster and with a better profit at each
    store. The software enables companies to price a
    product according to season, geography (specific
    store location), local tastes, and past demand,
    by analyzing historical pricing and sales data.
  • For the leftovers the pilot showed a 25 percent
    increase in its gross margin previous years,
    while its payroll costs fell by 24 percent and
    the percentage of unsold goods at the end of each
    cycle fell from seven percent to two percent.

3
1. Evaluate the role of information systems in
the way ShopKo and Pamida run their business. How
important are they?(2)
  • The warehouse was expanded from 200,000square
    feet to 418,000squuare feet, but the warehousing
    software was neither updated nor replaced.
  • The estimated loss in sales for the 107 stores
    served by the Lebanon distribution center was 5
    million, lagging 5 percent behind sales for the
    remaining 122 stores in the chain.

4
2. Evaluate the importance of Pamidas
distribution center consolidation project for
both Pamida and ShopKo. What management,
organization and technology factors prevented
Pamidas new distribution center from working
successfully?(1)
  • organization
  • When ShopKo purchased Pamida, the chain had a
    total of about 180 stores, although that number
    increased to 229 stores in 16 states when ShopKo
    purchased the P.M. Place chain of 49 small town
    Midwestern stores in may 2000 and merged it into
    Pamida.
  • Pamida had too many out-of-stock items. To make
    matters worse many key products were in
    warehouses even though they were not on store
    shelves.

5
2. Evaluate the importance of Pamidas
distribution center consolidation project for
both Pamida and ShopKo. What management,
organization and technology factors prevented
Pamidas new distribution center from working
successfully?(2)
  • management
  • Pamida management turnover contributed, with the
    CEO.
  • technology
  • Pamidas warehouse management software was not
    updated the rest of the warehouse was modernized
    because the software had been working fine under
    the old system.

6
3. Are ShopKo and Pamida using information
systems effectively? Why or why not? How much
value do their systems provide to the business?
  • Markdown Optimizer used effectively. This system
    increase gross margin and decrease leftover rate
  • Immediately expanding warehouse created serious
    bottlenecks in Pamida warehouses. But the company
    had never update the warehouse management
    information system software. So this system
    caused damage to the company.

7
4. If you were the CEO of ShopKo, how would you
have addressed the problem? If you were the CEO
of Pamida when it was purchased by ShopKo, would
you have solved the problem?
  • If we were the CEO of ShopKo, we cooperated with
    pamida because consolidation has some risk.
  • Pamida had too many out-of-stock item. So we
    expanded warehouse and updated warehouse
    management information system.

8
5. What management challenge does this case study
illustrate? Explain your answer.
  • We must use the information system the right time
    in the right place. According to this case, wrong
    decision caused loss margin, frequently change
    management, or unsuccessful company.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com