Emerging telecom industry lanscape - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Emerging telecom industry lanscape

Description:

Wireless. Verizon Wireless - 26.3 m. Cingular Wireless - 19 m (SBC BellSouth) AT&T Wireless - 15 m. Sprint PCS - 9.2 m. Nextel Communications - 6.2 million. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:26
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 13
Provided by: Franco99
Learn more at: https://web.stanford.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Emerging telecom industry lanscape


1
Emerging telecom industry lanscape
  • Has the 96 Act failed?
  • Confused political assurances w/ economic
    motivations
  • Misunderstood difficulty, thus lacked enforcement
    mechanisms
  • Oversold short-term benefits
  • The RBOC's revenge Re-emergence of large,
    vertically integrated telcoslocal /
    long-distance / business networks
  • WirelessVerizon Wireless - 26.3 mCingular
    Wireless - 19 m (SBC BellSouth)ATT Wireless -
    15 mSprint PCS - 9.2 mNextel Communications -
    6.2 million.
  • Fiber troubles
  • Residential access 75 BB availability, 11
    take-upWiFi surprise?
  • Next wave of consolidation

2
What Telecom Bust?
  • Two distinct events
  • Dot-com bust
  • Telecom collapse
  • Not demand nor technology bust
  • (over) supply bust - 1990's investment
  • New entrants
  • Economics of fiber supply
  • "Technology successfully met the challenge posed
    by unrealistic business plans that were
    formulated in willful disregard of real demand."
    (A. Odlyzko)

3
(No Transcript)
4
(No Transcript)
5
(No Transcript)
6
(No Transcript)
7
(No Transcript)
8
(No Transcript)
9
Infrastructure
  • 90s internet "free" bandwidth (from the open
    phone network)
  • Today bifurcated situation
  • Long-haul and CLECs crisis
  • Local still holding
  • What comes next?
  • Re-verticalization
  • Competitive bankruptcy
  • "Let them fail fast"
  • Challenge incentives for infrastructure
    investment

10
Standards Architecture
  • 90s internet
  • Open standards (compete on implementation)
  • End-to-end architecture
  • Next-Generation
  • Standards wars?
  • Limits to E2E strategic incentives
  • Challenge incentives for open / end-to-end?

11
Lead users / leading applications
  • 90s internet
  • expanding communities military, research,
    education, mass-medium
  • users (individual / corporate) invent the
    applications
  • Productivity network-based re-organization of
    work
  • Next-Generation
  • User-led innovation requires user control
  • Closed networks / fragmented user communities
  • Challenge sustaining user-driven innovation

12
"Consolidation, Integration Network Control"
  • Some fundamental choices
  • Consolidated Infrastructure or 'fibersphere'
  • Integrated network or open architecture
  • Supplier control or user-driven change
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com