Criminal Procedure - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 47
About This Presentation
Title:

Criminal Procedure

Description:

Necessity - must be absolutely necessary for government to take power ... Water-Boarding. Interrogation Tactics. Rochin v. California (1952) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:93
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 48
Provided by: andyful
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Criminal Procedure


1
Criminal Procedure CJ 422 Chapter 15
Constitution and Crisis Andrew Fulkerson, JD,
PhD
2
Constitution and Crisis
  • Emergency powers may be given to government
  • Limitation on emergency powers
  • Necessity - must be absolutely necessary for
    government to take power
  • Temporary - as soon as crisis over, exercise of
    power must end

3
War on Terrorism - Post 9/11
  • Different kind of war
  • No defined national enemy
  • No uniform
  • No territorial boundaries

4
USA Patriot Act
  • U - Uniting, and
  • S - Strengthening
  • A - America, by
  • P - Providing
  • A - Appropriate
  • T - Tools
  • R - Required, to
  • I - Intercept, and
  • O - Obstruct
  • T - Terrorism

5
Patriot Act - Scope
  • Does the USA Patriot Act go too far in infringing
    on rights of persons?
  • Is it necessary to preserve society?

6
Surveillance and Terrorism
  • 4th Amendment protects against unreasonable
    searches and seizures
  • Supreme Court ruled on limits of 4th Amendment
  • 4th Amendment bans unreasonable searches and
    seizures
  • Private conversations recorded from "wired"
    informant (U.S. v. White)
  • Telephone company records of outgoing calls-"pen
    registers" (Smith v. Maryland)
  • Persons bank records (U.S. v. Miller)
  • Not all government action is search or seizure

7
Surveillance and Terrorism
  • 3 "tiers" of balancing govt power against
    individual privacy

8
Tier 1 Real-time electronic surveillance
  • Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968
  • General prohibition of wiretaps
  • Exception for serious crimes
  • Serious crime defined as one punishable by death
    or one year prison (generally-felonies)
  • A. G. or senior DOJ official may ask for order
    authorizing wiretap or bug to intercept
    conversations
  • Application must include facts which justify
    order full statement that other methods of
    investigation have been tried and failed how
    long interception shall last

9
Tier 2 Surveilling Stored Electronic
Communications
  • More government power-less individual privacy
  • Patriot Act allows government to access stored
    wire and electronic communications - voice mail,
    and email
  • Not limited to "serious" crimes - apply to any
    criminal investigation
  • Limits on power for communications stored over
    six months, govt must get warrant based on
    probable cause. But govt does not have to tell
    the subscriber of the existence of the warrant
    for 90 days if court finds disclosure could have
    adverse result on investigation

10
Tier 3 Secret Caller ID
  • Allows govt to capture and record all telephone
    numbers from a persons telephone (numbers not
    conversations)
  • No court order requied
  • No time limit
  • No requirement to tell the subscriber they are
    getting this information, or what is learned

11
Tier 3 Secret Caller ID
  • Only restriction is that use of secret caller ID
    must be approved by a DOJ senior official
  • Allows recording of email "headers" along with
    telephone numbers
  • When email headers are collected, agency must
    report to court who installed device date of
    installation configuration of device and any
    modifications information captured

12
Patriot Act Library Provisions
  • Section 215
  • FBI may demand records
  • "if there are reasonable grounds to believe that
    the records contain information relevant to a
    national security investigation."

13
Patriot Act Library Provisions
  • Is this overly broad?
  • Should it be limited to terrorism activities?

14
National Security Agency Terrorist Surveillance
Program (TSP)
  • After abuses by NSA in Vietnam era (COINTELPRO)
  • Congress enacted Foreign Intelligence
    Surveillance Act (FISA) in 1979
  • Allowed govt to eavesdrop on foreign agents
  • But required warrant from court

15
FISA
  • Due to highly sensitive nature of foreign
    terrorism investigations
  • Established special court to review warrant
    requests
  • FISA court operates in secret
  • Judges selected from US Courts of Appeal

16
FISA Court
  • Allows for investigation of suspected foreign
    agents
  • But maintains checks and balances required by
    Constitution
  • Warrants reviewed and approved by judicial branch
  • Warrants executed by executive branch

17
FISA Court
  • Provides for emergency situations
  • Surveillance without warrant
  • But, warrant must be obtained within 72 hours

18
TSP
  • After 9-11 Bush issued Executive Order allowing
    warrantless surveillance inside US
  • Terrorist Surveillance Program (TSP)
  • January 18, 2007 program halted
  • Administration would use the FISA court

19
"Sneak and Peak" Searches
  • Generally, search of private place is
    unreasonable unless there is a warrant supported
    by probable cause and the officers "knock and
    announce"
  • No-knock" emergency exception
  • Broad expansion of no-knock procedure is the
    "sneak and peak" search

20
"Sneak and Peak" Searches
  • Warrant allows officers to enter private place
  • Owner does not consent and does not know the
    entry takes place

21
"Sneak and Peak" Searches
  • Sneak and peak warrants began in drug cases in
    1980s
  • Over 35 such warrants issued by federal judges in
    1980s
  • Two Circuits (2d and 9th) upheld this procedure
  • 2d Circuit held it was a reasonable search
  • 9th Circuit held it was not a reasonable search
    but was under the "good faith" exception to
    exclusionary rule

22
Sneak and Peak Searches
  • Patriot Act enacted sneak and peak search into
    statutory form ( 213)
  • Court must find reasonable cause to believe that
    providing immediate notification of execution of
    warrant may have adverse effect

23
Sneak and Peak Searches
  • "Adverse effect" defined as
  • Endangering life
  • Flight from prosecution
  • Destruction of evidence
  • Intimidation of witnesses
  • Otherwise seriously jeopardizing investigation

24
Sneak and Peak Searches
  • Warrant prohibits seizure of property except
    where court finds reasonable necessity for
    seizure
  • Warrant provides for giving notice within a
    reasonable time of execution. This time may be
    extended by court for good cause

25
Sneak and peak criticism
  • Restrictions are meaningless
  • Warrant is issued in secret ex parte hearing
  • Issued based on "boilerplate" allegations
  • Judges are "rubber stamp" for cops

26
Sneak and peak criticism
  • Adverse effect" requirement is so broad as to be
    no restriction at all. Only requires court to
    find that one of the factors "may" exist
  • Prohibition on seizure of tangible property has
    broad exception where court finds it "reasonably
    necessary" to seize
  • Notice requirement can be delayed without
    limitation

27
Detention of Terrorist Suspects
  • Terry v. Ohio requires reasonable suspicion to
    even briefly stop and detain
  • Detaining person for a few hours at police
    station is unreasonable
  • 4th and 6th Amendment require person who is
    detained to be taken before a judge within 48
    hours for probable cause determination
    (McLaughlin v. Riverside)

28
Post 9-11 enactments
  • Presidential Proclamation 7463 7463, Federal
    Register 2001, 48199 (September 14, 2001)
  • Declared "national emergency by reason of certain
    terrorist attacks"

29
Post 9-11 enactments
  • Congressional Joint Resolution "Authorization for
    Use of Military Force"
  • President authorized to use force against those
    nations, organizations or persons who involved in
    9/11/01 terrorist attacks

30
Post 9-11 enactments
  • Presidential Military Order of November 13, 2001,
    "Detention, Treatment, and Trial of Certain
    Non-Citizens in the War Against Terrorism"
  • Federal Register 2001, 57831-57836
  • Certain non-citizens who were involved in 9-11
    attacks, or members of al Qaida, may be detained
  • Detainees shall be treated humanely given
    adequate food and water, shelter and clothing,
    and medical care allowed free exercise of
    religion, subject to requirements of detention

31
Torture During Detention
  • Article 15 of the (Geneva) Convention against
    Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman, or Degrading
    Treatment or Punishment.
  • Statements gained through torture will not be
    used as evidence in any proceeding.

32
Torture During Detention
  • Abu Ghraib
  • Alberto Gonzalez, as White House Counsel, wrote
    that Geneva Conventions were a "quaint" relic of
    the past.

33
CIA Interrogation Tactics
  • The Attention Grab
  • Attention Slap
  • Belly Slap
  • Long-time Standing
  • Cold Cell
  • Water-Boarding

34
Interrogation Tactics
  • Rochin v. California (1952)
  • Pumping suspects stomach to retrieve heroin
    violated due process

35
Terrorists Right to Counsel
  • 6th Amendment guarantees right to counsel
  • Powell v. Alabama recognized this right is
    "necessary to insure fundamental rights of life
    and liberty."
  • Applies to criminal cases. District Court in
    Padilla v. Bush, held this not apply to terrorist
    cases.
  • All Writs Act 18 U.S.C. 3006A(2)(B) permits
    court to appoint counsel in habeas corpus cases
    "if the interests of justice so require."

36
Terrorist Trials by Military Court
  • Persons accused of terrorist acts can be tried
    for criminal offenses in Article III Courts
    (federal courts created by Article III of the
    Constitution)
  • Or be tried for war crimes in Military
    Commissions (aka military tribunals)

37
Military Commissions
  • Panel of military officers
  • War crimes defined as acts that inflict
    needless and disproportionate suffering and
    damages in pursuit of a military objective
  • Military Commission distinguished from court
    martial (which tries only violations of Code of
    Military Justice.)

38
Military Commission Authority
  • Article II, Section 2 Constitution
  • Makes President Commander-in-Chief of armed
    forces.
  • Gives President responsibility to ensure laws are
    faithfully executed

39
Jurisdiction of Military Commissions
  • Executive Order, Federal Register 2001, 57833
    applies only to non-citizens
  • During wartime, aliens of enemy nations can be
    detained and deported, property confiscated, even
    denied access to courts
  • Gives exclusive jurisdiction to military
    commission
  • No right of review by another court
  • But Quirin held that court still has right to
    habeas corpus jurisdiction

40
Trial Proceedings of Military Commissions
  • Military commissions not governed by
    constitutional requirements
  • But, Department of Defense has enacted procedural
    protections

41
Trial Proceedings of Military Commissions
  • Right to speedy trial
  • Requirement that govt prove case beyond
    reasonable doubt
  • Right to call witnesses, and cross-examine
  • Protection against self-incrimination
  • No adverse inference from remaining silent
  • Must prove case beyond reasonable doubt
  • Any hearing will be full and fair
  • Military Defense Counsel provided at no cost

42
Right to Counsel
  • Accused may hire private civilian counsel at
    their own cost, if counsel is
  • American citizen
  • Admitted to practice in a US jurisdiction
  • Not been sanctioned or disciplined by a state bar
    committee
  • Eligible for and obtains at least a Secret
    clearance
  • Agrees to follow Military Commission rules

43
Evidence
  • Presiding Officer may admit any evidence that has
    probative value to a reasonable person
  • Finding of guilt requires 2/3 of the panel
    members to concur in finding of guilt
  • Panel may impose any reasonable sentence,
    including death
  • Death sentence requires unanimous decision.

44
Review
  • 3-member Review Panel of Military Officers
  • Review Panel may return case to Commission if
    majority of Review Panel believes that material
    error of law exists.
  • Secretary of Defense will review and may return
    case to Military Commission for further
    proceedings or may forward to President with a
    recommendation for disposition
  • President may return case to Commission for
    further proceedings or make final decision.

45
Review
  • President may delegate final authority for
    decision to Secretary of Defense.
  • If President has delegated final authority
  • Secretary of Defense may approve or disapprove
    findings or may change the finding of guilty to
    a finding of not guilty, or guilty of a lesser
    offense or may mitigate or defer, or suspend any
    sentence or part of any sentence
  • Finding of Not Guilty by Commission cannot be
    changed to Guilty.

46
Sentence/Review
  • After final decision, sentence shall be carried
    out promptly
  • Military Commissions Act of 2006 limits habeas
    corpus relief

47
Gitmo/Non-citizen Detainee
  • Hamdan v. Rumsfeld, 126 S.Ct. 2749 (2006)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com