Presentation to:

1
Joint Staff Operational Contract Support (OCS)
Update

• Presentation to
  
• OCS Community of Interest
• 24 March 2009

CAPT(s) Peter Stamatopoulos

Joint Staff J-4, Logistic Services, OCS,
[phone]
1
1
2
Agenda

• OCS Goals
• Doctrine
• Planning
• Initiatives
• CJCS Task Force
• JS J4 OCS Roadmap

3
OCS Goals

• Policy Doctrine
• Total integration of DoD and interagency
  contracted support
• Planning
• Institutionalize OCS planning across all OPLANS
  CONPLANS
• OCS Concept of Operations (CONOPS)
• Capabilities Based Assessment/analysis to drive
  future solutions (JCIDS)
• Personnel Training
• Senior non-contracting officers trained and
  familiarized in OCS prior to deployment
• Organization
• Develop comprehensive solutions to integrate OCS
  and eliminate redundancies (Joint Contingency
  Acquisition Support Office)
• Business Systems
• 100 visibility and accountability of contractors
  in designated contingency operations

4
Agenda

• OCS Goals
• Doctrine
• Planning
• Initiatives
• CJCS Task Force
• JS J4 OCS Roadmap

5
Policy DoctrineJoint Publication 4-10

• Current Queue
• NDAA 2008/09
• Draft Policies
• DODD 3020.qq
• DODI 3020.pp
• DODI 3020.41 (Revision)
• CJCSM JOPES (Revision)APEX
• DOS MOU (PSC)
• JCASO
• Expanded WOG/MN
• OCS linkage to CERP
• Refined TTPs for Organizational Options Boards
• Deployable civilian workforce (e.g. EE)
• Expanded linkage to fiscal contingency
  management
• Theater Business Clearance (e.g. Linkage to
  boards)
• DCMA change of mission?
• Enhanced requirements definition section?
• Contingency Contracting, and
• Joint Rapid Weapons Systems Acquisition (JRAC)

6
Agenda

• OCS Goals
• Doctrine
• Planning
• Initiatives
• CJCS Task Force
• JS J4 OCS Roadmap

7
Planning Refine and Influence the Joint OCS
Planning Process

• Improved Communication
• OCS Planning is not a logistics only issue!
• Expand community to include J1s-J8s, Service
  Components and Agencies
• Institutionalize OCS planning to the same level
  of fidelity as we do organic forces

8
Planning Guidance
Policy
Templates
Execution
CJCSM 3122.01A JOPES Manual Vol. 1
Policies, Plans Procedures
CJCSM 3122.03 JOPES Manual
Vol. 2 Plans and Formats
CJCSM 3122.02C JOPES Manual Vol. 3
TPFDD Planning and Execution
Detailed Templates for Loggies
OPLANS CONPLANS Base Plan (Para 4) Admin
Logistics (Contracting Guidance)
Evaluate
(In Draft) CJCSM 4300.01A Planning Joint
Logistics Support
Annex W CSIP
CJCSI 3110.03C Logistics Supplement to the JSCP
Assess the Plan Sustainability Feasibility
Appendix 1 to Annex W CMP
Other Annexes
JP 4-10 Planning Checklists Appendices E F
Annex W What we are focused on first!
9
Annex WNext Steps

• Completed
• 115 Comments Adjudicated
• CCDR Consensus reached (19 Feb)
• Next Steps
• JS J7 Assessment/Comments Adjudication, then
• Plan development process change?
• Annex W in JOPES Manual Vol. II Planner Chop
  Start April 09
• JOPES Manual Vol. II Re-issue late CY09

10
Test, Harmonize Update
Update

• Test Annex W in context of OPLAN or CONPLAN
  Development
• Manuals, Instructions Doctrine
• JOPES Manual Volume II-extensive re-write
  possible process change
• JOPES Manual Volumes I III
• Update to JP 4-10 Operational Contract Support
• Update 56 of 76 joint pubs, CJCSIs, CJCSMs
• Incorporate Legislation/Policy

Update
11
OCS Planning Strategic Communications
Venue Attendance When Status
World Wide Planners Conference (J5 sponsored) GOFO May Researching
Adaptive Planning Implementation Team AO thru O-6 JPEC June (1st week of each month) Confirmed
JPEC CCDR and Service Component Planners O-5/O-6 December Confirmed
Additional venues being researched Additional venues being researched Additional venues being researched Additional venues being researched
12
Agenda

• OCS Goals
• Doctrine
• Planning
• Initiatives
• CJCS Task Force
• JS J4 OCS Roadmap

13
JS J4 Ongoing Initiatives

• Hot
• DCMA CSARTSME support
• Minor Construction.Professional and Technical
  Oversight
• Contractor drawdown
• Lead
• Plan Review (OCS Equities) Initiated 11/08
• Chairmans Task Force Phase II-Dependence on
  Contractors
• Semi-Annual OCS Planning Conferences
• Next Late summer/Fall 09 (stay tuned)
• Focus
• Test results Annex W in context of OPLAN or
  CONPLAN development
• Supporting
• OCS Advocacy
• Strategic Guidance/GDF/QDR
• Analytic Agenda
• Chairmans legislative Agenda
• Force Structure

14
Agenda

• OCS Goals
• Doctrine
• Planning
• Initiatives
• CJCS Task Force
• JS J4 OCS Roadmap

15
Dependence on Contractors in Contingency
Operations Task Force (Phase II)

• Examine how to plan for and integrate contracted
  support into joint operations
• Evaluate the current range and depth of
  contracted capabilities in Iraq and Afghanistan
  across all Joint Capability Areas

• Guide the development of future force planning

16
Agenda

• OCS Goals
• Doctrine
• Planning
• Initiatives
• CJCS Task Force
• JS J4 OCS Roadmap

17
JS J-4 OCS Roadmap
Today
June
January
February
March
April
May
July
August
Data Collection
Validation
Analysis
Assessment
Desired outcome Areas of high reliance on
contractors
Complete Organic vs. Contractor Assessment
Complete JCA assessment
Brief CJCS
Complete validation of JCA alignment
CJCS TF Working Group Kick Off Meeting
Components submit contract data
Data Call
Desired outcome More complete JCAs
UJTLs
Desired outcome Phase II Findings and
Recommendations. Kick Off Phase III
Complete mapping of JCA to UJTL
Complete UJTL assessment
CSIP (Annex W) and CMP Adjudication
Inform Supporting CSIP and CMP Design
Initiate CSIP and CMP Supporting Plan Design
Desired Outcome CSIP and CMP Supporting Plan
Template
OCS COI
OCS Planning Conference
Desired Outcome Regulation and Policy
Recommendations
Regulation and Policy Analysis
Design Repeatable Process
Codify Repeatable Process
TASK 1-2
TASK 3
TASK 4
TASK 5
18
JS J-4 OCS Roadmap
June
July
August
September
October
November
Select a representative Tier III or IV
OPLAN/CONPLAN to serve as a test case to validate
standardized OCS planning methodology and utility
of Annex W template Apply standardized OCS
planning methodology and Annex W templates to the
selected plan in order to identify the potential
scope and estimated magnitude of contractor
support across the range of military capabilities
Apply what we have learned in Iraq to future
Afghanistan operations and most likely/least
likely OPLANs CJCS
Force Structure
Desired outcome Areas of high reliance on
contractors
Complete Organic vs. Contractor Assessment
Brief CJCS
PPBES / JCIDS
TF Phase III
Desired outcome More complete JCAs
UJTLs
Phase II Findings and Recommendations. Kick Off
Phase III
Inform Supporting CSIP and CMP Design
Update CJCSM
Desired Outcome CSIP and CMP Supporting Plan
Template
Inform Policy Doctrine
Desired Outcome Regulation and Policy
Recommendations
TASK 4
TASK 5
19
Questions

• Questions?

20
Back Up
20
20
21
Data Call
Linked to slide 12
Data Call

• Collect contract and task order data for
  contractor personnel performance in Iraq and
  Afghanistan, as well as other select countries in
  the CENTCOM AOR (Bahrain, Jordan, Kuwait, Oman,
  Qatar, UAE, and Pakistan)
• Identify scope and magnitude by System Support
  Contracts, External Support Contracts, and
  Theater Support Contracts
• Identify data (best fit) by primary and
  supporting Joint Capability Area (JCA)

FO/GO/SES Oversight Council
Working Group
System
External
Theater
Policy
Service Contracts
ISR
Stryker
LOGCAP
PSC
C4I
Maintenance
Logistics
RSOI
Construction
Transportation
Information Operations
22
Data Sources
Linked to slide 20
Components submit contract data

• CENTCOM CENSUS Data
• QTRLY data spanning FY07-FY08
• Contains System, External and Theater Support
  contracts
• Includes 13 detailed data elements (US, TCN, LN,
  Location, Requiring Activity, Mission,
  Description, K-Duration, K-Number, Company,
  Supporting Unit)
• Does not include contract dollar value
• External Support Contracts
• Services and Agencies Provide
• FY03 through FY08
• System Support Contracts
• Services and Agencies Provide
• FY03 through FY08

CENTCOM CENSUS 07-08
Service Profile
Theater Support
Personnel
Start FY03
23
Linked to slide 12
Data Call, Mapping, Analysis and Assessment
Complete validation of JCA alignment
Phase II
ISR
Stryker
Component Contracts
LOGCAP
PSC
C4I
Maintenance
Logistics
RSOI
Construction
Transportation
Information Operations
Period of Performance / / FTE
System Support Contracts
External Support Contracts
Theater Support Contracts
Categorize by contract type
Map to JCA
JCA
JCA
JCA
Apply findings to Tier III or IV OPLAN
UJTL
UJTL
UJTL
Map to UJTL

• Desired Outcomes
• Various displays of contractor force structure
• Areas of high reliance on contractors
• Contract capabilities by JCAs UJTLs

Where are we most reliant or dependent on
contractors?
24
Logistics JCAs account for 78
Linked to slide 12
Complete JCA assessment
Personnel breakdown by Type of Service
6
25
Operational Contract SupportCENTCOM Census (FY09
1st QTR)
DoD Contractor Personnel in the USCENTCOM AOR
Total Contractors U.S. Citizens Third Country Nationals Local/Host Country Nationals
USCENTCOM AOR 259,421 52,971 103,096 103,354
Iraq Only 148,050 39,262 70,875 37,913
Afghanistan Only 71,755 5,960 5,232 60,563
Other 39,616 7,749 26,989 4,878
Data does not include other U.S. Government
Agencies/Departments

• Current Contractor Ratio
• Iraq 11
• Afghanistan 12

Personnel breakdown by Type of Service
Contractors currently make up 50 of the total
force in the USCENTCOM Area of Operation
26
Test OCS Planning
True False

• Documented rules, tools, and business processes
  exist to integrate external support contracted
  requirements (PAX/STs) into Service component
  plans¹
• For RFFs (or deliberate plans), a process exists
  to substitute and rapidly convert requested or
  planned military capabilities to contracted
  capabilities as well as 2nd and 3rd order effects
  (BOS, force protection, etc.) considering mix of
  likely nationals with AMCITS/TCNs. Then, execute
  within timeline expectations.
• Planning for contracted support is at the same
  fidelity as forces.
• Basic Plans, CONPLANS and OPLANS contain
  contracted capability requirements
• The RFF requesting and adjudication process
  integrates contracted support requirements
  alongside forces

¹ Capability to manually enter TPFDD data/create
force records exists-JOPES M Vol III.
27
Operational Contract SupportCENTCOM Census (FY09
1st QTR)
DoD Contractor Personnel in the USCENTCOM AOR
Total Contractors U.S. Citizens Third Country Nationals Local/Host Country Nationals
USCENTCOM AOR 259,421 52,971 103,096 103,354
Iraq Only 148,050 39,262 70,875 37,913
Afghanistan Only 71,755 5,960 5,232 60,563
Other 39,616 7,749 26,989 4,878
Data does not include other U.S. Government
Agencies/Departments

• Current Contractor Ratio
• Iraq 11
• Afghanistan 12

Personnel breakdown by Type of Service
Contractors currently make up 50 of the total
force in the USCENTCOM Area of Operation
28
Acronyms

• AOR Area of Responsibility
• CBA Capabilities Based Assessment
• CJCSI Chairman of the Joint Chiefs Instruction
• CJCSM Chairman of the Joint Chiefs Manual
• CMP Contractor Management Plan
• CONOPS Concept of Operations
• CONPLAN Concept Plan
• CSA Combat Support Agency
• CSIP Contract Support Integration Plan
• DODI Department of Defense Instruction
• DPAP Defense Procurement and Acquisition Policy
• GEF Guidance to Employ the Force
• JCA Joint Capability Area
• JCASO Joint Contingency Acquisition Support
  Office
• JCIDS Joint Capability Integration Development
  System
• JOCSP Joint Operational Contract Support
  Planners
• JOPES Joint Operational Planning and Execution
  System
• JP Joint Publication (Doctrine)
• JSCP Joint Strategic Capabilities Plan