Tivo v' EchoStar - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 14
About This Presentation
Title:

Tivo v' EchoStar

Description:

Tivo is seeking a permanent injunction against EchoStar's DVR products ... Tivo did whatever necessary to take the focus off the technology and emphasize ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:80
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 15
Provided by: goog61
Category:
Tags: echostar | tivo

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Tivo v' EchoStar


1
Tivo v. EchoStar
  • CS181

2
  • The Software Patent Controversy
  • Software patents slow and/or discourage the
    adoption of new technologies (except by rich
    companies)
  • Patent holders have too much power

3
  • Companies think ahead to lock up a piece of
    technology that all their competitors will need
    as a part of the natural evolution of the
    technology (nVidia)

4
  • Companies lock up entire technologies to keep
    competitors out entirely, or to benefit from
    licensing fees (Tivo)

5
  • If software patents are valid means of promoting
    scientific progress, is this actually playing out
    in the courts?
  • By far, most patent litigation settles out of
    court with a license agreement. Those that go to
    trial are big-money, big-issue cases
  • Are juries competent to decide factual issues
    regarding complex, sophisticated technologies?

6
How it started
  • Jan. 2004 Tivo sues EchoStar
  • Tivo 200M
  • EchoStar 3B
  • Suit was filed in a federal district court in
    eastern Texas.
  • Court denied EchoStar's motion to transfer the
    case outside Texas

7
Patents and Tivo
  • The patent in question, which TiVo filed for in
    1998, is an "invention allowing the user to store
    selected television broadcast programs while the
    user is simultaneously watching or reviewing
    another program."
  • TiVo has been awarded 40 patents and has more
    than 100 applications pending.

8
How it ended
  • Case went to trial in Marshall, Texas in March
    2006
  • Tivo won
  • Court awarded Tivo more than 73 million for lost
    profits and reasonable royalties.
  • Tivo is seeking a permanent injunction against
    EchoStars DVR products
  • Appeal is on-going EchoStar won in one area
    where judge made an error
  • Recently, some of Tivos patent claims have been
    invalidated by USPTO and the appeal was denied

9
The patent
  • Demos

10
Object
  • At the crux of the argument over software claims
    was the use of the term object in the claims,
    and the use of C and an object hierarchy in the
    specification.

11
Object
  • EchoStar An object is an abstraction
    programmers use to design and build software
    systems using an object-oriented programming
    language (for example, C).  The tasks a system
    performs are accomplished in this paradigm by
    delegating software objects that cooperate to
    perform the tasks.  The software objects
    themselves contain data and methods which operate
    on the contained data.  This encapsulation of
    data and methods in an object, which is derived
    from a class, is a key characteristic of
    object-oriented programming.

12
Object
  • Tivo An object is any piece of a program, i.e.,
    software

13
Claim Construction
  • Court construed object as a collection of
    data and operations.
  • Can a jury of 8 (6 of whom have only a
    high-school education) understand the subtle
    difference?

14
Whats Fair?
  • Tivo did whatever necessary to take the focus off
    the technology and emphasize instead a small,
    smart start-up being victimized by a big,
    unethical company
  • EchoStar did whatever necessary to put the focus
    on the technology did they infringe or not?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com